logo
Family of Winnipeg man killed by strangers address court in 'devastating' murder case

Family of Winnipeg man killed by strangers address court in 'devastating' murder case

CBCa day ago
Social Sharing
The sisters of a man killed when a trio of strangers forced their way into his home almost two years ago wept in a Winnipeg courtroom Tuesday as prosecutors described how Cory Roulette's death shattered his family.
"This grief is like nothing I've experienced," Crown attorney Jennifer Comack read from a victim impact statement written by Roulette's sister, Stefanie Menjivar-Noriega, who cried quietly next to the lawyer as she read the woman's words.
"This has taken a part of me away."
Roulette, 38, was hit with a baton and shot in the chest in his home on Winnipeg's Furby Street in August 2023.
Menjivar-Noriega was among a group of Roulette's family members who gathered in court, some wearing T-shirts with a photo of his face on them, for the sentencing of the people convicted in his death.
Several wrote victim impact statements, which described the victim as a gentle, funny man and an old soul who loved country music.
The group included Roulette's two teenage children, who court heard are mourning the loss of their chance to develop a stronger relationship with him.
"That was taken away, and we'll never be able to have that," their victim impact statement said.
Prosecutor Comack told Court of King's Bench Justice Sadie Bond the family's loss is "permanent and unrelenting" and said the hole caused by Roulette's death "has deeply impacted all of their lives and will continue to impact their futures."
"What happened to Cory Roulette was devastating, inexcusable and 100 per cent avoidable," Comack said.
'I'm going to … shoot the place up'
Court heard the events that culminated in Roulette's death were sparked by an argument with an 11-year-old boy.
Ramona Harper, one of three co-accused in the killing, was walking with another person outside Roulette's building on the night of Aug. 25, 2023, when Harper started kicking over garbage cans in the back alley.
An 11-year-old boy who was visiting Roulette at the time confronted Harper as he stood on Roulette's balcony. The two started yelling at each other, and the boy threatened to shoot Harper, who is now 23, an agreed statement of facts said.
Harper then left, saying, "I'm going to get my brothers and shoot the place up," the court document said. Soon after, Harper returned with their brother Raoul Harper, who had a collapsible baton, and their cousin Kyle Harper, who had a loaded, sawed-off rifle.
Shortly after midnight, the group went to the second floor of Roulette's building and forced open the door of his suite. Raoul Harper, now 21, hit Roulette several times with the baton — including at least once in the face — and Kyle Harper, now 26, shot him in the chest, the agreed statement of facts said.
Roulette was taken to hospital, where he was pronounced dead shortly after arriving. His cause of death was the gunshot wound to his chest, the court document said.
Vanessa Roulette said she's remembering the victim as her baby brother who was always joking around, but was always there when you needed him.
"Cory had that shoulder you could lean on. You didn't even have to be a sibling. You could've just been his friend and someone off the street," she told CBC News in an interview outside court Tuesday.
Murder victim's sisters weep during killers' sentencing
42 minutes ago
Kyle Harper pleaded guilty to second-degree murder in the case for pulling the trigger, and faces an automatic life sentence with no parole eligibility for at least 10 years. However, prosecutors and defence lawyers jointly recommended he should wait 12 years before being allowed to apply for parole.
Prosecutors asked for Raoul and Ramona Harper, who both pleaded guilty to manslaughter, to be sentenced to eight years in prison for their roles in Roulette's killing. Their lawyers asked for slightly lower sentences of five and between five and six years.
When given the chance to speak in court Tuesday, all three accused expressed remorse for their actions and took responsibility for their roles in Roulette's death.
"I can't imagine what it must feel like to lose a family member like that," Ramona Harper said. "I am so sorry. And I know nothing I can say or do will make up for what happened, but that won't stop me from trying every day."
Meanwhile, Roulette's sister Vanessa said she doesn't wish ill on the three convicted in her brother's death.
"They're going to get judged from the guy upstairs. Not from me. Not from my family. You know, Creator has a journey for each of us," she said.
Justice Bond reserved her sentencing decision to a later date.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Uninsured, suspended G2 driver from Ottawa facing impaired driving charges
Uninsured, suspended G2 driver from Ottawa facing impaired driving charges

CTV News

time20 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Uninsured, suspended G2 driver from Ottawa facing impaired driving charges

An Ottawa G2 driver being towed near Merivale Road on Wednesday, July 23, 2025. (OPP/X) An Ottawa man is facing a laundry list of charges for allegedly driving impaired on a suspended licence without insurance Wednesday afternoon. Ontario Provincial Police say officers were patrolling on Merivale Road near Baseline Road when they were alerted to a suspended driver by an Automated Licence Plate Reader (ALPR). While speaking to the G2 driver, police had reason to believe he was impaired by alcohol. A roadside screening device was used and the driver was taken back to the police detachment for a breath test. Officers also located open alcohol inside the vehicle, police say. G2 drivers in Ontario cannot have any measurable amount of alcohol in their system while operating a vehicle. A 29-year-old man from Ottawa faces seven charges, including two counts of operation while impaired, driving while under suspension, operating a motor vehicle without insurance, driving a motor vehicle with an open container of liquor, driving a motor vehicle without a permit and for having a blood alcohol content (BAC) above zero. The man had his licence automatically suspended for 90-days and had his vehicle impounded for seven days. He is scheduled to appear before the Ontario Court of Justice in Ottawa at a later date.

Hockey Canada, NHL could clear or sanction players after sexual-assault verdict
Hockey Canada, NHL could clear or sanction players after sexual-assault verdict

Globe and Mail

time20 minutes ago

  • Globe and Mail

Hockey Canada, NHL could clear or sanction players after sexual-assault verdict

On Thursday, the five former Canadian world junior hockey players charged with sexual assault after a 2018 celebratory gala in London, Ont., will learn their fates at the hands of the criminal justice system. But that won't be the final word: Both the National Hockey League and Hockey Canada still have matters to resolve with the men. Each organization conducted its own parallel investigation into the allegations, but when police laid charges in February, 2024, the league and national sport organization held off making any final determination until the end of the trial. Now that those processes may finally continue – barring any appeal in the case – some or all of the players could be excluded from the highest levels of professional hockey, or barred from ever playing for Canada again. If the probes don't find the players breached the league's or Hockey Canada's rules, though, the men may not face any serious professional consequences at all. The case has brought scrutiny to how sports organizations in Canada should proceed when athletes allegedly engage in behaviour that is not only inappropriate, but potentially criminal. It has also offered the public a rare glimpse into how the country's safe sport regime makes decisions, the mechanics of which are normally shrouded in secrecy. What to know about the Hockey Canada trial ahead of the verdict The Hockey Canada sexual-assault trial is nearly over. We're answering your questions after the verdict Shortly after the alleged incident in June, 2018, Hockey Canada hired lawyer Danielle Robitaille for an independent investigation into whether the players had contravened its code of conduct. She conducted a raft of interviews, including with four of the five players who were ultimately charged, and filed a report with the organization in the fall of 2022. In November, 2023, Hockey Canada announced that an independent adjudicative panel held a hearing on the matter and rendered a decision, but an appeal had been filed. No other information was released, including what the panel had decided. Hockey Canada commissioned a new arm's-length panel to hear the appeal. Ten months later, in September, 2024, the organization announced that panel had granted a motion to adjourn the proceedings until the criminal trial was over. The five accused are not the only ones directly affected by the pause. Hockey Canada suspended the entire 2018 world junior team when the incident came to light in June, 2022 – preventing them from playing, coaching, officiating, or volunteering with any programs overseen by the organization. The players remain in limbo until the conclusion of the independent appeal process. Experts say when a matter could be subject to a criminal investigation, sports organizations should hold off on their own inquiry until after the police probe. 'You don't want to taint the criminal matter,' said Hilary Findlay, a retired associate professor of sports management at Brock University, and a founding partner of the consulting firm Sport Law. Independent investigators 'could inappropriately question people. Somebody could make a false accusation that could have repercussions,' she said, adding that any number of things could happen that might bleed into the criminal investigation. In a ruling last fall on a pretrial motion, Justice Bruce Thomas noted that Ms. Robitaille had, in fact, suspended her investigation in late July, 2018, and then resumed it after police determined that there weren't sufficient grounds to continue their probe, in February, 2019. She then shut down her inquiry again in September, 2020, after failing to secure an interview with the complainant. But in July, 2022, both the London Police Service and Ms. Robitaille reopened their investigations after a public outcry. Hockey Canada threatened a lifetime ban on any player who didn't speak to Ms. Robitaille. Justice Thomas noted she was aware that the information she gathered could be shared with police. Ms. Robitaille's findings did end up spilling into public view during the trial. However, much of the evidence and material she uncovered in her 2022 interviews with three of the players – including an admission by Dillon Dubé that he had slapped the complainant on her naked buttock – was ultimately ruled inadmissible because they were obtained under threat of the lifetime ban by Hockey Canada. While that threat was unusual, Canada's safe sport regime has other sanctions at its disposal to compel participation. Signy Arnason, the executive director of safe sport for the Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport, or CCES, noted that those accused of breaching a code of conduct 'can choose to not participate' in a probe. 'But that doesn't stop anything.' If those individuals are found guilty, they do not have the right to an appeal. The NHL also launched its own investigation that concluded in 2023, but the results were not made public. Though the league's commissioner, Gary Bettman, denounced the alleged behaviour – calling the claims 'disgusting, horrific, and unacceptable' in an interview with The Globe and Mail in April – the league said it won't discuss its investigation or potential consequences while the matter is before the courts. In April, the CCES took over responsibility for administering the safe sport file, outlined in the Universal Code of Conduct to Prevent and Address Maltreatment in Sport, or UCCMS, for federally funded national sport organizations such as Hockey Canada. The accused players may face sanctions under the UCCMS, regardless of the outcome of the criminal trial. 'The standard of proof, and what you need to show culpability, differs between the two processes,' said Ms. Findlay. A criminal conviction requires evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. The threshold for proof in the Canadian safe sport regime, on the other hand, is lower. The regime abides by what is known as a 'balance of probabilities,' meaning an investigator only has to be at least 51 per cent certain that the alleged behaviour occurred. Hockey Canada verdict could break new ground on sexual consent Gary Bettman won't say if Hockey Canada players on trial for sexual assault could return to NHL if acquitted Both the probes commissioned by NHL and Hockey Canada have unfolded behind a heavy curtain of secrecy. Investigations into behaviour that occurs under the auspices of national sport organizations are not released to the public. Only serious sanctions, such as a temporary or permanent suspension, are announced. Ms. Arnason stressed it is imperative for investigations like these to remain secret. National sport organizations, and the people who work for them, can make or break athletes' careers, which creates a disincentive to report maltreatment if people fear being identified as a complainant or whistleblower. 'People want to remain, in many instances, confidential,' she said. Taylor McKee, the director of the Centre for Sport Capacity at Brock University, broadly agrees, though he argued that the public deserves more transparency than the system currently offers. He outlined a potential scenario in which a coach is alleged to have violated what is known in sports as the one-on-one protocol, which ensures adults aren't left alone with minors. The coach may admit to breaking the rule, but that would not normally be disclosed outside the independent probe, since it is not subject to serious sanction. However, it would be in the public interest to disclose the coach's admission, regardless of its implications as per the code. 'If they can find statements of fact that are agreed upon, even by the accused,' it's in the interest of the Canadian hockey establishment to make those public, Mr. McKee said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store