
Ontario campaign does little to solve financial crisis among cities
Social Sharing
Local politicians were all smiles when Ontario PC leader Doug Ford made a multi-billion dollar promise to upload responsibility for the Ottawa's struggling LRT — a pledge also made by Liberal leader Bonnie Crombie, with the NDP and Greens opting for a pledge to restore operational transit funding.
It's by far the biggest campaign promise for the capital, and one of the most high-ticket promises made for any city.
But municipalities have had another issue at the top of their wishlists, albeit with far less flash.
"Cities need a different way of creating revenue. That would solve for everything," Laine Johnson, a councillor for Ottawa's college ward, said.
Municipalities say years of provincial and federal downloading, including responsibility for increasingly complex social issues, have made the situation untenable.
"It's boring. You can't cut a ribbon on that," said Johnson. "But the centre cannot hold."
Paying for services
Without other revenue sources, cities must predominantly rely on property taxes.
Riley Brockington, another Ottawa city councillor and board member with the Association of Municipalities of Ontario, said that inevitably leads to large tax hikes.
"Property taxes were never intended to pay for things like social services and the health crisis that is the homelessness, mental health, addictions crisis unfolding on our streets," explained Marianne Meed Ward, mayor of Burlington and chair of Ontario Big City Mayors.
She noted the calls for a new fiscal framework are coming from all municipal organizations.
Ontario spending on homelessness 'stagnate' while problem worsens, new report says
Toronto's not alone in looking at property tax hikes. These municipalities are too
"We are all aligned. And I don't know that I've ever seen that in my 15 or so years in elected office," said Meed Ward.
The current system of funding major projects is overly bureaucratic and makes it impossible for cities to make long-term plans, according to Meed Ward.
"It's like The Hunger Games of funding and it doesn't guarantee us the revenue that we need," she said.
Why not now?
Meed Ward would like to see more flexible funding similar to the gas tax, which grows with populations, reduces the administrative burden, and provides certainty at a time when an impending trade war threatens to derail local economies.
She said Ford's three main competitors are all open to a new financial relationship, which is progress, adding that OCBM had "good dialogue" with the government prior to the campaign.
But the issue has failed to break through as a main election concern.
It's not an easy headline nor an easy vote-getter for the PCs, which Myer Siemiatycki, professor emeritus of politics at Toronto Metropolitan University, say have effectively set the election agenda.
He said Ford has made big-ticket promises in areas with the most seats — including the Ottawa LRT uploading, a tunnel under Highway 401, and the redevelopment of Ontario Place — focusing on the "pathway to becoming premier" regardless of what municipal politicians might choose to prioritize.
Other parties have struggled to turn the conversation toward social issues, though Siemiatycki applauds AMO for its "cheeky" and "aggressive" campaign telling Ontarians to 'vote like your quality of life on it.'
"Municipalities need tax sources beyond the property tax. Regrettably, that's not what we have heard on the campaign trail," Siemiatycki said. "On that front, I would imagine that this campaign has been a disappointment to municipal politicians."
Uploading responsibilities
Alexander Wray, a research scientist at Western University, agreed the party platforms provide nothing "groundbreaking."
"Nobody's discussing how we're going to give municipalities new revenue tools that they can use to raise revenue and pay for different programs and services as well as address some of the downloading that's occurred over the last 20 years," he said, suggesting local sales taxes should be put on the table.
Beyond Ottawa's LRT promise, several parties have suggested uploading responsibility for social issues. The NDP has specifically mentioned emergency shelters.
Wray calls that a "non-starter" which simply shifts money around while opening the door to politicization.
Johnson has her own concerns.
"Cities are essential for hyperlocal responsiveness where people are at. I get a little concerned when the solution to some of our problems is that the province actually gets to assume greater parts of our programs," she said.
Provincial overrides
Brockington said provincial responsibilities shouldn't be paid for off the backs of local taxpayers, noting paramedic, long-term care and childcare costs.
He warns that without intervention "huge" property tax hikes will be inevitable.
"We need the provincial government to acknowledge that there are provincial services that municipalities are offering and that has to be again reexamined and uploaded back to the province," he said.
Siemiatycki notes another issue that's come sharply into focus over the past term — provincial involvement in municipal issues.
"We've got a premier who wants to decide where there should and shouldn't be bike lanes, where there should and shouldn't be safe injection sites, how traffic should move in cities," he said.
The PC platform also suggests a desire to restrict the placement of speed enforcement cameras and upload building approvals for some infrastructure projects.
While the fiscal issue can feel "dry," Brockington implored voters to consider it.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
2 First Nations working on roads to Ring of Fire speak out against Ontario's new mining law
Two First Nations that signed deals with the provincial government to improve access to the Ring of Fire are speaking out against a new Ontario law that seeks to ease mineral extraction in the northern region. Aroland First Nation Chief Sonny Gagnon said his community objects to the law known as Bill 5, which seeks to speed up development in the face of pressure from the United States. The legislation passed last week and allows Ontario to suspend provincial and municipal laws by creating so-called special economic zones for certain projects it chooses, such as new mines. "We do not stand with Ontario in support of Bill 5," Gagnon said in a statement. "We do stand in support of the other First Nations in Ontario who are opposed to Bill 5 and working to have it thrown out." Ontario intends to name the mineral-rich Ring of Fire as the first such zone, but the law has created a firestorm of anger among many First Nations. They say they want to be involved in development, but that the new law violates their treaty rights and ignores their concerns. Aroland signed a shared-prosperity agreement with the province in January for major upgrades to roads that lead to the proposed roads to the Ring of Fire, a 5,000-square kilometre region about 450 kilometres north of Thunder Bay, Ont. Aroland sits outside the Ring of Fire region with access to the provincial highway system that ends near its territory. Premier Doug Ford has trotted out Gagnon's name at least five times in recent weeks in defence of Bill 5. Ford also often points to Marten Falls First Nation and Webequie First Nation, which are the lead proponents for three roads that will connect their remote communities to the provincial highway system. One of them would connect the Eagle's Nest site in the Ring of Fire, a proposed mine owned by Australian mining giant Wyloo, to the other two roads. "There's going to be a group that doesn't want anything done," Ford said last week. "Well, good, don't do it then. There's going to be another group in the middle that says, 'Boy, let's see what happens.' And then there's the progressive group that's saying, 'Let's get it done,' like Chief Sonny from Aroland — and Webequie and Marten Falls." Gagnon said Aroland has never consented to mining the Ring of Fire. Rather, part of the agreement was designed to give road access to its neighbouring First Nation, Marten Falls. Marten Falls and Webequie First Nation are fly-in communities that have a month or so of winter road access. "Aroland has never said Marten Falls cannot build a road so that it is no longer remote; if they want to have road access to the highway system like we do, they should be able to," Gagnon said. WATCH | Ontario passes Bill 5 despite opposition from First Nations, environmental groups: Ontario passes Bill 5 despite opposition from First Nations, environmental groups 6 days ago Duration 2:39 "But that has to be done right — with proper assessment and protection measures and Aroland involvement and consent. The agreement with Ontario is about that, and some necessary electrical power to our community." "We were to get funding to support that initiative and so far we have received nothing and instead have spent our own dollars trying to ensure our community has basic services," Gagnon said. Aroland does not consent to that road being used for mining companies, he added. "We have consistently in writing indicated that no such decision on what happens to the Ring of Fire should be made until the regional assessment being conducted now and being co-led by many First Nations, including Aroland, is complete, and indicates that mining in this sensitive and vulnerable peatlands region is safe for humanity, for us, for wildlife, climate and water," Gagnon said. "We don't yet know that. More important — Ontario does not yet know that." Ford says he will speak to Gagnon Ford took issue with Gagnon's comments. "Does he want the $200 million electricity deal that we handed over to him? Does he want to get off diesel because they live on diesel? Does he want a road that they can actually leave their community and drive?" "Does he want a community centre? Does he want a hockey arena inside that community centre? The answer is 1,000 per cent yes," Ford said Monday at Intersect/25, an event hosted by the Globe and Mail. Ford said he will be speaking to Gagnon shortly. "Mark my words in this room, he will be moving forward with us, not because of me, not because of pressuring me, because he's a smart man, and he understands his community needs to prosper," Ford said. Marten Falls First Nation also has an agreement with the province on roads, and its chief says he cannot support the law as it is written — though he hopes Ontario can correct course with consultation. 'I'm not OK with this bill' Chief Bruce Achneepineskum said he is feeling conflicted. "I'm not OK with this bill," he told The Canadian Press in an interview. On the one hand, he and his community want road access built so they do not have to rely on winter roads. Last year, the frozen road only lasted a month as the winter road season keeps shrinking, he said. Marten Falls also wants to be in the driver's seat for any development in its territory, Achneepineskum said. "Our intent is to take the lead on development in our area and with that we're still in discussions with government on how to move forward," he said. "We don't agree with everything that government says and does. So we're taking it on an approach that's based on a negotiation." Marten Falls First Nation has been working on environmental assessments for the roads. One of the assessments has been in development for going on six years, though about half that time was lost due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Achneepineskum said. "Sometimes, you think to yourself, that is a really long time," he said. Ford, Indigenous Affairs Minister Greg Rickford and Energy and Mines Minister Stephen Lecce have said the province will consult First Nations on the new law throughout the summer. WATCH | Breaking down the controversial Bill 5: Breaking down the Ford government's controversial Bill 5 11 days ago Duration 7:16 The Ford government has been receiving criticism from Ontario's opposition parties, as well as environmental and Indigenous leaders on their controversial Bill 5. CBC's Mike Crawley breaks down what you need to know about the legislation. Achneepineskum said he is willing to listen to the province and give them time to get Bill 5 right, but, like many other First Nations have said, he wanted the province to consult with them on the language in the legislation rather than starting those conversations after it is already law. "I have to support Aboriginal and treaty rights that other First Nations are talking about because, in principle, that's what we're fighting for also: to have our rights and interests in our traditional area — and that includes the Ring of Fire — recognized," Achneepineskum said.


CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
The Beer Store announces more store closures across Ontario. Here's when and where they will happen
The Beer Store has announced it will be closing 10 more locations across Ontario this summer, including six in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA). In a release issued on Monday, the retailer said three locations in Mississauga—2925 Eglington Ave. W, 3154 Hurontario St., and 65 Queen St. N—will all close effective Aug. 10. Also closing on Aug. 10 are locations at 2934 Finch Ave. E in Scarborough, 1470 Major Mackenzie Dr. in Vaughan, and 1431 Rebecca St. in Oakville. 'We made the difficult decision to close these retail locations,' Ozzie Ahmed, The Beer Store's vice president of retail, said in the release. 'We will continue our focus on what we do best, ice-cold beer, great customer service and a world-class recycling program that last year returned more containers than we sold.' Stores in Amherstview, Cambridge, Iroquois Falls, and Tottenham will also close on the same date elsewhere in the province. The Beer Store says 'all efforts' will be made to support employees through the closures. It is unclear how many employees will be let go, or if they will be moved to other nearby branches. This is the latest in a series of closure-related announcements that the retailer has made since the start of 2025. 'Modernizing operations in a changing marketplace is never easy, we know this will be difficult news for customers and employees,' said Ahmed. The newest round of closures follows the province's move to expand alcohol sales to corner stores across Ontario, which saw Premier Doug Ford broker a new deal with The Beer Store to get done. Part of the new agreement includes keeping at least 386 stores open until July 2025 and at least 300 until Dec. 31, 2025. Nearly 40 stores have been closed or scheduled for closure across the province so far this year. With files from CTV News Toronto's Alex Arsenych


Globe and Mail
3 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Carney was right to not retaliate against Trump's latest tariffs
Fraser Johnson is the Leenders Supply Chain Management Association Chair at the Ivey Business School at Western University in London, Ont. In the latest twist to the Canada-U.S. trade saga, last week U.S. President Donald Trump doubled tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, which now stand at 50 per cent. As the largest supplier of both metals to the U.S., these tariffs disproportionately affect Canada. Not surprisingly, there were immediate calls for the Canadian government to retaliate, including Ontario Premier Doug Ford, who said: 'We can't sit back and let President Trump steamroll us. We need to react immediately.' To do so would be a mistake. The federal government initially imposed a series of retaliatory tariffs in March and early April in a tit-for-tat trade exchange with Washington. It was a predictable, and maybe natural, response. Many Canadians felt that we were being bullied by our largest trading partner and Canada needed to retaliate. However, this approach has been unproductive, only serving to further alienate Mr. Trump and his trade representatives. More recently, Prime Minister Mark Carney has taken a more pragmatic approach to trade relations with Washington, and the Canadian strategy has quietly appeared to shift. Mr. Carney has exempted products from counter-tariffs to help Canadian businesses adapt and because of concerns about driving up costs for Canadian consumers. According to a report by Oxford Economics released last month, almost 60 per cent of the $96-billion in U.S. imports hit by Canadian counter-tariffs are eligible for relief. The rhetoric from Ottawa has also been toned down. While it is still clear that he believed the tariffs were 'unjustified' and 'illegal,' Mr. Carney decided not to respond immediately and refrained from publicly admonishing Washington, as was the tendency of his predecessor Justin Trudeau. That was the right thing to do. I have been steadfast in my opinion that responding with counter-tariffs is an ineffective strategy. They serve only to raise prices for consumers and punish Canadian businesses that are already struggling with the effects of Mr. Trump's tariff policy. From retaliation to negotiation: How Canada's U.S. trade strategy is shifting under Carney Ottawa sees $617-million boost for import duties in March as Conservatives demand countertariff numbers Similarly, it is also my view that the U.S. tariffs are ill-conceived and unsustainable. Another reason to not retaliate against the tariffs is that Mr. Trump would not be able to keep them up for long. Supply chains rely on regional networks for a number of practical reasons, including minimizing transportation costs and shortening lead times. North America is a perfect example, with our integrated supply chains in sectors such as energy, autos, and steel and aluminum. That Canada and Mexico are America's largest trading partners is a function of the supply-chain infrastructure that has developed and evolved over decades. American businesses need Canadian steel and aluminum. U.S. production capacity for primary aluminum can satisfy only about 20 per cent of its total demand and it has been nearly half a century since a major aluminum smelter has been built in the United States. Nearly one-quarter of U.S. steel and iron imports and approximately one-half of its aluminum imports come from Canada. Ultimately, though, we must be realistic. Efforts to diversify our markets and eliminate barriers to interprovincial trade certainly need to be pursued. However, the practical reality is that Canada's geographic proximity to the world's largest market means we will continue to rely on our economic relationship with the U.S. The indirect effect of the recurring cycle of tariffs and counter-tariffs is economic and business uncertainty, which contributes to investment hesitancy and reduced risk-taking. In the current environment, Canadian businesses are less likely to make commitments to capacity expansion, new technologies, hiring and new product/service development. A resolution is required so that businesses can understand the rules and evaluate the economic consequences of their decisions. Canadians are starting to see the effects of the trade dispute with Washington, with plunging exports to the U.S. and the unemployment rate ticking up. Many economists are expecting an economic slowdown and possibly a recession later this year. The Ivey Purchasing Managers Index, a leading economic indicator, contracted for the second straight month in May while the Prices Index showed accelerating costs. This is not the time for impulsive reactions. I support a deliberate approach. Neither party wins by escalating the trade war, and I believe Mr. Trump wants a deal with Canada, but the U.S. has the advantage in this situation, and it will be more difficult if we retaliate. The negotiations are complex and involve multiple stakeholders, and will most certainly take several weeks to hash out. While I expect that current negotiations with the U.S. will be resolved successfully, patience is required.