logo
Local elections 2025: Climate, traffic and rubbish

Local elections 2025: Climate, traffic and rubbish

BBC News29-04-2025

In the run-up to the local election the BBC is looking at the issues that matter the most to you, as part of Your Voice, Your Vote.County councils and other authorities hold elections on 1 May.Traffic, climate change, litter and recycling centres were important to Sarah Turner from Leamington Spa in Warwickshire.Shop units were empty, the main road gets congested and visting household waste sites could be tricky, she said. Other people who contacted the BBC said the environment and climate change should be the county council's priority.
"On the main street in [Leamington's] Parade, there's just hardly anything, you've got so many empty shops," Ms Turner said.Traffic through the town is another issue, she added, even though there was lots of cycling and walking provision."You'd be silly to take a job the other end of town to where you live," she said."With climate change and everything else, the Greens seem to be the only ones protecting what green spaces we've got left."
Household recyling centresw (HRCs) should be able to take rubbish from anyone, instead of charging fees for businesses to take their waste thier."You'd think that this service would stop half of the stuff being dumped everywhere," she said.
Warwickshire County Council has signed up to the Leamington Town Centre Vision - a scheme designed to regenerate the town over the next decade.It has also committed to becoming a net-zero organisation by 2030 adding it would support the county to achieve net-zero by 2050.
What do the parties say?
Candidates and parties in the Leamington Willes ward were contacted to have their say.Will Roberts, the Green Party candidate, said:Support was needed for town centres, and a fund was recently put forward for more events to drive footfall thereThe party prioritised making short journeys to walk and cycle to schools, leisure and work saferImproved infrastructure was needed, and money needed to be better directedLocal access to parks and the countryside was vital, and the party had worked to try and reduce the number of greenfield sites for developers that need to come forward in the local planThe party would review the household recycling centres to see where they can be made more accessible and increase their recycling rates.Sarah Millar, on behalf of the Labour party, said: Supporting local businesses and growing the economy was a priority The party believed the active transport policy in the county was often "paid only lip service". It believed the county could "do better" in terms of cycle provisionA masterplan of better sequenced road works would be developedGreen spaces would be protected and a green municipal board for Warwickshire be developedThere was a need for better enforcement of fly tipping and the party would look into the "pay as you throw" approach for commercial vehicles.Paulo Viana, candidate for the Liberal Democrats, said:It would boost small businesses and abolish business rates, replacing them with a commercial landowner levy to help high streets.Encourage residents to travel to the town centre by walking, cycling or using public transportThe party wants to see cycle routes from other areas of Leamington joining the Kenilworth to Leamington cyclewayThe party would invest in accelerating the decarbonisation of all county council buildings and transport, with savings invested in local servicesStreet trees would be well maintained and more trees planted where possible HRC booking slots should be reviewed.Reform UK did not respond for comment, but its national manifesto said:It wants to free more than 1.2m small and medium-sized businesses from corporation tax, and abolish business rates for high street-based small and medium-sized enterprises, offsetting with online delivery tax at 4% for large multinational enterprisesNet-zero and related subsidies should be scrapped along with an annual £10bn of renewable energy subsidiesIt would keep road speed limits low where safety is critical, otherwise it would scrap 20mph zonesExisting rail and road links would be imprroved focusing on coastal regions, Wales, the North, and the Midlands.The Conservative Party did not respond for comment, but its 2024 manifesto said:It would ease business rates for high street, leisure and hospitality businesses by increasing the multiplier on distribution warehouses that support online shopping over timeAccess to finance for small and medium-sized enterprises would be improved, including through expanding open financeIt would invest £4.7bn for smaller cities, towns and rural areas in the North and Midlands - to spend on transport priorities. This will cut congestion and upgrade local bus and train stationsThe cost of tackling climate change for households and business would be cut, and net zero delivered by 2050Red tape that holds back the planting of trees would be cut.
Follow BBC Coventry & Warwickshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
POSTCODE LOOKUP: Check if there is an election in your areaSIMPLE GUIDE: Everything you need to know about the local electionsGET IN TOUCH: Tell us the election issues that matter to youFULL COVERAGE: Catch up on all our election stories

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

There are no ‘journalists' in Gaza. Just Hamas propaganda operatives
There are no ‘journalists' in Gaza. Just Hamas propaganda operatives

Telegraph

time20 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

There are no ‘journalists' in Gaza. Just Hamas propaganda operatives

Britain and the world's views of the rights and wrongs of the Gaza war are so often shaped by what the BBC reports. That's mattered more than ever in recent weeks, amid the feverishly heated coverage of Israel's new Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) scheme to deliver aid to the Palestinian people and bypass allegedly Hamas-controlled NGOs. Hamas-linked sources claim Israeli soldiers have repeatedly shot and killed Palestinian civilians waiting for GHF food with their families. Stories bearing the bylines of BBC 'journalists' in Gaza largely tell this version of events, albeit including the denials of the IDF. News organisations using Gazan reporters say they have no choice, given the IDF's refusal to allow in outside journalists. But that's no reason not to exercise care and employ the same editorial standards as they would on any other story. For critics of the BBC, the results have been a disaster for the Corporation and its standards. They point to the stories that have not been told, or have been largely overlooked, by these reporters almost throughout the war: of Hamas's tyranny over the people of Gaza, its torture and murder of opponents, and of the courageous Palestinians who defy its rule. And why is there such scant coverage of Hamas using the civilian population as a human shield by placing tunnels under civilian buildings and military bases in hospital? Where are the stories of Israeli hostages being moved across Gaza? Why is there no footage of Hamas firing rockets or their gunmen on the move? There is an obvious answer: it appears that these reporters are either pro-Hamas, or too afraid of reprisals from terrorist gunmen to tell the truth. It is a charge that BBC Global News Director Jonathan Munro entirely rejects. Almost spluttering in disbelief recently at the suggestion that 'some of the people you're using in Gaza might be under pressure, might be restricted in what Hamas allows them to see,' resulting in a 'partial view', he insisted: 'There's no restriction on what they can see, what they can show and what they can film when they're on location. 'There's no suggestion at all that any of those very brave people are under any political influence.' Munro's denial shows an astonishing disregard for the well-documented reality of life in Gaza. Take a recent report from the well regarded NGO the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ). It tears apart the notion that press freedom exists in Gaza. According to the CPJ, journalists there have been subject to 'detentions, assaults, obstruction and raids' going back to the start of Hamas rule almost twenty years ago. While detailing numerous violent assaults on members of the press in Gaza, the analysis warns that violations by Hamas are 'underreported'. Some journalists who have been assaulted are believed to be too afraid to say anything at all; others have gone to the Palestinian Journalists Syndicate (PJS) but say they do not want to go public for fear of retaliation. Note that both the CPJ and PJS are the staunchest critics of Israel. There can be no doubting the credibility and accuracy of their accounts on this matter. The picture they paint is light years removed from Munro's suggestion of unencumbered press freedom in Gaza. Some of the journalists in Gaza used by the BBC have been exposed as having deeply hateful views of Israel and Jews, making them entirely unsuitable as journalists. Yet there is a problem that goes far beyond any individual, if Munro and other executives cannot understand the reality of reporting from Gaza. TV producer Leo Pearlman has proposed the solution: 'The BBC make a huge deal of adding to every news script from Gaza by saying that Israel doesn't allow independent access for journalists. 'What it never says – and maybe should start doing – is that no journalist can operate freely in Gaza under Hamas control.'

Foreign Office staff told to consider resigning if they disagree on Gaza
Foreign Office staff told to consider resigning if they disagree on Gaza

North Wales Chronicle

time37 minutes ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Foreign Office staff told to consider resigning if they disagree on Gaza

Some 300 staff at the Government department, based in the UK and offices abroad, sent a letter to Foreign Secretary David Lammy raising concerns about Israel's conduct in Gaza, the BBC reported. The letter warned of 'complicity' in Israel's actions and questioned continued UK arms sales to the country, according to the broadcaster. The Foreign Office's two most senior officials, Sir Oliver Robbins and Nick Dyer, responded to the letter. 'If your disagreement with any aspect of Government policy or action is profound your ultimate recourse is to resign from the Civil Service. This is an honourable course,' they told staff in their reply. The two Foreign Office bosses insisted they wanted to see a 'healthy challenge' to policy but said it was up to civil servants to deliver on the will of the Government. The letter, which follows several other similar missives to Civil Service chiefs, was signed on May 16, the BBC reported. In it, the signatories said: 'In July 2024, staff expressed concern about Israel's violations of international humanitarian law and potential UK government complicity. 'In the intervening period, the reality of Israel's disregard for international law has become more stark.' They went on to list the killing by Israeli forces of 15 aid workers in March, and the blockade on aid into Gaza, among their concerns. They added that 'supported by the Trump administration, the Israeli government has made explicit plans for the forcible transfer of Gaza's population'. Ministers' official line is that Israel is 'at risk' of breaching international law with its actions in Gaza. The Government halted 30 out of around 350 arms sales licences to Israel in September last year, for fear they may be used for war crimes. MPs critical of Israel's actions have called on ministers to go further, and to halt all UK arms sales to the country. A Foreign Office spokesperson said: 'Since day one, this Government has rigorously applied international law in relation to the war in Gaza. 'One of our first acts in Government was to suspend export licences that could be used by the Israeli Defence Forces in Gaza. 'We have successfully implemented the suspension decision and continue to refuse all relevant licence applications. 'We have suspended direct exports of F-35 parts for use by Israel, and we categorically do not export any bombs or ammunition which could be used in Gaza. 'We have also suspended negotiations on a free trade agreement, while supporting humanitarian efforts through the restoration of funding to UNRWA, and the commitment of over £230 million in assistance across the past two financial years.' They added: 'It is the job of civil servants to deliver on the policies of the government of the day and to provide professional, impartial advice as set out in the Civil Service Code. There are systems in place which allow them to raise concerns if they have them.' The Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS) said the Foreign Office's reply to the letter from civil servants was 'hopelessly inadequate', and the suggestion they could resign 'simply reprehensible'. PCS general secretary Fran Heathcote said: 'The response from Oliver Robbins and Nick Dyer to the concerns of staff in FCDO is consistent with the attitude displayed by Civil Service management all along, in that it is hopelessly inadequate. 'There has been little effort to address our members' concerns and no effort to justify the UK Government's interactions with the government of Israel, despite our genuine concerns over its potential failure to comply with its obligations under international and domestic law.' The PCS chief said she had raised the International Court of Justice ruling 'that some of the alleged acts by Israel in Gaza could potentially be considered within the provisions of the Genocide Convention' last year. 'We were clear that PCS concurred with that view. The horrors visited upon the people of Gaza since then have only reinforced our view,' she said. Ms Heathcote added: 'As for the suggestion that civil servants may wish to resign if they are uncomfortable with what they are being asked to do – this is simply reprehensible. 'It is a dereliction of duty and a startling ignorance of the provisions of the Civil Service code, which require all civil servants to act in accordance with the law, including international law.'

Foreign Office staff told to consider resigning if they disagree on Gaza
Foreign Office staff told to consider resigning if they disagree on Gaza

Leader Live

timean hour ago

  • Leader Live

Foreign Office staff told to consider resigning if they disagree on Gaza

Some 300 staff at the Government department, based in the UK and offices abroad, sent a letter to Foreign Secretary David Lammy raising concerns about Israel's conduct in Gaza, the BBC reported. The letter warned of 'complicity' in Israel's actions and questioned continued UK arms sales to the country, according to the broadcaster. The Foreign Office's two most senior officials, Sir Oliver Robbins and Nick Dyer, responded to the letter. 'If your disagreement with any aspect of Government policy or action is profound your ultimate recourse is to resign from the Civil Service. This is an honourable course,' they told staff in their reply. The two Foreign Office bosses insisted they wanted to see a 'healthy challenge' to policy but said it was up to civil servants to deliver on the will of the Government. The letter, which follows several other similar missives to Civil Service chiefs, was signed on May 16, the BBC reported. In it, the signatories said: 'In July 2024, staff expressed concern about Israel's violations of international humanitarian law and potential UK government complicity. 'In the intervening period, the reality of Israel's disregard for international law has become more stark.' They went on to list the killing by Israeli forces of 15 aid workers in March, and the blockade on aid into Gaza, among their concerns. They added that 'supported by the Trump administration, the Israeli government has made explicit plans for the forcible transfer of Gaza's population'. Ministers' official line is that Israel is 'at risk' of breaching international law with its actions in Gaza. The Government halted 30 out of around 350 arms sales licences to Israel in September last year, for fear they may be used for war crimes. MPs critical of Israel's actions have called on ministers to go further, and to halt all UK arms sales to the country. A Foreign Office spokesperson said: 'Since day one, this Government has rigorously applied international law in relation to the war in Gaza. 'One of our first acts in Government was to suspend export licences that could be used by the Israeli Defence Forces in Gaza. 'We have successfully implemented the suspension decision and continue to refuse all relevant licence applications. 'We have suspended direct exports of F-35 parts for use by Israel, and we categorically do not export any bombs or ammunition which could be used in Gaza. 'We have also suspended negotiations on a free trade agreement, while supporting humanitarian efforts through the restoration of funding to UNRWA, and the commitment of over £230 million in assistance across the past two financial years.' They added: 'It is the job of civil servants to deliver on the policies of the government of the day and to provide professional, impartial advice as set out in the Civil Service Code. There are systems in place which allow them to raise concerns if they have them.' The Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS) said the Foreign Office's reply to the letter from civil servants was 'hopelessly inadequate', and the suggestion they could resign 'simply reprehensible'. PCS general secretary Fran Heathcote said: 'The response from Oliver Robbins and Nick Dyer to the concerns of staff in FCDO is consistent with the attitude displayed by Civil Service management all along, in that it is hopelessly inadequate. 'There has been little effort to address our members' concerns and no effort to justify the UK Government's interactions with the government of Israel, despite our genuine concerns over its potential failure to comply with its obligations under international and domestic law.' The PCS chief said she had raised the International Court of Justice ruling 'that some of the alleged acts by Israel in Gaza could potentially be considered within the provisions of the Genocide Convention' last year. 'We were clear that PCS concurred with that view. The horrors visited upon the people of Gaza since then have only reinforced our view,' she said. Ms Heathcote added: 'As for the suggestion that civil servants may wish to resign if they are uncomfortable with what they are being asked to do – this is simply reprehensible. 'It is a dereliction of duty and a startling ignorance of the provisions of the Civil Service code, which require all civil servants to act in accordance with the law, including international law.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store