Details of new Aussie road camera trial finally revealed
As authorities try new tactics and technology to deter dangerous drivers, a recent announcement to trial new mobile road safety cameras in Victoria sparked confusion among drivers. The Department of Justice and Community Safety did not reveal what was new about the technology, or what traffic offences were being monitored.
A leading traffic lawyer described the information as "vague", saying it's a "problem for transparency and trust". RACV (Royal Automobile Club of Victoria) told Yahoo News it was seeking more information about the trial.
Now, Serco, the company that operates and maintains traffic cameras in Victoria, has revealed new details about exactly what is on trial.
A spokesperson told Yahoo News the trial, which began in selected Victorian suburbs on July 21, actually involves the trailers which carry the cameras.
Serco reveals what is new about road safety camera trial
The spokesperson told Yahoo News that mobile safety cameras "play an important role" in road safety in Victoria. Their main role is to promote and enforce safe driving behaviours that save lives on roads, she explained.
"Serco's trusted partnership with the Victorian Government means we are continuously looking at improvements and innovation that enable us to deliver an exceptional service.
"As part of this commitment, we are trialling new trailers for Road Safety Cameras," she said.
The trial, which began on July 21, will carry on through to 2025 in select Victorian locations which are already used by current road safety camera operations.
"The trial is exploring the use of trailers, utilising existing Road Safety Camera technology. No trailer camera fines will be issued as part of the trial," she said.
"We are committed to continuing to work closely with the Victorian Government to help keep all road users safe."
🎥 Vandalised surveillance camera on Aussie road goes viral
📸 Drivers stumped by bizarre roadside surveillance camera spotted on road
🚘 Detail overlooked rollout of mobile and seatbelt detection cameras
Victoria's ambitious goal to reduce road deaths
After the trial, the department may consider integrating them into the mobile camera program and used for enforcement purposes.
'Victoria's road safety camera program plays a critical role in changing driver behaviour, reducing serious injuries and saving lives," the spokesperson said last week.
'That's why we're continuing to explore new locations and trial new equipment across the road network, to prevent crashes and deaths on our roads.'
'Every dollar received from road safety cameras goes to the Better Roads Victoria Trust, where it is spent on road restoration, road surface replacement, bridge strengthening and other road safety infrastructure improvements.'
On its website, the department states that it regularly trials new technology, and drivers may notice some trials, while others will go unnoticed because they are simply software changes on existing cameras.
The trailers will be present in the following suburbs:
Tottenham
Port Melbourne
Toorak
Caulfield South
Heatherton
Healesville
Oaklands Junction
During the trial, the cameras will not issue fines, but police will continue patrolling and enforce dangerous and risky road user behaviours.
More information can be found about the trial here.
Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@yahoonews.com.
You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
3 hours ago
- Washington Post
Britain hopes a crackdown on people-smugglers' social media ads will help curb Channel crossings
LONDON — Britain says people who advertise fake passports or people-smuggling services on social medial could face up to five years in prison, in the government's latest effort to deter migrants from crossing the English Channel in small boats. The government said Sunday that anyone convicted of creating online materials intended to break U.K. immigration law will face prison time and a large fine.


New York Post
5 hours ago
- New York Post
Aussie running for Boston suburb mayor says there's ‘no chance' he'll change his name despite Jeffrey Epstein comparison
He's not name-dropping. An Australian man named Geoffrey Epstein is running for mayor in a Massachusetts town — and he rejects any comparisons to the convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, according to a report. Epstein, who goes by 'Geoff,' said he wasn't afraid of the overt homophonic resemblance his name bears to that of the notorious, dead sex trafficker. Advertisement 3 Geoffrey Epstein attends the Framingham Democrats summer barbecue on July 27, 2025. Geoff Epstein for Mayor/Facebook 'That other one is a dead American and I am a live Aussie,' Epstein, who is seeking office in Framingham, a Boston suburb, told HuffPost Tuesday. 'But, of course, there is all the horrifying criminality and darkness of the other guy,' the aspiring pol said, adding, 'I have lived my life trying to be straight up and improving things.' Advertisement Epstein said there was 'no way' he would change his name to avoid association with the degenerate criminal, who officials said committed suicide in a Manhattan lockup in 2019. 'I like my name and I am proud of my family,' he said, adding his family proudly fought in World War II. The Aussie, who noted he was born on September 11, further stands apart from his doppel-namer by way of holding a Ph.D. in theoretical physics, whereas Jeffrey Epstein dropped out of Cooper Union before attaining a degree. He is not the first politician to fight off associations with the infamous sex trafficker. Advertisement 3 Epstein, who goes by 'Geoff,' said he wasn't afraid of the overt homophonic resemblance his name bears to that of the notorious, dead sex trafficker. Geoff Epstein for Mayor/Facebook 3 Convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in a mugshot after his arrest in 2019. Kypros New York State Assemblyman Harvey Epstein was mocked on Saturday Night Live last year for having a name that recalled not only Jeffrey Epstein, but convicted rapist Harvey Weinstein. Advertisement 'It was a total surprise,' Epstein told The Post the day after the show aired. 'Imagine if you were watching SNL and there was a parody about you.' 'Your name is your name. It is what it is. Both [Jeffrey Epstein and Harvey Weinstein] are horrific,' the pol added.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Judge blocks Trump rapid-fire deportations for immigrants with parole status
A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration from rapidly deporting hundreds of thousands of immigrants who had previously been paroled into the United States to flee violence and oppression in their home countries. U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb said in a ruling Friday that the Department of Homeland Security's tactics — rapid-fire deportation proceedings with little to no chance to lodge challenges — amounted to changing the rules in the middle of the game for people previously welcomed into the country on a temporary basis. Cobb barred foreigners with immigration parole, typically a short-term status that allows foreigners to live and work in the U.S. legally, from being subjected to a controversial maneuver the administration has adopted in recent months: dismissing immigrants' pending proceedings in immigration court — only to immediately arrest them outside the courtroom and put them into a sped-up deportation process known as expedited removal. 'In a world of bad options, they played by the rules,' Cobb, a Biden appointee, wrote. 'Now, the Government has not only closed off those pathways for new arrivals but changed the game for parolees already here.' That new tactic arrived amid pressure within the Trump administration to ramp up arrests in support of President Donald Trump's mass deportation agenda, a detail Cobb cited in her ruling. But she said the basis for the expansion of 'expedited removal' and for targeting those previously granted parole exceeded the administration's legal authority and was arbitrary. The White House has put intense pressure on Immigration and Customs Enforcement to increase arrest numbers, with the aim of 3,000 a day. Trump officials view the immigration courts as one of the biggest roadblocks in reaching its goal of 1 million annual deportations and have used the immigration court arrests to increase its numbers. Immigration attorneys have scrambled to adapt to the tactic in recent months, preparing their clients for the possibility of being detained at ICE check-ins and immigration courts. The arrests have spurred fear in immigrant communities across the country, with attorneys warning of a chilling effect among immigrants who have long followed the rules. 'This case's underlying question, then, asks whether parolees who escaped oppression will have the chance to plead their case within a system of rules. Or, alternatively, will they be summarily removed from a country that — as they are swept up at checkpoints and outside courtrooms, often by plainclothes officers without explanation or charges, may look to them more and more like the countries from which they tried to escape?' It's unclear how many immigrants are impacted by Cobb's ruling. She estimated the number as 'hundreds of thousands,' but statistics compiled by Republican lawmakers and immigration opponents suggest the figure could be 1 million or more. "Judge Cobb is flagrantly ignoring the United States Supreme Court which upheld expedited removals of illegal aliens by a 7-2 majority," DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said. "This ruling is lawless and won't stand." As illegal crossings at the border with Mexico mushroomed into a political crisis during the Biden administration, officials increasingly turned to immigration parole as a means to limit chaotic scenes at the border by allowing immigrants from Central America to enter the U.S. legally. A report presented at a House hearing in April by a group favoring greater restrictions on immigration, the Center for Immigration Studies, estimated that the Biden administration granted immigration parole to 2.8 million people. However, only some of those people would be impacted by the judge's ruling Friday since federal law bars the use of expedited removal against immigrants who have been living in the U.S. for more than two years. The new ruling specifically blocks three Trump administration directives: a Jan. 23 memo authorizing the use of 'expedited removal' as broadly as possible; a Feb. 18 Immigration and Customs Enforcement directive authorizing expedited removal for 'paroled arriving aliens'; and a March 25 notice canceling parole status for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans. Solve the daily Crossword