In wake of new law, EKU swaps ‘diversity,' ‘inclusion' for ‘viewpoint neutrality'
Students walk on Eastern Kentucky University's campus in Richmond, May 14, 2025. (Kentucky Lantern photo by McKenna Horsley)
RICHMOND — With approval of its governing board, Eastern Kentucky University became the first in the state to formally adopt policies that bring it into compliance with a Republican-backed state law banning diversity, equity and inclusion practices at Kentucky public universities.
In its Wednesday meeting, the EKU Board of Regents passed a policy to uphold viewpoint neutrality and a resolution showing EKU plans to comply with the recently passed House Bill 4. The board also approved removing words such as 'diverse' from its strategic goals. No board members voted against the measures in a voice vote.
Kentucky public universities have been reviewing HB 4 since its passage by the Republican-controlled General Assembly earlier this year. GOP caucuses in the House and Senate easily had the votes to override Democratic Gov. Andy Beshear's veto of the law, which he said 'is about hate.'
In his veto message, the governor wrote, 'Acting like racism and discrimination no longer exist or that hundreds of years of inequality have been somehow overcome and there is a level playing field is disingenuous.' He also said the law would prevent universities and colleges from investigating allegations of bias except in limited circumstances.
EKU's board members had little discussion on the new policies before they cast votes. Regent Laura Babbage asked questions about how the university will still support students from a variety of backgrounds. She added that she hoped as an institution, EKU 'believes that we have responsibility to our brothers and sisters, regardless of their race, creed, beliefs or whatever the case might be.'
'I'm not speaking for the board. I'm speaking for Laura Babbage, but I am just saying that that is an essential part of who I am,' she said. 'And so as we have issues that come before us that perhaps need a voice, I will, in fact, be that voice.'
EKU President David McFaddin said in response to Babbage that supporting all students would remain a focus of the administration.
'Student success will continue to be our focus. Supporting students — every student — in every way that we can will continue to be a part of the institution,' he said.
The newly adopted university policy — titled 'Institutional Viewpoint Neutrality' — says that EKU 'does not discriminate against individuals or groups based on their social or political viewpoints and values the contributions of all community members to robust dialogue and the free exchange of viewpoints to contribute to an intellectually diverse campus community.' The university may not require anyone to 'endorse or condemn a specific ideology, political viewpoint, or social viewpoint to be eligible for hiring, contract renewal, tenure, promotion, admission or graduation.' Directing the state's public universities to adopt such viewpoint neutrality policies was a tenet of HB 4.
The university policy says that the EKU president has the only authority to issue official statements on behalf of the university, and may designate someone else to issue statements as needed. The board chair has a similar authority to issue official statements of the board. The president and board chair are prohibited from issuing official statements 'on political, social or cultural matters that are not directly related to the operations, mission or legal obligations of the University.' The policy says that any violation 'will be handled through the normal University processes.'
The board also approved changes to the university's strategic goals, removing a reference to supporting 'EKU's diverse learners' and replacing the word 'inclusivity' with 'respect.' The changes also remove 'Inclusion' as a guiding value of the university, which was defined as 'Community engagement, Diversity of people and perspectives, Professional growth, Hospitality, Celebration' and replaces it with 'Opportunity,' defined as 'Community Engagement, Multiple Perspectives and Lived Experiences, Professional Growth, Hospitality, Celebration.'
The resolution approved by the board says EKU will follow the state law. An EKU spokesperson previously told the Kentucky Lantern the university planned to comply with the law.
The bill's primary sponsor, Rep. Jennifer Decker, R-Waddy, said in a statement after filing the legislation that it sought 'to prohibit discrimination on the basis of religion, race, sex, color, or national origin, and ensure that our university campuses are free from the failed and misguided DEI policies that have proven only to make higher education less attainable for Kentuckians.'
In a statement ahead of Wednesday's board meeting, Decker said the law ended 'discriminatory and wasteful practices on our public postsecondary campuses.' Decker added that the law ensures Kentucky public colleges 'provide equal treatment to all of their students and judge students on their individual merits, not on their race, color, or creed.'
'These are institutions of learning and must focus on improving the quality of education on their campuses and increasing enrollment among all Kentuckians,' Decker said.
HB 4 directs the governing boards of Kentucky's public universities to enact a policy by June 30 to meet requirements under the law such as not restricting scholarship eligibility criteria on the basis of religion, race, sex, color or national origin and not requiring or encouraging students to complete courses 'of which the primary purpose is to indoctrinate participants with a discriminatory concept.'
Next year on July 1, each institution must begin submitting annual certification to the Council on Postsecondary Education to verify the institution has not spent money to support DEI programs.
The law largely had support from Republicans in both the state House and Senate throughout the legislative session earlier this year.
It comes on the heels of Republicans nationwide aiming to rollback DEI programs. President Donald Trump has taken actions against such programs, including issuing an executive order
early in his second term aimed at curbing DEI in private sector businesses. More recently, Trump signed an executive order directing the U.S. Department of Education to overhaul university and college accreditation programs to root out DEI standards.
Before the General Assembly passed the law, Kentucky college students held protests against the legislation on their campuses, including EKU. Students also voiced opposition in committee hearings and protests at the Capitol.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
MAGA Svengali Wants Trump to Pull Ukraine Support Over Surprise Drone Attack
MAGA podcaster Steve Bannon is calling on President Donald Trump to nix support for Ukraine after it carried out a surprise drone attack in Russia that blindsided the White House. The attack inflicted $7 billion in damage on Sunday and destroyed a third of Russia's strategic bomber fleet. Ukrainian said the strike had been in the works for over 18 months. Bannon, one of Trump's closest confidants, commended Ukraine for executing the attack. However, he was not pleased that it occurred without Trump's knowledge, as the White House revealed on Monday. 'The White House has to condemn this immediately and pull all support,' Bannon said on his War Room podcast Monday. Bannon said Kyiv should have notified Trump of the escalation. He said the supposed betrayal, which he claims has brought the United States closer to war with Russia, must have consequences for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. 'If they did not give us a heads up on this, full stop, no minerals deal—walk away from all of it,' he said. 'They're irresponsible. They're dragging us into a kinetic third world war.' The podcaster, who served as a White House adviser during Trump's first term, went so far as to suggest that Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham, one of Kyiv's most prominent backers in Congress, should be arrested if he does not stop traveling overseas and 'stirring it up' in Ukraine. Bannon theorized that Graham, instead of the president, may have given Ukraine the green light to attack deep into Russia. 'Lindsey Graham's over there saying: 'Hey, forget Trump. I got the House and the Senate. We're going to pass it. You're going to see something in a couple of days.' Remember that? He's stirring it up over there,' Bannon said. 'He's telling them they got backing.' Ukraine reportedly carried out its attack by smuggling drones across the Russian border in wooden crates. They were then deployed simultaneously to attack five airbases, including the Belaya airbase in the far-east Irkutsk region, 2,500 miles away from Ukraine. Bannon said he is not convinced that the attack did not involve U.S. intelligence. If Russia reaches a similar conclusion, he fears the three-year-old conflict could soon include America. 'This is a ticking time bomb,' Bannon said. 'And you see what they're going to get us into. Because now we're now, inexorably, we're being drawn into this.' Trump campaigned last year on a promise to end the war between Ukraine and Russia on day one of his presidency. That promise has fallen flat, as have any peace negotiations brokered by U.S. officials. The latest instance of talks falling through occurred on Monday, when a scheduled meeting between Russia and Ukraine to discuss peace in Turkey was brief, with no agreement reached. 'You're supposed to be in Turkey today talking peace,' Bannon said Monday, 'not 3000 miles into Russia, blowing up their strategic bombers.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump's mega-bill faces rocky ride in Senate
US senators have begun weeks of what is certain to be fierce debate over the mammoth policy package President Donald Trump hopes will seal his legacy, headlined by tax cuts slated to add up to $3 trillion to the nation's debt. The Republican leader celebrated when the House passed his "big, beautiful bill," which partially covers an extension of his 2017 tax relief through budget cuts projected to strip health care from millions of low-income Americans. The Senate now gets to make its own changes, and the upper chamber's version could make or break Republicans' 2026 midterm election prospects -- and define Trump's second term. But the 1,116-page blueprint faces an uphill climb, with moderate Republicans balking at $1.5 trillion in spending cuts while fiscal hawks are blasting the bill as a ticking debt bomb. "We have enough (holdouts) to stop the process until the president gets serious about spending reduction and reducing the deficit," Senator Ron Johnson, one of half a dozen Republican opponents to the bill, told CNN. Democrats -- whose support is not required if Republicans can maintain a united front -- have focused on the tax cuts mostly benefiting the rich on the backs of a working class already struggling with high prices. The White House says the legislation will spur robust economic growth to neutralize its potential to blow up America's already burgeoning debt pile, which has ballooned to $36.9 trillion. But several independent analyses have found that -- even taking growth into account -- it will add between $2.5 trillion and $3.1 trillion to deficits over the next decade. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, meanwhile, found that the combined effects of tax cuts and cost savings would be a giant transfer of wealth from the poorest 10 percent to the richest 10 percent. Republicans muscled the measure through the House by a single vote on May 22 by a combination of bargaining vote holdouts on policies and deploying Trump himself to twist arms. House Speaker Mike Johnson is now pleading with the Senate not to alter the bill too much, as any tweaks will need to go back to the lower chamber. - Faultlines - The Senate wants to get the bill to Trump's desk by US Independence Day on July 4 -- an ambitious timeline given Republicans' narrow three-vote majority and wide faultlines that have opened over the proposed specifics. Independent analysts expect around seven million beneficiaries of the Medicaid health insurance program will be deprived of coverage due to new proposed eligibility restrictions and work requirements. Polling shows that the vast majority of Americans oppose cutting Medicaid -- including Trump himself, as well as some Republicans in poorer states that rely heavily on federal welfare. Senate moderates are also worried about proposed changes to funding food aid that could deprive up to 3.2 million of vital nutrition support. One thing is almost certain -- Trump himself will get involved at some point, though his negotiation tactics may be more subtle than they were when he threatened "grandstanders" holding up the tax bill in the House. Trump took to his Truth Social website on Monday to decry "so many false statements (that) are being made about 'THE ONE, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL'" -- and to falsely claim that it would not cut Medicaid. "The only 'cutting' we will do is for Waste, Fraud, and Abuse, something that should have been done by the Incompetent, Radical Left Democrats for the last four years, but wasn't," he said. One more wrinkle for Trump: tech billionaire Elon Musk -- no longer one of his closest aides but still an influential commentator -- has already broken with the president to criticize the mega-bill. "A bill can be big or it can be beautiful. But I don't know if it can be both," Musk said in a CBS interview criticizing its effect on debt. ft/jgc
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump's new FEMA head stuns staff by telling them he didn't know US had a hurricane season, report says
The recently installed head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency alarmed staff members on Monday when he reportedly said he was unaware that the U.S. has a hurricane season, which formally began on June 1. The reported comments are the latest sign of upheaval at the federal disaster-management agency, which the Trump administration says it wants to 'eliminate,' handing many of its responsibilities to state governments. The comments from David Richardson, who has been overseeing FEMA since May, came during a briefing with staff members, Reuters reports, citing four sources familiar with his comments. Richardson, a former Marine artillery officer and Homeland Security official, has no formal disaster-management experience. During the briefing, Richardson also allegedly said he was holding off on unveiling a new disaster plan so as not to contradict the administration's review of FEMA activities, despite previously saying in May one would be ready by later that month. The agency quickly downplayed the reporting, telling Reuters the comments were a joke and that FEMA was prepared for the coming hurricane season. "FEMA is shifting from bloated, DC-centric dead weight to a lean, deployable disaster force that empowers state actors to provide relief for their citizens,' the agency said in a statement. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration recently warned this year's hurricane season, which runs through November, has a 60 percent chance of above-normal conditions. The agency has been in turmoil throughout the Trump administration. It has reportedly cut back on training for state and local emergency managers, and acting FEMA administrator Cameron Hamilton was fired in May, after he testified in Congress he didn't think the administration should shutter the disaster response body. Hurricane preparations inside FEMA have reportedly slowed in the face of the roughly 2,000 people who have been fired or resigned under Trump. 'As FEMA transforms to a smaller footprint, the intent for this hurricane season is not well understood,' according to an internal agency review prepared at the direction of Richardson that was obtained by CNN . 'Thus FEMA is not ready.' In January, Trump created a FEMA Review Council to determine the future of the agency. The administration has criticized FEMA from a number of angles, ranging from arguments that it's inefficient, to inaccurate claims the agency diverted emergency funding to house migrants. On the campaign trail, Trump also falsely claimed then Vice President Kamala Harris and President Joe Biden didn't visit the disaster zones in North Carolina after Hurricane Helene, and that the federal government didn't help people in Republican-leaning areas. Trump has also threatened to withhold wildfire aid to California if it doesn't agree to various policy demands.