Bill establishing Indiana residency for tax assessment boards passes House
Senate Bill 187, authored by State Sen. Dan Dernulc, R-Highland, states the term of anyone serving on county PTABOA who isn't an Indiana resident will expire July 1. The fiscal body, which is the council in Lake County, would then be required to appoint a new member to finish out the member's term.
The bill maintains Indiana's current PTABOA law that states a member has to be at least 18 years old and be 'knowledgeable in the valuation of property.' The bill also maintains that a majority of the members must have the certification of a level two or level three assessor-appraiser.
The bill was amended in the Senate Local Government Committee to include language State Sen. Greg Taylor, D-Indianapolis, proposed to ensure that the PTABOA member lives in Indiana throughout his or her four-year term.
Dernulc said he drafted the bill after learning Cook County Board of Review commissioner and Lake County PTABOA member Samantha Steele was arrested for driving under the influence in Chicago late last year.
Steele wasn't reappointed to her seat and left the PTABOA board in early January, said Lake County Assessor and PTABOA secretary LaTonya Spearman. The Board of Commissioners appointed Warren Reeder, a local realtor, she said.
Steele had served on the Lake County PTABOA since 2020, Spearman said. Steele declined to comment on her leaving the PTABOA board.
In her Cook County Board of Review biography, Steele states she is a level three assessor and appraiser with more than 15 years of experience in property valuations.
Dernulc said Monday that 'the person that this started with' had the qualifications to serve on the PTABOA, but he felt the board members should live in Indiana.
'I just want Hoosiers to be in these positions,' Dernulc said.
Senate Bill 187 passed 90-0 out of the House Monday.
Lake County Councilman Ted Bilski, D-Hobart, previously said conceptually the PTABOA bill makes sense, and he supports it. The members of the board should live in the community they are serving, he said.
But Bilski said he hopes the bill doesn't make it more difficult to find PTABOA members because it's not always easy to find level two or level three assessor-appraisers.
'(The bill) makes sense. I have no issues with it. I hope it doesn't impede our ability to fill the board,' Bilski said.
Lake County Council President Christine Cid, D-East Chicago, previously said she told Dernulc she supports the bill. Cid said the county uses a state website to find level two and level three assessors, so it would be easy to find qualified people who live in the county or state that could serve on the PTABOA.
'I believe there are plenty of qualified people here, not just in Lake County but in Indiana, that could serve,' Cid said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
8 minutes ago
- The Hill
Newsom promises to ‘fight fire with fire,' escalates anti-democratic war
California Gov. Gavin Newsom made a pretty major announcement yesterday, taking his latest stance to fight back against Republicans' mid-decade redistricting plans in Texas and beyond. This move comes as Republicans in Texas — with President Donald Trump's backing — are pursuing a new congressional map that could give them as many as five more House seats. And Newsom's response? He's leaning into some signature California swag: 'I know they say 'Don't mess with Texas.' Well, don't mess with the great Golden State.' He's calling it the 'Election Rigging Response Act,' a proposal that would let California Democrats bypass the state's independent redistricting commission and redraw maps more favorable to their own party. Newsom says it's a direct response to Republican moves. 'I'm grateful to all of the remarkable leaders that have stepped up this unifying effort, and we'll be asking for the people on the November 4th special election, coinciding with a lot of local municipal elections, to provide a temporary pathway for congressional maps. We will affirm our commitment to the state independent redistricting after the 2030 census, but we're asking the voters for their consent to do midterm redistricting.' Here's my take: I am not a fan of gerrymandering from either side. It's anti-democratic, plain and simple. If both red states and blue states start stealing congressional seats through partisan map-making, we all lose. In an ideal world, Texas would wait until the next census and adopt independent redistricting committees — and California would resist the temptation to 'fight fire with fire.' Because in this case, the 'fire' is actually a direct hit to one of democracy's core values: voting equality. And if you burn that down, you're doing the work of democracy's enemies for them. When both political parties start disenfranchising voters to push their policies without actually earning our votes, the only winners are the people rich enough to buy politicians' loyalty. But while I think Newsom's redistricting plan is wrong, I have to admit — the man is on a roll. He's trolling Trump like it's his new hobby, even calling him 'DONALD 'TACO' TRUMP' in all caps on X. The nickname caught fire a few months ago, with Jeanine Pirro even chuckling on air when a reporter brought it up to the former president. Take a look — I guess I'm not the only one who thinks it's funny! At the end of the day, my hope is simple: Republicans stick with the current Texas maps, Democrats back off the retaliation, and Gov. Newsom keeps going just enough to keep us all entertained — because clearly, he's found his spotlight.
The Hill
8 minutes ago
- The Hill
Abbott announces second special session as Texas Democrats plan return
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) announced a second special session on Friday after state lawmakers gaveled out their first special session earlier that morning amid the ongoing redistricting fight. 'Delinquent House Democrats ran away from their responsibility to pass crucial legislation to benefit the lives of Texans,' Abbott said in a statement. 'Numerous other bills to cut property taxes, support human trafficking survivors, eliminate the STAAR test, establish commonsense THC regulations, and many others have all been brought to a halt because because Democrats refuse to show up for work,' he explained. 'We will not back down from this fight. That's why I am calling them back today to finish the job. I will continue to use all necessary tools to ensure Texas delivers results for Texans.' The special session, which is expected to begin around 1 p.m. ET, includes redistricting on its agenda. Texas Democrats are expected to return to the state soon, noting that two conditions had to be met before arriving back to the Lone Star State: Texas Republicans adjourning their first special session and California's introduction of new congressional lines aimed at neutralizing the expected gains from Texas' proposed House map.
Axios
8 minutes ago
- Axios
Democrats introduce measure to terminate Trump's D.C. takeover
A group of House and Senate Democrats on Friday introduced a joint resolution that would put an end to President Trump's control of the city's police force. Why it matters: The measure is an extreme long-shot, but it is a show of strong Democratic opposition to a move that many in the party say amounts to a chilling and unprecedented power-grab. Axios was first to report on Wednesday that Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), the ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, planned to introduce a measure terminating the crime emergency. Driving the news: Raskin is introducing the resolution along with Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.), House Oversight Committee ranking member Robert Garcia (D-Calif.), and Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.). The legislation would end the "crime emergency" that Trump declared under the Home Rule Act, which allowed him to temporarily federalize the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department. The resolution argues that Trump "has failed to identify special conditions of an emergency nature" and isn't authorized to federalize the MPD under the Home Rule Act — only direct it to assist federal law enforcement. It also notes that violent crime in D.C. has "declined for the past two years and currently stands at a 30-year low," and points to the federal government recently shortchanging the city's budget by $1 billion. What they're saying: "Trump has made clear that his efforts in D.C. ... are part of a broader plan to militarize and federalize the streets of cities around America whose citizens voted against him," Raskin said in a statement. "In any event, there is no federal emergency justifying such a takeover even if Congress sought to use its lawmaking power to effectuate it," he added. Holmes Norton, D.C.'s non-voting delegate to Congress, said in a statement: "No emergency exists in D.C. that the president did not create himself, and he is not using the D.C. Police for federal purposes, as required by law." A White House spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Reality check: The lawmakers have no way to force the joint resolution to a vote in the House or Senate, and the Republicans who control both chambers are highly unlikely to put it to a vote. Congress is also out of session until next month, meaning the deployment and D.C. police takeover would last at least several weeks. Yes, but: The Senate's 60-vote threshold will soon be an obstacle to Trump if he seeks to maintain his control of the D.C. police after a month, as he will need Democratic support for a joint resolution to extend the emergency.
