DA Gauteng faces internal strife over Zille's Johannesburg mayoral bid
DA Federal chairperson Helen Zille, is considering contesting for the Johannesburg mayoral chain.
Image: Itumeleng English/ Independent Media
The DA in Gauteng is facing internal divisions as senior members have expressed discontent over Federal Council chairperson Helen Zille's interest in contesting as the DA candidate for the Johannesburg mayoral job ahead of the 2026 local government elections.
With 13 candidates already throwing their hats into the ring, Zille's potential candidacy has sparked debate within the party.
At the weekend, Zille made her intentions known that she was considering contesting the mayoral seat in the Johannesburg metro ahead of the elections.
However, some senior DA members in Gauteng feel that Zille's decision to contest for the mayoral position undermines the party's leadership in the province and in Johannesburg.
"It cannot be that we were responsible for deposing the ANC and then leaders of yesterday want to rein in on our success," said a senior member who spoke on condition of anonymity.
"There is no continuity in this party, and to be honest with you, I'm not the only one who feels this way…We will continue to bleed members if this goes on,' they added.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Another member said Zille's ambition could be compared to the ANC where 'leaders wanted to grow old in positions of power'.
"We have seen this, year in, year out, with the leaders of the ANC not wanting to vacate positions of power. This led to the party's downfall as there were no new ideas. It's sad that we have officials who want to hog power."
However, DA leaders in Gauteng have downplayed concerns over internal divisions as a result of Zille's potential candidacy.
The leader of the DA in Gauteng, Solly Msimanga, said that Zille will not be treated differently and will have to undergo the same application process as everyone else who is interested in applying to be the mayor of Johannesburg.
"The DA's candidate selection is a competitive process," Msimanga said.
"Many people apply, and they will compete with each other. No one will be deployed. The party has a process that will produce an outcome.
'Obviously people in the party have different views, but they will accept the outcome of a fair process in which any DA member is free to compete,' Msimanga said.
According to DA Gauteng chairperson Fred Nel, the preferred candidate is selected through a rigorous process that involves nominations, a screening phase, assignment completion, presentation and questioning, ranking and proposal and the final decision.
Zille did not respond to questions over the division her announcement had created.
In a related development, former City of Johannesburg mayor Mpho Phalatse has ruled out contesting the city's mayoral position ahead of the 2026 local government elections.
Phalatse, who made history in November 2021 as the first woman mayor of Johannesburg, confirmed that she has no intention of returning to the mayoral seat.
"I am not considering making the move," Phalatse stated. "I am still a member of the DA, but my political journey is taking a different path,' she told IOL.
Opposition parties have also weighed in on Zille's potential candidacy, with many expressing skepticism over her ability to unite the city's diverse communities.
In a statement the UmKhonto weSizwe Party (MK Party) rejected Zille's intention to take over the Johannesburg Mayor's seat.
'Let it be known that the MK Party stands ready and capable to rescue the City come the 2026 Local Government Elections,' MKP said.
The party added that it was nonsensical to consider the possibility of a Capetonian resident holding Mayoral capacity in a City that she is alien to.
'We call on the residents of Johannesburg, especially proud black people, to reject the propaganda that the DA does not see colour. As shown in the City of Cape Town, the DA's priorities tend to shift depending on the race of the residents.
'There are more than enough black candidates who can adequately fulfil the mayoral mandate in the City of Johannesburg,' the MK Party said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
20 minutes ago
- IOL News
High court rejects call for South Africa to declare Israel an enemy state
The Gauteng High Court, Pretoria, has dismissed the Society for the Protection of Our Constitution's attempt to force the government to declare Israel its enemy over the ongoing genocide in Palestine. Image: Jacques Naude / Independent Newspapers The Society for the Protection of Our Constitution has failed in its attempt to force the South African government to declare Israel its enemy for its acts of genocide against the people of Palestine. The society approached the Gauteng High Court, Pretoria, on an urgent basis in a bid to compel the government and a dozen other sovereign states to declare Israel an enemy of South Africa. Brazil, Russia, India, China, Norway, Switzerland, Sweden, Denmark, UK, Ireland, and France were among the countries cited by the organisation, which wanted them to take reasonable measures, including using force, to enable the about 3,000 trucks, containing food, medicine, water, vaccines and aid, currently stuck at the border between Egypt and Gaza to gain entry into Gaza. The society wanted the court to direct the South African government to call upon the relevant organs of the United Nations (UN) to take such action under the UN Charter as they consider appropriate to suppress Israel's infliction of acts of genocide upon the people of Palestine. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ In addition, the high court was also asked to direct the Government to take measures to impose economic, cultural, sport, and academic sanctions against Israel. The society wanted the government to direct Israel's ambassador to South Africa to return to his/her place of origin. Denmark filed a notice in which it can raise a point of law only without having to submit an answering affidavit with detailed factual averments, and stated that the society had not complied with the Foreign States Immunities Act and international service requirements. The Act requires that the service of legal process on a foreign state must occur through the Department of International Relations and Cooperation for onward transmission to the Foreign Ministry of the state concerned. In terms of the Act, no direct receipt by the Foreign Ministry by service on an embassy or diplomatic mission is valid, and there is a mandated two-month waiting period after proper service to safeguard foreign states from rushed proceedings. The society later withdrew its application against the 12 states, but Judge Sulet Potterill found that Israel could not be declared an enemy of the South African state if it is not a party to the proceedings. She said the blockage of aid to vulnerable people is horrific and is ongoing, but the society did not set out what triggered its application and failed to set out explicitly the circumstances that render the matter urgent. The judge added that the society also did not set out why it cannot be afforded substantial redress at the hearing in due course. 'Directing the government to impose sanctions against the State of Israel and withdrawing Israel's ambassador is incompetent due to the withdrawal, but also because this would breach the separation of powers principle,' the judge ruled. Judge Potterill said the orders sought by the society were all aspects of foreign policy, which is essentially the function of the executive and will be better served by diplomats than the judiciary. 'A court cannot tell the government to make diplomatic interventions, it is within the prevue of the government,' reads the judgment delivered on June 4. Additionally, the order sought to call upon relevant UN organs was also incompetent as it would be vague and impractical, according to Judge Potterill.
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
One year on, SA's GNU marked by dysfunction and missed opportunities
A year into South Africa's Government of National Unity, political compromise remains elusive, raising concerns about gridlock, infrastructure decay, and coalition fragility amid hopes for economic reform and unity. As South Africa marks the one-year anniversary of its Government of National Unity (GNU), the country stands at a crossroads—again. The 2024 general election failed to produce an outright majority, ushering in a coalition arrangement intended to provide political stability and economic direction. But has it worked? That was the central question of a webinar hosted by the University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN) on Thursday, chaired by Professor Purshottama Reddy, a governance expert. The panel featured UKZN political science lecturer Zakhele Ndlovu, Merchant Africa director Advocate Lavan Gopaul, KwaZulu-Natal Finance MEC Francois Rodgers, and Deputy Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment Narend Singh. Ndlovu noted that despite the hope surrounding the GNU's formation, the country remains mired in indecision and dysfunction. 'Eight months ago, I said we were at a crossroads. Guess what? We still are,' he said. He cited legislative stalemates over key bills - the BELA, NHI and Expropriation Bills - as well as a deadlock on the national budget, as evidence of systemic gridlock. 'All these bills passed without DA support, yet the DA remains in the GNU. Some call it capitulation. I disagree,' said Ndlovu, arguing instead that the DA's legal challenge over the budget reflects profound unease. Still, there have been flashes of unity. Ndlovu referenced a recent White House delegation led by President Cyril Ramaphosa: 'Seeing GNU partners speak with one voice gives us hope.' Ndlovu narrowed his economic critique to two flashpoints: collapsing infrastructure and dysfunctional state-owned enterprises (SOEs). 'Electricity and water outages caused by poor maintenance are hurting business. Rail systems, especially those serving working-class routes like Stanger-Durban, have all but collapsed,' he said. He called the cabinet's portfolio allocations 'misaligned,' pointing to Defence Minister Angie Motshekga's lack of military experience. 'Appointments must be based on competence, not political horse-trading.' beg to differ,' Ndlovu said.
Daily Maverick
2 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Musk wants South African rocket launch site and rare earths
New developments since the Oval Office spectacle cast new light on the potential implications for South Africa's critical minerals, space ambitions, and ongoing trade negotiations. Three weeks ago, behind closed doors at the White House, South African-born billionaire Elon Musk and US President Donald Trump found common ground in a much friendlier, extended lunch meeting with President Cyril Ramaphosa, which followed an earlier public spat in the Oval Office. While that initial encounter set the stage, a flurry of developments since – including a public and very messy fallout between Trump and Musk – has cast new light on the potential implications for South Africa's critical minerals, space ambitions, and ongoing trade negotiations. As previously reported for Business Day, both Musk and Trump talked to the South Africans about South Africa's rare earths and extremely high tariffs on imported cars. Rare earths are used in magnets in just about every hi-tech gadget on Earth, and especially in electric vehicles (EVs). 'You guys are the largest economy on the continent… and you have minerals we need,' Trump said, according to DA leader and Agriculture Minister John Steenhuisen, who was in the room. Both Musk and US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick were interested in South Africa's critical minerals because of the shortage of rare earths used, especially in magnets. Magnets are vital in several of Musk's multibillion-dollar businesses, and he takes an active interest in the location of mines capable of providing the rare earths they require. Though Trump did most of the talking and Musk was almost as reticent in the closed-door lunch meeting as in the Oval Office, both had rare earths and their use in magnets on their minds. At the time, China, the world's main supplier of rare earths for magnets, had frozen exports of both the minerals and the magnets to the US. There have been a few key developments since the White House meeting. This week, China and the US agreed that China's magnet and rare earths exports to the US will resume. The magnet and rare earths freeze was a significant threat to the US, and several product lines had to suspend production in the US, Japan and Europe. You could say Musk got to experience what it felt like to be Ramaphosa or Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky. South Africa has a valuable rare earths mine, Steenkampskraal, about 380km north of Cape Town, but its first significant output will not be available until some time next year (2025). Musk also said he was interested in launching SpaceX rockets from the Denel Overberg rocket test site at Arniston, outside Cape Town. Two space experts said the value of the Arniston launch site to Musk is to launch satellites that will orbit over the South Pole, as well as Starlink low-Earth orbit satellites to provide broadband to consumers. In the White House meeting, Musk did not mention Starlink, which has been in the news in South Africa lately, apparently because the South African government has already set up a process to review its Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (B-BBEE) policy as it affects companies like Starlink. This week, Communications Minister Solly Malatsi confirmed that the decision will depend on a review process by the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa, which he first raised in September 2024. The review was announced last month, but no outcome of that process is expected soon. In the three weeks since the White House meeting, Trump and Musk have exchanged extremely harsh words in a fallout that echoed around the world. You could say Musk got to experience what it felt like to be Ramaphosa or Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky, though Musk, at least, brought it on himself. Musk broke with Trump by announcing that he 'couldn't stand it anymore', called Trump's omnibus budget bill, the One Big Beautiful Bill – its official title – a 'disgusting abomination', an 'outrageous, pork-filled' spending bill that will 'massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden America [sic] citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt'. Then Musk alleged that Trump is implicated in the scandal around indicted alleged paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, who committed suicide in prison before his trial. Oops. More directly relevant since the White House meeting is the still uncertain status of US-South Africa trade talks. Then on Tuesday Musk dialled it back with a reconciliatory phone call. Clearly he discovered being out in the cold was no fun. 'I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week,' he messaged. 'They went too far.' Then the two men spoke on the phone. We'll see where that goes. Musk apologised, but didn't say which part was 'too far' – the bill or the hint at a connection to an accused paedophilia celebrity? Musk's objection to the bill is real. Musk believed most fervently in that part of the Maga agenda that would cut America's mushrooming debt. With this bill, that goal has been abandoned and may be hard to resurrect. But what does the Trump-Musk feud mean for South Africa's trade negotiations, particularly in light of these recent developments? More directly relevant since the White House meeting is the still uncertain status of US-South Africa trade talks. Ramaphosa has announced that he will meet Trump this weekend in Canada on the sidelines of the G7 meeting. However, Trump is running the policy for South Africa directly from the White House, and sources in the State Department said nothing from the White House meeting has trickled down to them to indicate that negotiations are under way. Trump has successfully imposed a total blackout on any leaks about what happened behind closed doors. Neither Secretary of State Marco Rubio nor anyone from his department was in the meeting. The three officials who did discuss a new trade deal with the South African delegation are located elsewhere in the administration, and Trump has not yet nominated an Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, who normally leads US Africa policy. Jamieson Greer, the US Trade Representative, which is a cabinet position, met the South African ministers in Washington for substantive talks. And at the White House, Lutnick was active in discussing future deals. Trump, who has taken a special interest in the auto sector, raised the question of auto tariffs and directed Lutnick to follow up in his talks with South African Trade and Industry Minister Parks Tau. Perhaps the most important implementer of US Africa policy at present, Massad Boulos, who is a senior adviser to the US president, was in the meeting too. The father-in-law of Tiffany Trump, the president's youngest daughter, Boulos emigrated to Texas from Lebanon as a teenager, and spent his career in Nigeria as CEO of a trucking and heavy machinery dealership. He was instrumental in the Trump campaign for Arab-American votes in the election in 2024. His first appointment was as Arab and Middle Eastern adviser to the president, a position he still holds. Boulos, whom Trump singled out in the Oval Office meeting, has been driving US policy in eastern DRC peace talks, and had meetings with the Nigerian president, among others, since taking office. The Denel Overberg test site near Arniston, the brainchild of the Aerospace Systems Research Institute led by Professor Michael Brooks at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, has successfully launched several suborbital South African rockets to nearly 18km, some using South African-made engines. Its last launches used a new six-storey gantry, and it is currently on track to be capable of launching satellites into orbit in 2028. A SpaceX investment could significantly accelerate this progress. More than 30 significant space companies and start-ups are based in South Africa. They collaborate with the South African National Space Agency. Sources in Washington are reluctant to predict whether the optimism of Ramaphosa and his delegation about a trade deal will be justified. South Africa is currently working with international space sector partners in the US, Europe and China. The US and South Africa are partnered on a project to build a new deep-space ground station in Matjiesfontein in the Western Cape. It will support communications for future US Artemis missions to the moon and Mars. In August 2023, Chinese President Xi Jinping signed two agreements with South Africa on cooperation in space projects. One focused on crewed spaceflight, and the other included South Africa in the team for the planned Chinese-Russian International Lunar Research Station. South Africa is also working with the European Space Agency. The trade deal South Africa offered the US included a duty-free quota of 40,000 US vehicles a year for the auto sector and duty-free access for automotive components sourced from South Africa for automotive production in the US. South Africa agreed to buy LNG gas from the US for 10 years, costing about $1.2-billion in trade per annum, or $9-billion to $12-billion over 10 years. Sources in Washington are reluctant to predict whether the optimism of Ramaphosa and his delegation about a trade deal will be justified. Trump was aiming for 90 trade deals with foreign countries in 90 days. That was 70 days ago, and only one outline deal, with the UK, has been announced. More than any president in recent history, the final decision will depend almost entirely on how this president feels about it at the time. DM
