logo
Inflation and interest rates predictions: What it means for your money in 2025

Inflation and interest rates predictions: What it means for your money in 2025

Independent25-02-2025

SPONSORED BY TRADING 212
The Independent Money channel is brought to you by Trading 212.
Hopes of interest rates coming down quickly this year appear to be fading amid rising taxes and economic uncertainty in the UK.
Inflation may no longer be at double digits and the cost of living measure even managed to hit the 2 per cent target last year, which prompted interest rate cuts in August and November.
But despite an interest rate cut in February and the cost of borrowing figure now being at 4.5 per cent, there are concerns that inflation may now be heading the wrong way and further rate cuts could be pushed back.
Is the inflation rate rising?
Inflation measures the cost of goods and services in the UK. This includes everything from your energy bills to your food shop.
It is measured by the consumer prices index (CPI) and calculated by the Office for National Statistics (ONS), which revealed a figure of three per cent for January, up from 2.5 per cent in December.
Laith Khalaf, head of investment analysis at AJ Bell, said: 'Inflation is now one per cent away from target and heading in the wrong direction, and consumers better buckle up for prices to trend higher throughout this year.
'The Bank of England reckons inflation will hit 3.7 per cent in the third quarter, and that's without a potential tariff shock stemming from US trade policy. The chancellor's decision to raise national insurance and the national living wage from April will no doubt feed into the inflationary dynamic.'
Joe Nellis, an economic adviser at accountancy firm MHA, adds that increases in household utility bills will provide an even greater uplift on prices.
He said: 'From April, the national average household water bill will increase by £123 a year to £603, a considerable uptick of 26 per cent, and the cap on energy bills is expected to rise in the same month.' Tuesday's announcement shows the cost for the average household being an additional £9.25 a month for energy.
Craig Rickman, personal finance expert for interactive investor, added: 'The VAT hike on private school fees is already starting to bite, while the employer national insurance increase and national minimum wage rise are set to kick in from April. Many businesses have warned these additional costs will force them to raise prices.'
When will interest rates be cut?
With inflation remaining sticky, experts warn that the Bank of England may be more reluctant about further interest rate cuts.
That is despite the Bank cutting interest rates in February. Rickman said the Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee has plenty to consider when it next meets to set interest rates on 20 March.
He said: 'The Bank has alternated between reductions and holds since it kickstarted the rate-cutting process in August 2024 and after voting to slash the bank rate a couple of weeks ago, it seems this trend will continue with a hold the most likely outcome next month.'
Nicholas Hyett, investment manager at Wealth Club, added: 'Making matters worse is the substantial uptick in core inflation – which strips out food and energy prices and is considered a better measure of domestically generated inflation. With core inflation nearly twice the Bank of England's target we see little chance the Bank starts cutting rates again any time soon.'
Khalaf said the markets are pricing in two further rate cuts this year, but added: 'There are risks to the market's view that rates will move lower throughout this year. At 5.9 per cent, pay growth is high and seems to be on a rising trend, which may be pumped up by the rise in the National Living Wage.
'A strong dollar and trade tariffs could also add to inflationary pressures.'
For these reasons, Khalaf suggests cutting rates remains a risky move.
He said: 'To cut rates in the coming months, the Bank of England would need to do so in the face of what it admits will be rising inflation. Of course, the Bank must look to the longer term when it comes to monetary policy, but cutting rates while inflation is heading in the wrong direction is still a pretty sticky wicket.'
What do higher rates and inflation mean for your money?
Higher inflation could mean interest rates remain at their relatively high levels.
This would be a blow for anyone looking to buy a house or remortgage as mortgage lenders may be reluctant about cutting pricing or offering more competitive deals.
Savers, who have benefited from rates being at 15-year highs, could continue to benefit although many of the best deals have been disappearing in recent months. There are still plenty of savings accounts offering above four per cent, however.
Additionally, higher or rising inflation may eat into your returns.
Dean Butler, managing director for retail direct at Standard Life, said: 'For borrowers and mortgage holders, the prospect of higher-for-longer interest rates will be frustrating.
'However, for savers, an extended period of elevated rates provides an opportunity. Easy-access cash savings deals at or just below five per cent remain available, but as inflation picks up it will more aggressively erode real returns. Shopping around for the best rates remains crucial.'
As inflation races away from the UK's two per cent target, Rickman said it offers a timely reminder to investors and savers to make sure their money is working as hard for them as possible.
He said: 'If inflation outpaces the return you receive, your wealth will erode in real terms. If not kept in check over long periods, this can have a punishing impact on your financial future.
'With tax year end fast approaching, one simple task is to fight inflation to make sure you're using the most of your tax wrappers, such as pensions and ISAs. Paying less is one of the most effective ways to guard against the impact of price rises as it means you get to keep more of any growth and income, helping your money to grow faster."
When investing, your capital is at risk and you may get back less than invested. Past performance doesn't guarantee future results.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cash savers exposed to risky investments by popular Isa providers
Cash savers exposed to risky investments by popular Isa providers

Telegraph

time10 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Cash savers exposed to risky investments by popular Isa providers

Have you or a loved one lost money trading CFDs or other complex financial products? Get in touch at money@ to share your stories. Cash savers attracted by competitive interest rates are being exposed to high-risk investment products by popular Isa providers, experts have warned. Two popular Isa providers, Trading 212 and IG Group, offer a product that results – according to their own research – in the majority of investors losing money. Contract for differences, or CFDs, are complex and highly risky trading products that allow investors to speculate on the price movement of an underlying asset without actually owning it. Traders can also use leverage to boost their potential winnings, but this in turn raises the chances they will lose money. According to trading platform Trading 212, 77pc of its retail customers lose money when trading spread bets with CFDs. IG pegs its own figure at 71pc. Trading 212 is a popular savings and investment app, with its cash Isa and stocks and shares Isa promoted across personal finance websites including MoneySavingExpert and Which?. The app pays 4.35pc interest annually on uninvested cash in its stocks and shares Isa. This figure was 4.6pc until recently, just shy of the top-paying cash Isa at 4.85pc. Trading 212's cash Isa, meanwhile, pays just 4.1pc, meaning its customers are better off keeping their money uninvested in its stocks and shares Isa. Yet savers with a stocks and shares Isa who opt not to invest and solely earn interest on cash may be chided by the following notification: 'Keep your benefits active. We noticed you haven't traded for a while, yet you are still earning interest on your cash. 'We wanted to remind you that your Trading 212 account is primarily an investment account. It's designed for investing, rather than for holding cash as in a traditional savings account.' IG – another trading platform that primarily offers high-risk products such as CFDs – offers a stocks and shares Isa that pays interest of 4.25pc on uninvested cash. Savers that signed up in May could earn a market-busting 8.5pc, but they are forced to trade to earn the cash interest rate. Savers may also be unaware that interest paid on these savings is not necessarily earned in the traditional sense, and comes with fewer protections. Those who opt into earning interest on uninvested cash see their money – at least in part – invested in qualifying money market funds. While these funds are low-risk, cash held within them is not covered by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme, unlike the interest offered for cash Isa savers. Trading 212 customers with a cash or stocks and shares Isa will also frequently see the CFD section of the app when switching between their accounts, or accessing menu screens. Darius McDermott, managing director of Chelsea Financial Services, said: 'Trading 212 has built much of its platform on its cash [Isa] product. You get into the market with one competitive product and then transfer your customers to other kinds of products.' Since IG launched its stocks and shares Isa in 2014, it has seen a 175pc increase in active clients, according to analysis of its data by investment platform Lightyear. Holly Mackay, founder of independent financial platform Boring Money, said: 'Trading 212 [has] had success in attracting and engaging new investors – whether through cash Isas or just better apps and user experience than traditional players. 'This better digital experience combined with very low costs – in some cases no costs at all – has seen [these platforms] add huge numbers of new customers.' In line with Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) rules, if users opt to start trading CFDs in the Trading 212 app, they are warned that '77pc of retail investor accounts lose money when trading with this provider'. Before they can start trading CFDs, users must also answer just five multiple choice questions about the investment product, and disclose whether they have any experience in the area. But these steps can be breezed through quickly, and the platform carries out no other checks to verify whether a customer is a professional with trading experience or not. The FCA's Consumer Duty, which took effect in July 2023, states that firms should aim to continuously address issues that risk causing consumer harm, and must act to deliver good outcomes for retail customers. McDermott said: 'I do not believe that CFDs should be readily available to the majority of retail investors – you should be a professional trader with a high net worth to use them. People who are saving for medium and long-term goals shouldn't be exposed to CFDs.' Mackay added: 'I think we do need to reconsider the disclosures around CFDs and crypto, which are increasingly being offered up alongside much less spicy investment products, but have the potential to go very wrong, very fast.' 'CFDs have their roots in gambling' In April, IG Group completed its acquisition of Freetrade, a popular stocks and shares Isa and investment app, gaining access to the platform's 720,000 customers. Freetrade, like Trading212, is known for its low fees, and is a popular option for retail investors. Freetrade has not previously offered CFDs, and the platform has not hidden its disapproval of such high-risk products in the past. One blog post on the Freetrade website from 2017 warned customers that 'CFDs are hazardous to your wealth'. Another, from 2024, read: 'CFDs have their roots in the UK gambling sector and they are designed for people to take short-term, high-risk bets on price movements in the financial markets. 'Freetrade does not offer CFD margin trading accounts as we believe they do not provide value to investors or encourage the sort of investing habits that usually provide positive financial outcomes over the long term.' A spokesman for Trading 212 said: 'Each product that Trading 212 offers has its own specific target market, i.e. what type of customer we consider the product has been designed for, and how the product will deliver on the customer's expectations. 'In order to ensure those products reach the intended target market, we have created a clear separation between each product type via separate onboarding journeys and distinct accounts. 'Each onboarding journey incorporates specific hurdles, such as risk tolerance, investment objectives, experience, knowledge tests and vulnerability assessments to ensure the customer is aware of the product risks and sufficiently capable, both in knowledge and financial resilience, to accept those risks. 'If a prospective client does not meet the requisite thresholds, they will not be able to use the product. This is in line with the FCA's Consumer Duty.' A spokesman for the FCA said: 'All financial promotions must be fair, clear and not misleading. Trading platforms must make sure that their customers can make well-informed investment decisions by providing appropriate risk warnings.'

Reeves has been captured by Bank of England orthodoxy
Reeves has been captured by Bank of England orthodoxy

Telegraph

time13 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Reeves has been captured by Bank of England orthodoxy

Ahead of her spending review on Wednesday, Chancellor Rachel Reeves faces a set of national accounts drenched in red ink. But Nigel Farage's upstart Reform party has a plan which, at a stroke, will apparently bring about a multibillion-pound improvement, paving the way for higher public spending without more borrowing and even allowing for tax cuts. Richard Tice, Reform's deputy leader, has this weekend written an explosive letter to Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey, accusing the UK's central bank of 'systemic misuse of taxpayers' money ... at a time when the nation's accounts are already under very severe pressure'. Despite the sud den resignation of chairman Zia Yusuf and Labour's victory in last week's Hamilton by-election, Reform has come out fighting. Still leading in most opinion polls, the party has launched a broadside against the financial establishment, publicly claiming the Bank of England 'is unnecessarily wasting tens of billions of pounds of taxpayers' money, whilst enriching City institutions'. Tice's letter to Bailey focuses on the merit of interest payments made on balances held at the Bank of England, resulting from the UK's 15-year-long quantitative easing (QE) programme. The detail behind these issues is understood by just a few – expert policymakers, specialist investors and a handful of overly curious economic commentators. But Reform's now boldly stated policy aim of forcing the Bank of England to stop paying interest to commercial banks on QE reserves, resulting in potential savings of £35bn per year, is not outlandish. I believe it should be taken seriously and openly debated – as do a range of widely respected, politically agnostic economists, including two former deputy governors of the Bank of England. Public sector net borrowing for the financial year ending March 2025 was £151.9bn, a massive £14.6bn above the Office for Budget Responsibility's (OBR) forecast and £20.7bn more than the previous year. With public sector net debt at £2,770bn – equivalent to 97.2pc of GDP, the highest ratio since the early 1960s – the Government is making annual interest payments of £105bn, which is the schools and transport budget combined and almost twice what it spends on defence. But with Reeves facing competing spending demands from all departments and Labour Left-wing activists out to get her, Reform's policy of ending obscure interest payments buried deep in the national accounts, barely recognised and even less widely understood, could unlock serious money – an average of some four times the fast-diminishing £9.9bn of fiscal headroom she has allowed for 2028/29, each and every year for the rest of this parliament. This is why Tice has written this public letter now, piling pressure on a desperately cash-strapped Chancellor who has already pointed to the 'dangers' of curtailing these interest payments, accepting the Bank of England's self-serving arguments against change, just as she swallowed whole the Treasury's long-cherished idea of scrapping of winter fuel payments that has turned out to be politically disastrous. QE was launched in response to the 2008 financial crisis, as the Bank of England 'printed' virtual money to try to revive the UK economy. Threadneedle Street created balances 'ex nihilo', using them to buy government bonds (known as gilts) from investors, mainly commercial banks, in an attempt to drive down borrowing costs. Those banks then parked the cash they received for their gilts back at the Bank of England, helping to stabilise their own balance sheets and the broader financial system, while earning the 'base interest' on those deposits. When rates were just 0.5pc following the financial crisis and 0.1pc during the Covid lockdown, the Bank earned far more on returns from gilts than it paid commercial banks in interest, reaping handsome profits which were duly passed on to the Exchequer. But when QE inevitably led to inflation, interest rates started rising – especially over the past few years, up above 5pc. And that has resulted in big losses on QE balances, which the Government is obliged to indemnify, with some £85.9bn being transferred from the Treasury to the Bank since the end of 2022. Even more controversially, the profits of commercial banks have since then been much higher than before Covid – with some of the same institutions perceived to have helped cause the financial crisis making money years down the line, again at taxpayers' expense, from the very emergency measures designed to clear up the mess. And on top of that, as Tice points out in his letter, the Bank has also been selling its stockpile of gilts back to the market – so-called quantitative tightening (QT) – crystallising billions of pounds of losses for the taxpayer. Again, many serious economists think this is a mistake, with some of the bonds bought during times of genuine distress now being sold at knockdown prices. 'Once again this is a voluntary decision by the Bank of England, that is imposing tens of billions of pounds of unnecessary losses on the taxpayer,' wrote Tice to Governor Bailey. 'QT is also partly responsible for keeping gilt yields higher than they otherwise would be, resulting in even more punitive interest costs, imposing yet more strain on the Government's profit and loss account,' Tice continued. He is right. And, of course, the Bank decided to begin its QT programme just a couple of days before Liz Truss's 'mini-Budget', piling pressure on government debt markets by flooding them with additional gilts, just as a Tory prime minister was launching policies designed to scale back the size of the state. The timing of that decision, at the very least an important contributory factor in the chaos which ensued, is almost never remarked upon. It certainly will be if the political and media class, at Tice's behest, now becomes seriously interested in the inner workings of the Bank of England's balance sheet.

Reform launches attack on the Bank of England
Reform launches attack on the Bank of England

Telegraph

time15 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Reform launches attack on the Bank of England

Reform has launched a blistering attack on the Bank of England for wasting tens of billions of taxpayers' cash on its money-printing programme. Richard Tice, the party's deputy leader, accused Threadneedle Street of prioritising bank profits over the interests of working people as he vowed to order it to stop paying billions of pounds in interest to commercial lenders. In a letter to Andrew Bailey, the Governor of the Bank of England, Mr Tice says the Bank has engaged in 'systemic misuse of taxpayers' money' by paying interest on cash parked at the Bank as well as selling its existing stockpile of government bonds at substantial losses. Reform, which is leading several polls, claims it could save £35bn a year by scrapping interest on central bank reserves, created as part of the Bank's £895bn quantitative easing (QE) programme to boost the economy during the financial crisis and Covid lockdowns. It wants to use this money to help pay for an increase in the tax-free personal allowance to £20,000 and cut corporation tax. Mr Tice said the unwinding of this programme – known as quantitative tightening (QT) – was pushing up borrowing costs and piling pressure on the public finances. 'The Bank of England is unnecessarily wasting tens of billions of pounds of taxpayers' money, whilst enriching City institutions,' the letter says. 'The nation's accounts are already under very severe pressure. QT is also partly responsible for keeping gilt yields higher than they otherwise would be, resulting in even more punitive interest costs, imposing yet more strain on the [public finances].' The remarks put the Bank on a collision course with Reform if the party wins the next election. Mr Bailey has warned that a victory for Reform could lower savings rates or push up borrowing costs for consumers. Commercial banks earn interest on reserves held at the Bank at the base rate. Threadneedle Street made huge profits from QE when interest rates were at record lows of 0.1pc because the returns on the government gilts it bought were far higher than the amount it had to pay in interest on reserves. A total of £123.9bn was generated and sent to the Treasury. However, this rapidly reversed when borrowing costs started to rise, with £85.9bn transferred back from the Treasury to the Bank since the end of 2022. NatWest, Barclays, Lloyds and Santander received more than £9bn in interest on Bank of England reserves in 2023 – a 135pc increase on the previous year, according to the Treasury committee of MPs. The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), the Government's tax and spending watchdog, expects the cumulative lifetime loss to the taxpayer to total £133.7bn – which is bigger than the annual education budget and more than twice what the UK spends on defence. Reform is not alone in its criticism of QT. Former Bank deputy governors including Sir Paul Tucker and Sir Charlie Bean have also suggested changes to how reserves are remunerated. Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, also wrote to Mr Bailey last month to stress that the process of reducing the Bank's stockpile of bonds must provide 'value for money'. However, the Governor has repeatedly warned that ending interest payments on reserves could undermine the Bank's ability to influence the cost of borrowing, while another former policymaker, Gertjan Vlieghe, said such a move would be a 'disaster' akin to a debt default. Mr Tice used the letter to describe the comparison as 'complete nonsense'. He said: 'This money was created out of thin air by the Treasury and Bank of England to lubricate the wheels of the economy at two times of extreme national stress over the last 18 years. 'It did not belong to those City institutions in the first place. It is no coincidence that commercial bank profits have soared as interest rates rose as the Bank of England paid out tens of billions of this voluntary interest. Those institutions cannot believe their luck.' Catherine Mann, a member of the Bank's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) that sets interest rates, has also warned that policymakers must pay closer attention to the impact of QT on financial markets and the wider economy now that it is cutting interest rates. She estimated that QT could raise borrowing costs by almost a quarter of a percentage point. Mr Bailey has repeatedly spoken out against changing the way commercial lenders are compensated for parking their cash at the Bank, warning that it could undermine financial and monetary stability if lenders no longer wished to hold extra buffers at the Bank. In a letter to the Treasury select committee in April, Mr Bailey said: 'Remuneration of reserves is a key component of the Bank's approach to ensuring rate control. Any loss of rate control would undermine the MPC's ability to affect the real economy with its interest rate decisions and could cause significant harm to credibility of monetary policy.' However, Mr Tice denied that Reform would be interfering with the Bank's independence, comparing the Bank's choices to 'extraordinary strategic decisions which amount not to monetary policy but to fiscal policy, costing the taxpayer tens of billions of pounds of losses'. He added: 'The role of elected governments and politicians is to protect taxpayer's money and the broader interests of the electorate. It would be negligent of us to ignore this very significant issue and leave it in the hands of unelected people. Our job is to challenge, scrutinise and question'. A Bank of England spokesman said: 'The Governor set out the Bank's views on the matter in a letter to the Treasury Select Committee.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store