
Why industry-driven, tailored courses are an alternative to bachelor's degrees
To begin with, all are 'booster shots' or even alternative ways to spend one's time after completing school (Class XII) instead of enrolling in a regular bachelor's degree - which has been reduced in many instances to a worthless piece of paper - in one of the country's myriad but mostly indifferent quality colleges.
Some Pros
Another commonality is that all these companies are exploiting the inability of Indian colleges, with their dated syllabuses, to keep up with the times. All of them offer an experience different from the usual fare dished out at legacy universities around India, be it teaching by industry professionals or internships in companies that are in sectors students intend to join, making those who graduate job-ready, industry-aligned and skill-focused.
Instead of waiting for students to get a taste of real life after their bachelor's and during an MBA or another Master's level programme, these new institutes are trying to grab the student early if he or she has a reasonable idea of which field they wish to pursue..
While traditional universities and colleges continue to lay strong academic foundations, today's job market demands digital-first skills, adaptability, and a professional portfolio. Employers no longer seek just graduates but professionals who can hit the ground running from day one so that those who hire them are spared the trouble of training and teaching them the initial ropes. That's where industry-driven UG programmes, offering a curriculum that integrates real-world exposure, industry mentorship, and applied learnings are coming in.
The inability of Indian colleges to keep their content relevant is being exploited eagerly by the new companies. These are options that make you work-ready at 21; at 18 and 19, the internships they will do will give them a taste of what is to come when they seek permanent employment.
All these courses encourage students to obtain an online degree on the premise that the traditional bachelor's degree as we knew is dying and ask students to make better use of their time by attending offline classes on their campuses where the students will be exposed to 'real life' problems and solutions, often delivered by the best in the business.
'The stamp of a bachelor's can literally be acquired from anywhere. Options like we are offering will allow you to acquire that stamp regardless but gain a more all rounded education in digital marketing at our campus by interacting directly with future employers and industry stalwarts', said IIDE's Karan Shah, a recent entrant to this club. IIDE has an alumni base of 8000 through four shorter duration courses offered on its campus in Mumbai and has placed a majority of its students with companies that require deep digital skills like Kinnect, FoxyMoron, ToggleHead, WebShakers, Schbang, Socheers, Mumbai Foodie, Mindshift, White Rivers Media, BigMouth and Gozoop among others. Many of these companies spawned recently as social media begun to dominate the marketing landscape.
Also, often replacing the old, stodgy bespectacled professor who comes in and starts reading in monotones from his notes to deliver a lecture to somnolent students will be a young, nattily dressed and somewhat brash teacher - in the form of an entrepreneur of start-ups or CEO of a unicorn who have already made their millions by the time they touch 30. So, it will not be uncommon to visit one of the campuses of these newbies and find Binny Bansal or Bhavish Agarwal holding a session on app-based sales, digital sales or marketing techniques. In other words, your lecture might be directly delivered by your future employer.
Further, all are trying to be masters of one trade and not jack of all. So, while Scaler is focussed on computer science and artificial intelligence, IIDE is set to make a digital marketeer out of you, Master's Union gets you deeper into the psychology of marketing while Mesa (Bengaluru) is in the business of nurturing future entrepreneurs. The school offers students at least three-four-month internships with real-life start up entrepreneurs during the course of the four-year programme, which will help them gain an insight into what they might need in case they choose to follow in their footsteps. In some cases, students are being promised opportunities for 'global immersion' in Silicon Valley or closer home in Dubai.
Since all the new companies are small in scale - so far, the student intake is between 60 to 300 students a year - finding placements is not difficult as it is at the premier Indian institutions like IITs and even ISBs. In many cases, since the batch will be interacting and even interning at some of the new age companies and with their founders, many will be made entry-level offers through this process itself.
The premise is clear for the founders and CEOs: the student who has already picked his or her area of interest and gained some real work experience would be more work-ready than graduates from regular colleges.
'Traditionally, degrees were often paired with professional certifications like CA or CFA, seen as essential for climbing the corporate ladder. But as aspirations shift, particularly among younger generations drawn to entrepreneurship and the digital economy, the landscape is changing' said Shah, saying that a CA and CFA are being seen as 'stodgy and has-been' options now.
He pointed out that today, job portals like Naukri.com are flooded with listings for roles in digital marketing (as high as 5x in comparison to jobs like CA and CFA), content creation, and product management - areas once considered niche. For students, these programmes translate into higher employability, hands-on experience, and fewer 'fresher' rejections.
For institutions pioneering these programmes, this is a chance to carve out a permanent place in mainstream higher education without the red tape involved in setting up a college or university that has in place regulations required to bestow degrees. Higher education remains a fairly regulated sector, especially when it comes to conferring degrees.
Some Cons
Almost all the new institutes come with a hefty price tag, when compared with public universities. Even today, the fees at SRCC - the premier commerce and economics college in India - is just above ₹1 lakh for three years (non- residential). However, even with hostels, the public colleges rarely exceed ₹2 lakh per year.
The cost of studying at new certificate-based courses vary widely with the lowest available at around 7.5 lakh while the more expensive ones are equivalent to a degree from private colleges at ₹40 lakh for the duration of the course. So, affordability and whether these newbies are 'value for money' becomes a big question. Since most of the offerings are still in the early stage, there is no precedent to go by. As a result, they remain uncharted territory. Unlike Delhi University or a number of state colleges, these don't have a vast alumni network for graduates to tap into.
If the lack of an alumni base is a drawback, so is the threat of competition, especially from the online edtech firms. There are a number of players in the purely online space, some of which are established and have already mastered the placement game.
For instance, in the technology space, there are several established players charging lower fees and offering a range of pay-after-placement options. One online entrant in 2016, Masai School, offers students five courses including one in full stack development or coding, data analytics, automation and testing among others and has a zero upfront fee policy. Students take a test, are interviewed to assess their interest and drive and then admitted to the 11/11/6 course (11 am to 11 pm, 6 days a week) for six months, after completing which they are placed in jobs which typically start at ₹5 lakh per annum. The school even offers a stipend of ₹10,000 a month to students who need it and payment for the course is made by the student only after he or she is placed.
Flash in the Pan Versus Here to Stay
The million-dollar question is whether these new institutions and programmes will last the test of time. Those vested in the higher education sector point out that the first job for a graduate from any institution is only a stepping stone to a long journey and the alumni and network built while studying is usually the reason many opt for the institution, more than the academic learning imparted.
IIM-A alumni Roy K. Cherian, who is currently anchoring the askIIMA portal for the institute, an initiative that will allow the institute's alumni to give career advice to anyone who needs it, said that most of these programmes are aimed at targeting 'affluent' parents whose children failed to make it into any premier colleges.
'The quality of an institution or a programme depends on the student intake. If the intake is a bunch of sub-par students, the outcome is unlikely to be much better', he said.
Abhijit Bhaumik, an independent consultant and a former IIM-A graduate, said that trying to teach management or business to 18-19-year-olds is unlikely to work in whatever form it might be packaged. 'Even for an MBA, most institutes require or want students to have a minimum 3-4 years of work experience. Trying to teach business to just out of high school novices is in my view a non-starter', he said, adding that the same goes for entrepreneurship : one needs the maturity to understand entrepreneurship comprehensively. Most founders will face many failures before and if they finally hit success and there are no shortcuts available, he added.
It is here that the bigger issue of whether the authorities should be regulating such courses and institutes comes in. Experts in the sector said that in the absence of clear guidelines, the market becomes a 'free for all' and episodes like Byju's will continue to recur both in the K12 and in the higher education space. The reality is that India suffers from an acute shortage of good quality higher education options and now with the US and overseas options shrinking or looking less attractive, it is to be expected that many more newcomers will jump in. Some will bait anxious parents and students and fizzle out while others might be here to stay and herein lies the rub: separating the wheat from the chaff is easier said than done.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Time of India
11 minutes ago
- Time of India
India's Stand Vindicated As Putin Exposes Trump, Confirms US Trades With Russia But Penalises Others
Russian President Vladimir Putin publicly confirmed that U.S.-Russia trade increased by 20% during Trump's tenure, revealing contradictions in U.S. sanctions policy. Trump criticized India with tariffs but stayed silent about rising U.S.-Russia trade amid the Ukraine conflict. Previously, Trump had avoided answering questions on Russian imports and Indian tariffs. India had highlighted this hypocrisy, continuing to import Russian crude for energy security despite international pressure. In 2023, Russia became India's largest oil supplier, delivering over 1.8 million barrels daily. The U.S. responded by imposing tariffs on Indian products as a punitive measure for its dealings with Russia.


Mint
11 minutes ago
- Mint
Transformer by Mint: The man shaping India's AI dreams, and continuing chaos at Vodafone
I've known Abhishek Singh, a senior bureaucrat, for some time now. He's been in the Indian tech ecosystem for a while, leading multiple government-backed digitisation initiatives. Now, as chief of the billion-dollar India AI Mission, he faces one of his biggest challenges in a public-service career spanning three decades. The reasons for this are varied. For one, the fact that AI presents a huge opportunity to a long-serving government official shows just how far the technology has come, and how it now affects everyone. More importantly, though, India could potentially gain or lose a lot depending on what we do with AI. Let me take you back a few decades. If you've read the venerable Chip War by Chris Miller (whom I had the pleasure to meet this January), you know that during America's push for leadership in electronic machines at the start of the world's tryst with semiconductors, India missed the bus. This allowed Japan and Taiwan to become global technology leaders despite being societies steeped in tradition. Then came the mobile revolution, and apart from emerging as a big global market, India almost missed the bus there, too. But then the Digital India and Make in India initiatives emerged, digital skills took centre stage, and India is now at a point where tech manufacturing is at least on the ascendancy. To cut a long story short, after having missed out on tectonic global shifts, India a chance to show with AI that it is not just the world's tech back-office and can lead from the front, too. Singh has a plan for this: building a voice-based foundational model that, along with India's government-supported base of thousands of Nvidia GPUs, would become India's next big export to the world after UPI. Here's why he thinks this will work. Speaking of tech's back offices… Jas Bardia, our resident correspondent for India's nearly $300-billion IT services industry, reported last week that there's a war brewing at India's mid-sized tech services firms, which truly believe they can take on the behemoths and win. India's IT services industry had began booming in the early 1990s, turning Tata Consultancy Services, Infosys, Wipro and the likes into the mammoths they are today. During the late 1990s and early 2000s, almost every household around where I grew up had at least one person working at these IT giants. The world, however, as changed considerably since then. Over the past two years companies such as Coforge and Persistent Services have emerged as serious competitors, pitching themselves as specialised firms with a deeper understanding of technology. Where does this leave TCS and its ilk? Will they lose out? Maybe not so soon, but market dynamics are undeniably changing. Also changing is the top job at Vodafone-Idea The beleaguered telecom operator began its India journey as Command Telecom, a telco operated under Kolkata's Usha Martin. In 2000, Hutchison Max acquired Command, leading to the creation of network provider Hutch in 2005. In 2007, Vodafone entered the market and created Vodafone Essar Limited, the entity's longest-standing identity so far. Despite its more than three decades of history, the Vodafone-Idea entity of today is in perilous financial health. Last week the telco appointed erstwhile chief operating officer Abhijit Kishore as CEO for three years as outgoing chief Akshay Moondra's term ended. Now, being a CEO is a dream for anyone in corporate India, but Vi faces a veritable nightmare. After all, it needs to catch up with Airtel and Jio on quality of service while paying off its eye-watering dues and needing $30 billion of capital immediately. Suddenly, Kishore's job doesn't seem like a dream. One thing's clear, though – whichever way this goes, Vodafone-Idea's story will make for a fascinating case study in India's telecom sector for years to come. Mint's telecom correspondent Jatin Grover brings you all the juicy details. Finally, satellites on the frontline Last week, Jatin and I wrote about India's potential revamp of sensitive defence networks in an exclusive report. The full story: over the past two years, the government has been exploring ways for modern satellite internet providers such as Elon Musk's Starlink and Bharti Airtel's OneWeb to offer their services to India's defence forces. The reason is clear: it's now imperative to have secure and blazing-fast internet connectivity even in remote bounary regions. India needs drones, consistent satellite feeds, and a host of other technologies to stay ahead of its enemies. Older satellite connections—which serve only as a backup—aren't up to the task. In other news: the battle for Chrome, and an iPhone 'Air' Last week, Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas put in a bid for Google Chrome, saying his company was willing to spend $34.5 billion to buy the world's leading browser. However, he doesn't have that kind of money. You see, Perplexity is only worth about $18 billion. Chrome, on the other hand, is valued more than $50 billion. Then, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman added fuel to the fire, asking, 'Is Google really selling Chrome? If they are, we'd be interested. Why not?" Welcome to Silicon Valley's newest battleground, one that we'll be tracking. We've already reported about Google and OpenAI's silent fight, and how it forced Sergey Brin, a Valley legend, back to the engineering table. Finally, its that time of the year when we expect to see new Google Pixels and Apple iPhones. This year, rumours are that Apple will launch an 'iPhone Air' as part of its range this year. If you've followed Apple, you'd know the 'Air' branding refers to ultra-thin and light devices. The first MacBook Air, in fact, remains one of the most legendary consumer devices to date. Will the iPhone Air live up to this? Here's what we've gathered so far. Transformer by Mint is a weekly newsletter that brings India's most important and interesting technology updates under one umbrella. As the world transforms with every day of innovation, Transformer will keep a tab on the impact that technologies will make in each of our lives. Published every week, the newsletter brings some of India's tech landscape's most insightful coverages until date.


Indian Express
11 minutes ago
- Indian Express
S&P rating upgrade: how India earned it and what lies ahead
Last week was turning out to be a great one for the Indian economy even before Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced a raft of reforms in his Independence Day speech. A day earlier, S&P Global Ratings had upgraded its rating on India to BBB from BBB-. The sovereign rating upgrade by S&P is significant for two key reasons. One, it came after a gap of nearly two decades; and two, it has meaningful implications for the Indian economy. India's upgrade pursuit The Indian government has over the last several years aggressively pursued the three global agencies — S&P, Moody's, and Fitch Ratings — for higher ratings that, in its opinion, better reflect the economy's fundamentals. In fact, New Delhi has repeatedly expressed its displeasure over the agencies' methodologies, saying they were biased against emerging economies. The Economic Survey for 2020-21 even had a chapter titled 'Does India's Sovereign Credit Rating reflect its fundamentals No!'. 'The rating of India did not capture India's fundamentals for almost a decade,' Soumya Kanti Ghosh, State Bank of India's Group Chief Economic Adviser, said in a note on August 14. So, what has convinced S&P that now is a good time for India to be given an upgrade? Steady economic improvement The primary reason is clarity on the government's finances. While the Centre has had a law called the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act since 2003 — it demands reducing the annual fiscal deficit to 3 per cent of GDP — it has rarely been met. In fact, only once since the Act's enactment has the Centre's fiscal deficit fallen below 3 per cent, in 2007-08, and that was primarily due to some financial jugglery. It was in January 2007 that S&P had last upgraded its rating on India. However, post the coronavirus pandemic, the fiscal deficit has been reduced aggressively from 9.2 per cent in 2020-21 to a targeted 4.4 per cent in 2025-26. Going forward, the Centre will start targeting a reduction in its debt-to-GDP from 57.1 per cent in 2024-25 to 49-51 per cent by 2030-31. Then there is growth. Despite GDP growth falling to a four-year low of 6.5 per cent in 2024-25, India remains one of the fastest growing large economies in the world — or in S&P's words, 'among the best performing economies in the world'. And this is real, or inflation-adjusted, growth; nominal growth — which is the actual increase in the GDP in today's prices — is even higher. When it comes to calculating the debt-to-GDP ratio, it is the nominal GDP that matters. As such, as long as nominal GDP growth is higher than the pace with which the debt is increasing, the debt-to-GDP ratio will keep falling. Another key factor has been the fairly low and stable domestic inflation, with S&P praising the Reserve Bank of India's inflation management record. As per latest data, India's headline inflation rate had fallen to 1.55 per cent in July — the lowest since mid-2017. Low and stable inflation is crucial to foreign investors as sharp increases in prices can erode their investments, weaken growth and the domestic currency, and create social unrest — all factors that can lead to a rating downgrade. A credit rating is nothing more than a measure of an entity's creditworthiness, or how likely it is that they may pay back borrowed money. If you pay back your loans and credit card bills on time and in full, your credit score improves. It is the same for countries. Most countries need to borrow money every year to fund some of their expenditures. The difference between the total income and the expenditure for a year is the fiscal deficit; the Indian government's is Rs 15.69 lakh crore for 2025-26. This has to be met by borrowing money from the markets, with the government paying interest on it. Now, if the government is seen as being more likely to repay the loan — which is what a higher credit rating indicates — then the rate of interest is lower. According to Madhavi Arora, Chief Economist at Emkay Global Financial Services, the rating upgrade 'can open the door for new pools of global funds' capital', resulting in 'lower cost of funding across macro agents' curves, including corporates — especially those borrowing abroad'. The rating scale To be sure, India's rating level with S&P has itself not changed — the country remains in the BBB category. It's just that it has gone from the lowest edge of it, or BBB-, to a more secure position. The next step would be BBB+. So where does the move to BBB put India on the rating scale? Ratings are divided into two rough classes: investment and speculative grades. Entities, including countries, in the former class are worth investing in, while repayment of loans taken by those in the latter is difficult to predict. But even within the investment grade, there are steps, and BBB is the lowest. According to S&P, a BBB rating indicates 'adequate capacity to meet financial commitments, but more subject to adverse economic conditions'. The next step is A, then AA, and finally, AAA, which signifies 'extremely strong capacity to meet financial commitments'. Who stands where Alongside India, S&P has the likes of Greece, Mexico, and Indonesia at BBB. Just above it, at BBB+, are Botswana (negative outlook), Bulgaria, Italy, Thailand, Uruguay (all stable outlook), and Philippines (positive outlook) A positive outlook puts a rating closer to an upgrade, while a negative outlook makes a downgrade more likely. Above this, with an A- rating, are countries such as Cyprus, Poland, and Malaysia. And right at the top of the tree, with AAA rating, are the richest countries in the world — Australia, Canada, Denmark, and Germany, among others. The richest countries are not guaranteed the best rating. Take the US, for instance, which was downgraded to AA+ by S&P in August 2011 — the first time the world's largest economy had ever been assigned any rating lower than AAA — days after the US Congress raised the country's debt ceiling. More recently, Moody's Ratings in mid-May 2025 lowered its rating on the US to Aa1 from Aaa reflecting 'the increase over more than a decade in government debt and interest payment ratios to levels that are significantly higher than similarly rated sovereigns'. What's next? The implications of a better credit rating are clear — the Indian government should be able to borrow at a lower rate of interest. This has already occurred, with government bond yields in the secondary market on August 14 falling as much as 10 basis points, with the rupee's exchange rate also getting a boost. What about the next upgrade? Helpfully, S&P said on August 14 that it may further raise India's rating if the fiscal deficit of the Centre and states falls below 6 per cent of GDP on a structural basis. This, however, is a 'tough ask', according to Arora of Emkay Global. S&P itself expects the combined fiscal deficit to decline only to 6.6 per cent in 2028-29 from 7.8 per cent in 2024-25.