logo
Columbia Expands Efforts to Fight Antisemitism as Trump Deal Seems Near

Columbia Expands Efforts to Fight Antisemitism as Trump Deal Seems Near

New York Times2 days ago
Columbia University announced on Tuesday that it will make additional reforms to combat antisemitism on campus, including by formally adopting a contentious definition of antisemitism that classifies some criticisms of the state of Israel as antisemitic.
The changes, some of which have been long sought by pro-Israel Jewish organizations, come ahead of a possible deal with the Trump administration to restore more than $400 million in research funding that was frozen as a result of allegations that Columbia was not doing enough to curb antisemitism on campus.
That agreement, which could come as early as this week, is likely to require Columbia to pay a fine of hundreds of millions of dollars to settle antisemitism claims. It is likely to also require further reforms in exchange for reopening the federal funding spigot, two people with knowledge of the matter told The New York Times last week.
The latest efforts to fight antisemitism were disclosed in a letter to the Columbia community from Claire Shipman, the acting president.
'In my view, any government agreement we reach is only a starting point for change,' she wrote. 'Committing to reform on our own is a more powerful path. It will better enable us to recognize our shortcomings and create lasting change.'
Ms. Shipman announced that the changes would include formally incorporating the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's definition of antisemitism into the work of a recently established office at Columbia that considers complaints of discrimination and discriminatory harassment.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Looks Like Bribery!': Critics Say This 1 Colbert Joke May Have Gotten 'Late Show' Canceled
'Looks Like Bribery!': Critics Say This 1 Colbert Joke May Have Gotten 'Late Show' Canceled

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'Looks Like Bribery!': Critics Say This 1 Colbert Joke May Have Gotten 'Late Show' Canceled

CBS stunned fans of 'The Late Show' on Thursday after it announced that it would cancel the Stephen Colbert-led program, a move that renewed attention to a recent jab that the host made toward the network's parent company over its heavily panned $16 million settlement with President Donald Trump. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) shared a clip from Colbert's Monday monologue on social media where he slammed Paramount Global for settling a lawsuit with Trump, who claimed that a '60 Minutes' interview with Kamala Harris was deceptively edited to aid her chances of winning the election. That settlement notably arrived as Paramount looks to merge with Skydance Media in a multibillion-dollar deal, one that requires approval from the Trump administration to proceed. 'As someone who has always been a proud employee of this network, I am offended. I don't know if anything — anything — will repair my trust in this company,' Colbert quipped. 'But, just taking a stab at it, I'd say $16 million would help.' The host proceeded to point out that Paramount once described the lawsuit as 'completely without merit' before joking that the company put a price tag on its 'dignity' and referred to the settlement as a 'big fat bribe.' Colbert, a frequent Trump critic, previously made fun of Paramount back in May amid reports that the company was ready to settle the lawsuit. Warren echoed Colbert's sentiment as she wrote on X that the deal 'looks like bribery' and America 'deserves to know if his show was canceled for political reasons.' In May, Warren, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and more lawmakers sent a letter to Paramount Global chair Shari Redstone warning her not to make a 'grave mistake' by settling the lawsuit. At the time, Sanders — when asked by Colbert about the letter to his 'ultimate boss' — quipped that it could be the host's 'last show' before stressing that such a deal could set a dangerous precedent for other media companies. CBS canceled Colbert's show just THREE DAYS after Colbert called out CBS parent company Paramount for its $16M settlement with Trump – a deal that looks like deserves to know if his show was canceled for political and share his message. — Elizabeth Warren (@SenWarren) July 18, 2025 Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), who is set to appear on Thursday's episode of 'The Late Show,' also criticized CBS' move. 'If Paramount and CBS ended the Late Show for political reasons, the public deserves to know. And deserves better,' Schiff wrote on X. Just finished taping with Stephen Colbert who announced his show was Paramount and CBS ended the Late Show for political reasons, the public deserves to know. And deserves better. — Adam Schiff (@SenAdamSchiff) July 17, 2025 Other critics alleged that the move by CBS was political motivated although the network claims it was 'purely a financial decision.' CBS sells out…again. — Martin Heinrich (@SenatorHeinrich) July 18, 2025 Stephen Colbert's show was canceled three days after he called out Paramount, CBS's parent company, for folding to Trump with a $16M settlement for a lawsuit that even they called 'without merit."People deserve to know if this is a politically motivated attack on free speech. — Rep. Pramila Jayapal (@RepJayapal) July 18, 2025 Colbert to be canceled May 2026.A direct result of Paramount paying Trump 60 million. — Steve Martin (@UnrealBluegrass) July 18, 2025 'This is purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night,' top CBS executives said in a statement announcing the news. 'It is not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount.' — Bill Simmons (@BillSimmons) July 18, 2025 Colbert has the highest ratings of any late night host."Financial reasons" my ass. This is political. — Charlotte Clymer 🇺🇦 (@cmclymer) July 18, 2025 On the one hand: There *is* an economic rationale for this. Late night shows aren't cheap (w/ giant talent salaries) and they don't deliver traditional strong ratings hand: I don't believe them. It's not the money in this case. — Michael Socolow (@MichaelSocolow) July 17, 2025 If Donald Trump is going to get Stephen Colbert canceled, Stephen Colbert should talk about Donald Trump & Jeffrey Epstein every night on his show until it's off the air. — Evan (@daviddunn177) July 18, 2025 Stephen Colbert doesn't need CBS anyway. Wherever he ends up, people are going to watch him even harder now. All CBS did was solidify the fact that they'll be know until the end of time as just another spineless corporation that couldn't do the right thing. — Karly Kingsley (@karlykingsley) July 18, 2025 Related... CBS Cancels 'Late Show,' Ending Stephen Colbert's Run After Decades On Air 'Brace Yourself': Stephen Colbert Spots Trump Moment That Quickly 'Went Off The Rails' Stephen Colbert Exposes The Most Baffling Part Of Trump's Latest Rant

Trump requests release of documents related to Epstein case
Trump requests release of documents related to Epstein case

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump requests release of documents related to Epstein case

US President Donald Trump directed Attorney General Pam Bondi on Thursday to release the grand jury testimony related to the Jeffrey Epstein case, following court approval. "This SCAM, perpetuated by the Democrats, should end, right now!" Trump wrote in a post on his Truth Social platform, decrying the "ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein." Shortly after Trump's statement, Bondi said on X that the Justice Department was ready to move the court on Friday to unseal the grand jury transcripts. President Trump—we are ready to move the court tomorrow to unseal the grand jury transcripts. — Attorney General Pamela Bondi (@AGPamBondi) July 18, 2025 Trump wrote Epstein lewd birthday letter, says WSJ Trump's latest announcement on the Epstein case came shortly after his threats to sue The Wall Street Journal newspaper over a story that the president wrote a crude letter to Epstein. The letter allegedly featured a drawing of a naked woman and was part of a collection of notes for Epstein's 50th birthday in 2003. Trump strongly denied writing the note, calling it "false, malicious, and defamatory," and claiming the newspaper ignored his direct denials. "President Trump will be suing The Wall Street Journal, NewsCorp, and Mr. (Rupert) Murdoch, shortly. The Press has to learn to be truthful, and not rely on sources that probably don't even exist," Trump posted on Truth Social. Epstein case and Trump's rift with MAGA The president was already under intense scrutiny for his previous ties to Epstein. Trump is among several high-profile figures who were once acquainted with Epstein, though he denies ever visiting Epstein's infamous estate in the US Virgin Islands. Epstein, a wealthy financier, was arrested on child sex trafficking and in conspiracy charges. He died by suicide in jail August 2019 while awaiting trial. During the 2024 election campaign, Trump promised to release files relating to Epstein, but later backtracked, urging his Make America Great Again (MAGA) supporters to forget about the files. Many of Trump's supporters, notably those in the core MAGA movement, are accusing the administration of shielding powerful figures allegedly tied to case. The Epstein case is the most prominent rift between Trump and his loyal MAGA base ahead of the 2026 midterms. Edited by: Dmytro Hubenko

Immigrants suing Trump administration for practice of making arrests at court hearings
Immigrants suing Trump administration for practice of making arrests at court hearings

CBS News

time16 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Immigrants suing Trump administration for practice of making arrests at court hearings

A dozen immigrants are suing the Trump administration for its practice of arresting asylum seekers at their court hearings. The lawsuit is filed on behalf of 12 asylum seekers who all showed up to their scheduled court hearings and were detained, most of them taken into custody in the courthouse. The suit claims plaintiffs "have been abruptly ripped from their families, lives, homes, and jobs for appearing in immigration court, a step required to enable them to proceed with their applications for permission to remain in this country." "So many things are illegal about this process," said lead attorney Keren Zwick, with the National Immigrant Justice Center. "The Immigration and Nationality Act that Congress passed creates a process that says this is how the procedures should go ... and the government is just sort of pulling that entire rug out from under folks who are here to seek protection." In a statement, a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson called arresting immigrants in courthouses common sense, saying in part, "Nothing in the Constitution prohibits arresting a lawbreaker where you find them ... It conserves valuable law enforcement resources because they already know where a target will be." These courthouse arrests have been happening across the country, including in New York. A woman named Trini told CBS News New York her adult son was taken into custody at a court hearing for his asylum case and deported to Honduras in June. "He is all I have," she said in Spanish. "Now I am alone." Mariposa Benitez, with the organization Mi Tlalli, is one of several volunteers who have been assisting families daily at immigration court since the spring when DHS began routinely arresting immigrants there. "They are following the due process that they were promised," she said. She added, "When we met Trini, she was really worried. She was sitting on a bench, crying." New York City Council recently passed an additional $33.6 million in funding for pro-bono legal services, saying the crackdown has led to an increased need for legal support.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store