
Republicans worry Medicaid cuts would hurt their communities, poll finds
More than 4 in 10 Republicans worried significant cuts to Medicaid would hurt health-care providers in their communities and lead to people losing insurance, according to a KFF poll released Friday.
The findings illustrate the political perils of upending the public health insurance program as Senate Republicans feud over Medicaid cuts. As they face pressure to slash spending to finance President Donald Trump's sweeping tax and immigration legislation, they risk alienating their own supporters who depend on the program.
While most Medicaid enrollees identified as Democrats or independents, 27 percent said they are Republican, including 19 percent who identified as supporters of Trump's Make America Great Again movement.
About 3 in 4 GOP Medicaid recipients were worried federal cuts to the program would hurt their ability to receive and pay for health care for themselves and their families, the poll found.
Those concerns are not limited to people enrolled in the program. Nearly a third of all Republicans and 26 percent of MAGA Republicans had the same worries about their own access to health care if Medicaid is cut, the survey showed.
While Democrats and independents were far more likely to express concerns, the level of worry among Republicans reflects Medicaid's appeal across party lines.
'Medicaid is really a popular program, and a large majority of Americans do not want to see decreases in spending,' said Liz Hamel, director of public opinion and survey research at KFF, a health policy research organization. 'These findings reflect that many people, whether or not they rely on Medicaid, see it as vital to their communities.'
Medicaid is the nation's largest public health insurer, serving poor families, people with disabilities and nursing home residents, among others. It covers around one in five Americans, many of them in states and districts represented by GOP lawmakers. It also provides a crucial line of revenue for health-care providers such as rural hospitals.
Half of rural adults, including 37 percent of rural Republicans, were worried the cuts could affect their access to care, the poll found. They were even more worried about health care in their communities. Almost every Democrat and half of Republicans in rural areas worried Medicaid cuts would negatively impact their local hospitals, nursing homes and other providers.
Edwin Park, a health policy researcher at Georgetown University's McCourt School of Public Policy, said those findings about rural concerns are not surprising.
'We've done research showing that both children and non-elderly adults in rural communities disproportionately rely on Medicaid,' he said. 'And these are areas that tend to vote Republican and supported President Trump.'
The poll was conducted May 5 through May 26 and included 2,539 U.S. adults and had a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points. The margin was slightly higher for findings about Republicans.
Senate Republicans wrestled this week over how deeply to cut Medicaid as they strive to pass their own version of a bill to extend Trump's tax cuts and reduce other spending by Independence Day.
The version passed by the House achieves nearly $800 billion in savings, primarily by requiring childless adults with low incomes to prove they are working, limiting a tax used by states to receive increased federal Medicaid funds and canceling new regulations proposed by the Biden administration to streamline enrollment.
About 7.8 million fewer people would be insured within a decade because of Medicaid changes in the House legislation, according to projections from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.
The Senate aims to revise the House legislation, but Republicans are engaged in hot debate over whether to contract or expand the Medicaid cuts.
Senate Republicans, who hold a slim majority, can afford to lose only three of their members if all Democrats oppose the bill as expected. They're already likely to lose the vote of Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky), who has raised concerns about the cost of a bill the CBO estimates would add $3 trillion to the national debt.
Most Republican senators are on board with adding work requirements to Medicaid, a measure polling has found most Americans favor. That includes senators who have expressed the most concern about Medicaid cuts, such as Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Missouri) and Susan Collins (R-Maine).
But there is growing concern around another provision in the House bill aimed at limiting the taxes states impose on hospitals and other Medicaid providers as backdoor way of increasing federal Medicaid payments. States pass the tax back to providers in the form of higher Medicaid payments, which are then partially matched by the federal government.
'I'm concerned about the impact on rural hospitals and how it all would work with a provider tax,' Collins told The Post this week. Hawley said 'it would hurt rural hospitals in my state.'
Sen. Jim Justice (R-West Virginia), whose state has one of the highest Medicaid populations in the country, worried this week about letting provider taxes 'get undermined,' according to Punchbowl News.
And in an April floor speech, Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kansas) said he's focused on making sure 'the hospitals have the capability and the revenues necessary to provide the services the community needs — Medicaid is a component of that.'
Other Republican senators this week defended cuts to Medicaid, arguing the program would still be available to those most in need. Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) sparked an uproar last week after she flippantly replied 'Well, we all are going to die' to a town hall attendee who shouted people would die if they lose Medicaid coverage.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
33 minutes ago
- The Hill
Musk could lose billions of dollars depending on how spat with Trump unfolds
NEW YORK (AP) — The world's richest man could lose billions in his fight with world's most powerful politician. The feud between Elon Musk and Donald Trump could mean Tesla's plans for self-driving cars hit a roadblock, SpaceX flies fewer missions for NASA, Starlink gets fewer overseas satellite contracts and the social media platform X loses advertisers. Maybe, that is. It all depends on Trump's appetite for revenge and how the dispute unfolds. Joked Telemetry Insight auto analyst Sam Abuelsamid, 'Since Trump has no history of retaliating against perceived adversaries, he'll probably just let this pass.' Turning serious, he sees trouble ahead for Musk. 'For someone that rants so much about government pork, all of Elon's businesses are extremely dependent on government largesse, which makes him vulnerable.' Trump and the federal government also stand to lose from a long-running dispute, but not as much as Musk. The dispute comes just a week before a planned test of Tesla's driverless taxis in Austin, Texas, a major event for the company because sales of its EVs are lagging in many markets, and Musk needs a win. Trump can mess things up for Tesla by encouraging federal safety regulators to step in at any sign of trouble for the robotaxis. Even before the war of words broke out on Thursday, the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration requested data on how Musk's driverless, autonomous taxis will perform in low-visibility conditions. That request follows an investigation last year into 2.4 million Teslas equipped with full self-driving software after several accidents, including one that killed a pedestrian. A spokesman for NHTSA said the probe was ongoing and that the agency 'will take any necessary actions to protect road safety.' The Department of Justice has also probed the safety of Tesla cars, but the status of that investigation is unclear. The DOJ did not respond immediately to requests for comment. The promise of a self-driving future led by Tesla inspired shareholders to boost the stock by 50% in the weeks after Musk confirmed the Austin rollout. But on Thursday, the stock plunged more than 14% amid the Trump-Musk standoff. On Friday, it recovered a bit, bouncing back nearly 4%. 'Tesla's recent rise was almost entirely driven by robotaxi enthusiasm,' said Morningstar analyst Seth Goldstein. 'Elon's feud with Trump could be a negative.' One often-overlooked but important part of Tesla's business that could take a hit is its sales of carbon credits. As Musk and Trump were slugging it out Thursday, Republican senators inserted new language into Trump's budget bill that would eliminate fines for gas-powered cars that fall short of fuel economy standards. Tesla has a thriving side business selling 'regulatory credits' to other automakers to make up for their shortfalls. Musk has downplayed the importance of the credits business, but the changes would hurt Tesla as it reels from boycotts of its cars tied to Musk's time working for Trump. Credit sales jumped by a third to $595 million in the first three months of the year even as total revenue slumped. Musk's foray into right-wing politics cost Tesla sales among the environmentally minded consumers who embraced electric cars and led to boycotts of Tesla showrooms. If Musk has indeed ended his close association with Trump, those buyers could come back, but that's far from certain. Meanwhile, one analyst speculated earlier this year that Trump voters in so-called red counties could buy Teslas 'in a meaningful way.' But he's now less hopeful. 'There are more questions than answers following Thursday developments,' TD Cowen's Itay Michaeli wrote in his latest report, 'and it's still too early to determine any lasting impacts.' Michaeli's stock target for Tesla earlier this year was $388. He has since lowered it to $330. Tesla was trading Friday at $300. Tesla did not respond to requests for comment. Trump said Thursday that he could cut government contracts to Musk's rocket company, SpaceX, a massive threat to a company that has received billions of federal dollars. The privately held company that is reportedly worth $350 billion provides launches, sends astronauts into space for NASA and has a contract to send a team from the space agency to the moon next year. But if Musk has a lot to lose, so does the U.S. SpaceX is the only U.S. company capable of transporting crews to and from the space station, using its four-person Dragon capsules. The other alternative is politically dicey: depending wholly on Russia's Soyuz capsules. Musk knew all this when he shot back at Trump that SpaceX would begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft. But it is unclear how serious his threat was. Several hours later — in a reply to another X user — he said he wouldn't do it. A subsidiary of SpaceX, the satellite internet company Starlink, appears to also have benefited from Musk's once-close relationship with the president. Musk announced that Saudi Arabia had approved Starlink for some services during a trip with Trump in the Middle East last month. The company has also won a string of other recent deals in Bangladesh, Pakistan, India and elsewhere as Trump has threatened tariffs. It's not clear how much politics played a role, and how much is pure business. On Friday, The Associated Press confirmed that India had approved a key license to Starlink. At least 40% of India's more than 1.4 billion people have no access to the internet. Big advertisers that fled X after Musk welcomed all manner of conspiracy theories to the social media platform have started to trickle back in recent months, possibly out of fear of a conservative backlash. Musk has called their decision to leave an 'illegal boycott' and sued them, and the Trump administration recently weighed in with a Federal Trade Commission probe into possible coordination among them. Now advertisers may have to worry about a different danger. If Trump sours on X, 'there's a risk that it could again become politically radioactive for major brands,' said Sarah Kreps, a political scientist at Cornell University. She added, though, that an 'exodus isn't obvious, and it would depend heavily on how the conflict escalates, how long it lasts and how it ends.' ___ Associated Press Writer Barbara Ortutay in San Francisco contributed to this report.


Bloomberg
33 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Supreme Court Leaves Intact Ban on High-Capacity Gun Magazines
The US Supreme Court turned away a fresh gun-rights appeal, refusing to question the District of Columbia's ban on large-capacity ammunition-feeding devices. The justices on Friday rejected arguments from four firearms owners who said the ban violates the gun-rights protections in the Constitution's Second Amendment.


Fox News
33 minutes ago
- Fox News
'The Five' touts need for 'transparency' following Biden's doctor being subpoenaed
All times eastern Special Report with Bret Baier Maria Bartiromo's Wall Street FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage MOMENTS AGO: Trump takes questions as Abrego-Garcia faces human trafficking charges