AFL 2025: Hawthorn coach Sam Mitchell addresses James Sicily's injury concern
Hawthorn coach Sam Mitchell has cleared the air over the injury concern to star captain James Sicily.
Mitchell last week strongly defended the fitness of Sicily for him to later be ruled out for at least the next two weeks with a hip-abdominal issue.
Sicily will miss the Hawks' season-shaping matches with Western Bulldogs on Thursday night and Adelaide next Friday.
Mitchell conceded his comments 'didn't age too well' but doubled down on his previous stance of Sicily playing uninjured.
'We have management of lots of different players across the season of course, and at no point has he been a chance to not play,' Mitchell said.
'That was my frustration last week. It didn't age too well, obviously … at no point have we even considered not playing him, it hasn't even been close.
'There's injuries where 'is he going to get to the line? Is he going to be able to play this week?' He's never been in that category, he's definitely been playing every week – obviously it doesn't age well when it comes out like that.
'He got something that we didn't expect, it's been tracking, getting slightly better each week. His numbers on the screen have been getting slightly better.
'Then this week he had a big progression, so we need to get him right.'
Mitchell said Sicily's injury concern had nothing to do with the groin and was in a 'higher spot'.
The injury, according to Mitchell, can be 'unpredictable' but he still expected Sicily to return on time for Hawthorn's match with North Melbourne after the bye.
'You don't see that (the injury) often, we have had one recently a couple of years ago which can settle down in a couple weeks, but they can take a little bit longer,' he said.
'We're hopeful the two weeks can be a maximum. He would probably play the third we hope, but there's a bye then, so on the other side of the bye hopefully we get him back.
'One of the downsides of the injury is that he hasn't been able to train a lot. While playing has never been a risk, his actual training consistency hasn't been there.
'Obviously, that makes it a little bit tougher to perform on the weekend, but he's such a proud sort of guy he's always trying to train, always trying to do a bit more.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Erin Patterson's responses to five prosecution accusations in mushroom murder trial
On Thursday, crown prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC launched her cross-examination of Erin Patterson, who is accused of murdering three of her relatives after they ate a beef Wellington she prepared and served. During her questioning, Dr Rogers put several propositions to Ms Patterson, who has pleaded not guilty to charges of murder and attempted murder and maintains the deaths were a tragic accident. Here are some of those accusations and how Ms Patterson responded. During her cross-examination, Dr Rogers targeted Ms Patterson's health, particularly a cancer diagnosis the court has previously heard was fake. Ms Patterson agreed she had wanted the lunch guests to believe she was having treatment for cancer, but disagreed she had told them she had been diagnosed with cancer. "Did you tell people at the lunch that you had cancer?" Dr Rogers asked. "No," Ms Patterson responded. Dr Rogers continued to question Ms Patterson about whether she had told her guests she had cancer, which Ms Patterson continued to deny. The prosecution said the sole surviving guest of the lunch, Ian Wilkinson, had earlier testified that Ms Patterson told the group she had cancer. Dr Rogers then brought Ms Patterson back to her evidence on Wednesday, where she had been questioned by her own defence lawyer, Colin Mandy SC, about a conversation she had with her guests about cancer. This is part of the transcript: Colin Mandy: And what happened with that conversation about cancer, did it move on to other topics? Erin Patterson: Um, it stayed at that topic at that point. Um, I … Colin Mandy: What did you say about your health? Erin Patterson: So, it was right at the end of the meal and I mentioned that I'd had a - maybe not 'scare' is the right word, but I had an issue a year or two earlier where I thought I had ovarian cancer and had various scans about and related to that. And then, um, I'm not proud of this, but I led them to believe that I might be needing some treatment in regards to that in the next few weeks or months. When asked by Dr Rogers if she told her guests she had upcoming treatment for cancer, Ms Patterson said she could not remember the precise words. "But I do know what I was trying to communicate was that … that I was undergoing investigations around ovarian cancer and might need treatment in that regard in the future," she said. Dr Rogers also put to the accused that she had researched different types of cancer on the internet to "tell a more convincing lie about having cancer". "I mean, theoretically, that's true, but that's not what I did," Ms Patterson said. During the questioning, Dr Rogers put the following statement to Ms Patterson: "I suggest that you never thought you would have to account for this lie of having cancer, because you thought that the lunch guests would die and your lie would never be found out." Ms Patterson denied this accusation, saying "that's not true". Ms Patterson admitted she did not have a lump on her elbow or an appointment at St Vincent's hospital in the weeks before the July lunch in 2023, despite telling her mother-in-law Gail Patterson both of those things. "You didn't have any medical issues to discuss with Gail Patterson at the lunch, did you?" Dr Rogers asked. "I didn't have a legitimate medical reason, no, that's true," Ms Patterson said. When she was asked why she told Gail about these things, Ms Patterson said she didn't want the care Don and Gail had been showing her to stop. "I had initially thought I had an issue with my elbow, I'd had a lot of pain for a number of weeks," she said. "I probably whinged a bit too much to Don and Gail about it, and felt a bit embarrassed by that. "I suggest that you told Gail Patterson that you had a lump in your elbow and had to go to St Vincent's Hospital to plant the seed of you having a serious health issue," Dr Rogers said to Ms Patterson during the hearing. "I'd say no, I don't think that's right, no," Ms Patterson responded. On Thursday, the court was again shown a series of Facebook messages between Ms Patterson and her online friends. In the messages, Ms Patterson vented to her friends about her parents-in-law being reluctant to take sides in a financial disagreement she was having with their son, Simon. In her messages, she recounted her in-laws suggesting prayer and conversation between Ms Patterson and her husband to resolve the matters. Dr Rogers referred to "eye-roll emojis" used in one of the messages and another emoji that Ms Patterson said showed a straight-line smile underneath. Dr Rogers noted that emojis were a deliberate choice made by a user, and asked Ms Patterson what she would call the emojis. "All I can say about it, it's a face with a straight line for a mouth," she replied. "I don't know what I'd call it." "Even though you used it?" Dr Rogers asked. "Yeah," Ms Patterson replied. Dr Rogers takes her to another emoji after a reference to prayer again in the message. They disagreed about whether it was an eye-roll emoji. "There's a better eye-roll emoji than these … I can't see anything about eyes rolling in there," Ms Patterson said. Dr Rogers suggested Ms Patterson was "mocking" the advice from her in-laws in some of these messages, including the religious aspects of that advice. "I wasn't mocking, I was frustrated," Ms Patterson said. Dr Rogers took Ms Patterson to evidence given by one of her Facebook friends, who told the court the accused had told them she was an atheist and found her husband's religious background difficult. Ms Patterson denied this. "So, your evidence is that you did not say or post that you were an atheist?" Dr Rogers asked. "No, I didn't do that," Ms Patterson replied. During the prosecution's cross-examination on Thursday, Ms Patterson was shown several photos of mushrooms sitting on a dehydrator rack, including some balanced on scales. When asked about the images, Ms Patterson said she "probably" took them but had no memory of doing so. Dr Rogers told the court fungi expert Tom May's evidence was that the mushrooms depicted on a tray in one of the photos were "consistent with Amanita phalloides [death cap mushrooms]". "I suggest that you were weighing these death cap mushrooms so that you could calculate the weight required for the administration of a fatal dose for one person. Agree or disagree?" Dr Rogers asked Ms Patterson. "Disagree," Ms Patterson replied. Dr Rogers suggested to Ms Patterson that the mushrooms depicted in the photo were death cap mushrooms that the accused had foraged in Loch after seeing a post on iNaturalist. Ms Patterson replied, "that's not correct". Nanette Rogers: You deny that these are death cap mushrooms? Erin Patterson: That's correct, I don't think they are. Dr Rogers also put to Ms Patterson that the reason she had lied to police about never owning a dehydrator was because she knew she had used it to prepare death cap mushrooms for the lunch. Ms Patterson denied this. Dr Rogers then suggested that Ms Patterson was "very keen to dispose of any evidence that might connect you with the possession of death cap mushrooms". "No, I didn't know they'd been in it," Ms Patterson said. Dr Rogers put to Ms Patterson that she had deliberately used foraged mushrooms in the beef Wellington and that those foraged mushrooms were death cap mushrooms. "I did not deliberately put death cap mushrooms in the meal," Ms Patterson said. During the questioning, the prosecution put to Ms Patterson a suggested reason for her lying to police about owning a dehydrator. "You lied, because you knew if you'd told the police the truth, it would implicate you in the deliberate poisoning of your four lunch guests," Dr Rogers said. "No, no, it's not true," Ms Patterson responded. Dr Rogers also put to the accused that she had lied about owning a food dehydrator because "you knew you had used the dehydrator to prepare death cap mushrooms to include in the lunch". Ms Patterson also denied that, saying "I didn't know that". She was then asked if she agreed or disagreed that she lied about dehydrating mushrooms because she knew if she "told police the truth then that would implicate you in the poisoned lunch". "I agree that I lied because I was afraid I would be held responsible," Ms Patterson replied. Ms Patterson later agreed if she had told the truth to police she would have been a suspect. "You knew that if you told police the truth then you would be immediately suspected by police of being involved in a poisoning event?" Dr Rogers asked. "That's probably true, yes," Ms Patterson said. The trial continues.
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
My to-do list for the man about to become football's Mr Fix It
As difficult as it was for The Fonz to say 's ... s ... s ... s ... sor ... sorry' in TV's Happy Days, some critics of the AFL might be equally reluctant to say 'w ... w ... w ... wel ... well done' to the AFL on the appointment of Greg Swann. But the league deserves plaudits for appointing Swann. He has an incredible track record wherever he has gone. Not only did he lead two of the biggest clubs in footy heartland – Carlton and Collingwood – but the job he did steering the turnaround of the Brisbane Lions was remarkable. The Lions today are a stable club, with healthy attendance at games, on-field success, elite training facilities, and are considered a destination club for many players. That's a far cry from the position the club was in when Swann arrived in 2014. Just like your columnist in his playing days, the AFL is never be accused of being fast. But Swann was lured to league headquarters just days after the role of head of football performance was created. The speed and quality of that appointment has been widely applauded, even by the league's harshest critics. But the AFL's glacial response to a raft of issues needing serious attention has left a legacy. After taking nearly two years to appoint Andrew Dillon as CEO to replace Gillon McLachlan, the league has continued to lack urgency, particularly in the development of a new drugs policy, and addressing concerns about the football department soft cap. Let's hope the events of the past week herald an era of greater vigour and energy from the AFL, spearheaded by Swann, a man who is both pragmatic and decisive – just what they need at footy's City Hall. As he prepares to step into his new job next month, I, like many others, have some ideas on what his priorities should be. This is my to-do list for the AFL's new footy supremo:
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Hawthorn star Massimo D'Ambrosio's Clayton home tour has buyers buzzing
Hawthorn's Massimo D'Ambrosio has traded footy drills for espresso shots, helping sell a mate's home that could've doubled as his nonna's. In an exclusive to the Herald Sun, it can be revealed the rising AFL talent has joined the campaign for 23 Murdo Rd, Clayton as a proud property ambassador, bringing heart, heritage and a touch of la dolce vita to a much-loved listing. The four-bedroom, two-bathroom home sits on a generous 715sq m block and is being sold through Buxton Oakleigh auctioneer Dimitri Damianos, with strong appeal for both families and developers. While the 21-year-old isn't the owner, he's an Italian friend of the vendors, and the home's nostalgic charm, from its manicured gardens to its fruit-laden trees, instantly struck a chord. 'He grew up around homes like this,' Mr Damianos said. 'The fruit trees, the layout, the smell of cooking in the air, it reminds him of his grandparents' place. 'His Italian roots are a big part of who he is, and this home really captured that.' D'Ambrosio, who was drafted by Essendon in the 2022 mid-season draft and played a breakout season for Hawthorn in 2024, visited the home this week and Mr Daminos bonded instantly with the owners over coffee, cannoli and shared Sicilian roots. 'There was this hilarious moment where he spotted some gaggiu fruit — loquats — in the yard and called it out immediately,' he said. 'I had no idea what it was — the family gave me grief for that. 'But Massimo was in his element.' Inside, the home features original Sortino furniture — a brand that rivalled Franco Cozzo, as well as polished timber floors and a layout made for family gatherings. With the matriarch now moving into aged care and managing health issues the family is parting with the home after decades of milestones and Sunday lunches, and they're hoping it finds new owners who'll love it just as much. 'This place has hosted countless birthdays, barbecues and celebrations,' Mr Damianos said. 'It's full of love, and now the campaign is, too.' Auction day is set to be a full-blown Italian celebration, complete with coffee, cannoli, and, if his schedule allows an appearance from D'Ambrosio himself. Clayton continues to be one of Melbourne's most in-demand pockets, with PropTrack data showing house prices have climbed more than 36 per cent over the past five years, driven by strong buyer demand, proximity to Monash University and the Victorian Heart Hospital, and excellent rail and retail connections. The home will be brought to market soon.
