Harvard seeks billions in funding restored at a pivotal hearing in its standoff with Trump
BOSTON -- Lawyers for Harvard University argued in federal court Monday the Trump administration illegally cut US$2.6 billion from the storied college -- a pivotal moment in its battle against the federal government.
If U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs decides in the university's favour, the ruling would reverse a series of funding freezes that later became outright cuts as the Trump administration escalated its fight with the nation's oldest and wealthiest university. Such a ruling, if it stands, would revive Harvard's sprawling scientific and medical research operation and hundreds of projects that lost federal money.
A lawyer for Harvard, Steven Lehotsky, opened the hearing by saying the Trump administration violated the university's First Amendment rights. He said the government conditioned research grants on Harvard 'ceding control' to the government over what is appropriate for students and faculty to say.
A second lawsuit over the cuts filed by the American Association of University Professors and its Harvard faculty chapter has been consolidated with the university's.
Harvard's lawsuit accuses President Donald Trump's administration of waging a retaliation campaign against the university after it rejected a series of demands in an April 11 letter from a federal antisemitism task force.
The letter demanded sweeping changes related to campus protests, academics and admissions. For example, the letter told Harvard to audit the viewpoints of students and faculty and admit more students or hire new professors if the campus was found to lack diverse points of view. The letter was meant to address government accusations that the university had become a hotbed of liberalism and tolerated anti-Jewish harassment on campus.
Harvard President Alan Garber pledged to fight antisemitism but said no government 'should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue.'
The same day Harvard rejected the demands, Trump officials moved to freeze $2.2 billion in research grants. Education Secretary Linda McMahon declared in May that Harvard would no longer be eligible for new grants, and weeks later the administration began canceling contracts with Harvard.
As Harvard fought the funding freeze in court, individual agencies began sending letters announcing that the frozen research grants were being terminated. They cited a clause that allows grants to be scrapped if they no longer align with government policies.
Harvard, which has the nation's largest endowment at $53 billion, has moved to self-fund some of its research, but warned it can't absorb the full cost of the federal cuts.
In court filings, the school said the government 'fails to explain how the termination of funding for research to treat cancer, support veterans, and improve national security addresses antisemitism.'
The Trump administration denies the cuts were made in retaliation, saying the grants were under review even before the April demand letter was sent. It argues the government has wide discretion to cancel contracts for policy reasons.
'It is the policy of the United States under the Trump Administration not to fund institutions that fail to adequately address antisemitism in their programs,' it said in court documents.
The research funding is only one front in Harvard's fight with the federal government. The Trump administration also has sought to prevent the school from hosting foreign students, and Trump has threatened to revoke Harvard's tax-exempt status.
Finally, last month, the Trump administration formally issued a finding that the school tolerated antisemitism -- a step that eventually could jeopardize all of Harvard's federal funding, including federal student loans or grants. The penalty is typically referred to as a 'death sentence.'
By Michael Casey
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
an hour ago
- Global News
Canadian home prices could drop 2% from Trump trade war, CMHC says
U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war will continue to hit Canada's housing market, with a recovery in prices unlikely until 2026, a new report from the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation said on Thursday. 'Canada's housing market will continue to cool in 2025 due to trade tensions, economic uncertainty, slower population growth and increasing unemployment. Home prices are expected to fall around 2%,' the CMHC's summer housing market outlook said. The largest drops in home prices will be in Ontario and British Columbia, which are both home to some of Canada's most expensive housing markets. 'Trade tensions and slower population growth are contributing to a likely modest recession in 2025, dampening business and consumer confidence and slowing housing activity,' the report said. Homebuyers and developers alike will continue to take the 'wait-and-see' approach to the housing market amid the impact of the tariffs and economic uncertainty, it added. Story continues below advertisement 'Affordability remains a major issue and new construction is slowing. Rental markets are easing slightly as more supply comes online and demand softens,' the report said. 4:11 Liberal minister jokes Conservatives are confused by the words 'affordable' and 'housing' together What will happen next year? The housing market is likely to remain cool for the rest of 2025, the report predicted. A gradual recovery is only expected to begin by 2026. Story continues below advertisement The CMHC said the negative impact from trade tariffs will 'peak in the second half of 2025' but will begin to abate by 2026, along with the Canadian GDP. During this time, Canada's housing market will remain in a 'period of adjustment.' Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'We expect conditions to stabilize more in 2026 as trade tensions ease, mortgage rates moderate and demand slowly recovers. As the economic environment improves, the housing market should gradually return to a more balanced trajectory,' the report said. Canada started building slightly more homes in June than it did in May, the CMHC said in a report last week. Compared with May, the annual rate of housing starts was largely flat, with a 0.4 per cent increase, but it rose 14 per cent compared with this time last year.
Global News
an hour ago
- Global News
‘Fake news': White House reacts after WSJ says Trump's name in Epstein files
A report by the Wall Street Journal claiming that the U.S. Justice Department informed President Donald Trump in May that his name appeared multiple times in the Epstein files is 'fake news,' the White House says. A spokesperson for the president pushed back on the WSJ report, which cited 'senior administration officials,' on Wednesday by calling the reports into the administration's handling of the Epstein files 'fake news.' 'This is nothing more than a continuation of the fake news stories concocted by the Democrats and the liberal media,' White House director of communications Steven Cheung said in an emailed statement to Reuters. On Thursday, he posted on X, 'The democrats are so moronic and crackbrained they never learn from their mistakes.' Story continues below advertisement 'Instead of actually working for the American people, they are so consumed and obsessed with destroying this country because they suffer from a debilitating case of Trump Derangement Syndrome that has rotted their pea-seized brains,' he wrote. According to the report, which the WSJ called an exclusive, Trump was informed by Justice Department officials, including U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi, during a routine briefing in May that his name appeared in the files alongside hundreds of others. Being mentioned in the files is not indicative of any wrongdoing. (Global News nor any other news outlet has independently verified the reporting, as of this writing.) View image in full screen U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to the media as he departs the White House on July 15, 2025, in Washington, D.C. Anna Moneymaker / Getty Images The WSJ reported that the briefing was routine and that the Epstein files were not the focus of the meeting. Story continues below advertisement Officials reportedly informed the president that documents containing his name also included 'unverified hearsay about many people' associated with Epstein. One department official told the WSJ that the documents contained hundreds of other names. Trump was also reportedly informed that the Justice Department had no plans to release more documents related to the convicted sex offender's case because they contained child pornography and personal information of victims. The president agreed with the department's decision to keep the material from view, the report says, marking a shift in a narrative that hinged on a promise to deliver the Epstein files in full to the public. In February, Bondi said Epstein's client list was 'sitting on my desk right now to review.' Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy In a statement to the WSJ on Friday, Bondi and the deputy attorney general, Todd Blanche, told the outlet that 'as part of our routine briefing, we made the President aware of the findings.' Story continues below advertisement Trump told reporters last week that Bondi hadn't told him that his name was in the files. His administration announced its decision not to release the files on July 7 through a memo on its website, which stated that an exhaustive review of the documents 'revealed no incriminating client list,' and that it found no more evidence that warranted public exposure or necessitated criminal charges against more individuals. 'We did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties,' the note said. It also stated that only a fraction of the material it reviewed would have been aired publicly had Epstein gone to trial, as the seal 'served only to protect victims.' On Tuesday, following a wave of criticism from Trump's allies — including Georgia Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene and Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, who were pushing for the release of the files — Blanche announced that the Trump administration was reaching out to Epstein's former accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving a 20-year sentence for her involvement in Epstein's underage sex trafficking ring. 'Justice demands courage. For the first time, the Department of Justice is reaching out to Ghislaine Maxwell to ask: what do you know?' he wrote. Story continues below advertisement Justice demands courage. For the first time, the Department of Justice is reaching out to Ghislaine Maxwell to ask: what do you know? At @AGPamBondi's direction, I've contacted her counsel. I intend to meet with her soon. No one is above the law—and no lead is off-limits. — Todd Blanche (@DAGToddBlanche) July 22, 2025 Earlier that day, Bondi shared a statement written along similar lines. Statement from @DAGToddBlanche: This Department of Justice does not shy away from uncomfortable truths, nor from the responsibility to pursue justice wherever the facts may lead. The joint statement by the DOJ and FBI of July 6 remains as accurate today as it was when it was… — Attorney General Pamela Bondi (@AGPamBondi) July 22, 2025 Story continues below advertisement 'This Department of Justice does not shy away from uncomfortable truths, nor from the responsibility to pursue justice wherever the facts may lead,' it said, adding that Trump had granted her department permission to release 'all credible evidence' in the Epstein case. Last week, Trump sued the WSJ for US$10 billion after it published new details about a sexually suggestive letter the president allegedly wrote to Epstein for his 50th birthday. 2:09 Trump sues Wall Street Journal for $10B over article tying him to Jeffrey Epstein The outlet said the note bore Trump's signature and contained 'several lines of typewritten text framed by the outline of a naked woman, which appears to be hand-drawn with a heavy marker.' 'A pair of small arcs denotes the woman's breasts,' it says, with the president's alleged signature written in a 'squiggly' font below her waist and a final line that reads: 'Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.' Story continues below advertisement Trump denied the note was of his creation and, according to the WSJ, said the letter was 'a fake thing.' 'I never wrote a picture in my life. I don't draw pictures of women,' he added. 'It's not my language. It's not my words.' Trump and Epstein have been photographed together at events throughout the '90s and early 2000s, including at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida. The two men reportedly fell out over an alleged business dispute in 2004 — according to the WSJ — and before Epstein pleaded guilty to a 2008 charge for procuring prostitution. This week, the Trump administration has been accused of attempting to distract from the fallout created by its handling of the Epstein files when it released hundreds of thousands of documents detailing intelligence on former Civil Rights activist Martin Luther King Jr. View image in full screen In this March 17, 1963, file photo, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and his wife, Coretta Scott King, sit with three of their four children in their Atlanta home. From left are: Martin Luther King III, 5, Dexter Scott, 2, and Yolanda Denise, 7. AP Photo/File Included in the files are leads pursued by the FBI following King's assassination, as well as details of the CIA's investigation into King's focus on international anti-war and anti-poverty movements in the years before he was killed. Story continues below advertisement In a statement released on Monday, King's two living children, Martin III, 67, and Bernice, 62, said their father's death had been a 'captivating public curiosity for decades,' but reiterated that the files were deeply personal and urged people to read them 'within their full historical context.' Meanwhile, civil rights leader Al Sharpton says the release of the King files is 'not about transparency or justice,' but is merely a 'distraction' from 'the firestorm engulfing Trump over the Epstein files and the public unraveling of his credibility.' Despite King's children's disapproval of the unsealing of their father's file, other family members have expressed support for the Trump administration's actions. Alveda King, Martin Luther King Jr.'s niece, said she was 'grateful to President Trump' for his 'transparency.' On Wednesday, Trump ordered the Department of Justice to investigate former president Barack Obama, after he claimed to have 'irrefutable' evidence that Obama's administration had acted treasonously by falsely accusing Trump's campaign of having ties to Russia in an attempt to undermine his 2016 election bid. View image in full screen President Barack Obama and president-elect Donald Trump, arrive for the 58th presidential inauguration in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Friday, Jan. 20, 2017. PhotoScott Applewhite / Getty Images Before the criminal investigation was announced, Obama responded to the allegations in a rare public comment, saying, 'Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response.' Story continues below advertisement 'But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one. These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction.' 1:37 Obama slams Trump's 'weak attempt at distraction' from Epstein files in response to election-rigging allegation A day later, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard introduced intelligence she says details how 'President Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false.' As of this writing, Obama has not responded to the Trump-ordered DOJ investigation or its subsequent claims of criminal misconduct.
Toronto Star
an hour ago
- Toronto Star
The Latest: US cuts short Gaza ceasefire talks, blaming Hamas
President Donald Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff said Thursday the U.S. is cutting short Gaza ceasefire talks and bringing home its negotiating team from Qatar for consultations, after the latest response from Hamas 'shows a lack of desire to reach a ceasefire in Gaza.' The talks have been bogged down over competing demands for ending the war. Hamas says it will only release all hostages in exchange for a full Israeli withdrawal and end to the war. Israel says it will not agree to end the war until Hamas gives up power and disarms — a condition the militant group rejects.
