logo
Cambodia-Thailand border clash a setback for ASEAN: Singapore foreign minister

Cambodia-Thailand border clash a setback for ASEAN: Singapore foreign minister

August 6, 2025
SINGAPORE – The recent armed clash between Cambodia and Thailand was a setback not only for peace in the region, but also Asean's credibility, said Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan.
The territorial dispute raised questions about Asean's ability to prevent and manage crises, and Dr Balakrishnan said while such disputes are not uncommon in South-east Asia, he emphasised that violence can be avoided.
When it does occur, it reflects a failure of leadership, said Dr Balakrishnan, who also cautioned against letting matters deteriorate into catastrophe, as the region faces rising geopolitical tensions and an increasingly fragmented global economic landscape.
Speaking at the 17th Asean and Asia Forum organised by the Singapore Institute of International Affairs on Aug 5, Dr Balakrishnan described the Cambodia-Thailand conflict as a serious blow for the grouping.
'There's no need to put lipstick on this. This is a setback, a major setback, not just for peace and stability, but for credibility in Asean,' he told an audience of about 300 diplomats, academics and business leaders at the Parkroyal on Beach Road.
Countries in the region have long lived with unresolved territorial disputes between them, which Dr Balakrishnan noted 'is not a short list'. But he stressed that the existence of such disputes does not mean they must result in violence.
'Just because you have got areas which have not yet been delimited or which are in contention, does not mean it has to lead to violence, and the fact that violence occurs is a failure of diplomacy, and arguably complicated when leadership is hamstrung,' he said.
The solution, said Dr Balakrishnan, is for nations to first take care of their own societies – a point he has often made by emphasising that foreign policy begins at home.
He noted that a backlash against globalisation and trade, including the weaponisation of tariffs and supply chains, often stems from domestic insecurity and a loss of confidence that existing systems are delivering fair outcomes for all segments of society.
'If your home front is not settled, it is very difficult to conduct economic or diplomatic (policy),' he said.
Dr Balakrishnan's comments came after a ceasefire was brokered on July 28 in Malaysia, who is this year's Asean chair, following five days of clashes between Cambodia and Thailand. The fighting left more than 40 dead and displaced over 300,000 people along their shared border.
The incident remains one of the most serious armed confrontations between Asean member states in recent years.
Asean Secretary-General Kao Kim Hourn, who spoke in a separate session at the same forum, said Malaysia's chairmanship played a key role in calming tensions.
'The decisive decision by the Asean chair to intervene has been remarkable,' he said, adding that defence ministers from both sides have resumed talks in Kuala Lumpur and that progress is being made.
Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said on Aug 5 that Putrajaya is prepared to deploy a monitoring team to the border if requested by both Thailand and Cambodia, though for now, the situation is being observed remotely via satellite and coordinated through Malaysia's defence attache.
The Cambodian-Thai tensions come as Asean continues to manage the fallout from the Myanmar crisis, which has seen ongoing violence and political instability since a military coup in 2021.
The grouping has barred Myanmar's ruling junta from key meetings due to its failure to implement peace plans and end the violence that has gripped the country since it seized power.
Dr Balakrishnan said the roots of the conflict there run deeper than politics, citing Myanmar's long-standing failure to forge a cohesive national identity.
National reconciliation, moral leadership and political imagination are essential, he said, adding that military force is not sufficient.
Push for deeper integration
Both leaders in their separate sessions also spoke about the broader regional and global context, warning that the space for cooperation is narrowing amid growing economic fragmentation and weakening multilateral institutions.
To a question on how Asean will navigate the current economic situation, Dr Kao said that member states are responding both individually and collectively, though there is still considerable uncertainty ahead.
On the impact of US tariffs, he said the immediate priority is to minimise their effects and protect livelihoods. Governments are working to finalise the upgraded Asean Trade in Goods Agreement (Atiga), which is expected to be signed in October, as part of efforts to move closer to the grouping's single market goal.
The Atiga, a key free trade agreement for the region, was signed in 2009 and came into force a year later. Negotiations to upgrade this agreement were concluded in May.
Meanwhile, Dr Balakrishnan described the current moment as the end of the post-Cold War era of rules-based globalisation.
The result, he said, is a 'world disorder' in which international institutions such as the United Nations Security Council and the World Trade Organisation are increasingly paralysed.
He noted that since January, developments such as new US tariffs and the so-called 'Liberation Day' shift in trade policy have underscored the urgency of adapting Singapore's external and domestic strategies.
While bilateral and regional deals continue to be signed, he warned that the erosion of global norms means small states like Singapore must navigate a more transactional and fragmented world.
Dr Balakrishnan said that Asean must engage all partners and practise flexible multilateralism but also acknowledged that operating by consensus can at times feel like a straitjacket that slows progress.
The goal, he said, is not to abandon consensus, but to recognise that insisting on unanimity can make decisions nearly impossible, especially when some members act as spoilers.
He stressed the need for a system in which if enough members want to move forward constructively, they should be allowed to do so. Asean should continue seeking compromises, but not allow consensus to become a permanent obstacle.
For Singapore to tackle global shifts, Dr Balakrishnan outlined a three-part strategy of reforming global institutions, deepening regional integration, and reinforcing the country's domestic economic resilience.
Global institutions must be reformed in terms of representation, decision-making, and process, said Dr Balakrishnan. And on its part, Singapore is contributing to this effort through its nominations to international bodies.
He gave the example of veteran diplomat and international law expert Rena Lee, who will be fielded by Singapore for election as a judge at the International Court of Justice in 2026.
On regionalisation, Dr Balakrishnan noted that Singapore's leaders have consistently attended Asean meetings, and the Republic is working with the grouping to expand key trade agreements and launch new economic frameworks.
Regarding efforts to reinforce Singapore's domestic economic resilience, Dr Balakrishnan pointed to an ongoing review of the country's economic strategy, announced by Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong on Aug 4.
The review will develop long-term plans to boost Singapore's global competitiveness and enhance the start-up ecosystem. Committees led by political office-holders will engage stakeholders and present their recommendations by mid-2026.
Singapore is also focused on managing its external partnerships carefully. Dr Balakrishnan said Asean remains Singapore's 'innermost core' politically, militarily and economically. He stressed the need for member states to 'hang together or hang separately.'
Beyond the region, Singapore must also carefully manage its relations with the US and China, Dr Balakrishnan said. This includes handling ties bilaterally, as well as navigating 'space between them, and where we fit'.
'We don't want to be forced on two sides, but we want to have a value proposition for both, so that they have a stake in our success and prosperity,' he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Thai court to deliver verdict on Aug 29 in PM Paetongtarn dismissal case
Thai court to deliver verdict on Aug 29 in PM Paetongtarn dismissal case

CNA

time10 hours ago

  • CNA

Thai court to deliver verdict on Aug 29 in PM Paetongtarn dismissal case

BANGKOK: Thailand's Constitutional Court announced Wednesday (Aug 13) that it will rule this month on a case seeking to oust Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra over her handling of a diplomatic spat with Cambodia. A group of conservative senators filed a case accusing Paetongtarn of unprofessional conduct and breaching ministerial ethics during a border row with Cambodia that led to the two neighbours' bloodiest military clashes in decades. The Constitutional Court said in a statement that it will deliver its verdict in the case at 3pm local time on Aug 29. Paetongtarn, daughter of controversial billionaire ex-PM Thaksin Shinawatra, took office less than a year ago when her predecessor was thrown out of office by the same court. Suspended from her duties by the court last month, the 38-year-old has defended her actions, insisting she acted in the country's interests. In a leaked phone recording, Paetongtarn addressed Cambodian statesman Hun Sen as "uncle" during a call about the tensions and referred to a Thai military commander as her "opponent" - remarks that sparked a backlash. Conservative lawmakers accuse her of kowtowing to Cambodia and undermining the military, and allege she breached constitutional provisions requiring "evident integrity" and "ethical standards" among ministers. If the verdict goes against her, Paetongtarn would become the third Shinwatra to be ousted early as premier, after her father and aunt Yingluck - both thrown out in military coups. Thai politics has been driven for two decades by a battle between the conservative, pro-military, pro-royalist elite and the Shinawatra clan, whom they consider a threat to the kingdom's traditional social order. Thaksin is on trial for lese-majeste and is due to hear his verdict on Aug 22. In a July interview with local media, Thaksin said that if his daughter is removed from office, she will "just go back and perform her duty as a mother".

Malaysia's top court allows jailed ex-PM Najib to pursue legal bid for house arrest
Malaysia's top court allows jailed ex-PM Najib to pursue legal bid for house arrest

Straits Times

time12 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Malaysia's top court allows jailed ex-PM Najib to pursue legal bid for house arrest

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox A supporter of former Malaysian prime minister Najib Razak outside the Federal Court in Putrajaya, on Aug 13. KUALA LUMPUR - Jailed former Malaysian prime minister Najib Razak won a major court battle on Aug 13 that took him a step closer to being able to serve out at home a years-long jail term over the multibillion-dollar 1MDB scandal. Najib, imprisoned since August 2022 in one of several cases related to state investor 1Malaysia Development Berhad, has been seeking a judicial review to compel the authorities to confirm the existence of and execute a royal order issued by the former king, Sultan Abdullah Ahmad Shah, entitling him to serve the remainder of his jail sentence under house arrest. In a unanimous decision, the Federal Court, Malaysia's top tribunal, said on Aug 13 it accepted that there was a royal document related to granting house arrest for Najib but it was not in a position to determine its authenticity. Najib has said that an addendum order accompanied a pardon by Sultan Abdullah in January 2024 halved his sentence from 12 years to six. The case has stirred intrigue in Malaysia, with multiple government authorities, including members of the pardons board, for months denying knowledge of the royal document despite the former king's office confirming it had been issued. The Federal Court's three-member panel said that while it accepted the order's existence, it could not determine whether it was truly issued as part of the pardon. The court declined a request by Najib's lawyer to hear further arguments, referring the case back to a lower tribunal. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Business Singapore banks face headwinds in rest of 2025, but DBS is pulling ahead: Analysts Singapore Yishun man admits to making etomidate-laced pods for vaporisers; first Kpod case conviction Singapore HSA seeks Kpod investigators to arrest abusers, conduct anti-trafficking ops Asia Malaysia's anti-graft agency busts arms smuggling ring masterminded by senior military officers Asia Mixed reactions among Malaysia drivers on S'pore move to clamp down on illegal ride-hailing services Singapore Allianz insures Singapore's first fully driverless bus amid challenges posed by autonomous vehicles Business Singapore life insurance sales surges in first half, led by boost in investment-linked plans Singapore SG60: Many hands behind Singapore's success story 'We remit the case to the High Court for the hearing of the substantive judicial review proceedings before a new judge,' said Federal Court judge Zabariah Mohd Yusof. Najib was found guilty in 2020 of criminal breach of trust and abuse of power for illegally receiving funds misappropriated from a unit of 1MDB. Although some 1MDB-linked charges against him have been dropped, he is still awaiting a verdict in the biggest trial he faces over the scandal, with the court expected to hear closing arguments in October. Najib has denied all the charges brought against him. Addendum's existence undisputed The Aug 13 decision is expected to boost calls by Najib's party Umno for him to be granted house arrest. Umno campaigned against current Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, but joined Datuk Seri Anwar's coalition in government following a 2022 election that resulted in a hung Parliament. More than 100 people gathered outside the court complex on Aug 13 to support Najib, who lost the 2018 General Election amid public anger over 1MDB. Najib initiated his judicial review in April 2024. The bid was initially dismissed by the Kuala Lumpur High Court, but was overturned on appeal in January, after Najib's lawyers produced a letter from the former king's palace saying there was an addendum. The Attorney-General's office appealed against the decision questioning the document's admissibility. A lawyer acting on behalf of the Attorney-General told the court in July that he did not dispute the document's existence, but was challenging the way in which it was being submitted as evidence. The Federal Court said the concession by the Attorney-General that the order existed had a significant impact on its decision on Aug 13. 'As of now, the addendum order exists and its status vis-a-vis its validity or whether it is true needs to be ascertained at a substantive hearing,' Judge Zabariah said. The court fixed Aug 18 for the case to be heard at the High Court. REUTERS

Malaysia's top court allows jailed ex-PM Najib to pursue legal bid for house arrest
Malaysia's top court allows jailed ex-PM Najib to pursue legal bid for house arrest

Business Times

time13 hours ago

  • Business Times

Malaysia's top court allows jailed ex-PM Najib to pursue legal bid for house arrest

[KUALA LUMPUR] Jailed former Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak won a major court battle on Wednesday (Aug 13) that took him a step closer to being able to serve out a years-long jail term over the multi-billion dollar 1MDB scandal at home. Najib, imprisoned since August 2022 in one of several cases related to 1MDB, has been seeking a judicial review to compel authorities to confirm the existence of and execute a royal order issued by former King Al-Sultan Abdullah entitling him to serve the remainder of his jail sentence under house arrest. In a unanimous decision, the Federal Court, Malaysia's top tribunal, said on Wednesday it accepted that there was a royal document related to granting house arrest for Najib but it was not in a position to determine its authenticity. Najib has said an addendum order accompanied a pardon by Al-Sultan Abdullah in January last year that halved his sentence from 12 years to six. The case has stirred intrigue in Malaysia, with multiple government authorities, including members of the pardons board, for months denying knowledge of the document despite the former king's office saying an addendum had been issued. The Federal Court's three-member panel said while it accepted the order's existence, it could not determine whether it was truly issued as part of the pardon. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies. Sign Up Sign Up The court declined a request by Najib's lawyer to hear further arguments, referring the case back to a lower tribunal. 'We remit the case to the High Court for the hearing of the substantive judicial review proceedings before a new judge,' said Federal Court judge Zabariah Mohd Yusof. Najib was found guilty in 2020 of criminal breach of trust and abuse of power for illegally receiving funds misappropriated from a unit of state investor 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB). Although some 1MDB-linked charges against him have been dropped, Najib is still awaiting a verdict in the biggest trial he faces over the scandal, with the court expected to hear closing arguments in October. He has denied all the charges against him. Wednesday's decision is expected to boost calls by Najib's party, the United Malays National Organisation (Umno), for him to be granted house arrest. Umno campaigned against current Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, but joined Anwar's coalition in government following a 2022 election that resulted in a hung parliament. More than 100 people gathered outside the court complex on Wednesday to support Najib, who lost the 2018 election amid public anger over 1MDB. Najib initiated his judicial review in April last year. The bid was initially dismissed by the Kuala Lumpur High Court, but was overturned on appeal in January, after Najib's lawyers produced a letter from the former king's palace saying there was an addendum. The attorney-general's office appealed the decision questioning the document's admissibility. A lawyer acting on behalf of the attorney-general told the court in July he did not dispute the document's existence, but was challenging the way in which it was being submitted as evidence. The Federal Court said the concession by the attorney-general that the order existed had a significant impact on its decision on Wednesday. 'As of now, the addendum order exists and its status vis-a-vis its validity or whether it is true needs to be ascertained at a substantive hearing,' judge Zabariah said. The court fixed August 18 for the case to be heard at the High Court. REUTERS

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store