logo
‘Disrespectful and stupid': BSOM candidates condemn sign vandalism

‘Disrespectful and stupid': BSOM candidates condemn sign vandalism

On election day, an X is supposed to be used to endorse a candidate. This week, it was used to negate one.
Sometime Sunday night or Monday morning, a number of signs belonging to Rose Zacharias, the Liberal candidate for Barrie-Springwater-Oro-Medont, were spray-painted with a large blue X across both sides.
Oro-Medonte Coun. John Bard sent BarrieToday an email advising that multiple Liberal signs on Bass Lake Sideroad had been spray painted with blue Xs.
'Very discouraging,' he said.
Allan Baker, an Oro-Medonte resident who lives near the hamlet of Jarratt, said someone drove to his property Sunday night after dark, around 9 p.m., and stopped at the end of his laneway. He thought it was someone dropping something off in his mailbox.
When Baker went to check a half-hour later, he noticed the Zacharias sign on his property was damaged, a large blue X spray-painted on both sides.
He called the actions 'disrespectful and stupid.'
Baker said another Zacharias sign down the street was also vandalized.
'It's unfortunate that some sought to resort to such tactics in the final days of the campaign, but neither myself nor my team were intimidated,' Zacharias said in a text to BarrieToday on Thursday night. 'We stayed focused, respectful and positive to the very end.'
Orillia OPP confirmed one call was made to report the vandalism and advised that if a suspect was found, they could be charged with mischief.
Doug Shipley, the Conservative candidate who won another term in the Barrie-Springwater-Oro-Medonte riding on Monday night, said he was disappointed but not surprised to hear about the vandalism.
'It takes a tremendous amount of money, time and effort to do campaign signs and I have never been involved in a campaign, municipal or federal, where my signs weren't damaged, stolen, moved or vandalized,' he said.
A veteran of six elections going back 15 years, the former Barrie city councillor said the vandalism casts a shadow over the candidates as the public assumes it was one of the other campaigns that caused the damage.
'I would say 99.9 per cent of the time, it's not someone involved with another candidate's campaign — it's kids or vandals,' he said. 'People who are involved in campaigns know how much money they cost and, I think overall, they respect that.'
Shipley said he talks to the other candidates about signs at the outset of a campaign.
'I called Rose at the start of this campaign and told her, 'stuff is going to happen to your campaign signs, stuff will happen with my campaign signs and you have my word, anything that happens to your campaign signs is not done by me or anybody associated with our campaign,'' he said.
Despite being a ubiquitous part of any election campaign, Shipley said he could live without lawn signs. He said they're expensive, they cause a lot of litter, they're not great for the environment and he's not sure they make that much of an impact when it comes to swaying a potential voter.
'Honestly, if someone passed a bylaw and said no more campaign signs, I think most campaigns would be happy with it because they're just a lot of work, a lot of money and I don't know how much they really do,' he said.
Shipley and 28 campaign volunteers spent Tuesday driving all over Barrie, Springwater and Oro-Medonte removing election signs.
While Springwater Mayor Jennifer Coughlin wouldn't go as far as Shipley does in recommending a complete ban on election lawn signs, she would support getting election signs off public property.
'Private property only,' she said. 'If you want to put up a sign, go and get the property owner's permission.'
In addition to ensuring every sign is authorized by property owners it would also save the township money and staff time.
After the 2022 municipal election, Coughlin said, bylaw enforcement spent numerous hours driving the entirety of the township's 536 kilometres of roads, removing 290 election signs in the process.
However, it might not solve the vandalism problem.
The sign that was defaced on Baker's property was at the end of his laneway
'Sign wars are symptomatic of the most current and one of the most divisive components of society — politics,' he said. 'The bar for political ethics and behaviour in North America seems to have reached a new low.
'Sadly, very little respect for anyone,' he added.
Springwater Deputy Mayor George Cabral agreed. He said there used to be a time when we looked after each other, respected each other, respected property that was not ours and obeyed the rule of law.
'There's been a huge negative swing this last decade in the handing out of moral compasses, integrity, civic responsibility and respecting the communities where we live,' he said in an email to BarrieToday.
'Then, of course, there is the root cause of vandalism, including that of election signs, and it is the progressive lack of respect for people and property, coupled with this sense in some individuals that they need not worry any longer about being held accountable for their actions,' Cabral added.
'And this attitude is unfortunately becoming ever more prevalent being driven in this new world of intense social media world where bad behaviour can and often does get applauded.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Campaigners join national walk against solar farms
Campaigners join national walk against solar farms

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Campaigners join national walk against solar farms

Campaigners have taken part in a walk to protest against plans to install thousands of solar panels on prime agricultural land. The Claydons Solar Action Group organised the event near Winslow and The Claydons in Buckinghamshire as part of a national community walk day on Sunday to highlight the issue of rural solar farm development. Developers say the Rosefield Solar Farm would provide enough clean energy to power more than 57,000 homes - and would have a shelf life of 40 years. The Conservative Mid Buckinghamshire MP, Greg Smith, described the plan as "inefficient technology that trashes the countryside and damages our food security". A government spokesperson said projects were "subject to a rigorous planning process, in which the views and interests of the local community and impacts on the local environment, including any impact on amenities, landscapes and land use, are considered." The walk at Botolph Claydon was one of 25 taking place nationally against solar farm developments, with others planned in Cambridgeshire, Northamptonshire, Norfolk and Bedfordshire. Geography teacher Lorraine Campbell, who has lived in the area for 15 years, said: "The whole reason people come to live in the countryside is because they want to be able to enjoy the wildlife and the landscape. "It's being taken away from us. "This is not the place for solar panels. This is agricultural grade land, it's full of biodiversity. "Solar panels should be put on the roofs of warehouses, of distribution centres. There are hundreds of those." Local councillor Frank Mahon said the plan was a "ridiculous proposal". "North Buckinghamshire has become a dumping ground for major infrastructure, HS2, East West Rail, a mega prison, not to mention three solar farms. "Nobody is taking into consideration the beautiful countryside we have and the amount of farmers that will lose their livelihoods." MP Mr Smith said constituents were "absolutely opposed to the dearth of solar farms, battery storage, substation rebuilds that we're seeing in our beautiful Buckinghamshire countryside". "Two thousand acres of solar panels to produce enough energy for 50,000 homes - a tiny tiny fraction of our energy need." A government spokesperson said: "Solar is at the heart of our mission to make Britain a clean energy superpower, and just this week the government confirmed that new build homes will have solar panels by default. "As of September last year, solar farms covered around 0.1 per cent of the total land area of the UK, while bringing huge benefits for the British public and our energy security." A consultation on the Rosefield plan took place between 18 September and 5 December 2024 and the planning process was ongoing. Follow Beds, Herts and Bucks news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X. Campaigners join national walk against solar farms Solar farm size reduced after public consultation Rosefield Solar Farm

Campaigners join national walk against solar farms
Campaigners join national walk against solar farms

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Campaigners join national walk against solar farms

Campaigners have taken part in a walk to protest against plans to install thousands of solar panels on prime agricultural land. The Claydons Solar Action Group organised the event near Winslow and The Claydons in Buckinghamshire as part of a national community walk day on Sunday to highlight the issue of rural solar farm development. Developers say the Rosefield Solar Farm would provide enough clean energy to power more than 57,000 homes - and would have a shelf life of 40 years. The Conservative Mid Buckinghamshire MP, Greg Smith, described the plan as "inefficient technology that trashes the countryside and damages our food security". A government spokesperson said projects were "subject to a rigorous planning process, in which the views and interests of the local community and impacts on the local environment, including any impact on amenities, landscapes and land use, are considered." The walk at Botolph Claydon was one of 25 taking place nationally against solar farm developments, with others planned in Cambridgeshire, Northamptonshire, Norfolk and Bedfordshire. Geography teacher Lorraine Campbell, who has lived in the area for 15 years, said: "The whole reason people come to live in the countryside is because they want to be able to enjoy the wildlife and the landscape. "It's being taken away from us. "This is not the place for solar panels. This is agricultural grade land, it's full of biodiversity. "Solar panels should be put on the roofs of warehouses, of distribution centres. There are hundreds of those." Local councillor Frank Mahon said the plan was a "ridiculous proposal". "North Buckinghamshire has become a dumping ground for major infrastructure, HS2, East West Rail, a mega prison, not to mention three solar farms. "Nobody is taking into consideration the beautiful countryside we have and the amount of farmers that will lose their livelihoods." MP Mr Smith said constituents were "absolutely opposed to the dearth of solar farms, battery storage, substation rebuilds that we're seeing in our beautiful Buckinghamshire countryside". "Two thousand acres of solar panels to produce enough energy for 50,000 homes - a tiny tiny fraction of our energy need." A government spokesperson said: "Solar is at the heart of our mission to make Britain a clean energy superpower, and just this week the government confirmed that new build homes will have solar panels by default. "As of September last year, solar farms covered around 0.1 per cent of the total land area of the UK, while bringing huge benefits for the British public and our energy security." A consultation on the Rosefield plan took place between 18 September and 5 December 2024 and the planning process was ongoing. Follow Beds, Herts and Bucks news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X. Campaigners join national walk against solar farms Solar farm size reduced after public consultation Rosefield Solar Farm

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store