logo
California can never win a race to the bottom with Trump on redistricting

California can never win a race to the bottom with Trump on redistricting

If California's ruling Democrats were wise, they'd use this moment to introduce reforms that would enhance democracy — and even boost Republican representation in California's Legislature and congressional delegation.
But they're not that smart. Instead, Gov. Gavin Newsom is leading his state and the national Democratic Party into a contest of anti-democratic tactics with MAGA Republicans. For starters, this is a competition over which side can best exploit the legislative redistricting process to lock up Congressional seats in the 2026 election.
That's a contest that Californians simply can't win. We're never going to out-autocrat or out-authoritarian President Donald Trump.
Why would we ever want to?
Newsom answers that question with what he and other Democrats claim is hard-headed realism. Trump is trying to gerrymander Texas and GOP states to steal U.S. House seats and retain MAGA control of Congress. So, Newsom says, blue states must 'fight fire with fire' and gerrymander to steal additional seats of their own.
Fighting Trump is righteous, but this strategy is a loser, for several reasons.
The first is practical: It won't work. Republicans control more state legislatures (28) than Democrats (18), and thus have more opportunities to gerrymander more seats in their favor. Escalating the gerrymandering fight will produce more Democratic losses.
Second, it's legally and constitutionally risky. California's independent citizens redistricting commission, which draws lines based on keeping communities together (rather than politics), was approved by voters and is popular. Newsom, by gerrymandering, would replace the commission's map with legally dubious ones. California's own courts could find Newsom's move unconstitutional. And California voters could block the maps in a special election — and then punish the Democrats for their anti-democratic behavior in the 2026 election.
Even worse, using anti-democratic tactics against Trump validates his authoritarianism. The fight against Trump shouldn't become just another partisan battle between Democrats and Republicans. Instead, it must be framed as a fight between democratic self-government and a would-be dictator.
To win that contest, California must demonstrate that it is a leader — a major global actor, relentlessly committed to freedom and democracy, despite attacks from the fascist American government. But Newsom's gerrymandering gambit diminishes California, making us just another large state with a dominant political party using its might to determine election outcomes.
So, what should California do instead?
The only way to beat the awful MAGA authoritarians is by enhancing democracy — and showing a commitment to empowering the people, even if it brings your side political costs. A true democracy is one where even political losers feel like winners.
Which is why Newsom and state leaders should make California more democratic, not less. And they should demonstrate that with reforms that would give Republicans more democratic representation in California.
First, California and its Democrats should enact proportional representation, the fairest way to divide up legislative seats. Right now, Republicans get about 40% of the votes for Congress and the Legislature in California, but they have less than one-quarter of the representatives. That's because the current winner-take-all system awards each legislative district only one representative.
A proportional system would allocate representation based on voting percentage and would likely give the GOP 40% of the seats, nearly doubling the percentage of today's Republican minorities in the Legislature and Congress.
National Democrats would go crazy at boosting Republicans. But so what? National Democrats never get strategy right. Right now, turning the other cheek — enhancing democracy instead of engaging in anti-democratic war — would be the real gangster move.
It would awaken a country all too accustomed to endless political escalations. And it would demonstrate that California, at least, is dedicated to fighting for democratic representation for all. Even some Republicans would be impressed and appreciative.
Second, California should combine proportional representation with the elimination of rules that make it hard for smaller political parties to form and compete in politics. This change would reduce the power of MAGA because Republicans who don't like Trump could form separate parties.
Dividing Californians into more parties would inspire political coalition-making. And it would avoid a war over redistricting that distracts from the righteous fights we need to have.
While Democratic politicians obsess about gerrymandering and their own seats, they are failing to provide Californians the protections we need right now.
The state has done far too little to mitigate against Trump's budget cuts and dismantling of federal agencies. California law enforcement is failing to investigate and hold accountable the federal agents acting as secret police on our streets.
When will California leaders go on offense? Why aren't we taking the fiscal fight to Trump by seizing federal property or organizing tax strikes? Where are the initiatives to establish legal autonomy or even nationhood for California?
Joe Mathews writes the Connecting California column for Zócalo Public Square.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Scoop ... Inside Jeffries' donor retreat
Scoop ... Inside Jeffries' donor retreat

Axios

time3 minutes ago

  • Axios

Scoop ... Inside Jeffries' donor retreat

Many Democrats left House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries' annual California fundraising event last week convinced Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear is running for president, according to four attendees. 🍷 Jeffries' event at the luxury Lodge at Torrey Pines is the successor to Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi's wine-soaked summer donor party in Napa, California. Why it matters: Democrats lapped up the message from the two-term governor, who told big dollar donors and vulnerable House Dems that the key to winning over Trump voters is staying true to your values. Beshear's biggest applause line came when he explained why he vetoed a bill in 2023, when he was up for reelection, that restricted some medical care and bathroom use for transgender people. Beshear called it"the nastiest anti-trans bills in the nation — and I vetoed it," according to attendees. "There are some things worth losing over," Beshear, who went on to win by five percentage points, said. Zoom out: Democrats are eager to find candidates — and messages — that they think will appeal to voters in red and blue states. Both Beshear and Jeffries spoke of the importance of authenticity and using words that voters actually use. Don't be afraid to say "addiction," Beshear said, when discussing the opioid crisis. Zoom in: In both public and private conversations, the looming mid-cycle redistricting battle was frequently discussed. Democrats promised their donors that they would respond to GOP gerrymander efforts. "We are working on an aggressive plan to make sure we fight fire with fire on redistricting," according to a member of Congress in attendance. In addition to Jeffries, House Minority Whip Katherine Clark and Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar attended, along with roughly a dozen "Frontline" lawmakers and some California members as well. After Beshear's Friday night fireside chat with Jeffries, donors got a political update from DCCC Chair Suzan DelBene and Mike Smith, the president of the House Majority PAC, which can accept unlimited donations. Jared Bernstein, Biden's former chair of the Council of Economic Advisers and Wally Adeyemo, Biden's deputy treasury secretary, provided an economic overview. Jake Sullivan, Biden's national security adviser, and Susan Rice, one of his domestic policy advisers, discussed foreign affairs and immigration.

Spicy Senate fight
Spicy Senate fight

Axios

time3 minutes ago

  • Axios

Spicy Senate fight

President Trump has added an unsolicited, high-profile confirmation fight to the Senate's plate when they're back from August recess. Why it matters: With a 140+ person backlog on civilian confirmations, Senate Republicans left Washington vowing to fast-track the rules. Senate GOP leaders told senators to be ready to move as soon as they return to D.C. in September, sources familiar tell us. Senators have suggested everything from shorter debate time to allowing more nominees to be voted on en bloc. 🌶 But the newest nominee's a doozy: Trump said yesterday he'll nominate Heritage Foundation economist E.J. Antoni to lead the Bureau of Labor Statistics after he fired Erika McEntarfer. Zoom in: Antoni's confirmation process will first have to go through the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) committee which is chaired by Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) Cassidy called McEntarfer's removal"understandable," and he had previously demanded answers as to why BLS's jobs reports were inaccurate. He's also up for re-election next year. But HELP includes frequent Trump critics: Sens. Susan Collins (R-Me.) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska). "BLS's years-long failure to produce reliable data — especially when that data has broad market-moving implications — is unacceptable," a Cassidy spokesperson told Axios. "Cassidy looks forward to meeting with Dr. Antoni to discuss how he will accomplish this."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store