logo
US supreme court allows Trump administration to freeze teacher-training grants

US supreme court allows Trump administration to freeze teacher-training grants

Yahoo04-04-2025
The US supreme court is letting the Trump administration temporarily freeze $65m in teacher-training grants that would promote diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in a 5-4 decision.
The decision came down on Friday afternoon, with five of the court's conservatives – Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh – in the majority. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson all dissented.
In the unsigned opinion, the court said that the states made it clear 'that they have the financial wherewithal to keep their programs running', but the Trump administration had a strong case that it would not be able to reclaim any of the funds spent while the lower court's order remained in place.
The cuts to more than 100 programs had been temporarily blocked by a federal judge in Boston, who found that they were already affecting training programs aimed at addressing a nationwide teacher shortage. The federal appeals court in Boston turned away an appeal from the administration to allow them to resume.The emergency appeal is among several the high court is considering in which the justice department argues that lower-court judges have improperly obstructed Donald Trump's agenda.Friday's order was the first time in three attempts that the nation's highest court gave the administration what it wanted on an emergency basis.US district judge Myong Joun issued a temporary restraining order sought by eight Democratic-led states that argued the cuts were probably driven by efforts from Trump's administration to eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion programs.The Republican president also has signed an executive order calling for the dismantling of the education department, and his administration has already started overhauling much of its work, including cutting dozens of contracts it dismissed as 'woke' and wasteful.The two programs at issue – the Teacher Quality Partnership and Supporting Effective Educator Development – provide more than $600m in grants for teacher preparation programs, often in subject areas such as math, science and special education, the states have argued. They said data has shown the programs had led to increased teacher retention rates and ensured that educators remain in the profession beyond five years.Despite Joun's finding that the programs already were being affected, the high court's conservative majority wrote that the states can keep the programs running with their own money for now. By contrast, the majority said in an unsigned opinion, the federal government probably wouldn't be able to recover the cash if it ultimately wins the lawsuit. Kagan wrote in dissent that there was no reason for the court's emergency intervention.'Nowhere in its papers does the Government defend the legality of canceling the education grants at issue here,' Kagan wrote.In a separate opinion, Brown Jackson wrote: 'It is beyond puzzling that a majority of Justices conceive of the government's application as an emergency.' The administration halted the programs without notice in February. Joun, an appointee of Democratic president Joe Biden, found that the cancellations probably violated a federal law that requires a clear explanation.The appellate panel that rejected the administration's request for a stay also was made up of judges appointed by Democrats. California is leading the ongoing lawsuit, joined by Massachusetts, New Jersey, Colorado, Illinois, Maryland, New York and Wisconsin. Boston public schools have already had to fire several full-time employees due to the loss of grant funding, and the College of New Jersey has also canceled the rest of its teacher-residency program. California State University has ended support for two dozen students in a similar program, and eliminated financial assistance for 50 incoming students.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

National Guard vehicle, car collide in DC
National Guard vehicle, car collide in DC

The Hill

time20 minutes ago

  • The Hill

National Guard vehicle, car collide in DC

A National Guard vehicle collided with a civilian car early Wednesday morning approximately a mile away from the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. The D.C. Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department said in a statement that the crash occurred at the intersection of 8th Street SE and North Carolina Avenue SE. The civilian driver was trapped in the car, rescued and transported to a local hospital with minor injuries, the statement said. The Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) said officers responded to reports of the crash at 6:18 a.m. EDT and 'upon arrival officers discovered a two-car accident involving a government vehicle.' The driver was 'conscious and breathing' when taken to the hospital for 'non-life-threatening injuries,' MPD said. The military vehicle was a D.C. National Guard Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected All-Terrain Vehicle and was part of a five-vehicle convoy and an MPD cruiser, the National Guard said in a statement reported by local news outlets. The National Guard is investigating the incident, the statement said. Washington, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser (D) was asked about the incident at a press conference later Wednesday and said, 'I actually haven't gotten a readout on that collision yet, other than I know we had a person, I believe one person transported for medical attention. So I can't really say more,' NewsNation reported. The incident comes after President Trump ordered hundreds of National Guard troops to Washington, D.C., in an effort to crack down on crime in the nation's capital. Several Republican governors have joined his effort, bringing the total number of troops in the city to nearly 2,000.

Trump official slams 'elderly white hippies' as Vance mocks pushback to DC takeover
Trump official slams 'elderly white hippies' as Vance mocks pushback to DC takeover

USA Today

time20 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Trump official slams 'elderly white hippies' as Vance mocks pushback to DC takeover

Top Trump official Stephen Miller derided protesters as "elderly white hippies" in a city that has more Black residents than white residents. WASHINGTON ― Top Trump administration officials including Vice President JD Vance fired back at noisy protesters targeting the recent federal takeover of Washington D.C. during a scene at Union Station, the city's transit hub. Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Stephen Miller, a senior White House official, dropped by Union Station unannounced on Aug. 20 for a photo-op to tout President Donald Trump's recent deployment of National Guard troops to the nation's capital to crack down on crime. But as the trio spoke from a Shake Shack to claim credit for bringing down crime, a small group of protesters could be heard from the main hall chanting "Free D.C.!" and producing a drumbeat of noise that visibly irritated the three Trump officials. More: Voters split on Trump's DC police takeover, National Guard deployment, new poll Miller, the White House's deputy chief of staff, called the protesters "crazy communists" who have no connections to Washington D.C., accusing them of advocating for "the criminals, the killers, the rapists, the drug deals." "I'm glad they're here today," Miller said in brief remarks, "because me, Pete and the vice president are going to leave here, and inspired by them, we're going to add thousands more resources to this city to get the criminals and the gang members out of here." More: How DC's unique status let Trump take control of police, deploy National Guard Miller went on to label the protesters "elderly white hippies" in a city that has more Black residents than white residents. "Most citizens in Washington D.C. are Black. This is not a city that has had any safety for its Black citizens for generations, and President Trump is the one who is fixing that," Miller said. "So we're going to ignore these stupid white hippies. They all need to go home and take a nap because they're all over 90 years old." Vance, who claimed violent crime in D.C. has dropped 35% in nine days, also took note of the loud demonstrators. "Of course, these are a bunch of crazy protesters. But I'll tell you: A couple of years ago, when I brought my kids here, they were being screamed at by violent vagrants, and it scared the hell out of my kids," the vice president said. Vance said Union Sation is now a place where parents can safely bring their children again. "I know we've traded now some violent crazy people who are screaming at kids with a few crazy liberals who are screaming at the vice president, but I think that's a very worthwhile trade to make," Vance said. More: Trump orders National Guard into Washington and takes over DC police Declaring a local crime emergency in D.C., Trump on Aug. 11 deployed 800 National Guard troops to the streets of Washington and took action to seize control of the city's police force. Trump said the extraordinary steps were necessary to combat crime in the city, even though Washington's violent crime rate was down 26% in 2025 compared with last year. The National Guard has maintained a major presence at Union Station, a frequent stop for visitors of Washington but not a destination in one of the city's most dangerous neighborhoods. "We talked to a first-responder before we came up here," Hegseth said. "They said this is their No. 1 call location ‒ Union Station ‒ for first responders. So it's not as if this is insignificant. In many ways, this is part of the epicenter." During their visit to Union Station, Vance, Hegseth and Miller thanked the guard members for their service. After speaking for 12 minutes to reporters, Vance stuck around at Shake Shack to have lunch with the troops. 'You guys bust your ass all day and we give you hamburgers ‒ not a fair trade but we're grateful for everything you do," Vance said. Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.

Epstein grand jury records to remain sealed, but judge says government can release info
Epstein grand jury records to remain sealed, but judge says government can release info

USA Today

time20 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Epstein grand jury records to remain sealed, but judge says government can release info

A judge denied the Justice Department's bid to unseal records from the grand jury that indicted the late financier Jeffrey Epstein on sex trafficking charges, saying the material paled in comparison to the trove of records the government has about the case but is not releasing. Manhattan-based U.S. District Judge Richard Berman's Aug. 20 decision came as President Donald Trump has sought to quell discontent from his conservative base of supporters over his administration's decision not to release files of the case. The judge wrote that it would be more logical for the government to directly release the vast amount of information it has collected from its investigation into Epstein than to petition the court to release the more limited grand jury materials, whose secrecy is protected by law. "The Government's 100,000 pages of Epstein files and materials dwarf the 70 odd pages of Epstein grand jury materials," Berman wrote. "The grand jury testimony is merely a hearsay snippet of Jeffrey Epstein's alleged conduct." The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Trump, a Republican, had campaigned for a second term in 2024 with promises to make public Epstein-related files, and accused Democrats of covering up the truth. But in July, the Justice Department declined to release any more material from its investigation of the case and said a previously touted Epstein client list did not exist, angering Trump's supporters. Evidence seen and heard by grand juries, which operate behind closed doors to prevent interference in criminal investigations, cannot be released without a judge's approval. In July, Trump instructed Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek court approval for the release of grand jury material from Epstein's case. The grand jury that indicted Epstein heard from just one witness, an agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Justice Department said in a court filing in July. Epstein died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. He had pleaded not guilty. His death in jail and his friendships with the wealthy and powerful sparked conspiracy theories that other prominent people were involved in his alleged crimes and that he was murdered. The New York City chief medical examiner determined that Epstein's death was a suicide by hanging. On Aug. 11, a different Manhattan-based judge, Paul Engelmayer, denied a similar request by the Justice Department to unseal grand jury testimony and exhibits from the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's longtime girlfriend. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence following her 2021 conviction for recruiting underage girls for Epstein to abuse. Engelmayer wrote that the public would not learn anything new from the release of materials from Maxwell's grand jury because much of the evidence was made public at her monthlong trial four years ago. The grand jury testimony contained no evidence of others besides Epstein and Maxwell who had sexual contact with minors, Engelmayer wrote. Maxwell had pleaded not guilty. After losing an appeal, she has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review her case. In July, a Florida judge rejected the administration's request to unseal grand jury records from federal investigations there into Epstein in 2005 and 2007. Epstein served a 13-month sentence after pleading guilty in 2008 to a state-level prostitution charge as part of a deal now widely regarded as too lenient. (Reporting by Luc Cohen in New York; Editing by Noeleen Walder, Daniel Wallis and David Gregorio)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store