
Why Is Medical Cannabis Missing From Med School Curriculum?
In 2020, at least 8.3 million Americans acknowledged using medical cannabis; many of the same patients also reported mixed (ie, medicinal/recreational) use.
Clinical education has not caught up.
There are 19 cannabis education certificate and/or master's level programs offered in colleges, universities, and graduate schools in 14 US states, meaning that only about one third of the 48 states that have legalized medicinal cannabis have some sort of college or graduate-level curriculum to support patients.
The dearth of cannabis education has also left a large percentage of the more than 1 million practicing physicians in the US — and concurrently, most future prescribers — without a framework to leverage what has the potential to become one of the most important tools at their disposal.
Leah Sera, PharmD, is associate professor and the inaugural program director of the nation's first Master of Science in Medical Cannabis Science and Therapeutics program at the University of Maryland (UMD) School of Pharmacy in Baltimore.
Sera explained the impetus behind UMD's program (which launched in August 2019) was the concerns voiced by health professionals; not only were they not learning about cannabis medicine and the endocannabinoid system in academic programs, but more importantly, they lacked the knowledge to help patients coming to them with questions.
'I think that it's important for health professional educational programs to incorporate cannabis medicine into their curricula so that when we graduate new generations of healthcare providers, they're better equipped to really engage with a public who clearly wants more information — both to keep them safe and help improve their lives,' she said.
Medical literature has underscored that medical students feel the same.
A 2019 survey of medical school students indicated that although participants expressed mixed feelings about medicinal cannabis, the majority said they lacked adequate knowledge about its therapeutic applications, research, and science and instead relied on anecdotal evidence and social media for information.
The Endocannabinoid System
Arguably, politics have played a large role in slowing broad acceptance of the medicinal benefits of cannabis (eg, fearmongering, the war on drugs), and it is still considered a Schedule 1 drug. These factors are also believed to have contributed to the lack of inclusion in medical school curriculum.
'What it means for cannabis to be a Schedule 1 substance is that the federal government says that cannabis does not have a currently accepted medical use and the highest risk of abuse,' said Sera. 'Although there's been a lot of cannabis research both within and outside the US, it's very difficult to do gold standard randomized, controlled trials with any Schedule 1 drug.'
'Until very recently (and it may be occurring still), a lot of medical and nursing programs taught that cannabis is bad, has no therapeutic benefits, and it's highly addictive,' added Nishi Whiteley, cofounder and chief operating officer of CReDO Science, a science and research organization geared toward education, cannabis product optimization, and clinical consultation.
'There's been an active campaign to malign cannabis, which is an enormous disservice to the patient and to the medical professional who needs to have more tools in their toolbox,' she said.
Despite these challenges, decades of scientific research have consistently shown that the endocannabinoid system helps modulate a wide range of physiologic processes (eg, pain, inflammation, mood, metabolism, and neuroprotection) through its interaction with the major systems in the body, including the nervous, immune, and endocrine systems and digestive symptoms.
This is a key reason why cannabis researchers and specialists have argued for its inclusion within medical education programs.
'Every place we've looked, in whatever physiological system, the endocannabinoid system has a role as a homeostatic regulator,' said Ethan Russo, MD, a board-certified neurologist, psychopharmacology researcher, and cofounder/CEO of CReDO Science.
'We now understand that there are endogenous cannabinoids that are similar in structure to what we see in cannabis,' said Reggie Gaudino, PhD, a molecular geneticist and director of the Cannabis Research Institute at the University of Illinois Chicago.
'The endocannabinoid system is like the one ring to rule them all,' he said. 'It interacts through all other biochemical pathways and systems in the body to help keep our different processes in balance. Without understanding that system, we create other problems.'
Just the Basics
These cannabis experts said that at the very least, practicing and future prescribers need a foundational education that might include an overview of the endocannabinoid system, how it applies to disease processes, and its major components.
'The endocannabinoid system is a good starting point; it's how we are used to learning about medications and how biological systems are altered from disease or medication or other treatments,' said Sera.
She explained that this provides a foundation for discussions about the pharmacology of cannabinoids — chemicals within the cannabis plant that have biologic activity in humans and other animals — and how they interact with the endocannabinoid system to produce downstream effects on other organs.
Sera also said that it is important for future prescribers to learn how to interpret different types of medical literature and cannabis studies despite methodological concerns that have plagued the industry and the lack of studies on specific products available in medical dispensaries.
The same is true for counteracting cannabis hysteria in mainstream media every time a new study comes out, said Russo.
'Medical students need to be aware that real issues can arise with cannabis and its potential abuse, which does happen,' he explained. 'But the other side of the coin is therapeutics, which is quite distinct in terms of intent and dosages, ie, there's a distinction between a small dose for therapeutic purposes and a large dose that may produce harm.'
Importantly, this fact has often been overlooked in alarmist headlines and stories that have gained the most traction.
Bridging the Gap
Today, the gap between educational needs and educational reality is large. To address this, Russo and Whiteley said they developed an online, 40-hour advanced medical cannabis certificate program for practicing clinicians.
For professionals interested in learning how to address patient questions in an informed manner, they also created a Foundations of Cannabis Therapeutics course.
Though future prescribers can certainly benefit from these sorts of online foundational courses, the dearth of cannabis education within medical schools has left a large knowledge and practice deficit.
Dustin Sulak, DO, an integrative medicine specialist, cannabis expert, and founder of Intergr8 Health and Healer.com, a medical cannabis education resource in Falmouth, Maine, considers cannabis medicine revolutionary in that it actually alters the way the medicine is practiced.
'Cannabis medicine is a paradigm shift away from single-molecule interventions that have single physiologic targets toward more complex botanical treatments that target many things in the body — most of all, interfacing with the endocannabinoid system,' said Sulak. He used the example of managing pain, sleep, spasticity, and depression all at the same time with the same treatment.
'For any field of medicine to fail to take into consideration the role of the endocannabinoid system in pathophysiology is a shortcoming and a missed opportunity for interventions that improve symptoms and potentially, a cure,' he said.
There is a broader paradigm shift that's needed, one that requires a new mindset, especially within the medical education and practice arena.
'I think of myself as a patient advocate, not a cannabis advocate,' said Sera. 'Cannabis is a potentially powerful tool for some patients that can improve their lives; it's not about the plant itself.'
Russo is chief medical officer for Indira Pharmaceuticals and receives advisory fees from Carnada. Sulak is equity owner of Healer.com. Whiteley, Gaudino, and Sera reported having no relevant financial relationships.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Medscape
25 minutes ago
- Medscape
Cancer Care Costs High Among Privately Insured Patients
TOPLINE: A recent analysis found that privately insured US patients with newly diagnosed cancer, especially those with more advanced disease, had 'substantial out-of-pocket costs.' Monthly out-of-pocket costs among these patients increased by a mean of almost $600, on average, but increased to nearly $720 per month for those with stage IV disease. METHODOLOGY: Out-of-pocket costs for cancer care in the US are rising, but most research has focused on Medicare beneficiaries. It's important to understand privately insured patients' financial burdens, especially with cancer rates growing among younger Americans. Researchers conducted a retrospective study of 19,656 patients with cancer, using a dataset that links claims from a large private insurer to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registry. Overall, 74.1% had breast cancer, 14.5% had colorectal cancer, and 11.4% had lung cancer. Analyses also included 26,502 individuals without cancer who were assigned pseudo – diagnosis date. Monthly out-of-pocket costs (copays, co-insurance, and deductibles) were calculated from claims and inflation-adjusted to 2024 US dollars. TAKEAWAY: After a cancer diagnosis, monthly out-of-pocket costs rose by $592, on average. Those added costs increased with disease stage, from $462 per month for stage 0 cancer to $720 per month for stage IV cancer. Out-of-pocket costs spiked in the month of diagnosis and remained elevated for 6 months compared with those in individuals without cancer — totaling an average of $4145 in cumulative additional costs (over 7 months). IN PRACTICE: 'In this cohort study, patients with private insurance were found to have high OOPCs [out-of-pocket costs] after an incident diagnosis of cancer, and those with the most advanced cancer had the highest OOPCs,' the authors wrote. 'The variability in OOPCs based on cancer stage underscores the need for policies such as paid sick leave, that address both insurance continuity and financial assistance, especially for patients with more advanced cancer.' SOURCE: This study, led by Liam Rose, PhD, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, was published online in JAMA Network Open. LIMITATIONS: Differential insurance attrition could have affected the results: Patients with stage IV cancer were most likely to drop their coverage. The study could only capture direct medical costs, which misses other potential financial burdens, such as lost income and travel expenses. DISCLOSURES: This study received funding support through a grant from the American Cancer Society. One author reported receiving grants from the Department of Veterans Affairs and National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This is why you shouldn't put make-up on children
Would you dab perfume on a six-month-old? Paint their tiny nails with polish that contains formaldehyde? Dust bronzer onto their cheeks? An investigation by the Times has found that babies and toddlers are routinely exposed to adult cosmetic products, including fragranced sprays, nail polish and even black henna tattoos. While these may sound harmless – or even Instagram-friendly – the science tells a more concerning story. Infant skin is biologically different from adult skin: it's thinner, more absorbent and still developing. Exposure to certain products can lead to immediate problems like irritation or allergic reactions, and in some cases, may carry longer term health-risks such as hormone disruption. This isn't a new concern. A 2019 study found that every two hours in the US, a child was taken to hospital because of accidental exposure to cosmetic products. Newborn skin has the same number of layers as adult skin but those layers are up to 30% thinner. That thinner barrier makes it easier for substances, including chemicals, to penetrate through to deeper tissues and the bloodstream. Young skin also has a higher water content and produces less sebum (the natural oil that protects and moisturises the skin). This makes it more prone to water loss, dryness and irritation, particularly when exposed to fragrances or creams not formulated for infants. The skin's microbiome – its protective layer of beneficial microbes – also takes time to develop. By age three, a child's skin finishes establishing its first microbiome. Before then, products applied to the skin can disrupt this delicate balance. At puberty, the skin's structure and microbiome change again, altering how it responds to products. The investigation found that bronzers and nail polish were being used on young children. These products often contain harmful or even carcinogenic chemicals, such as formaldehyde, toluene and dibutyl phthalate. Toluene is a known neurotoxin, and dibutyl phthalate is an endocrine disruptor – a chemical that can interfere with hormone function, potentially affecting growth, development and fertility. Both substances can more easily pass through infants' thinner, more permeable skin. Even low-level exposure to formaldehyde, such as from furniture or air pollution, has been linked to higher rates of lower respiratory infections in children (that's infections affecting the lungs, airways and windpipe). Irritating ingredients In the US, one in three adults experiences skin or respiratory symptoms after exposure to fragranced products. If adults are reacting, it's no surprise that newborns and children with their developing immune systems are at even greater risk. Perfumes often contain alcohol and volatile compounds that dry out the skin, leading to redness, itching and discomfort. Certain skincare ingredients have also been studied for their potential to affect hormones, trigger allergies or pose long-term health concerns: alkylphenols used in detergents and cosmetics may disrupt hormone activity antimicrobials such as triclosan can interfere with thyroid hormones and contribute to antibiotic resistance bisphenols, (BPA widely used in packaging are linked to hormone disruption. cyclosiloxanes (D4 and D5) may accumulate in the body and affect hormonal balance ethanolamines can react with other ingredients to form nitrosamines, some of which are potential carcinogens parabens are preservatives that mimic oestrogen, though some studies suggest minimal risk at low doses phthalates used in fragrances and plastics are linked to reproductive toxicity, especially in early-life exposures benzophenone is found in many sunscreens and some forms may act as allergens and hormone disruptors. While many of these ingredients are permitted in regulated concentrations, some researchers warn of a 'cocktail effect': the cumulative impact of daily exposure to multiple chemicals, especially in young, developing bodies. Temporary tattoos Temporary tattoos, particularly black henna, are popular on holidays but they aren't always safe. Black henna is a common cause of contact dermatitis in children and may contain para-phenylenediamine (PPD), a chemical approved for use in hair dyes but not for direct application to skin. PPD exposure can cause severe allergic reactions and, in rare cases, cancer. Children may develop hypopigmentation – pale patches where colour is lost – or, in adults, hyperpigmentation that can last for months or become permanent. Worryingly, children exposed to PPD may experience more severe reactions later in life if they use hair dyes containing the same compound. This can sometimes lead to hospitalisation or even fatal anaphylaxis. Because of these risks, European legislation prohibits PPD from being applied directly to the skin, eyebrows, or eyelashes. 'Natural' doesn't mean harmless Products marketed as 'natural' or 'clean' can also cause allergic reactions. Propolis (bee glue), for instance, is found in many natural skincare products but causes contact dermatitis in up to 16% of children. A study found an average of 4.5 contact allergens per product in 'natural' skincare ranges. Out of 1,651 'natural' personal care products on the US market, only 96 (5.8%) were free from contact allergens. Even claims like 'dermatologically tested' don't guarantee safety; they simply mean the product was tested on skin, not that it's free from allergens. Babies and young children aren't just miniature adults. Their skin is still developing and is more vulnerable to irritation, chemical absorption and systemic effects: substances that penetrate the skin can enter the bloodstream and potentially affect organs or biological systems throughout the body. Applying adult-targeted products, or even well-meaning 'natural' alternatives, can therefore carry real risks. Adverse reactions can appear as rashes, scaling or itchiness and, in severe cases, blistering or crusting. Respiratory symptoms like coughing or wheezing should always be investigated by a medical professional. When in doubt, keep it simple. Limit what goes on your child's skin, especially in the early years. Adam Taylor is a Professor of Anatomy, Lancaster University This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.


Business Upturn
6 hours ago
- Business Upturn
Bangladesh Proposes to Ban Safer Nicotine Products Under Foreign Influence, Ignoring Public Health Evidence and Regional Precedents
MANILA, Philippines, July 28, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — The Bangladesh Ministry of Health is pushing a new tobacco control bill that proposes a sweeping ban on all safer nicotine products (SNPs), including vaping devices and oral alternatives. Alarmingly, this move is being pursued without public consultation and under an interim government—raising serious concerns about transparency and accountability. Citing WHO FCTC Article 5.3, the Ministry is attempting to justify excluding public health experts, consumers, and harm reduction advocates from the policymaking process. According to a report by the Coalition of Asia Pacific Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates (CAPHRA), this misuse of international guidance is designed to block dissent and suppress scientific debate. The proposal appears to be heavily influenced by foreign actors—most notably Bloomberg Philanthropies and its primary grantee, the U.S.-based Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids (CTFK). Since 2008, Bloomberg Philanthropies has channelled over US$232 million to CTFK to promote anti-nicotine policies worldwide. These funds support NGOs, train bureaucrats, and embed advisors within government ministries, creating a network of influence that sidelines national sovereignty. In Bangladesh, Bloomberg partner Vital Strategies maintains a Dhaka office staffed by former government officials, while CTFK and its affiliates are listed as official partners of the Ministry's National Tobacco Control Cell. This arrangement allows foreign-funded groups to shape policy directly, with little regard for democratic process or public health realities on the ground. 'This is not tobacco control. This is policy outsourcing,' said Nancy Loucas, Executive Coordinator of CAPHRA. 'Bangladesh risks allowing foreign-funded NGOs to override its own democratic institutions and deny its citizens access to proven harm reduction tools.' The move contradicts regional trends. Similar foreign-backed proposals were recently rejected in Pakistan and the Philippines , where authorities prioritized evidence-based public health approaches over external influence. The dangers of banning SNPs are already visible elsewhere. Countries like India and Australia, which have implemented such bans, are now dealing with rampant black markets and unregulated products—problems that undermine rather than improve public health. With one of the highest rates of tobacco-related illness in the world, Bangladesh stands to benefit greatly from a regulated harm reduction strategy. The global evidence is clear: SNPs help smokers quit and significantly reduce harm. A blanket ban would be a step backward, not forward. Contact: N.E Loucas [email protected] WhatsApp: 64 0272348463