
Ontario campaign does little to solve financial crisis among cities
Social Sharing
Local politicians were all smiles when Ontario PC leader Doug Ford made a multi-billion dollar promise to upload responsibility for the Ottawa's struggling LRT — a pledge also made by Liberal leader Bonnie Crombie, with the NDP and Greens opting for a pledge to restore operational transit funding.
It's by far the biggest campaign promise for the capital, and one of the most high-ticket promises made for any city.
But municipalities have had another issue at the top of their wishlists, albeit with far less flash.
"Cities need a different way of creating revenue. That would solve for everything," Laine Johnson, a councillor for Ottawa's college ward, said.
Municipalities say years of provincial and federal downloading, including responsibility for increasingly complex social issues, have made the situation untenable.
"It's boring. You can't cut a ribbon on that," said Johnson. "But the centre cannot hold."
Paying for services
Without other revenue sources, cities must predominantly rely on property taxes.
Riley Brockington, another Ottawa city councillor and board member with the Association of Municipalities of Ontario, said that inevitably leads to large tax hikes.
"Property taxes were never intended to pay for things like social services and the health crisis that is the homelessness, mental health, addictions crisis unfolding on our streets," explained Marianne Meed Ward, mayor of Burlington and chair of Ontario Big City Mayors.
She noted the calls for a new fiscal framework are coming from all municipal organizations.
Ontario spending on homelessness 'stagnate' while problem worsens, new report says
Toronto's not alone in looking at property tax hikes. These municipalities are too
"We are all aligned. And I don't know that I've ever seen that in my 15 or so years in elected office," said Meed Ward.
The current system of funding major projects is overly bureaucratic and makes it impossible for cities to make long-term plans, according to Meed Ward.
"It's like The Hunger Games of funding and it doesn't guarantee us the revenue that we need," she said.
Why not now?
Meed Ward would like to see more flexible funding similar to the gas tax, which grows with populations, reduces the administrative burden, and provides certainty at a time when an impending trade war threatens to derail local economies.
She said Ford's three main competitors are all open to a new financial relationship, which is progress, adding that OCBM had "good dialogue" with the government prior to the campaign.
But the issue has failed to break through as a main election concern.
It's not an easy headline nor an easy vote-getter for the PCs, which Myer Siemiatycki, professor emeritus of politics at Toronto Metropolitan University, say have effectively set the election agenda.
He said Ford has made big-ticket promises in areas with the most seats — including the Ottawa LRT uploading, a tunnel under Highway 401, and the redevelopment of Ontario Place — focusing on the "pathway to becoming premier" regardless of what municipal politicians might choose to prioritize.
Other parties have struggled to turn the conversation toward social issues, though Siemiatycki applauds AMO for its "cheeky" and "aggressive" campaign telling Ontarians to 'vote like your quality of life on it.'
"Municipalities need tax sources beyond the property tax. Regrettably, that's not what we have heard on the campaign trail," Siemiatycki said. "On that front, I would imagine that this campaign has been a disappointment to municipal politicians."
Uploading responsibilities
Alexander Wray, a research scientist at Western University, agreed the party platforms provide nothing "groundbreaking."
"Nobody's discussing how we're going to give municipalities new revenue tools that they can use to raise revenue and pay for different programs and services as well as address some of the downloading that's occurred over the last 20 years," he said, suggesting local sales taxes should be put on the table.
Beyond Ottawa's LRT promise, several parties have suggested uploading responsibility for social issues. The NDP has specifically mentioned emergency shelters.
Wray calls that a "non-starter" which simply shifts money around while opening the door to politicization.
Johnson has her own concerns.
"Cities are essential for hyperlocal responsiveness where people are at. I get a little concerned when the solution to some of our problems is that the province actually gets to assume greater parts of our programs," she said.
Provincial overrides
Brockington said provincial responsibilities shouldn't be paid for off the backs of local taxpayers, noting paramedic, long-term care and childcare costs.
He warns that without intervention "huge" property tax hikes will be inevitable.
"We need the provincial government to acknowledge that there are provincial services that municipalities are offering and that has to be again reexamined and uploaded back to the province," he said.
Siemiatycki notes another issue that's come sharply into focus over the past term — provincial involvement in municipal issues.
"We've got a premier who wants to decide where there should and shouldn't be bike lanes, where there should and shouldn't be safe injection sites, how traffic should move in cities," he said.
The PC platform also suggests a desire to restrict the placement of speed enforcement cameras and upload building approvals for some infrastructure projects.
While the fiscal issue can feel "dry," Brockington implored voters to consider it.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Global News
an hour ago
- Global News
Public divided on Bill 5 but say Indigenous rights are more important than speed: poll
Public sentiment is divided on the Ford government's controversial new mining law, according to fresh polling, which indicates people are in favour of speeding up projects but not at the expense of First Nation rights or labour laws. New polling from Liason Strategies for the National Ethnic Press and Media Council of Canada gauged the mood of Ontarians as the government passed Bill 5 into law. The legislation makes a number of changes, among them is the power for the government to create so-called special economic zones, where municipal, environmental or labour laws could be bypassed. The government has indicated the Ring of Fire will be one such area, potentially along with Highway 401 and Ontario's fleet of nuclear power stations. The law's passage at Queen's Park last week sparked a storm of protests and backlash from First Nations leaders, who fear it will infringe on their rights and labour unions, who worry about workers' rights. Story continues below advertisement First Nations groups, in particular, have promised a summer of disruption in response to the legislation — potentially blocking railways, highways and mines in the north. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Liaison's polling shows public opinion on the legislation itself is evenly split. About half of those polled (49 per cent) said they were following the legislation somewhat or very closely as it passed through the legislature. Opinion of its value was also split. Forty-four per cent of those polled said they were in favour of it, while 41 per cent said they were opposed. Fifteen per cent of people said they were unsure. 'Given the poll's margin of error, this is a pretty close result,' David Valentin, principal at Liason Strategies, said in an interview on Focus Ontario. 'It's not probably where the premier wants to see it, which is somewhere closer to 60 or 65 per cent, but it's also not where the opposition would like to see it, with overwhelming opposition. So, we've got a sort of mixed result.' The poll also asked people to rank various issues against the importance of fast-tracking key construction projects. Sixty-three per cent of respondents said fast-tracking was more important than municipal bylaws, and 58 per cent favoured speeding up projects over following environmental regulations. Story continues below advertisement On the other hand, 64 per cent of people said respecting Indigenous rights was more important than speeding up projects, and 56 per cent of those polled said it was more important to follow labour laws than to speed up projects. The polling points to public opinion sitting behind two groups who have been most vocal in their opposition to Bill 5. 'It shows you that when it comes to Indigenous leaders and labour leaders, they've gotten their message out, their message has resonated, and Ontarians agree with them: Yeah, you can speed up the process, but you're not going to suspend labour laws,' Valentin said. Last week, Bill 5 received Royal Assent and became law, with Ontario Premier Doug Ford saying he wants to designate the Ring of Fire as a special economic zone 'as quickly as possible.' At the same time, the government is promising to consult with First Nations leaders before any major changes are made using the new powers. Valentin said the lack of examples for what a special economic zone will be was potentially making it harder for people to form a strong opinion in favour or against the legislation. 'What does it actually mean? Which regulations, which laws are going to be suspended? Which groups are ultimately going to be impacted?' he said. 'They've written the law so they can do a lot of things — OK, what are the specifics of that going to be? I think that might be why people perhaps have a hard time understanding what the ultimate effects of the bill are.'

Globe and Mail
8 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
The problem with politicians' pet projects
Governments of all political stripes in Canada are making the most of the economic crisis triggered by U.S. President Donald Trump's whiplash-inducing tariff decisions. From the Ontario PCs to the BC NDP, the economic disruption has provided cover for governments to push their pet projects to the front of the line so that they build, baby, build. Ontario Premier Doug Ford wants to construct the world's longest traffic tunnel under Highway 401 and is calling on Ottawa to scrap a federal law that assesses the environmental impact of major projects so that he can meet his long-held ambition to develop mines in the 'Ring of Fire.' B.C. Premier David Eby has already passed contentious legislation this spring to eliminate environment assessments for a string of energy projects and to fast-track approvals for critical mineral mines. He now wants Ottawa to help pay for a transmission line to connect those potential projects – and while Ottawa has its wallet open, he'd also like some substantial cash for a replacement of the aging Massey tunnel that presents a choke point on Highway 99. And the federal Liberals are talking about a fast track for nation-building projects. All of this, naturally, in the name of unlocking Canada's economic potential. New Democrats, Liberals, and Conservatives all seem to have ended up at the same place: Those sitting around a cabinet table ought to decide which projects get built in a hurry, and which ones will have to wade through the existing regulatory mire. Andrew Coyne: The premiers as nation-builders? Colour me skeptical Campbell Clark: Should Canada build a pipeline to the West or the East? Prime Minister Mark Carney's One Canadian Economy bill, introduced Friday, proposes to create an office to streamline approvals for 'nation-building' projects such as ports, critical mineral mines and trade corridors. Projects that get on the list will be prioritized – leaving behind those that don't win favour. His criteria are vague enough to allow elected officials to play favourites. Nation-building projects are those that strengthen Canada's autonomy, resilience and security, and offer 'undeniable benefits to Canada.' Projects with Indigenous backing and clean growth potential will get a boost up the ladder. Mr. Carney invited the premiers to submit their preferred projects for consideration, making for a very jolly meeting of the First Ministers on June 2 because as it happened, the leaders all had arrived with their own parochial definitions of the national interest. Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew wants infrastructure funding for the Port of Churchill. Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston wants Ottawa's backing to develop offshore wind energy. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has revived her province's push for a new bitumen pipeline to the Pacific. The premise for this activity is that Canada's current regulatory framework is broken, that environmental assessments take too long, and that cabinets need special powers to ensure that projects are built in a timely way. Editorial: Ottawa should look to B.C.'s fast-track blueprint for big projects Editorial: Free the market for renewable energy in Alberta What if, instead of politicians advancing their political pet projects, they instead tackled the underlying problem? The private sector will necessarily power much of this nation-building. There is much alignment with Ottawa's ambitions, but some subtle differences. The Business Council of Canada has called for efforts to fast-track strategic infrastructure in response to the economic challenges now facing the nation as its major trading partner redraws the playing field. But the council isn't asking premiers to pick winners. It sees essential infrastructure projects as those that support energy and trade but also research and development infrastructure such as industrial labs. Business is asking governments to harmonize regulations across levels of government and eliminate bureaucratic bottlenecks that delay strategic investments. There is duplication; get rid of it. Environmental assessments can be managed more efficiently; reform the system. And the Crown can find ways to better execute the constitutional duty to consult and accommodate First Nations. Canada's productivity decline has many causes, but one of the most obvious is the penchant of governments to subsidize favoured industries rather than undertake the less glamorous work of tearing down barriers to private sector investment. A regulatory fast lane for pet projects is just a new spin on that tired and failed approach.


Canada Standard
14 hours ago
- Canada Standard
Opinion: 'Don't Look, Just Leap', Carney and Ford Agree
Prime Minister Mark Carney and Ontario Premier Doug Ford seem to think that environmental assessment laws governing new pipelines, mines, nuclear power plants, ports, power dams, and transmission lines are no longer needed. Trust us, they say. Give us and the other politicians in our cabinets unfettered discretion to decide in secret which projects are in the national interest, where free-fire special economic zones should be established, and which corporations we should accept as trusted partners in exploiting Canada's natural wealth No need for serious debate in legislatures, they say. Ontario's Bill 5, the Protect Ontario by Unleashing our Economy Act , was whipped through the provincial legislature in eight weeks. Carney wants Bill C-5, the Building Canada Act , enacted by Parliament by Canada Day, July 1. Independent scientists, civil society, and local communities need not be consulted on new megaprojects, they say. Governments know best. Yes, Indigenous nations must be heard from on account of that pesky Constitution and Supreme Court. But those consultations must be done quickly because project approvals are guaranteed within two years to ensure certainty for investors. View our latest digests Yes, they say, Canada's boreal forest is burning, atmospheric and other rivers are overflowing, and sea levels are rising. But action to address the climate and biodiversity emergencies really must be put on hold on account of the tyrant to the south. We need to let the U.S. President-not to mention the big investment banks-know that Canada can lay steel and pour concrete as fast as his country can. Benefits to Canadians from these national interest projects must wait, as well. Beginning roughly a half-century ago, Conservative federal and Ontario governments enacted laws requiring development projects to be assessed so that their environmental effects could be avoided, or at least mitigated. Ontario's Environmental Assessment Act was enacted in 1975, the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act in 1992. Premier Bill Davis amd Prime Minister Mulroney understood that bureaucrats and consulting engineers don't always get it right, and that the singular focus on economic growth can sometimes leads to ecological disaster. Look before you leap. Ensure that government decisions to approve new highways, oil sands mines, or pipelines at least consider possible adverse environmental effects. Otherwise you get Chornobyl, Fukushima, Deepwater Horizon, and the Mount Polley and Giant mines. Ontario's Bill 5 and federal Bill C-5 effectively override these environmental assessment laws for the very projects that most need assessment and public discussion. Thank goodness we have elected such wise men who truly understand that a tunnel under the 401 highway, a trans-Canada energy corridor, and new roads to the Arctic are environmentally sustainable and will generate amazing benefits to regular Canadians. As catastrophic climate change and species extinctions accelerate, Canadians may be comforted by the thought that oil and gas and mining companies and investment banks will enjoy healthy profits for at least a few more quarters. Stephen Hazell is a veteran environmental lawyer, a member of the Energy Mix Productions Board of Directors, and an advisor to two national organizations assessing the impacts of Bill C-5. Source: The Energy Mix