logo
How Trump's 'Big Beautiful' Budget Bill Helps China Win the Clean Tech Race

How Trump's 'Big Beautiful' Budget Bill Helps China Win the Clean Tech Race

Newsweek22-05-2025

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Clean energy industry analysts and trade groups said Thursday that the budget reconciliation bill narrowly approved Thursday by the Republican-led House of Representatives would raise emissions and energy prices while giving China an edge in the growing clean technology market.
Business leaders in solar, wind, battery and EV manufacturing had hoped that the boom in clean energy investments in Republican districts would translate into political support for tax credits that benefit renewable energy and clean tech. But in the final hours of negotiations, the bill's text grew even worse for clean energy interests, phasing out most of the tax credits even earlier than proposed in the bill's earlier draft.
"It's a significant shock," Chirag Lala, director of energy at the Center for Public Enterprise, told Newsweek. CPE is a nonprofit that works with state and local governments on energy development and investment. The tax credits played an important role in reducing risk for investors, he explained, and have triggered hundreds of billions of dollars of investments in new projects.
"If we were hoping to be a big player in the manufacturing or development of key industries—nuclear, geothermal, batteries, electric vehicles—this is a huge set back," he said.
China has invested heavily in its capacity to manufacture solar panels, EVs and batteries and dominates the global market for most of those products. The U.S. has argued that China has also used unfair trade practices. Many U.S. businesses viewed the clean energy support in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law as the country's best chance to catch up with China.
The Kayenta Solar Plant in Arizona, one of the many clean energy projects made possible with federal financing.
The Kayenta Solar Plant in Arizona, one of the many clean energy projects made possible with federal financing."Gutting the incentives of the IRA will likely mean a number of projects are abandoned and many new ones won't start," University of Texas at Austin public affairs professor Joshua Busby told Newsweek via email. "While the rest of the world moves on to clean energy and looks to China for inputs, the U.S. will be left behind."
Busby, who formerly served as a senior climate adviser to the U.S. Department of Defense, argues that removing incentives for clean energy would undermine U.S. national security. Not only are clean tech products like batteries becoming important for military applications, but the revenue from the clean energy industry is also an important source of economic power.
"Clean energy is one of a handful of sectors that will be large sources of growth and revenue this century," Busby said. "Countries that have large healthy economies have the tax base to fund their militaries."
Shortly after the House vote Thursday morning, trade groups representing renewable energy and clean tech manufacturers responded with statements that echoed Busby's concerns about the U.S. ability to compete with China.
"A vote for this bill was a vote to close U.S. factories and concede manufacturing jobs of the most important energy resource of the 21st century to China," Mike Carr, executive director of the Solar Energy Manufacturers for America, said in a statement.
Ray Long, CEO of the American Council on Renewable Energy, said "recklessly disrupting" tax incentives will undermine projects that are ready to come online in the U.S.
"It would be a boon to Chinese manufacturers and a tremendous step backward for American jobs, competitiveness in manufacturing and AI, economic security, and energy security," Long said.
Abigail Ross Hopper, president and CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association, emphasized solar's growing importance in meeting growing energy demand. Energy analysts project a coming surge in demand for electricity driven by the boom in data centers for AI, and the combination of solar and battery energy storage made up the bulk of new electricity capacity added to the grid last year.
"If this bill becomes law, America will effectively surrender the AI race to China and communities nationwide will face blackouts," Hopper said in a statement.
Energy policy analysts raced to assess the impact the House bill would have. The Rapid Energy Policy Evaluation and Analysis Toolkit (REPEAT) is a joint effort including researchers from Princeton University, Dartmouth College and Binghamton University.
The REPEAT researchers noted that the House bill would not only scrap the clean energy tax credits, it would also rescind all unobligated funding for clean energy and climate programs under the IRA and the Infrastructure Law. They estimate that would:
Increase U.S. greenhouse gas emissions by roughly 0.5 billion metric tons per year in 2030 and more than 1 billion metric tons per year in 2035.
Raise U.S. household and business energy expenditures by $25 billion annually in 2030 and over $50 billion in 2035.
Increase average U.S. household energy costs by roughly $100 to $160 dollars per year in 2030.
Additionally, REPEAT found, the bill would put at risk $522 billion in announced but pending investments in U.S. clean energy reduce annual sales of electric vehicles by roughly 40 percent by 2030. The net effect, the researchers found, would "end America's battery manufacturing boom."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says he's 'disappointed' with Musk after former backer turned on the Republican tax bill
Trump says he's 'disappointed' with Musk after former backer turned on the Republican tax bill

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump says he's 'disappointed' with Musk after former backer turned on the Republican tax bill

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump said Thursday he's 'disappointed' with Elon Musk after his former backer and advisor lambasted the president's signature bill. Trump suggested the world's richest man misses being in the White House and has 'Trump derangement syndrome.' The Republican president reflected on his breakup with Musk in front of reporters in the Oval Office as Musk continued a storm of social media posts attacking Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' and warning it will increase the federal deficit. 'I'm very disappointed in Elon," Trump said. 'I've helped Elon a lot.' Musk has called Trump's big tax break bill a 'disgusting abomination.' The Associated Press Sign in to access your portfolio

When Pete Hegseth's Pentagon Tenure Started Going Sideways
When Pete Hegseth's Pentagon Tenure Started Going Sideways

Atlantic

time26 minutes ago

  • Atlantic

When Pete Hegseth's Pentagon Tenure Started Going Sideways

Things were going fine for Pete Hegseth, right up until a chance encounter with the world's richest man. His pursuit of Donald Trump's agenda at the Pentagon had made him a star among the president's advisers. The former Fox News host had moved swiftly to roll back diversity initiatives in the military and to expand U.S. troops' role in halting immigration at the southern border. His willingness to challenge Republican orthodoxy on foreign policy and punch back at critics was seen as an asset as Trump began his second term. But then, in mid-March, Hegseth bumped into Elon Musk in a White House hallway, and extended an ill-fated invitation to the tech titan for an exclusive military briefing. 'Up until then, DOD had been the golden child,' one person familiar with Hegseth's office told us. When Trump learned about the proposed briefing the night before it was scheduled to take place, he was displeased. Although Hegseth denied a New York Time s report that the March 21 meeting would focus on plans for potential war with Beijing, Trump told others that any presentation on China would be inappropriate for Musk, who has extensive business interests there, according to people familiar with the president's reaction. The very idea that top officers would brief the businessman in the Tank—the secure Pentagon conference room where the military brass assembles for visits by the commander in chief—added to an unwelcome perception that Musk wielded outsize government power. In a call hours after the Times story appeared, Trump made clear to Hegseth that the briefing was 'a bad look' for the administration, according to individuals with knowledge of the call. When Hegseth visited the White House the next day to debut the Air Force's newest fighter jet, Trump again conveyed his displeasure. 'This is crazy and stupid,' Trump said of the briefing, one of these people told us. 'Why would we even do this?' Jonathan Lemire: Why Trump is standing by Hegseth, for now Trump reserved most of his ire for Musk and did not express anger toward Hegseth personally, White House officials told us. Yet the Musk episode, and Trump's response to Hegseth, details of which have not been previously reported, represented a turning point for the new Pentagon chief, according to people familiar with his tenure who spoke with us on the condition of anonymity. Since then, a series of embarrassing revelations, including Hegseth's disclosure of military attack plans on the messaging app Signal, have fueled turmoil and suspicion at the Pentagon's highest levels. They have also intensified public scrutiny of Hegseth's judgment and deepened questions about his ability to deliver on the president's military priorities, including pushing back against China and demonstrating American strength, which the president believes was eroded by his predecessor. 'Things were heading in the right direction,' the person familiar with Hegseth's office added. 'But then the leaks and Signalgate just really fucked up Pete.' Hegseth oversees a workforce of more than 3 million, and a budget of close to $1 trillion, without a chief of staff. His shrunken circle of close aides lacks extensive Pentagon experience. Key military commanders are preparing to retire without replacements in sight. Sidelined aides have aired details of unseemly feuds at the department's senior levels, and a series of unflattering media reports have fueled what numerous officials describe as Hegseth's fixation on stopping leaks. White House officials say that Trump continues to support Hegseth—the defense chief's job is '100 percent safe,' one told us. This official also noted that in addition to having Trump's affection, Hegseth is personally liked by both Vice President J. D. Vance and White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles. White House Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly told us that the entire administration remains 'fully behind Secretary Hegseth's mission to prioritize our warfighters, eliminate terrorists, and restore common sense at the DOD.' But scores of congressional Democrats have called on Hegseth to resign. One Republican, Representative Don Bacon of Nebraska, has suggested that he be fired. Musk's Pentagon visit originated from a conversation in Musk's sparsely furnished office that followed their impromptu meeting in a White House hallway, when Hegseth suggested that Musk come over to the Pentagon to talk with senior military leaders. The defense chief later authorized the meeting to be held in the Tank. Several people told us that Hegseth's invitation came at a moment when the Defense Department, like other agencies across the government, was facing the prospect of cuts by Musk's Department of Government Efficiency. While Hegseth has touted DOGE's steps to reduce the number of federal contractors and other personnel, DOD was not driving the process. The invitation represented a chance for Pentagon leaders to help steer DOGE's direction in cutting one of the world's largest bureaucracies. (A representative for Musk did not respond to multiple requests for comment.) Tom Nichols: Pete Hegseth's patriotic duty is to resign Just three days after Musk's Pentagon visit, Hegseth's judgment again came into question when Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor in chief of The Atlantic, revealed that he had been added to a high-level Signal chat about plans to bomb Houthi militants in Yemen. Although then–National Security Adviser Michael Waltz had inadvertently invited Goldberg to the thread, it was Hegseth who escalated the exchange by posting details of an imminent attack on Houthi targets, including the precise times when U.S. jets would be flying over their targets in Yemen. Current and former officials have said that such advance attack information would typically be highly classified because of the danger its disclosure could pose to pilots. A cascade of other revelations followed, including stories detailing the unusual role that Hegseth's wife, Jennifer, has played in his work at the Pentagon, where she has attended meetings with foreign officials and issued orders related to her husband's media appearances. News reports also revealed that Hegseth gave his younger brother a senior Pentagon role and authorized the installation of a makeup studio at a cost of thousands of dollars. Current and former officials told us that Hegseth has since threatened to polygraph numerous senior officials, including the acting chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. He has also overturned decades of tradition in the military's relationship with the press, ousting media outlets from their long-standing Pentagon workspaces in favor of Trump-friendly voices and ending reporters' access to most of the building. When The Atlantic interviewed Trump in the Oval Office in late April, the president said he'd had 'a talk' with Hegseth about the various embarrassing reports, predicting, 'I think he's gonna get it together.' Yet the Musk and Signal episodes reveal what some individuals familiar with Hegseth's tenure described to us as his tendency to use his position heading the world's most advanced military as a 'flex.' He attempts to impress others with his access to sensitive information and his power to direct American forces, even if it means a little indiscretion along the way, they said. 'He's got this $180,000 Ferrari. That's the Pentagon for him,' another person familiar with Hegseth's office told us. 'And he likes to show it off.' Hegseth created further controversy after he elevated Ricky Buria, a Marine who'd been serving as a military aide when Hegseth took office, to a senior role and sought to name him as chief of staff. Buria often made demands of more senior officers, and his sudden promotion to a senior political position rubbed many in the rank-conscious military the wrong way. Trump personally blocked Buria from the chief-of-staff job because of his ties to Lloyd Austin, Joe Biden's Pentagon chief, White House officials told us. People familiar with Pentagon staffing told us that the White House had explored hiring at least four replacements for Joe Kasper, who had abruptly left the chief-of-staff job in April to take a new role in the department, but that none had worked out. The chief Pentagon spokesperson, Sean Parnell, said in a statement that personnel changes are a 'natural and necessary feature of any highly effective organization.' 'Americans outside the beltway don't care about 'palace intrigue' or sensationalized mainstream media gossip,' Parnell said. 'They care about action.' In response to suggestions from the White House, the Pentagon has in recent weeks begun to slowly expand its media engagement beyond MAGA-friendly outlets, taking reporters from several mainstream print-news organizations on Hegseth's travels to Latin America and Asia. Kingsley Wilson, Hegseth's Pentagon press secretary, told us that Hegseth's travels have involved bringing along journalists from 'a wide range of outlets.' Hegseth, however, has stuck to a rote playbook in responding to unfavorable news: attempt to discredit the media, then pivot to his efforts to rebuild the military and restore the 'warrior ethos' he says was lost under Democratic leaders. 'This is what the media does,' he told reporters during a family Easter event at the White House, children in party attire looking on from behind. He gestured at the journalists assembled before him, calling them 'hoaxsters.' 'They try to slash and burn people and ruin their reputations. It's not going to work with me.' Jason Dempsey: Hegseth has all the wrong enemies Trump has stood by his Pentagon chief, suggesting that he admires the combative approach Hegseth takes in attacking administration detractors. He is a 'tough cookie' who 'went through a lot,' the president said late last month. Trump also spent significant political capital pushing through Hegseth's nomination—Vance had to cast the tiebreaking vote after the Senate deadlocked on confirmation at 50–50—and is reluctant to abandon him now, especially because it might look like giving the media a scalp. That support will be tested next week, when Hegseth begins a series of hearings on Capitol Hill convened to address the administration's budget requests. Hegseth is sure to face difficult questions from Democrats, including on his handling of sensitive information, the upheaval in the Pentagon's upper ranks, and his firing of senior military officials. Those officers include the second-ever Black chairman of the Joint Chiefs and the first female Navy chief, both of whom Hegseth previously suggested were promoted because of their race and gender, respectively. Top Republicans, meanwhile, are unhappy with an administration spending proposal that they say doesn't include enough money for defense. Many at the Pentagon question how long the president's backing for their boss will last. During his first term, Trump cycled through four defense secretaries and four national security advisers. He also voiced support for Waltz until the former national security adviser was pushed aside last month and asked to take a less powerful role, at the United Nations. Although the president appears to appreciate Hegseth's pugnacious public style, he may require more from his defense secretary over time, as the administration faces pressure to deliver on a set of complex and interlocking goals, including fixing a byzantine military-procurement system, reviving a diminished defense industry, and strengthening America's response to China's military rise. Fighters endear themselves to Trump, one person told us, 'but you can't have a one-dimensional game. At a certain point, it's going to get old.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store