Hamas says it will release US hostage Edan Alexander from Gaza
Administration officials did not respond to requests for comment about its contacts with Hamas or the expected release.
In a social media post late Sunday, Vice-President JD Vance said: 'Pray that Hamas follows through and Edan gets to come home.' He credited Witkoff, who is also negotiating an end to the Ukraine-Russia war and nuclear talks between the United States and Iran, with 'another triumph'.
The pending release comes as Trump prepares to travel this week to the Persian Gulf. But he has pointedly not included Israel on his itinerary amid widespread reports that he has grown increasingly frustrated with Netanyahu's plans to continue and expand the war with Gaza that Trump vowed he would end in short order after assuming the presidency.
Alexander, 21, a dual US-Israeli citizen and a member of the Israel Defense Forces, was among around 250 hostages taken by Hamas during its October 7, 2023, attack inside southern Israel in which more than 1200 people, mostly Israelis, were killed. Since then, 145 have been freed or released during two brief ceasefires in exchange for Israeli-held Palestinian prisoners. Eighty-two have been killed, with up to 24 thought to still be alive, including Alexander.
The fate of the hostages has been an increasingly contentious one inside Israel, where large demonstrations, many led by families of released hostages and those still held, have demanded that Netanyahu bring an end to the war lest those remaining be killed as expanded military operations begin. Netanyahu has said that while rescuing the hostages remains his goal, Hamas must be destroyed inside Gaza.
Negotiations have recently come to a standstill over Hamas' insistence that any ceasefire include a US-backed Israeli pledge to permanently end the war, and Israel's refusal. Israel has said that all hostages must be immediately released.
Since the collapse of the most recent ceasefire in March, negotiated by the United States, with Qatar and Egypt as mediators, Israel has resumed attacks in Gaza with increasing intensity. For the past two months, it has imposed a blockade on the entry of food, water, fuel and other humanitarian aid into the enclave, claiming the previous aid shipments were stolen by Hamas, a charge that humanitarian organisations have disputed. The United Nations has said that many of Gaza's more than 2 million people are on the verge of starvation.
In a statement on Monday, Trump said that the people in Gaza 'are starving and we are going to help them get some food'. The administration has endorsed, and credited as a Trump initiative, an Israeli-backed plan to deliver aid to vetted Palestinians in IDF-designated zones in southern Gaza. The United Nations and most of the humanitarian agencies operating inside Gaza have refused to participate on grounds that it is inadequate, unworkable and violates their neutrality and international law.
The Hamas statement released on Sunday by Khalil al-Hayya, the head of the group's negotiating team, said that during contacts with the United States in recent days, 'the movement has expressed a high degree of positivity, and the release of Israeli soldier Edan Alexander … will be among the steps taken toward achieving a ceasefire, reopening the crossings, and allowing aid and relief to reach our people in the Gaza Strip'.
It 'affirms' readiness by Hamas to 'immediately begin intensive negotiations and exert serious efforts to reach a final agreement to end the war, exchange prisoners by mutual consent, and ensure the administration' of Gaza 'by an independent and professional body'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
19 minutes ago
- Otago Daily Times
US-China trade truce back on track, Trump says
A deal getting the fragile truce in the US-China trade war back on track is done, US President Donald Trump said, after negotiators from Washington and Beijing agreed on a framework covering tariff rates. The deal also removes Chinese export restrictions on rare earth minerals and allows Chinese students access to American universities. Trump took to his social media platform to offer some of the first details to emerge from two days of marathon talks held in London that had, in the words of US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, put "meat on the bones" of an agreement reached last month in Geneva to ease bilateral retaliatory tariffs that had reached crushing triple-digit levels. "Our deal with China is done, subject to final approval with President Xi and me," Trump said on the Truth Social platform. "Full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China. Likewise, we will provide to China what was agreed to, including Chinese students using our colleges and universities (which has always been good with me!). We are getting a total of 55% tariffs, China is getting 10%." A White House official said the 55% represents the sum of a baseline 10% "reciprocal" tariff Trump has imposed on goods imported from nearly all US trading partners; 20% on all Chinese imports because of punitive measures Trump has imposed on China, Mexico and Canada associated with his accusation that the three facilitate the flow of the opioid fentanyl into the US; and finally pre-existing 25% levies on imports from China that were put in place during Trump's first term in the White House. Lutnick said the 55% rate for Chinese imports is now fixed and unalterable. Asked on Wednesday on CNBC if the tariff levels on China would not change, he said: "You can definitely say that." Still, many specifics of the deal and details for how it would be implemented remain unclear. China's commerce ministry did not immediately reply to a request for comment and more information. Framework for a deal Officials from the two superpowers had gathered at a rushed meeting in London starting on Monday following a call last week between Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping that broke a standoff that had developed just weeks after a preliminary deal reached in Geneva that had defused their trade war. The Geneva deal had faltered over China's continued curbs on critical minerals exports, prompting the Trump administration to respond with export controls preventing shipments of semiconductor design software, aircraft and other goods to China. Lutnick said the agreement reached in London would remove restrictions on Chinese exports of rare earth minerals and magnets and some of the recent US export restrictions "in a balanced way," but did not provide details after the talks concluded . "We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus and the call between the two presidents," Lutnick said, adding that both sides will now return to present the framework to their respective presidents for approvals. "And if that is approved, we will then implement the framework," he said. In a separate briefing, China's Vice Commerce Minister Li Chenggang also said a trade framework had been reached in principle that would be taken back to US and Chinese leaders. 'BACK TO SQUARE ONE' Trump's shifting tariff policies have roiled global markets, sparked congestion and confusion in major ports, and cost companies tens of billions of dollars in lost sales and higher costs. US stocks drifted lower on Wednesday but have recouped most of the losses suffered earlier in the spring during Trump's wave of tariff announcements. "It's a done deal, according to President Trump, but we haven't seen any details, which is why I think the market is not reacting to it yet. As with just about everything, the devil is in the details," said Oliver Pursche, senior vice president and adviser at Wealthspire Advisors in Westport, Connecticut. The World Bank on Tuesday slashed its global growth forecast for 2025 by four-tenths of a percentage point to 2.3%, saying higher tariffs and heightened uncertainty posed a "significant headwind" for nearly all economies. The US-China deal may keep the Geneva agreement from unravelling over duelling export controls, but does little to resolve deep differences over Trump's unilateral tariffs and longstanding US complaints about China's state-led, export-driven economic model. "If China will course correct by upholding its end of the initial trade agreement we outlined in Geneva - and I believe after our talks in London, they will - then the rebalancing of the world' largest economies is possible," Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told members of Congress on Wednesday after returning from the London talks overnight. The two sides left Geneva with fundamentally different views of the terms of that agreement and needed to be more specific on required actions, said Josh Lipsky, senior director of the Atlantic Council's GeoEconomics Center in Washington. "They are back to square one, but that's much better than square zero," Lipsky added. It was not immediately clear from Trump's comments where things stood regarding the timeline for a more comprehensive deal that had been reached last month in Geneva. There, the two sides set August 10 as the deadline to negotiate a more comprehensive agreement to ease trade tensions, or tariff rates would snap back from about 30% to 145% on the US side and from 10% to 125% on the Chinese side. (Reporting by Doina Chiacu in Washington and Alistair Smout in London; Additional reporting by David Milliken and William James in London and Sachin Ravikumar; Ethan Wang, Shi Bu, Yuhan Lin and Alessandro Diviggiano in Beijing; Caroline Valetkevitch in New York; Writing by David Lawder, Kate Holton and Liz Lee; Editing by Lincoln Feast and Paul Simao)
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Mass arrests as protests continue in LA
Los Angeles police have made mass arrests after a partial curfew was imposed as protests against president Trump's immigration policies continue. Correspondent Toni Waterman spoke to Corin Dann. Tags: To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
Otago Daily Times
5 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
War worries keep Europe on alert
"There is a clear, present risk, particularly as Vladimir Putin does see himself as being at war with the West. The homeland is again (in peril) ... Air and missile attacks will potentially cause civilian casualties (in the United Kingdom) in very large numbers." Therefore, concludes General Sir Richard Barrons, the UK needs to bring back air raid sirens and air raid drills. I'm not making this up. Barrons, a former Deputy Chief of the Defence Staff who retired from the British Army in 2016, is not just an ageing military fantasist longing to relive the Blitz he was too young to experience first time around. He co-wrote the British government's Strategic Defence Review, published last week, and the government adopted it wholesale. It's not just the UK. In only four months the Nato countries of Europe have managed to talk themselves into the belief that their continent is on the brink of war. Almost the entire Russian army has been bogged down in Ukraine for three years and there is no other military threat in sight, yet the rhetoric suggests that Armageddon is just around the corner. This is yet another consequence of that highly infectious disease, Trump Derangement Syndrome. The American president's penchant for making random radical comments, often just for the hell of it, has a way of panicking other countries into making policy decisions that are premature or just plain wrong. For example, the European members of Nato are now convinced that the United States is cancelling its eight-decade commitment to the defence of Europe. In particular they think that the US is ending its guarantee of nuclear retaliation against a Russian attack, which enabled all of them (except Britain and France) to avoid getting nuclear weapons of their own. They are right to be concerned about all that, because that is certainly being considered by some factions in the Trump circus. But it is far too early to base policy on these concerns, because Trump himself has no idea where he is going with all this. Could the United States end up in a de facto alliance with Russia when the dance ends (or at least pauses for a while)? Unlikely but possible, given Trump's highly personalistic style and his bizarre but undeniably very close relationship with the Russian leader. What would become of the existing Russian-Chinese alliance in such a case? Hard to say, but Putin might prefer an American alliance that would deliver Ukraine into Russia's hands. That would be a more equal partnership (assuming continuing American decline) than Russia's current precarious alliance with a Chinese giant that has aspirations on Russian territory. Does that then leave China free to join with Europe and the more or less free-trading countries of Asia in an effort to preserve or restore the rules-based, law-abiding world order that is under attack by Russia and the United States? The possible permutations and combinations are almost endless. It could even all end up back where it started, with Nato's transatlantic dimension intact including the US nuclear guarantee for Europe. After all, Trump's ambassador to Nato, Matthew Whitaker, is demanding that all Nato members start spending 5% of their GDP on defence. (The United States itself only spends 3.4%.) So might Trump really want a powerful Nato in Europe in his moments of clarity (assuming he has some), or is he just trying to sucker America's trade rivals in Europe into weakening themselves by overspending on defence? It's best not to overthink these alternative futures, and not to jump to conclusions too fast. It is unfortunately true that flurries of last-minute changes in alliances often happen just before the great powers go into a great war, but that is another reason not to rush into radical changes now. This will require a high tolerance for make-believe on the part of Europe, but wait-and-see is probably the Continent's least bad strategy for the time being. The European members of Nato should do everything possible to sustain Ukraine's resistance even when Trump cuts it off again, and rebuild their own defensive capabilities as fast as possible in case Trump does take the Russian option. But there's no need to practise bleeding, as the soldiers say: try to sustain the fiction of a united Nato as long as possible. And if you're in need of consolation as the talk of war swamps the news, remember that the only genuinely revisionist great power at the moment is Russia. People will tell you China is revisionist too, but that is untrue apart from Taiwan. Beijing believes it can overtake the United States by economic means alone and with Trump's help it may be right. • Gwynne Dyer is an independent London journalist
