logo
Sanctions, on rise, are as deadly as armed conflict, study says

Sanctions, on rise, are as deadly as armed conflict, study says

SANCTIONS can cause as many fatalities as armed conflict, with unilateral penalties being associated with more than half a million deaths per year, according to a new analysis.
Unilateral and economic sanctions imposed by the US and the European Union lead to a substantial increase in mortality that disproportionately hurts children younger than five years old, the study published in the Lancet Global Health journal found. Sanctions can hobble public health provision and keep humanitarian organizations from operating effectively, weighing on the death toll.
The researchers found that unilateral sanctions cause more than 560,000 deaths each year worldwide — falling within a range that the researchers calculated for annual deaths from armed conflict using past literature and their own calculations.
'Woodrow Wilson referred to sanctions as 'something more tremendous than war.' Our evidence suggests that he was right,' authors Francisco Rodríguez, Silvio Rendón and Mark Weisbrot wrote. 'It is hard to think of other policy interventions with such adverse effects on human life that continue to be pervasively used.'
The researchers, whose work was funded by the Center for Economic and Policy Research, a progressive think tank, looked at mortality rates by age group in sanctions episodes for 152 countries between 1971 and 2021.
They used four unique econometric tools to isolate the causal relationship between categories of sanctions and higher mortality rates. Their findings were consistent across all four methods: Global, economic and unilateral sanctions are all associated with higher death tolls. United Nations sanctions are not, to any statistically significant level.
The term 'global sanctions' in the study refers to all penalties, whereas 'economic sanctions' are trade and financial deterrents and 'unilateral sanctions' are imposed by either the US or the EU.
UN sanctions potentially have less impact given they're framed as efforts to minimize impact on civilian populations, the authors point out, while US sanctions often aim for regime change or shifts in political behavior, which deteriorates living conditions in target countries.
'Many times, a rogue regime will blame sanctions for all the problems of its country,' Jeremy Paner, a sanctions lawyer at Hughes Hubbard, told Bloomberg before seeing the study. 'It's easy to blame the US or Brussels.'
Paner, who previously served as lead sanctions investigator at the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control, was skeptical of the study's conclusion, emphasizing that OFAC works to ensure that humanitarian groups can work in sanctioned countries effectively.
'The point of sanctions is to further foreign policy and American values, including humanitarian work,' he said.
Rodríguez, the study's lead author and an expert on sanctions and the crisis in Venezuela, countered that even if humanitarian aid is allowed into sanctioned countries, there are formidable obstacles to delivery. Banks and nonprofits often avoid interactions with the sanctioned nation regardless of the exceptions for aid.
'Saying, 'I'm going to block your oil exports, but I'm going to allow you to continue importing humanitarian goods,' is almost like saying to somebody who has just lost their job, 'Don't worry, you can still go into the store and buy whatever you want,'' Rodríguez said in an interview.
For decades, academics have debated how sanctions affect mortality, but have struggled to prove such a relationship. Joy Gordon, who focuses on sanctions at Loyola University in Chicago, said the Lancet study offers a 'compelling argument, supported by rigorous methodology, that sanctions directly impact mortality' across age groups.
The researchers urged policymakers to exercise restraint with sanctions, especially as the tool's use has ballooned. Some 25% of countries were sanctioned by the US, EU or UN between 2010 and 2022 — up from 8% of countries in the 1960s, according to the study, which cited Global Sanctions Database figures. –BLOOMBERG
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Stop production': Small US firms hit by tariff changes
‘Stop production': Small US firms hit by tariff changes

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

‘Stop production': Small US firms hit by tariff changes

WASHINGTON: When US President Donald Trump announced tariffs on almost all trading partners in April, Ben Knepler contacted the factory in Cambodia producing his company's outdoor furniture. 'Stop production,' he ordered. The announcement involved a 10% levy on imports from most partners, set to rise further for many of them. For Cambodia, the planned duty was a staggering 49%. 'That night, we spoke to our factory,' Knepler told AFP. 'We literally cannot afford to bring our own product into the US with that kind of tariff.' The decision was even more painful for Knepler and his Pennsylvania-based company True Places, given that he had previously shifted production of his outdoor chairs to Cambodia from China, following tariffs on Chinese imports imposed by Trump during his first presidency. 'We were facing 25% tariffs in China, and there were 0% tariffs in Cambodia,' Knepler recalled. It took him a year to move the massive equipment and molds to Cambodia only to see another steep levy. With Trump's 'reciprocal' tariff hikes taking effect last Thursday, these Cambodia-made chairs face a lower – though still significant – 19% duty. Knepler's experience echoes that of many US companies producing everything from yo-yos to clothing abroad, after years of offshoring American manufacturing. To cope, businesses use various strategies. Some pass on the new costs as a surcharge to customers. Others halted imports when duties reached prohibitive levels, hoping Trump would strike bilateral trade deals that would make their businesses viable again. Trump frames his tariffs as paid for by other countries, touting tens of billions in revenue this year – but firms contest this description. 'We make the tariff payments when the product comes into the US,' Knepler stressed. 'Before we sell it, we're the ones who pay that tariff.' Now saddled with hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt he took on to relocate the company's production to Cambodia. He likens the rapid policy changes to spinning a 'wheel of misfortune,' resulting in a new tariff each time. Over four months this year, the planned tariff rate on Cambodian exports has gone from 0% to 49%, to 10%, to 36%, to 19%, he said. 'No one knows what it's going to be tomorrow,' he added. 'It's impossible to have any kind of confidence in what the rate will be in three- or four-months' time.' Economists warn that tariffs could fuel inflation and drag on growth. EY chief economist Gregory Daco noted that the duties effective Thursday raise the average tariff rate to 17.6% from 2.8% at the start of the year – the highest level since the early 1930s. While Trump lauds the limited effects his duties have had on US prices so far, experts say tariffs take time to filter through to consumers. Many of Trump's sweeping levies also face legal challenges over his use of emergency economic powers. Barton O'Brien said he accelerated production and borrowed money to bring in as much inventory as possible before Trump took office. On the election campaign trail, the Republican leader had floated a 60% tariff on imports from China, where O'Brien makes most of his products. The Maryland-based veteran selling dog harnesses and other accessories rented a container to ship as many products as he could before Trump's new tariffs would take effect. There is 'no way' to produce domestically, he said, adding that comparable US-made products sell for nearly six times his retail prices.

US to probe Smithsonian museums for removal of partisan narratives
US to probe Smithsonian museums for removal of partisan narratives

The Sun

time3 hours ago

  • The Sun

US to probe Smithsonian museums for removal of partisan narratives

WASHINGTON: The administration of US President Donald Trump has ordered a sweeping review of several Smithsonian museums to ensure their exhibitions promote American exceptionalism and eliminate 'divisive or partisan narratives.' The move comes as Trump continues to exert influence over major cultural institutions since beginning his second term in January, alongside significant cuts to arts and humanities funding. The Smithsonian, one of America's most revered institutions, operates a vast network of museums housing tens of millions of artifacts for public display. A letter addressed to Smithsonian Secretary Lonnie Bunch, published on the White House website, announced a 'comprehensive internal review of selected Smithsonian museums and exhibitions.' 'This initiative aims to ensure alignment with the President's directive to celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions,' stated the letter, signed by three senior White House officials. Eight major museums will be scrutinised, including the National Museum of American History, the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the National Museum of the American Indian. The review will evaluate 'tone, historical framing, and alignment with American ideals' across exhibitions, educational materials, and digital content ahead of the nation's 250th anniversary next year. Last month, the Smithsonian's National Museum of American History removed a label referencing Trump's two impeachments, though the institution later denied the decision resulted from White House pressure. The review mandates that museums submit extensive documentation—including exhibition plans, wall text, educational materials, grant information, and internal guidelines—within 30 days. The Smithsonian has yet to respond to AFP's request for comment. In a statement to The New York Times, the Smithsonian affirmed its 'work is grounded in a deep commitment to scholarly excellence, rigorous research and the accurate, factual presentation of history.' 'We are reviewing the letter with this commitment in mind... and will continue to collaborate constructively with the White House, Congress and our governing Board of Regents,' the statement added. – AFP

Sam Rainsy rallies overseas Cambodians to challenge Hun Sen amid Thai-Cambodian conflict
Sam Rainsy rallies overseas Cambodians to challenge Hun Sen amid Thai-Cambodian conflict

The Star

time4 hours ago

  • The Star

Sam Rainsy rallies overseas Cambodians to challenge Hun Sen amid Thai-Cambodian conflict

PHNOM PENH: Exiled Cambodian opposition leader Sam Rainsy uses Thai-Cambodian border clashes to mobilise nationalist movement and press for justice for fallen soldiers. Sam Rainsy (pic left), the long-time political rival of Hun Sen, has seized upon the Thai-Cambodian border clashes to stage a parallel nationalist campaign through the Cambodia National Resistance Council (CNRC), strategising to overthrow Hun Sen's regime. The former leader of the Cambodia National Rescue Party (CNRP) re-emerged in the Cambodian political spotlight as the CNRC, under his leadership, issued a statement demanding the Cambodian government disclose key information to the public: Areas under Cambodian military control after the ceasefire; The number of military and civilian casualties; The number of displaced families; The number of workers returning from Thailand. The CNRC also called on Prime Minister Hun Manet's government to provide relief measures, employment, and debt alleviation for those affected. Rainsy launched the #TruthExpose campaign to demand justice for frontline soldiers who lost their lives. During the five-day conflict, CNRC leaders abroad expressed patriotic unity between 'overseas Cambodians' and 'Cambodians at home' in support of frontline troops. Initially, Rainsy appealed directly to Hun Sen to release Kem Sokha, the former CNRP leader jailed for 21 years on charges of treason and plotting with the United States to overthrow Hun Sen's government — a move Rainsy framed as a step towards reconciliation in facing foreign aggression. Hun Sen ignored the request, prompting Rainsy to publicly criticise him for concealing military death tolls. Most of the soldiers killed in combat were reportedly local troops, unlike the elite BHQ (Bodyguard Headquarters) unit — Hun Sen's personal guard — which was absent from the front lines. CNRC leaders used Facebook to post contrasting images of grassroots soldiers in sandals and the well-equipped BHQ forces. Meanwhile, 'overseas Cambodians' have used social media to raise funds for the families of fallen and injured soldiers and to act as a voice for families unable to contact their relatives on the front lines. The CNRC is an organisation of overseas Cambodians formed to restore full democracy to the country. It was founded by Mu Sochua (pic right), former CNRP deputy leader now based in the United States, together with Sam Rainsy, who lives in France. Seventeen years ago, Mu Sochua and Kem Sokha, a Cambodian-American, returned to Cambodia to co-found the Human Rights Party with US backing. This party later merged with the Sam Rainsy Party to form the CNRP, a new hope for Cambodians. Hun Sen later used 'lawfare' to force Rainsy into exile, in a bid to eliminate political rivals. Kem Sokha, who succeeded Rainsy as CNRP leader, was arrested for treason and accused of conspiring with the US. The CNRP was dissolved in 2018, prompting Mu Sochua and dozens of CNRP MPs to flee to Thailand before moving to the US. Since going into exile, Rainsy and Mu Sochua have long hoped to return to Cambodia, inspired by Rainsy's attempted 'Operation Kneel to the Homeland' in 2019. At that time, Rainsy announced on his Facebook page: 'On Saturday, Nov 2019, I will find a way to return to Cambodia, no matter what.' The plan was to mobilise Cambodian migrant workers in Thailand to walk to the Klong Luek border crossing in Aranyaprathet, Sa Kaeo province, to escort Rainsy and former CNRP MPs back to Cambodia. Small groups of Cambodian workers in Rangsit and Pak Nam prepared to lead the way for his symbolic return. Rainsy arrived at Suvarnabhumi Airport on Nove 8, 2019 from France, but was unable to leave the airport as then Prime Minister General Prayut Chan-O-Cha arranged for him to be sent to Malaysia instead. Most recently, on Aug 9, 2025, Mu Sochua and Sam Rainsy held a Zoom meeting with CNRC leaders to discuss the causes of the Thai-Cambodian conflict and to set out a strategy to topple Hun Sen's regime. - The Nation/ANN

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store