Salem's Lot Has Been Cited As Inspiration For Sinners, But It Weirdly Shares A Lot More In Common With A Different Stephen King Book
Like a lot of genre fans in the last few days, my brain is very much locked in to Ryan Coogler's Sinners right now. As I wrote in my five-star review for CinemaBlend, it's difficult to decide whether it's a better crime movie or horror movie, it's a stunning work of art to look at, and Michael B. Jordan delivers the best dual performance of 2025 thus far (and there's been a surprising number of them). I've been thinking about it in many different ways, but one particular thing I've been hooked on is its connection to the world of Stephen King.
This contemplation is the lead story of this week's edition of The King Beat, but it's one of two headlines thanks to the fact that a funny development regarding one of the worst Stephen King adaptations was discussed in the last few days. There's a lot to go over, so let's dig in!
Ryan Coogler is a filmmaker whose impressive body of work means that I will anticipate every new project he develops, but in the specific case of Sinners, the movie truly piqued my interest a couple months ago. Discussing his inspirations for the Prohibition era horror story, the writer/director namedropped some of my favorite modern filmmakers – including Joel and Ethan Coen and John Carpenter – but he also made a special note of influence from Stephen King's Salem's Lot.
Having now seen Sinners, I can most definitely see how all of those ingredients came together with Ryan Coogler's unique sensibilities to create what is an extraordinary film… but me being a Stephen King fan, a funny angle on it won't stop rattling around my brain. Anyone can plainly see where Salem's Lot plays into the mix (hint: it starts with the letter 'V') – but I can't help but also recognize parallels to a particular part of the beloved epic IT, and what makes the comparison more interesting is that the movie has arrived in theaters the same year that the upcoming King TV series IT: Welcome To Derry is set to have its premiere on HBO.
Allow me to present a quick logline: In 1930s America, a collection of Black characters rebel against the racist communities in which they live by establishing a juke joint where victims of segregationist attitudes can gather, eat, listen to live music, and dance. The good times are good, but they are short lived, as the party gets violently interrupted, and what should be a night of fun becomes a night of death and tragedy.
If you're not picking up what I'm saying here, that is a description of both what happens in Sinners and what happens in the tale told about the Black Spot in IT – a story that Mike Hanlon learns about at the bedside of his dying father. There are key differences between them – including the location (Mississippi vs. Maine), backgrounds of the organizers (gangsters vs. soldiers), and the fact that there aren't any vampires in the latter (instead, it's a KKK-adjacent group called the Maine Legion of White Decency) – but the similarities stand out.
At present, the only people who are going to see Sinners and make the connection to IT are Stephen King fans who have read the book, but what makes this comparison more significant is the fact that the story of the Black Spot is getting a big spotlight in just a few months' time. Produced by Andy and Barbara Muschietti, IT: Welcome To Derry is an HBO prequel series set in the same canon as 2017's IT and 2019's IT: Chapter Two, and it is treating the flashback about the Black Spot as its main source material. The setting will be shifted to the year 1962 as a means of adjusting to the timeline change that was made in the aforementioned blockbuster horror films, but the expectation is that that core details will remain.
Is this a problem? The folks behind the release of both Sinners and IT: Welcome To Derry don't seem to think so, as it's noteworthy that both are productions of Warner Bros. Discovery. I will, however, say that the new HBO series is going to be arriving on air at a disadvantage. When the Stephen King show does air, comparisons to the Ryan Coogler film are inevitable, and that's a tough boat to sail given that Sinners is one of the best movies we've seen so far on the big screen in 2025. I can already envision social media posts with a still of Michael B. Jordan playing Smoke and Stack with a caption reading, 'I'm gonna tell my kids that this was IT: Welcome To Derry.'
But if I'm being more optimistic, the two works could co-exist perfectly fine. The tale of the Black Spot is going to be a principal narrative on IT: Welcome To Derry, but because this is a TV show we're talking about, it won't be the exclusive storyline, and those other stories may provide unique material for audiences. There is also the shifting setting to consider (the 1930s and 1960s were considerably different eras), and the fact that protagonists will be in the military will obviously have an impact on the way things play out as well. Also, I'm still keeping my fingers crossed that it will establish a canon crossover with Stanley Kubrick's The Shining/Mike Flanagan's Doctor Sleep.
We'll find out soon. Sinners is now playing in theaters everywhere (arriving as a big hit in its opening weekend at the box office), but IT: Welcome To Derry isn't expected to arrive on HBO until spooky season (an official date has not yet been announced). Jovan Adepo, Chris Chalk, James Remar, Taylour Page, Stephen Rider, Madeleine Stowe, and Bill Skarsgård (reprising his role as Pennywise The Dancing Clown) are starring in the horror series, and you can be sure that you'll find all of the biggest updates about it here on CinemaBlend in the months and weeks leading up to its arrival.
I'm an individual who can appreciate the goofiness of Maximum Overdrive (The Green Goblin truck! The ATM calling Stephen King an asshole! The kid getting steamrolled!), but I wouldn't go as far as to call it a good movie. Giancarlo Esposito may have appreciated the talents of King as a first-time writer/director, but the film's story is a mess, and the characters are shockingly shallow. Regardless, it has managed to successfully create a cult following in the decades since its arrival in theaters in 1986, which is why I'm not actually all that surprised to learn that Emilio Estevez recently tried to get a Maximum Overdrive 2 made.
Fans of the original film will remember that Estevez starred as Bill Robinson, a line cook at a truck stop diner that finds its patrons under siege as machines around the world become sentient and turn on humanity. The actor didn't have any kind of hand in the writing of Maximum Overdrive's script, and the movie isn't remembered by the majority of his fans as one of his career highlights, but in the summer of 2023 when Hollywood was shut down in the midst of dual labor strikes, he found inspiration to start writing a sequel. Recently a guest on the HappySadConfused podcast, he revealed,
In truth, and with the advent of more computer technology and A.I. and all of that, I started to imagine what a sequel to Maximum Overdrive would look like. And during the strike I wrote one... I don't have the rights to any of this. These were just sort of... I started it. I started page one; I started an idea, and like now I'm on page 10. I'm on page 20. Now it's 50 pages, and I can't stop.
The rights to Maximum Overdrive – based on the Stephen King short story 'Trucks' – belong to the company founded by producer Dino De Laurentiis, but Emilio Estevez apparently wasn't letting that little detail get in the way of inspiration. He wrote a screenplay on spec, but he knew that it would need to get approved to move forward.
Long story short, Estevez wasn't able to garner any interest in his script for Maximum Overdrive 2… but what's nice is that let him be a bit more open in the interview about his ideas. Per the actor/screenwriter, the story would have caught up with Bill Robinson decades after the rise of the machines and still found him working in the food service industry – albeit with a much better job:
I created an insane world that takes place in a diner. So Bill, if you remember the movie – and if you do, I'm sorry, it's a terrible movie. But he was a short order cook. So now in the movie, it opens with, he's got his own diner, he's got a young daughter, he's got his crew, his people. And Guy Fieri is coming to do Diners Drive-Ins and Dives on the day the world falls apart and machines turn. And it was a cool idea. It's a bitchin' script. And De Laurentiis was like, 'Nope, we have the right to this. We're not interested. We're gonna pursue our own thing.' I was like, 'Ok.'
While I don't necessarily think that the world ever needs to see a Maximum Overdrive 2 move into production (one with or without the green light from De Laurentiis Entertainment Group), I will admit that I would love to get a gander and Emilio Estevez's script out of pure, unadulterated curiosity. I have many, many questions to which I would love to get answers.
That wraps up this week's edition of The King Beat, but that just means we're seven days away from the next one! You can find my roundups of all the big developments in the world of Stephen King here on CinemaBlend every Thursday – and with the list of upcoming movies and shows including The Life Of Chuck, The Long Walk, The Running Man, IT: Welcome To Derry and The Institute, one expects no shortage of exciting things to discuss.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Netflix's Extraction Spinoff Keeps Getting Good News, And I'm Pumped It Just Added A Game Of Thrones Alum
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Fans of the Extraction films starring Chris Hemsworth got some good news about the franchise earlier this year, although not in the form of a continuation in the form of Extraction 3. A television spinoff is happening to expand the world of the films, and there are finally some casting updates beyond Omar Sy as leading man. Game of Thrones vet Natalie Dormer landed a role, just days after another star was announced. Dormer will be a series regular on Extraction, according to Deadline, to play the leader of a private military contractor by the name of Clayton Wisper. This will be Dormer's second project for Netflix, although it's a safe bet that working on the series will be a lot more intense than her voice work on The Dark Crystal: Age of Resistance. (The Dark Crystal show was cancelled in 2020.) The actress is likely still best known for portraying Margaery Tyrell on Game of Thrones, with Dormer's character actually in more episodes than heavy-hitters like Joffrey Baratheon (Jack Gleeson) and Catelyn Stark (Michelle Fairley). Netflix describes the project as an "action thriller" following a mercenary on a risky mission in Libya to rescue hostages, stuck between killers and factions at war. It won't be all action, however, and the story unfolding as a TV show rather than a movie means that there will be more time for character development than could happen in either of the films. The spinoff comes from showrunner, executive producer, and writer Glen Mazzara (known for shows like The Walking Dead and The Shield), with the Russo Brothers of MCU fame on board as executive producers. While the Extraction show certainly won't be ready in time for a premiere in the 2025 TV schedule, there's more encouraging news about the progress so far. Boyd Holbrook has been cast to play an Extraction team leader named David Ibarra, according Deadline, as a series regular. Like Dormer, Holbrook has worked on Netflix productions before, including Narcos opposite stars like Wagner Moura, The Last of Us' Pedro Pascal, and Andor's Diego Luna. More recently, he wrapped his time as part of The Sandman cast with the series finale in July. Natalie Dormer and Boyd Holbrook star opposite The Killer and Jurassic World: Dominion's Omar Sy, who was the only cast member confirmed when the Extraction spinoff was announced in early 2025. (Sy also has Netflix credits to his name with three seasons of Lupin.) Now, if you're a fan of the Extraction films (both of which are available streaming now with a Netflix subscription), you may notice that I'm not listing Chris Hemsworth or any other names from the movies. At the time of writing, it's not clear how closely tied the show will be to the stories of Tyler Rake (Hemsworth), if at all. For now, you can always revisit the two movies streaming on Netflix, and keep your eyes peeled for any more casting news to come out of the show in the weeks to come. Solve the daily Crossword

Business Insider
36 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Why ESPN chief Jimmy Pitaro held back on streaming — until now
A decade ago, HBO broke from cable and started letting people subscribe to the service online. Most of the industry followed suit —just as the cable industry started to collapse. But Disney's ESPN has been the most important holdout. Up until this week, if you wanted to watch the country's most popular sports network — one stocked with must-see sports — you needed some kind of pay TV subscription. Now that is changing. On Thursday, you'll be able to stream ESPN and its related channels for $30 a month without paying for anything else. What took so long? It's pretty simple, says Jimmy Pitaro, who has been running ESPN since 2018: ESPN and its owner, Disney, wanted to keep its pay TV business intact as long as it could. Now, Pitaro is trying to do two things at once: attract new, cable-less sports fans to his streaming service while keeping the people who are still watching ESPN via a cable TV bundle in place. (Fox Corp. CEO Lachlan Murdoch is trying to do the same thing with his new streamer, too.) I talked to Pitaro about the challenges facing the new service — which is launching with a revamped app and promising all kinds of interactive bells and whistles — at Disney's new Manhattan headquarters this week. I was also curious about ESPN's embrace of sports betting and how the company is thinking about diversity in the Trump 2.0 era. You can hear our entire conversation, which also gets pretty deep in the weeds on topics like his new NFL deal, as well as moves to import programming from the likes of Pat McAfee, over on my Channels podcast. Here's an edited excerpt: Peter Kafka: This week you're launching your new streaming service, so people can subscribe to ESPN without paying for other cable channels. But you'd also like people who are still paying for cable to keep doing that, instead of dropping it and getting ESPN directly from you. How do you navigate that? Jimmy Pitaro: The cable and satellite TV business has been very good to us. It's been very good to The Walt Disney Company. And when we went into this and ultimately decided we were going to go direct to consumer a few years ago, we recognized internally that it would not serve us to incentivize people to cut the cord. Why not? Because it's a great business model. Do you make more money selling ESPN through a cable bundle than you would selling to me directly? Let me back up here. There are pros and cons to having a subscriber access ESPN through the traditional ecosystem and having a subscriber access ESPN directly. If you access us directly, the biggest problem we are going to have is churn. If you go back to the [traditional TV] ecosystem, you don't have as much of a churn problem. It's really easy for me to turn a streaming service on or off. It's much harder for me to do it with cable. Correct. So while we are charging $29.99 for a subscription to ESPN, standalone, and that's a high price point, we still think there's value there. Significant value. But the concern is the churn will be greater than what we're seeing in the traditional ecosystem. So you weigh the pros and cons. And where we net out is we're actually somewhat agnostic in terms of how Peter Kafka is accessing ESPN, whether it's through DirecTV or Charter, or through Hulu Live or YouTube TV or directly [from ESPN]. You've been talking about doing this internally for years. Ten years ago, Disney CEO Bob Iger freaked everyone out by acknowledging that ESPN was losing subscribers, and people have been asking you to go direct since then. What prompted you to do it now? It was really a few years ago, when we saw [cable TV] declines being in the neighborhood of eight or 9%. And not stopping. Yeah. Our research did not indicate it was going to slow down anytime soon. You've been doing a lot of deals to add more sports, like the NFL deal you announced last week. But you can't have all the sports. How is a consumer supposed to navigate a world where some NFL games are on one app and others are on different ones? So this is fascinating. We have a really talented research department, and one of the things that we've seen is that younger sports fans do not have any issue with having multiple apps. They know how to switch apps. That's how they grew up, bouncing from app to app. So the issues that you and I might have, they don't seem to be present with my teenagers, for example. Disney historically wanted nothing to do with gambling. Now you've embraced it. You guys have a branded ESPN sportsbook. But there's also pushback against the sports betting boom from people who say it's poorly regulated, and that we're starting to see harm from it, especially with young men. Is there anything that gives you pause or makes you consider tapping the brakes — maybe you'll allow it, but make it harder to do, add more friction to it? If you look at our research, what you'll see is that sports fans today see sports betting as a part of the fan experience. Our mission is to serve the sports fan. And it would be very hard for ESPN today to serve the sports fan without providing substantial, meaningful betting content and a frictionless — or somewhat frictionless — experience around placing a bet. We are not a book. We do not take people's money. But we partnered with Penn Entertainment to create ESPN Bet, and we get paid an annual license fee for our brand. We obviously promote it significantly and we integrate it into our programming. [Our new app] will have a significant sports betting tab that we're excited about, that we think is needle-moving. We have not really received any negative feedback on our offering. You have kids. Do they bet on sports? My kids do not. But I'm on college campuses all the time, and it's everywhere. You're surrounded by it. Does that concern you? Look. What I've experienced — and I don't want to be naive here — but from my limited experience, what I see is people making small bets. Obviously, I understand that there are many problem cases. We partner with an enterprise that is making this a priority — offers thoughtful PSAs; has the technology to identify problem bettors and cut them off; makes help available to them. The Penn deal seems like it's not working for them, based on what they've said in their public commentary. You guys have an out next year. The real leaders in sports betting remain DraftKings and FanDuel. Do you imagine that you'll look for a different provider next year? The opt-out you mentioned is mutual. So they have it, we have it. It's next summer. The good news here is that we're launching an enhanced app that includes significant betting integration, and we believe ESPN BET is going to benefit from that. So let's see if we can improve market share with this launch. And we will evaluate things at the end of football season. I was looking at an interview I did with you in 2019. I was asking about a change in programming from your predecessor, and you made a point of saying, "Diversity is very important for us," which was a sort of standard thing to say then. It wasn't considered controversial. In 2025, with the Trump administration, saying you're for diversity can be a trigger. The FCC held up the Paramount/Skydance deal, in part, because it wanted Paramount to get rid of its DEI program. Are you considering making changes within ESPN to accommodate the new political reality? When we talk about our priorities, we talk about direct-to-consumer quality, storytelling, innovation, and audience expansion. And if you were to walk the halls of any of our offices and ask our employees what our priorities are, I believe they would be able to rattle those four off. I also believe that most, if not all, of our employees would start with audience expansion. It's one of the things that has kept me up at night in this job, from the day I got it. I know that ESPN resonates with someone like me, someone my age, someone who's a hardcore sports fan. How do we make ESPN resonate with, for example, younger people, with the casual sports fan, with women? That's the opportunity for ESPN to expand and grow. And as a part of that, I believe that we need a workforce that reflects the audiences that we're trying to reach. Is "diversity" a word you guys can use in Bristol [Connecticut, where ESPN is headquartered]? I would say the words that we're using are "audience expansion."


USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
3 quick takeaways from Episode 3 of the Buffalo Bills on HBO's 'Hard Knocks'
The Buffalo Bills were back at it again on HBO's "Hard Knocks." It was the third episode of the NFL's offseason program for the team and there were many behind-the-scenes looks given to fans. Did you miss the bits from it? Maybe not watch it yet? Here are three quick takeaways from this week's episode: Ed Oliver horse It's well known that defensive tackle Ed Oliver is a fan of horses. In the past, video has surfaced of him riding one to practice and that even aired on this week's episode. The Houston native revealed he owns 30 horses and went into detail about his passion. James Cook saga ending When "Hard Knocks" got going, running back James Cook began his holdout. A behind-the-scenes look was expected that would be dramatic. Wrong. Instead his holdout ending was highlighted which was much more dull... but interesting nonetheless. General manager Brandon Beane features here. Pizza party The pizza parties the Bills' offensive line have been noted in the past. It happened more in-depth in this episode. Center Connor McGovern and his wife host one of them and "Hard Knocks" was invited.