Venu Holding Corporation Appoints Tom Ashley to President of Real Estate and Development
Ashley will oversee all real estate acquisitions, construction financing, and project developments, along with shepherding the three-year exclusive expansion agreement with Ryan, LLC tasked with delivering eight new markets annually.
Share
Drawing from his vast background in commercial banking and management, Ashley brings expertise in financing, real estate transactions, relationship building, and leadership to VENU as the company continues to rapidly scale its operations. In his new role, Ashley will oversee all real estate acquisitions, construction financing, and project developments, along with shepherding the three-year exclusive expansion agreement with Ryan, LLC which is tasked with delivering eight new strategic markets annually nationwide. Ashley previously served as the CEO of HighAltitude Equipment in Colorado Springs and prior to that held executive leadership roles at two regional banking institutions in Colorado and Kansas.
'This role is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for my family and me,' said Tom Ashley, President of VENU Real Estate and Development. 'I'm excited to help bring VENU's vision to life by building iconic, state-of-the-art facilities that communities can be proud of for years to come. VENU has the talent and leadership necessary to make a lasting impact wherever it plants roots, and I look forward to contributing to that.'
'Tom and I have known each other for nearly a decade,' said J.W. Roth, Founder, Chairman, and CEO of VENU. 'He brings seasoned expertise, deep relationships in real estate finance, and a strong understanding of the development process. Here's the deal, this division is pushing out billions of dollars of our national expansion over the next 36-months significantly impacting our balance sheet. Tom is the right person to lead this rapid growth, and we couldn't be more excited to tap him for this key position.'
As part of a deliberate, multi-pronged strategy to scale with precision, Ashley plays a key role in VENU's newly launched initiative to strengthen its organizational pillars as the company accelerates its national expansion. VENU's long-term vision to bring unparalleled venues to high-growth, underserved markets while democratizing ownership in the live entertainment industry is revolutionizing the space. Through innovative investment structures, ranging from real estate offerings to public market participation, VENU empowers fans and investors to get in on the ground floor of a fan-founded, fan-owned movement.
This leadership evolution reflects VENU's commitment to sustainable, scalable expansion. aligning entertainment innovation with asset-backed development to deliver lasting value for shareholders.
ABOUT VENU HOLDING CORPORATION:
Venu Holding Corporation ('VENU') (NYSE American: VENU), founded by Colorado Springs entrepreneur and 2023 VenuesNow All-star, J.W. Roth, is a premier hospitality and live music venue developer dedicated to crafting luxury, artist-centric, experience-driven entertainment destinations. VENU's campuses in Colorado Springs, Colorado, and Gainesville, Georgia, each feature Bourbon Brothers Smokehouse and Tavern, The Hall at Bourbon Brothers, and unique to Colorado Springs, Notes Eatery and the 9,570-seat Ford Amphitheater. Expanding with new multi-season Sunset Amphitheaters in Oklahoma and Texas, VENU's upcoming large-scale venues will host between 12,500 and 20,000 guests, continuing VENU's vision of redefining the premium live entertainment experience. Click here to view our company overview.
VENU has been recognized nationally by The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, Denver Post, Billboard, VenuesNow, and Variety for its innovative and disruptive approach to live entertainment. Through strategic partnerships with industry leaders such as AEG Presents and NFL Hall of Famer and Founder of EIGHT Elite Light Beer, Troy Aikman, VENU continues to shape the future of the entertainment landscape. For more information, visit VENU's website, Instagram, LinkedIn, or X.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
HELOC vs. Personal Loan: Which Should You Choose in 2025?
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. If you're a homeowner in need of extra cash—whether it's for a major renovation, debt consolidation, or an unexpected expense—you're likely weighing the pros and cons of a HELOC versus a personal loan. Both are popular borrowing options, but they take very different paths to get you the money. A HELOC leverages the equity in your home and typically offers lower interest rates, but it comes with more risk and a longer approval process. A personal loan, on the other hand, is usually unsecured, making it faster to access but potentially more expensive. The better option depends on your financial goals, how fast you need funding, and how much security you're willing to put on the line. Let's look closely at how each one works—and what trade-offs you should be prepared for. What is a HELOC? A home equity line of credit, or HELOC, is a revolving line of credit secured by your home. It allows you to borrow against the equity you've built up, often up to 85% of your home's appraised value, minus your remaining mortgage balance. That can translate into tens—or even hundreds—of thousands of dollars in available funds. For example, if your home is valued at $500,000 and you still owe $300,000 on your mortgage, a lender allowing 85% LTV (loan-to-value) would offer you a HELOC of up to $125,000. Because HELOCs are secured by your home, they tend to offer lower interest rates compared to unsecured loans. Most come with variable interest rates, meaning your monthly payment could increase or decrease over time depending on broader market conditions. Some lenders do offer fixed-rate HELOC options, though they're less common and may come with higher fees. HELOCs also have a two-phase repayment structure. During the initial draw period—typically lasting 10 years—you can borrow funds as needed and usually only make interest payments. Once that ends, you enter the repayment period, which may last another 10 to 20 years. At that point, you'll start paying back both principal and interest, which can significantly increase your monthly payments if you haven't been chipping away at the balance during the draw phase. The upside is flexibility: you borrow only what you need, when you need it, and repay on your own schedule (within the draw period). The downside? If you miss payments or default, your lender can initiate foreclosure proceedings. As Ashley Morgan, Attorney/Owner at Ashley F Morgan Law, PC, puts it: "A HELOC will often help a borrower get a lower interest loan and qualify for a higher amount, but you are exposing your house to risk." Don't Miss: . . What is a Personal Loan? A personal loan is an unsecured installment loan that provides you with a lump sum of money upfront. Unlike a HELOC, which works more like a credit card, a personal loan has fixed monthly payments and a defined repayment term—usually between two and seven years. Once you're approved, the funds are deposited directly into your bank account, and you start making payments immediately. Since personal loans don't require collateral, you don't have to put your home or other assets on the line. That makes them a safer option from a risk standpoint, especially for borrowers with less predictable income or who don't want to jeopardize their house. However, the trade-off is higher interest rates. Because the lender is taking on more risk, they often charge more—especially if your credit score isn't excellent. That said, some personal loans can still offer competitive rates, especially for borrowers with strong credit and stable income. Loan amounts typically range from $1,000 to $50,000, though some lenders go up to $100,000. Approval is often fast, with funds available in as little as 24 to 72 hours—much quicker than the weeks it often takes to process a HELOC. Another benefit? Most personal loans come with fixed interest rates, which makes it easier to plan your budget month to month. "A personal loan likely is at a higher interest (possibly lower than credit card rates) and typically has a lower amount financed, but it has no collateral attached to the loan," Morgan says. Breaking Down the Key Differences Between a HELOC and Personal Loan Collateral Requirements One of the most important differences between a HELOC and a personal loan is whether the loan is secured or not. A HELOC is a secured loan, which means your home acts as collateral. If you default, the lender has the legal right to pursue foreclosure. That risk isn't theoretical—missed payments can have serious, long-term consequences. On the upside, using your home as collateral makes you less risky in the eyes of the lender, which is why HELOCs tend to offer much lower interest rates than unsecured products. Personal loans, on the other hand, typically don't require collateral at all. They're approved based purely on your creditworthiness, income, and overall financial profile. While that's safer from a borrower's standpoint—there's no risk of losing your home—it also means you'll likely pay a higher interest rate unless your credit is excellent. Borrowing Limits Borrowing limits are another key differentiator. With a HELOC, the amount you can borrow is directly tied to the equity you have in your home. Most lenders allow you to borrow up to 85% of your home's appraised value, minus whatever you still owe on your mortgage. This can result in significantly higher borrowing power compared to a personal loan—especially for homeowners with substantial equity. Personal loans, by contrast, are generally capped at much lower amounts, often between $1,000 and $50,000, though some lenders may go as high as $100,000 for the most qualified applicants. If you're looking for a substantial sum of money to tackle a major renovation or consolidate large amounts of debt, a HELOC is likely to offer more headroom. Interest Rates Interest rates on HELOCs are usually lower than those on personal loans, and for good reason—they're secured by your property. However, most HELOCs come with variable interest rates, meaning the rate (and your payment) can go up over time based on market conditions. Some lenders do offer fixed-rate HELOCs, but they're less common and may come with trade-offs. Personal loans, in contrast, almost always come with fixed interest rates, giving you consistent monthly payments that won't change for the duration of the loan term. This makes personal loans easier to plan around, even if the interest rate is a bit higher. So, the decision here comes down to how much volatility you're willing to stomach in exchange for potentially lower costs. Trending Now: Warren Buffett once said, "If you don't find a way to make money while you sleep, you will work until you die." Here's how you can earn passive income with just $100. $100k in assets? Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: . Repayment Structure The repayment terms for HELOCs are more complex than those of personal loans. When you open a HELOC, you typically enter a "draw period" that lasts around 10 years. During this time, you can borrow funds as needed and usually only have to make interest payments. After the draw period ends, you transition into the repayment phase, which can last up to 20 years, and that's when you begin paying back the principal plus interest. This two-phase structure provides flexibility, but it can also lead to payment shock if you're not prepared. Personal loans, by comparison, offer a much more straightforward repayment process. You receive a lump sum upfront and make equal monthly payments from day one until the loan is fully repaid. If you prefer consistency and simplicity, the personal loan structure will likely feel more manageable. Tax Benefits Another often-overlooked difference between the two options lies in how the interest may be treated at tax time. HELOC interest may be tax-deductible if the funds are used for substantial home improvements that increase the property's value—think kitchen renovations or adding an extra bedroom. This deduction can make a noticeable difference in your total cost of borrowing, especially if your HELOC is large. On the other hand, personal loan interest is almost never tax-deductible, regardless of how the money is used. If you're looking to maximize potential tax advantages and plan to reinvest the money into your property, a HELOC gives you a financial edge that a personal loan can't match. Application Process and Speed Timing can be a major factor, especially if you need cash fast. Personal loans are generally quicker and easier to obtain. Many lenders can process your application, approve you, and deposit funds into your account within a few business days. HELOCs, on the other hand, involve a more time-consuming process. Because you're tapping into your home equity, lenders typically require a home appraisal, title search, income verification, and more. From start to finish, it could take anywhere from two to six weeks to close on a HELOC. There are also often closing costs and ongoing fees to consider. If you're in a time crunch, the speed and simplicity of a personal loan can make all the difference. Credit Requirements Both HELOCs and personal loans take your credit score and overall financial health into account, but they weigh those factors differently. With a HELOC, your home acts as security, so lenders may be a bit more flexible with borrowers who have fair credit. That said, excellent credit can still help you lock in better rates. For personal loans, the lack of collateral means lenders tend to be stricter. You'll typically need good to excellent credit to qualify for the most competitive offers, and your debt-to-income ratio is likely to face more scrutiny. If your credit isn't perfect but you have strong home equity, you may find that a HELOC offers better terms than any personal loan you'd be approved for. How to Choose Between a HELOC and a Personal Loan Choosing between a HELOC and a personal loan comes down to your unique financial situation, how much you need to borrow, and how comfortable you are with risk. If you have substantial home equity and want access to a flexible, potentially lower-cost borrowing solution, a HELOC may be the better choice—especially if the funds will be used for home improvements that qualify for tax deductions. But remember: your house is on the line. Defaulting on a HELOC isn't just a ding to your credit score—it could result in foreclosure. On the flip side, if you prefer predictability, fixed payments, and faster access to funds without risking your property, a personal loan may be a better fit. They're particularly useful for borrowers who need a smaller lump sum and want to avoid the complexity and risk that come with a HELOC. As Kyle Enright, president of Achieve Lending, puts it: "A HELOC could be a better choice if the borrower is looking to take out a large amount." But for smaller or more urgent needs, a personal loan might offer the speed and simplicity you're looking for. The bottom line? Both tools can work well—but only if matched to the right borrower, for the right reason, at the right time. See Next: . . This article HELOC vs. Personal Loan: Which Should You Choose in 2025? originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Business Insider
a day ago
- Business Insider
OT Management, LLC Introduces Structured Day Trading Framework Aimed at Institutional-Grade Discipline for Retail Traders
OT MANAGEMENT, LLC has introduced a structured educational approach to day trading aimed at addressing common misconceptions and behavioral pitfalls among retail traders. According to Strategic Partner Daniel John Impens, the firm's methodology is designed to mirror institutional trading frameworks through systematized execution and risk management tools. In a recent interview at OT Management's Boston office, Impens outlined the company's approach, which he describes as distinct from speculative trading. 'Most retail participants engage with markets without a structured methodology,' said Impens, who previously held roles at Fisher Investments, Goldman Sachs, and J.P. Morgan. 'Our focus is on replacing emotional decision-making with process-driven systems.' The firm's day trading initiative, referred to as the Retail Trader Rhythm Camp, emphasizes data analysis, scenario planning, and execution discipline. It forms part of OT Management's broader framework, the Collective Capital Alliance, which includes proprietary tools such as: Rhythm Detection Tool – for identifying market pacing and risk cycles Execution Journal System – for logging decisions and outcomes Discipline Scoring Engine – to track and assess behavioral patterns Strategy Replication Module – for simulation-based testing Impens notes that the educational program delays access to live markets until participants demonstrate structured planning through simulated environments. 'Trading should be viewed as a repeatable process, not an instinctive reaction,' he added. Founded in 2016 and registered with the SEC (Registration No. 801-126317), OT MANAGEMENT, LLC operates from Boston, Massachusetts. The firm reports that its tools are designed to bridge the methodological gap between institutional and retail trading practices. For additional information, users can visit or contact cs@ About OT Management, LLC Founded in 2016, OT Management, LLC is a Boston-based financial education firm focused on system-based day trading methodologies for retail traders. The company emphasizes structured execution strategies, data-driven decision-making, and disciplined risk management. Its leadership includes Daniel John Impens, a former executive at Fisher Investments, Goldman Sachs, and J.P. Morgan. OT Management is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC Registration No. 801-126317).
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Bitcoin-To-Ethereum Rotation: Genius Move Or FOMO Trap? Here's What The Data Shows
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. As Ethereum trades near multi-month highs and Bitcoin's dominance faces fresh challenges, the ETH/BTC ratio is currently sitting at 0.058, sparking intense debate on Reddit among crypto veterans about whether now is the time to rotate capital from Bitcoin into Ethereum for potential alt season gains. The strategy—known in crypto circles as 'the rotation'—involves temporarily swapping Bitcoin holdings for Ethereum during periods when altcoins typically outperform the flagship cryptocurrency, then rotating back to Bitcoin after capturing those gains. It's a high-stakes game of market timing that has created generational wealth for some traders while leaving others with costly tax bills and diminished holdings. Don't Miss: Accredited Investors: Grab Pre-IPO Shares of the AI Company Powering Hasbro, Sephora & MGM— — no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies. The Case for Making the Move Proponents of the Bitcoin-to-Ethereum rotation point to compelling historical patterns and current market dynamics that suggest significant upside potential for ETH relative to BTC. Over the past 90 days, Ethereum has dramatically outpaced Bitcoin with a 102% gain compared to Bitcoin's more modest 22% advance, demonstrating the kind of explosive relative performance that rotation traders seek. The fundamental case for Ethereum has strengthened considerably, particularly with the Genius Act legislation accelerating institutional adoption of stablecoins—90% of which operate on Ethereum's network. This regulatory tailwind, combined with Ethereum's transition to a deflationary monetary policy since moving to proof-of-stake, creates a compelling structural argument for continued outperformance. Galaxy Research projects the ETH/BTC ratio could reach between 0.03 and 0.045, suggesting substantial room for growth from current levels. For context, the ratio has historically peaked much higher during previous market cycles, with some traders targeting ranges between 0.049 to 0.088 based on technical analysis of past bull markets. Trending: Grow your IRA or 401(k) with Crypto – . Tax-conscious investors have found creative workarounds to execute this strategy without triggering immediate capital gains. By using lending protocols to collateralize Bitcoin holdings and borrow stablecoins or additional Bitcoin to purchase Ethereum, traders can gain ETH exposure while maintaining their original BTC position on paper—though this approach carries its own risks around loan-to-value ratios and liquidation scenarios. The Bear Case: Too Late to the Party? However, seasoned crypto veterans are increasingly cautioning that the optimal entry window for this rotation may have already closed. After Ethereum's 100% surge over the past three months, critics argue that attempting the swap now amounts to 'FOMOing' into an already extended move. The margin of error for timing the eventual rotation back to Bitcoin has become significantly tighter compared to earlier opportunities when Ethereum traded below $2,000. Bitcoin maximalists maintain that BTC remains the superior long-term store of value, pointing to year-to-date performance where Bitcoin is up 25% compared to Ethereum's 11% gain. Market structure concerns add another layer of complexity. The ETH/BTC ratio recently dropped to 0.022, its lowest level since 2020, and some analysts worry that the 2017-style altcoin euphoria that drove massive relative outperformance may not materialize in the current institutional-dominated market lending protocol strategy that appeals to tax-sensitive investors carries substantial risks, particularly the possibility of liquidation if Ethereum fails to perform as expected or if Bitcoin experiences an unexpected rally. Given Bitcoin's tendency for sudden, explosive moves, traders could find themselves 'stuck with debt' while watching their collateralized Bitcoin appreciate without them. The Verdict: Risk Management Over FOMO For retail investors considering this strategy, the key consideration isn't whether Ethereum might outperform Bitcoin—it very well could. The critical question is whether the potential gains justify the risks of market timing, tax implications, and the possibility of missing Bitcoin's continued institutional adoption cycle. The safest approach may be gradual portfolio rebalancing rather than wholesale rotation, allowing investors to maintain exposure to both assets while managing downside risks. As one seasoned trader noted, 'In crypto, permanent capital beats performance chasing.' Those determined to execute a rotation strategy should consider starting with smaller position sizes and maintaining strict exit rules, remembering that in previous cycles, the window between altcoin peaks and Bitcoin resuming its dominance has often been measured in weeks, not months. Read Next: A must-have for all crypto enthusiasts: . Image: Shutterstock This article Bitcoin-To-Ethereum Rotation: Genius Move Or FOMO Trap? Here's What The Data Shows originally appeared on
