Ford government obfuscated Greenbelt records through code words: commissioner
As part of Commissioner Patricia Kosseim's annual report, she says that a number of freedom-of-information appeals her office received on Greenbelt-related requests revealed concerning, systemic issues.
She says in addition to issues previously highlighted by the auditor general around political staff deleting Greenbelt emails and using personal accounts, the government has a 'surprising' lack of documentation on such an important decision and sometimes used code words in communications.
Kosseim says in the report that staffers sometimes referred to the Greenbelt project as 'special project,' or 'GB,' or 'G*,' with references to G* being next to impossible to find.
The RCMP is in the midst of an investigation into the government's decision to remove 15 parcels of land from the Greenbelt to remove 50,000 homes — a process the auditor general and integrity commissioner have found favoured certain developers.
Premier Doug Ford's office says the government has taken several steps to strengthen record-keeping practices and will continue to comply with legal obligations.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 12, 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
8 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
B.C. legislator shocked by American senator's ‘nonsense' pitch to join U.S.
VICTORIA – A British Columbia legislator says he went from 'disappointed' to 'enraged' after receiving a pitch from a Republican state senator for Canada's four western provinces to join the United States. Brennan Day, with the Opposition B.C. Conservative Party, says his office had to first confirm the authenticity of the 'nonsense' letter from Maine Sen. Joseph Martin after receiving it last week. He says the most shocking part of the letter was its attack on Canadian institutions, like the Charter of Rights, federalism, multiculturalism, and the dismissal of those cornerstones as 'political baggage.' Day says Martin needs to look at 'how heavy his luggage' is, and his party is 'hauling around wheeled trunks' of baggage in the United States where the Constitution is 'being torn up by Republicans.' Day says it's not clear why Martin wrote him, but suspects it might be 'some of the rhetoric' coming out of Alberta that led him to believe British Columbians would also be interested. Martin's pitch says if B.C., Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba were to seek admission to the United States, it must be as full American states. He says entry would not be in the form of annexation, but adoption, and the welcoming home of 'kindred spirits who were born under a different flag.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 15, 2025.
Global News
9 hours ago
- Global News
Doug Ford hands cabinet ministers mandate letters months after winning snap election
Months after winning a third consecutive majority mandate under a promise to 'protect Ontario' from economic war with the United States, Ontario Premier Doug Ford has outlined how he expects his inner circle to deliver the pledge. Multiple sources confirmed to Global News that mandate letters were finally delivered to cabinet ministers this week, giving each member of Ford's top team specific instructions. The wait for mandate letters meant ministers did not have codified instructions during the first sitting of the new parliament, leaving some smaller departments struggling with a lack of legislative direction. Ford's cabinet was sworn in in mid-March and, several sources told Global News, had hoped to use the summer to create policy road maps based on the mandate letters, which did not arrive. Sources previously said a combination of the snap February election, the federal ballot and staffing changes in the premier's policy team had all delayed the letters. Story continues below advertisement A spokesperson for the premier's office said the ongoing trade war with the United States is at the centre of the latest mandate letters. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'As we navigate an economic crisis that threatens the livelihood of hundreds of thousands of workers, our mandate letters provide the roadmap for long-term implementation of our plan to protect Ontario,' they wrote in a statement. 'The people elected our government with a historic third majority, and we will be relentless in building critical infrastructure, keeping costs low, unlocking interprovincial free trade, supporting Ontario-made products, and cracking down on crime.' Previous mandate letters The mandate letters are a traditional moment in Canadian politics. Written by the head of a government to cabinet members, they lay out the aims and goals of their department. Until 2018, it was traditional for governments to use them as a public platform to signal intent. Story continues below advertisement When Ford took office, however, he opted not to make his mandate letters public. That resulted in a legal battle which went all the way to the Supreme Court, which last year sided with Ford and confirmed he could keep them secret. The 2018 letters, obtained exclusively by Global News, outlined the premier's vision for Ontario, how cabinet members were expected to conduct themselves, and specific policy measures ministries were expected to pursue. They offered a number of bullet-point policy items — some of which were outlined in the party's election platform, along with other policies never revealed to voters. Andrew Sidnell, who once served as Ford's deputy chief of staff and head of policy in the premier's office, told Ontario's Integrity Commissioner that not all the measures outlined in the mandate letter were acted on and that some could be dropped after internal negotiations. 'You go back and forth, and then some of those things eventually are either too ambitious or they get cut off the list for impracticality reasons. Or, they do move forward and the minister will come back with a plan to actually implement them,' Sidnell told the Integrity Commissioner. In 2022, for example, then-housing minister Steve Clark was instructed to look for 'swaps, expansions, contractions' in Ontario's Greenbelt — a directive that eventually led to a scandal for the government.
Toronto Sun
10 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
EDITORIAL: Two-tier sentencing makes zero sense
Conservative MP Michelle Rempel Garner holds a news conference in Ottawa, Friday, Feb.21, 2025. Photo by Adrian Wyld / The Canadian Press Once upon a time in Canada, non-citizens who broke the law were deported. No muss, no fuss. If you can't live within our laws and show contempt for this country, you're gone. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account All that's changed. As Conservative immigration critic Michelle Rempel Garner points out, now if you're a non-citizen and you break the law, your citizenship status will be taken into consideration — so you get a lighter sentence than someone who's a Canadian citizen. Rempel Garner points to a recent case in which a permanent resident was given a conditional sentence after being convicted of trying to buy sexual services from a 15-year-old. The judge justified the lighter sentence because a tougher penalty would have hindered the offender and his wife from obtaining Canadian citizenship. This is only the most recent example. 'Another non-citizen, in Canada on a visitor's permit, was convicted twice of groping an 18-year-old woman's genitals at a bar, yet received a discharge to avoid a permanent criminal record and to allow for an appeal of their deportation,' Rempel Garner told a news conference this week. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The practice is the result of a 2013 Supreme Court ruling in an Alberta case, where a man, Hoang Anh Pham, was given a two-year sentence for trafficking marijuana, which jeopardized his immigration status. Had he been given a sentence of two years less a day, that status would not have been impacted. The Supreme Court ruled in his favour and said the trial and appeals judges erred in not taking this into consideration. The Supreme Court said the lesser sentence wasn't unusual for such an offence. It said such considerations, which it called 'collateral immigration consequences,' should be examined during sentencing. The court made it clear, though, that those consequences should not automatically influence the sentencing. Since then, it would appear lower court judges have ignored that caveat and have instead erred on the side of leniency to those who are non-citizens. Citizenship in this country is a privilege. The bedrock of a civil society is respect for the law. Our courts should show a little common sense when handing down sentences. We cannot have two-tier justice — one lenient sentence for non-citizens and tougher jail time for Canadians. Toronto & GTA Ontario Celebrity Golf Other Sports
