King Charles III leads 20th-anniversary commemoration of 7/7 London bombings
Fifty-two people died and more than 700 were wounded when four British men inspired by al-Qaida blew themselves up on three subway trains and a bus during the morning rush hour on July 7, 2005. They were the first suicide bombings on European soil.
Two weeks later, four other bombers attempted a similar attack, but their devices failed to explode. No one was hurt.
The bombings remain seared into London's collective memory, and the anniversary will be marked with a ceremony at the 7/7 memorial in Hyde Park and a service of commemoration at St. Paul's Cathedral.
In a message, the king said his 'heartfelt thoughts and special prayers remain with all those whose lives were forever changed on that terrible summer's day.'
He said the country could take heart from the bravery of the emergency services and others who responded to the attack, and 'the countless stories of extraordinary courage and compassion that emerged from the darkness of that day.'
Charles also hailed the 'spirit of unity that has helped London, and our nation, to heal.'
'As we remember those we lost, let us, therefore, use this 20th anniversary to reaffirm our commitment to building a society where people of all faiths and backgrounds can live together with mutual respect and understanding, always standing firm against those who would seek to divide us,' he said.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said July 7, 2005 was one of Britain's 'darkest days.'
She said that 20 years on, 'Islamist extremist terrorism remains the greatest threat' to national security 'followed by extreme right-wing terrorism."
'But we also face hybrid threats to our national security from hostile states, serious organized crime, cyber criminals, those threatening our border security and a troubling rise in violence-fixated individuals radicalized online,' she wrote in the Sunday Mirror newspaper, adding that the government would 'relentlessly confront and counter threats to our national security.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
24 minutes ago
- Times
Grant Shapps: I'd gag Afghan data leak again to save lives
Sir Grant Shapps defended keeping the superinjunction over the Afghan data breach in place and said he would 'do the same thing all over again'. The court order, which was lifted on Tuesday, prevented parliament and the public from knowing about a data breach that put up to 100,000 Afghans at risk. The data breach happened when a British soldier trying to verify Afghan applications to come to the UK mistakenly sent the entire database of 33,000 records to Afghans in the UK. The list was then sent on to people in Afghanistan. • UK special forces, MI6 spies and military officers named in Afghan data leak Shapps, who became defence secretary in August 2023 shortly before the superinjunction was imposed, said: 'Faced with the decision of protecting lives — both Brits and Afghanis — I would do the same thing all over again. I would walk over hot coals.' Speaking to the BBC's Today programme, the former Conservative minister said the injunction had been applied by his predecessor, Ben Wallace, 'quite rightly, in my view', and came into place as he came into office. 'And it is the case that I thought that once the superinjunction was in place, it should remain as a superinjunction,' he added. Shapps said: 'And I'll tell you what, anybody sat behind the desk that I was sat in as defence secretary and faced with the choice of whether that list would get out and people would be pursued, murdered and executed as a result of it, or doing something to try and save those lives, I'd much rather now be in this interview explaining why a superinjunction was required than being in this interview explaining why I failed to act and people were murdered.' He added that 'the public understands that there are times where you simply have to act in the most maximalist way in order to stop people from being murdered and executed, and that is, quite simply, what properly happened in this case.' • The Times view: Urgent parliamentary scrutiny on Afghan data breach is needed The former MP for Welwyn Hatfield insisted that his focus as defence secretary was on 'sorting out the mess and saving lives' and 'making sure the systems were in place which frankly should have always been in place to make sure this sort of sensitive information could never be sent on'. But he said he was 'surprised' the gagging order remained in place for 'so long'. He said: 'My expectation was, as the risks start to lessen over time and people are removed from the theatre, from Afghanistan, and measures are taken to protect the Brits on the list … I'd thought that it was probably going to come to an end last summer, the autumn perhaps at maximum.'
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Lord Lebedev speaks out on press freedom
Peers have raised the alarm over what they describe as a growing threat to free speech in the UK, warning that recent police investigations into journalists, artists, and festival performers are undermining fundamental liberties. Lord Lebedev organised the House of Lords debate on the growing number of people being arrested or questioned by police for perceived communication offences. He asked the government 'what estimate they have made of the number of people arrested daily for non-threatening, online communication offences, and what assessment they have made of the implications of such arrests for freedom of speech '. Opening the Grand Committee debate on Thursday, Lord Lebedev, the proprietor of the London Standard, said: 'Free speech is the fundamental freedom – the freedom on which all our other liberties depend. 'There is no cause so noble, no argument so sound, that it does not deserve to be challenged.' Lord Lebedev, who is a shareholder in The Independent, made an impassioned appeal about the importance of freedom of expression as he recalled his upbringing in the Soviet Union. 'For me – personally – the word dissident has a special resonance,' he said. 'I grew up in Soviet Russia, a regime where expressing the wrong opinion could lead to imprisonment. The famous house on Granovski Street - where I grew up - had once been home to the likes of Khruschev, Molotov and Trotsky. 'During my childhood the presence of secret policemen – there ostensibly to 'protect' us – was a constant reminder that a word out of place could mean cancellation in its most brutal form.' He cited a string of recent police interventions, including journalist Allison Pearson being visited by officers over a tweet, a criminal investigation launched into Bob Vylan's IDF chant at Glastonbury and Turkish human rights campaigner Hamit Coskun's conviction for burning a Quran. The incidents suggest the UK risks bringing 'back blasphemy laws by the back door', Lord Lebedev argued. 'You do not need to admire any of the people I mentioned above to find this deeply concerning,' he said. 'The right to free speech means nothing if it does not mean the right to offend.' He criticised current laws such as the Malicious Communications Act and the recording of so-called 'non-crime hate incidents', over 133,000 of which have been noted since 2014. Lord Lebedev accused successive governments of encouraging a culture of censorship and wasting police resources on speech rather than crime. 'Juxtaposed with 90 per cent of all crime unsolved in 2023 and 89 per cent of violent or sexual offences going unsolved in 2024, it is hard to conceive of a worse waste of police time,' he said. Lord Kempsell described the debate as 'timely and important' when Britain's 'legislative framework feels like it was built for the internet of 20 years ago'. He said: 'I think anybody listening to the debates in your lordships house today will have concluded that in 2025 the United Kingdom is in a state of free speech emergency. 'Police are now making more than 30 arrests a day for online offensive messages. A 121 per cent increase from 2017.' Baroness Fox of Buckley echoed the concern, warning that 'the police are going to lose credibility' by persistently targeting people for online speech. 'They take their direction from the top and the message is clear: speech crimes are on a par with or even more dangerous than real crimes,' she said. Referring to riots last year sparked by the murders of three young girls in Southport, Baroness Fox said the government's public campaign in the wake of the violence urging people to 'think before you post' was 'menacing'. She highlighted the 31-month prison sentence handed to Lucy Connolly over her 'offensive' tweet about setting fire to migrant hotels, while rioter Philip Prescott, who attacked a mosque, was only sentenced to 28 months. 'No wonder the police see online communication is on a par with violent actions,' she added. Liberal Democrat peer Baroness Doocey called for better data transparency in police forces. The Lib Dem peer said: 'Arrests for malicious communications are rarely made in isolation. They frequently overlap with sexual offending, harassment or hate crime. 'We also know that some police forces include serious domestic abuse-related crimes within this category. 'This complexity makes it difficult to isolate online offenses in the data, or to calculate how many might widely be classified as non-threatening. Nevertheless, as other noble Lords have mentioned, arrest for malicious communication have risen sharply, up by nearly 60 per cent between 2019 and 2023. 'But although the police are making more arrests, many of these cases never get to court. Now, some of this is because the courts are backlogged and some cases now are being listed for 2029. 'But the falling conviction rate also raises legitimate questions about how the police are enforcing these laws, with genuine concern that in some cases, their approach may be too heavy handed, with implications for freedom of speech.' Responding, Home Office minister, Lord Hanson of Flint, 'welcomed the debate' but said 'we must remember that online abuse is not a trivial matter, nor is it inconsequential'. He added: 'The government is clear that freedom of speech is a fundamental right, and it underpins our democratic society. 'I stood up dispatch box in the wake of the offences last year in the August riots after three young girls were murdered and set out clear boundaries on those issues. 'But also said that there was important regard to protests and to people expressing a view on political issues. 'Arrests by the police are manifestations of what we expect the police to do, which is to enforce the law as passed by both Houses, without fear or without favour, and based on the information they have at the time or is put before them. The police are operationally independent.'
BreakingNews.ie
27 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
MP Diane Abbott suspended from Labour Party over comments about racism
MP Diane Abbott has been suspended from the UK Labour Party for a second time, a spokesperson said, after she doubled down on comments about racism for which she had previously apologised. She has been 'administratively suspended' while the party investigates. Advertisement The move means the whip is automatically suspended in the UK House of Commons for the Hackney North and Stoke Newington MP, it is understood. 'Diane Abbott has been administratively suspended from the Labour Party, pending an investigation. We cannot comment further while this investigation is ongoing,' a Labour Party spokesperson said. Ms Abbott was suspended by the Labour Party in 2023 after writing a letter to the Observer comparing racism experienced by people of colour with that seen by other groups. She apologised for any anguish caused by the remarks, which drew criticism from Jewish and Traveller groups, and was readmitted to the party before the 2024 general election. Advertisement But in a new interview with BBC Radio 4's Reflections programme, she said she did not look back on the incident with regret. 'No, not at all,' she told the BBC. 'Clearly, there must be a difference between racism which is about colour and other types of racism, because you can see a Traveller or a Jewish person walking down the street, you don't know. 'You don't know unless you stop to speak to them or you're in a meeting with them. Advertisement 'But if you see a black person walking down the street, you see straight away that they're black. They are different types of racism.' She added: 'I just think that it's silly to try and claim that racism which is about skin colour is the same as other types of racism.' Diane Abbott lost the whip in April 2023 (Lucy North/PA) Ms Abbott posted a clip of her BBC interview after news of her suspension emerged. She did not respond to a request for comment. UK deputy prime minister Angela Rayner was asked if she was disappointed by the comments. Advertisement 'I was. There's no place for antisemitism in the Labour Party, and obviously the Labour Party has processes for that,' she told The Guardian. 'Diane had reflected on how she'd put that article together, and said that 'was not supposed to be the version', and now to double down and say 'Well, actually I didn't mean that. I actually meant what I originally said', I think is a real challenge.'Ms Abbott is the longest-serving female MP in the Commons, having entered Parliament in 1987, and holds the honorary title of Mother of the House. She lost the whip in April 2023 after her letter to the Observer, sparking a long-running process during which she sat as an Independent MP for about a year while an internal investigation took place. She was readmitted as a Labour MP shortly before the 2024 election. Advertisement Ms Abbott suggested in the letter that Jewish, Irish and Traveller people experience prejudice, but not racism. She withdrew the remarks the same day and apologised 'for any anguish caused'. In the newly released BBC interview, she said she was 'grateful' to be a Labour MP, but that she was sure the party leadership had been 'trying to get me out'.
