
Dr. Cory Franklin: Why the US is better than Europe at preventing heat deaths
But no less important are environmental deaths, specifically those related to hot and cold weather, which are rarely cited. The U.S. figures are far more impressive than those of the rest of the industrialized world, and it is inarguable that this country does a much better job of preventing heat and cold deaths than Europe does.
First, heat deaths: Comparisons of heat deaths between countries are limited because numbers vary according to how heat deaths are defined, the differences in weather and patient characteristics in various countries, and the sources of the data. The numbers here are a compendium from several sources including Lancet, Nature and several public health and weather websites; mileage may vary.
Taking all this into account, the difference in annual heat deaths between Europe and the U.S. is surprising: In the 21st century, European heat deaths on average range from 60 to 200 per 1 million people annually, while American heat deaths average about three to eight per million annually. This means, conservatively, each year, perhaps 20 times as many people die of the heat in Europe as in the U.S. A graphic example: During the recent European heat wave that began in May, one country, Spain, experienced 1,180 deaths in only two months.
The data from deaths due to cold weather are even more sobering. Even with a warming Earth, cold continues to kill more people than heat in most parts of the world where there is any kind of cold winter. In Europe, there are 300 to 500 deaths per million due to cold annually in the past three decades, while in the U.S., the number of deaths from cold is in the range of 10 per million. So a conservative estimate would be that for every person who dies as a result of cold weather in the U.S., at least 30 die in Europe.
When deaths from heat and cold are combined, Europe has close to 50 times as many deaths as the U.S. — as many as 250,000 to 500,000 more deaths every year. Over a decade, this means several million more people die from heat and cold in Europe than die in the U.S. from those causes. A comparison of the annual numbers shows that the difference in environmental deaths easily surpasses the much more widely reported firearm death comparison. The U.S. has nearly 50,000 firearm deaths annually, and Europe has under 10,000, so the difference in firearm deaths, roughly 40,000, is about 1/10th the difference in environmental deaths.
Why is there such a difference in environmental deaths between the U.S. and Europe? The consensus among experts regarding heat deaths is the ubiquity of air conditioning in the U.S. and the relative paucity in Europe. (The majority of deaths in Spain during the May-June heat wave were in the north of the country, where air conditioning is uncommon compared with in the south.) Besides providing comfort, air conditioning saves lives — often many — especially if air conditioning could be made more available in the Global South, where there are even more deaths due to hot weather.
Despite the consensus, some environmentalists want to limit air conditioning, citing increased electricity use and carbon dioxide production, which will aggravate greenhouse gas emissions. (In 2022, Spain was one of the countries that put restrictions on air conditioning.) The response to climate change must involve a combination of mitigation, such as reducing levels of heat-trapping greenhouse gases and adaptation — that is, adapting to the consequences of a warming environment.
According to Hannah Ritchie, deputy editor of the Our World in Data website, air conditioning currently accounts for about 7% of global electricity use and 3% of carbon dioxide emissions — not negligible but certainly not exorbitant considering how many lives cooling technology saves. While worldwide air conditioning use is expected to increase in the next decade, so is the efficiency of air conditioning units. Air conditioning represents one of the most effective and lifesaving methods of adaptation to a changing climate.
The reasons for increased cold weather deaths in Europe relative to the U.S. are harder to divine, but likely include the ubiquity of older homes with poorer insulation throughout Europe. Outside of Scandinavia, there may be less preparedness and an aging population more vulnerable to cold weather snaps on the European continent.
Human-made efforts to reduce greenhouse gases are essential, but human-made efforts to adapt to weather extremes would have lifesaving consequences more immediately.
Dr. Cory Franklin is a retired intensive care physician and the author of 'The COVID Diaries 2020-2024: Anatomy of a Contagion as it Happened.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
27 minutes ago
- New York Post
Your bra might be sabotaging your health — this style is the ‘worst offender'
They lift, they separate… and they just might sabotage your health. Surveys show that 8 in 10 American women wear a bra most days, and the majority agree it's a real pain in the chest. But could your style of over-the-shoulder boulder holder be doing more harm than good? 'This is such an important question — and one we've been trained not to consider,' Bree McKeen, founder and CEO of Evelyn & Bobbie, told The Post. Advertisement 5 Studies show most women are wearing the wrong bra size, which comes with a host of consequences. – 'The truth is, most of us were never taught how to properly assess whether a bra is actually serving our bodies, we just put up with the discomfort,' she said. 'But bras can have a significant impact on our health — both physically and emotionally.' McKeen revealed five surprising ways your bra might be hurting your wellbeing and named the worst offender still lurking on store shelves today. #1 Musculoskeletal mayhem Advertisement The average woman carries between half a pound and 1.5 pounds per breast — but for those with D-cups or larger, each side can weigh 3 pounds or more. 'If your bra doesn't distribute weight effectively, your shoulders and neck end up doing all the work,' McKeen said. That uneven load can lead to a laundry list of issues, including poor posture, neck and back pain, tension headaches and even long-term spinal misalignment. 5 Bree McKeen launched Evelyn & Bobbie in the US in 2019. Evelyn & Bobbie Advertisement 'It's especially true for women with fuller busts, who carry meaningful weight on their chest every day,' McKeen said. She knows firsthand. As a curvy woman with a 34G cup, she struggled for years with aching shoulders, tension headaches and posture issues from wearing underwire bras before founding Evelyn & Bobbie. #2 Strap attack You wouldn't carry a bag of sugar around your neck with a shoestring, right? Advertisement 'That's what a lot of women are essentially doing every day,' McKeen said. 'Ouch!' The straps of a poorly designed bra, she explained, can dig into the nerves that run from your neck and shoulders down to your arms. 'Over time, that can cause tingling, numbness or shooting pain — something many women live with daily and never trace back to their bra,' McKeen said. 5 Underwire bras, while providing support, can have several drawbacks, according to McKeen. Vitalina – #3 Lymph lock Traditional underwire bras — especially tight or ill-fitting ones — can squeeze the tissue around your breasts and underarms, McKeen said. That squeeze can restrict blood flow and interfere with the lymphatic system, which plays a key role in fighting infections and balancing fluids in your body. 'There is virtually no research on the impact of restricting lymph around the breast, so I'm a little cautious when it comes to this topic,' McKeen said. 'But what we do know is that lymphatic flow is critical for our tissues to detox properly.' Advertisement After surgery, doctors often recommend wire-free bras to reduce swelling and speed healing. 'Why not just wear that every day?' McKeen asked. 'I personally want a bra that doesn't restrict my natural physiology.' #4 Irritants and invaders Common allergens like latex, nickel and spandex often sneak into bras and can irritate your skin, causing symptoms like itchiness, redness, swelling and rashes, McKeen said. She also warned that some bras contain toxic materials that can transfer directly onto your skin. Advertisement 5 Evelyn & Bobbie makes bras that offer support without the underwire. Jenna Saint Martin One major culprit: Bisphenol A (BPA), a common chemical found in some fabrics that has been linked to health concerns such as asthma, heart disease, obesity and hormone disruption. In 2022, the Center for Environmental Health found that sports bras from top brands exposed wearers to up to 22 times the 'safe' BPA level. 'I'll take BPA-free bras, please,' McKeen said. 'I don't drink out of cheap plastic water bottles, and I don't put that on my skin either.' Advertisement #5 The emotional load This one's often ignored — but it hits deep. 'Wearing something that hurts or digs or reminds you all day long that your body doesn't fit the mold … and that takes a toll,' McKeen said. 'The discomfort can be distracting, exhausting, even demoralizing.' Studies back it up: women who suffer physical bra pain often report more anxiety and lower self-esteem. Advertisement 'Here's the deeper truth: What you wear against your body every day matters,' McKeen said. 'Not just for your physical health — but for your confidence, your energy, your ability to show up fully in your life.' 5 Underwires can dig into the skin, causing pain and pressure marks. New Africa – What's the worst bra for your health? 'Unfortunately, it's the kind that's been marketed to us as the 'gold standard:' the traditional underwire push-up bra,' McKeen said. That style, she explained, unnaturally forces breast tissue upward and inward using a flat piece of steel — all while putting pressure on vital lymphatic drainage pathways. 'The underwire also digs into delicate tissue and is often placed directly over the inframammary fold, where many women develop cysts or pain,' McKeen said. 'Many times, I've seen actual scars on full-busted women from the constant pressure and chafing,' she noted. Plus, McKeen said, this design leaves the straps and band doing all the heavy lifting, leading to shoulder grooves, back pain and constant adjusting all day long. 'At Evelyn & Bobbie, our mission is bigger than bras,' McKeen said, pointing to their patented technology that delivers support without underwires. 'It's about restoring dignity to the daily experience of being a woman. It's about listening to your body, honoring its needs, and refusing to settle.'

Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Dozens killed seeking aid in Gaza as Israel weighs further military action
DEIR AL-BALAH, Gaza Strip — At least 38 Palestinians were killed overnight and into Wednesday in the Gaza Strip while seeking aid from United Nations convoys and sites run by an Israeli-backed American contractor, according to local health officials. The Israeli military said it had fired warning shots when crowds approached its forces. Another 25 people, including several women and children, were killed in Israeli airstrikes, according to local hospitals in Gaza. The military said it only targets Hamas militants. The latest deaths came as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was expected to announce further military action — and possibly plans for Israel to fully reoccupy Gaza. Experts say Israel's ongoing military offensive and blockade are already pushing the territory of some 2 million Palestinians into famine. A new U.N. report said only 1.5% of Gaza's cropland is accessible and undamaged. Another escalation of the nearly 22-month war could put the lives of countless Palestinians and around 20 living Israeli hostages at risk, and would draw fierce opposition both internationally and within Israel. Netanyahu's far-right coalition allies have long called for the war to be expanded, and for Israel to eventually take over Gaza, relocate much of its population and rebuild Jewish settlements there. President Trump, asked by a reporter Tuesday whether he supported the reoccupation of Gaza, said he wasn't aware of the 'suggestion' but that 'it's going to be pretty much up to Israel.' Of the 38 Palestinians killed while seeking aid, at least 28 died in the Morag Corridor, an Israeli military zone in southern Gaza where U.N. convoys have been repeatedly overwhelmed by looters and desperate crowds in recent days, and where witnesses say Israeli forces have repeatedly opened fire. The Israeli military said troops fired warning shots as Palestinians advanced toward them, and that it was not aware of any casualties. Nasser Hospital, which received the bodies, said another four people were killed in the Teina area, on a route leading to a site in southern Gaza run by the Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, an American contractor. The Al-Awda Hospital said it received the bodies of six people killed near a GHF site in central Gaza. GHF said there were no violent incidents at or near its sites. Two of the Israeli airstrikes hit Gaza City, in the north of the territory, killing 13 people there, including six children and five women, according to the Al-Ahli Hospital, which received the bodies. The Israeli military says it only targets militants and blames civilian deaths on Hamas because its militants are entrenched in heavily populated areas. Israel facilitated the establishment of four GHF sites in May after blocking the entry of all food, medicine and other goods for 2 1/2 months. Israeli and U.S. officials said a new system was needed to prevent Hamas from siphoning off humanitarian aid. The United Nations, which has delivered aid to hundreds of distribution points across Gaza throughout the war when conditions allow, has rejected the new system, saying it forces Palestinians to travel long distances and risk their lives for food, and that it allows Israel to control who gets aid, potentially using it to advance plans for further mass displacement. The U.N. human rights office said last week that some 1,400 Palestinians have been killed seeking aid since May, mostly near GHF sites but also along U.N. convoy routes where trucks have been overwhelmed by crowds. It says nearly all were killed by Israeli fire. This week, a group of U.N. special rapporteurs and independent human rights experts called for the GHF to be disbanded, saying it is 'an utterly disturbing example of how humanitarian relief can be exploited for covert military and geopolitical agendas in serious breach of international law.' The experts work with the U.N. but do not represent the world body. The GHF did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Israeli military says it has only fired warning shots when crowds threatened its forces, and GHF says its armed contractors have only used pepper spray and fired into the air on some occasions to prevent deadly crowding at its sites. Israel's air and ground war has destroyed nearly all of Gaza's food production capabilities, leaving its people reliant on international aid. A new report by the U.N.'s Food and Agriculture Organization and the U.N. satellite center found that just 8.6% of Gaza's cropland is still accessible following sweeping Israeli evacuation orders in recent months. Just 1.5% is accessible and undamaged, it said. The military offensive and a breakdown in security have made it nearly impossible for anyone to safely deliver aid, and aid groups say recent Israeli measures to facilitate more assistance are far from sufficient. Hospitals recorded four more malnutrition-related deaths over the last 24 hours, bringing the total to 193 people, including 96 children, since the war began in October 2023, according to the Gaza Health Ministry. Jordan said Israeli settlers blocked roads and hurled stones at a convoy of four trucks carrying aid bound for Gaza after they drove across the border into the Israeli-occupied West Bank. Israeli far-right activists have repeatedly sought to halt aid from entering Gaza. Jordanian government spokesperson Mohammed al-Momani condemned the attack, which he said had shattered the windshields of the trucks, according to the Jordanian state-run Petra News Agency. The Israeli military said security forces went to the scene to disperse the gathering and accompanied the trucks to their destination. Hamas-led militants killed some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, in the Oct. 7, 2023, attack and abducted another 251. Most of the hostages have been released in ceasefires or other deals. Of the 50 still held in Gaza, around 20 are believed to be alive. Israel's retaliatory offensive has killed over 61,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which does not say how many were fighters or civilians but says around half were women and children. It is part of the now largely defunct Hamas-run government and staffed by medical professionals. The U.N. and independent experts consider it the most reliable source for the number of war casualties. Shurafa, Khaled and Melzer write for the Associated Press. Khaled reported from Cairo and Melzer from Tel Aviv. Israel. Associated Press writers Stefanie Dazio in Berlin and Sally Abou AlJoud in Beirut contributed to this report.


Buzz Feed
an hour ago
- Buzz Feed
RFK Jr. Cuts mRNA Vaccine Funding
I'm not sure if you've heard, but everyone's least favorite Health and Human Services Secretary, RFK Jr., recently announced that he's cancelling $500 million in funding for mRNA vaccine development. mRNA vaccines, which stand for messenger ribonucleic acid (RNA), are "highly effective" and "safe," according to the National Council on Aging, a nonprofit organization that works to improve the health of older adults in the US. According to the Cleveland Clinic, the mRNA vaccine helps teach your body to fight infectious diseases. More specifically, mRNA technology is utilized in the COVID-19 vaccine, which infectious disease experts say is what helped to slow the 2020 COVID-19 outbreak in the US. According to CBS News, RFK Jr. reiterated that "HHS supports safe, effective vaccines for every American who wants them." In response to the news, Mike Osterholm, a University of Minnesota expert on infectious diseases and pandemic preparations, recently said, "I don't think I've seen a more dangerous decision in public health in my 50 years in the business." Following these vaccine funding cuts, millions have expressed deep concern for the future of medicine, as well as the impact of future pandemics in the US. Here's how medical professionals, lawmakers, and citizens are reacting: Commonly, people threw some personal digs at RFK Jr., with one person calling him a "despicable quack." ...and a pediatric MD calling him an "anti-vaxx weirdo." While other medical professionals directly contradicted RFK Jr.'s claims about the mRNA vaccine, calling them "simply false." And called out RFK Jr.'s "fundamental misunderstanding of immunology." Another infectious disease doctor argued that RFK Jr.'s decision came from "ideology" and "online anti vax talking points." And this medical professional and health writer called mRNA vaccines "one of the most important tools we have for preventing future pandemics." Another person expressed their anger about "throwing away" years of research: Even politicians have weighed in, with Senator Reverend Raphael Warnock calling the funding cuts a "tragedy." "Whatever your reason for not voting or voting 3rd party, I promise it wasn't worth destroying our country over," this person wrote. And this person made a scary observation, writing: "A diseased population is easier to control..." And finally, this Reddit user summed up what many are feeling: "Imagine being so privileged to have lived in a tiny slice of human history when MILLIONS of people have been spared from pyrogens at the hands of vaccines……only to be somehow convinced the answer to the threat humanity faces going forward is to stop researching the most proven and effective medicine mankind has ever known." What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below.