logo
House GOP, still searching for common ground

House GOP, still searching for common ground

Politico10-02-2025

Presented by NFIB
ON SECOND THOUGHT: So about the House Budget Committee considering a budget this week…
House Republicans remain at loggerheads over core fundamental tax-and-spending issues as they try to build a single, large fiscal package in the coming months that would extend expiring tax cuts and enact other of President Donald Trump's priorities, as our Benjamin Guggenheim and Meredith Lee Hill reported late on Sunday.
Those issues keep pushing back the House GOP's timeline. House Republicans were hopeful they'd be able to roll out the details of a budget resolution late last week, ahead of a committee mark-up this week.
But Speaker Mike Johnson acknowledged on Sunday that his conference's timeline might keep slipping. 'The details really matter,' Johnson said on 'Fox News Sunday.'
Those lost days might end up being costly, too. Senate Republicans are poised to plunge ahead with the consideration of their own budget this week, to start the process for their preferred two-step approach — in which Republicans would presumably score an early victory on issues like border security, in which there is basic agreement within the party, and hold off on the more complicated issue of extending the temporary parts of the 2017 tax cuts and potentially offering further tax relief.
MORE ON THAT IN A BIT, but first thanks for joining this 'well, that was a happy birthday for Saquon' version of Weekly Tax. Also, time to catch up on the lobbying over the penny!
Descending like the confetti at a Super Bowl: Today marks 53 years since David Bowie first rolled out the alien alter ego Ziggy Stardust, at a performance at a now-closed London pub named the Toby Jug.
Be a hero. Send your best tips and feedback.
Email: bbecker@politico.com, bfaler@politico.com, bguggenheim@politico.com and teckert@politico.com.
You can also reach us on X at @berniebecker3, @Brian_Faler, @ben_guggenheim, @tobyeckert, @POLITICOPro and @Morning_Tax.
Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You'll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day's biggest stories.
DRILLING DOWN FURTHER: So what are these hang-ups plaguing House Republicans?
One big issue is, essentially, how much money to give the Ways and Means Committee to cut taxes. Chair Jason Smith (R-Mo.) has been pushing for around $5.5 trillion over a decade, an acknowledgment of the steep costs of extending the expiring parts of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (around $4.6 trillion on its own) and Trump's interest in other ideas, like scrapping taxes on tipped income.
But key deficit hawks in the House, like Budget Chair Jodey Arrington and Rep. Chip Roy, both Texans, have worked to push that number down, with a $4.7 trillion figure making the rounds by the end of last week.
That would be kind of an awkward number, according to several D.C. tax people. It would certainly make it more difficult to permanently extend the temporary TCJA provisions, which Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has stressed is a top priority for Trump and his administration.
There are a lot of moving parts to consider. The cost of a permanent extension of the expiring tax cuts is why a good number of Republicans are fans of using something called the current policy baseline, which basically assumes that it costs nothing to keep those temporary provisions.
Republicans have other options as well — including, of course, passing at least portions of their tax platform for shorter lengths of time. They also have a variety of revenue-raisers they can look to as a way to finance further tax cuts, like slashing some of the clean energy incentives signed into law by former President Joe Biden.
Still, the tax priorities that Trump's team spelled out last week underscore the challenge for Republicans. The president wants about a half-dozen tax relief measures, also including eliminating taxes on Social Security benefits and overtime pay and offering relief to the current $10,000 cap on state and local taxes, while he's offering a couple ways to raise revenues — ending the preferential treatment for carried interest and hiking taxes on rich owners of pro sports franchises.
The issue there, as the deficit hawks at the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget noted, is that the tax relief in Trump's wish list far, far outstrips the new revenues — by as little as $5 trillion over a decade, and as much as $11 trillion.
(Worth noting: Trump and his team keep bringing up his desire to eliminate taxes on Social Security benefits. Critics of that idea note that it would both be expensive and largely help better off beneficiaries. But it's also a proposal that would seem exceedingly difficult to pass through the budget reconciliation process, which specifically prohibits changes to Social Security.)
BROADENING THIS OUT A BIT: Congressional Democrats have been pretty open about the fact that they don't expect to play any real policymaking role in the debate over the expiring tax cuts.
Republicans still have well over 10 months to pass an extension of the temporary chunks of the Trump tax cuts. But the longer they have trouble getting on the same page on taxes, the more fears will grow within the GOP that they might need Democrats' assistance in avoiding at least a total expiration of TCJA's tax cuts for individuals.
With that in mind: New polling from a trio of liberal groups — Data for Progress, Groundwork Collaborative and the Student Borrowers Protection Center — makes the case that voters aren't fans of some of the trade-offs that might be necessary to offset the costs of tax cut extensions.
The polling found that majorities of voters support programs to boost energy efficiency and student loan repayment options, while opposing cuts to programs like food stamps, Medicaid and Medicare. Meanwhile, a majority of voters continue to oppose tax cuts for the rich and corporations.
That points to a broader challenge facing Republicans. It's not just that it's difficult for the GOP to find palatable tax increases to help fund their agenda. It's also that lots of government spending programs are quite popular as well.
For instance, Elizabeth Pancotti, Groundwork Collaborative's manging director of policy and advocacy, noted that a majority of Republicans back clean energy programs — underscoring the difficulty the GOP might face in cutting parts of the Inflation Reduction Act signed into law by Biden, which has brought new economic activity to a number of red congressional districts over the last couple years.
More broadly speaking, Pancotti argued the GOP is essentially danged if they do, danged if they don't on tax issues this year. Either Republicans will have to come to Democrats for help, she said, or they'll end up passing what will turn out to be a second unpopular tax package in eight years, after TCJA failed to give the GOP any real electoral boost after it was passed in 2017.
'Voters are clear about what they want: Lower prices, better jobs, vital programs protected and expanded, and for the wealthy to pay their fair share in taxes,' Pancotti said. 'And yet, Republicans in both chambers of Congress are working overtime to achieve the exact opposite.'
Around the World
Bloomberg: 'UK House Prices Rose in January in Rush to Beat Tax Deadline.'
Financial Times: 'Advisers urge wealthy Britons to consider life assurance to reduce IHT.'
The Connexion: 'More drivers to pay higher pollution taxes on new car registrations in France
Around the Nation
Oklahoma Voice: 'Oklahoma legislative leaders hesitant to cut income tax.'
Oregon Public Broadcasting: 'Oregon House GOP calls for tax cuts, housing fix. But Democrats hold the cards.'
Montana Free Press: 'Lawmakers ponder bills aimed at narrowing ag property tax loopholes.'
Also Worth Your Time
Stat News: 'Hospitals could be Congress' next target as GOP looks to extend Trump's tax cuts.'
Bloomberg: 'Trump's Sports Taxes Could Target Team Owners Worth $869 Billion.'
From the efficiency beat: 'Musk says Treasury, DOGE instituting reporting changes to all government payments.'
Did you know?
'The Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders from Mars' was Bowie's second highest-selling album, behind 'Let's Dance.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dollar Extends Its Slide as US Tariff Concerns Pick Up Again
Dollar Extends Its Slide as US Tariff Concerns Pick Up Again

Bloomberg

time14 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Dollar Extends Its Slide as US Tariff Concerns Pick Up Again

The dollar extended its decline versus major peers as worries over US tariffs increased after President Donald Trump said he would notify trading partners soon of unilateral levy rates. Bloomberg's gauge of the dollar slid as much as 0.3% on Thursday to touch its lowest level since July 2023 following the news, with the safe-haven yen and Swiss franc leading the advance against the greenback. The dollar was already under pressure from a weaker-than-expected US inflation print, which helped spur traders to fully price in two quarter-point Federal Reserve interest rate cuts this year.

How the $1,000 ‘Trump accounts' for American babies compare to 529s and custodial Roth IRAs
How the $1,000 ‘Trump accounts' for American babies compare to 529s and custodial Roth IRAs

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

How the $1,000 ‘Trump accounts' for American babies compare to 529s and custodial Roth IRAs

President Donald Trump and American business leaders this week celebrated a provision in his tax bill that would create and fund investment accounts for babies born in the next few years. The accounts would be allowed to compound and grow tax-deferred, similar to the way some retirement accounts work. 'In addition to the substantial financial benefits of investing early in life, extensive research shows that children with savings accounts are more likely to graduate high school and college, buy a home, start a business and are less likely to be incarcerated,' Trump said. 'Trump accounts will contribute to the lifelong success of millions of newborn babies.' Here's what you should know about these 'baby 401(k)s' and how they compare to other savings plans for children. The so-called Trump accounts are part of Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' that passed through the House of Representatives last month. Republicans are aiming to get the bill through the Senate and signed by Trump by July 4th. Here's how the accounts would work: The federal government would contribute $1,000 to an investment account for every American baby born between Jan. 1, 2025, and Dec. 31, 2028. An additional $5,000 in after-tax contributions could be made annually to the accounts by parents, employers or other private entities. The money would be invested in index funds that track the overall U.S. stock market. Accounts would be controlled by a child's legal guardians until age 18. Earnings would grow tax-deferred and qualified withdrawals would be taxed at the long-term capital gains rate. 'The compounded growth of an initial $1,000 investment at the time of birth, at an average annual return of 8 percent, would amount to nearly $4,000 by age 18, more than $10,000 by age 30, and over $148,000 by age 65,' according to Bankrate Chief Financial Analyst Greg McBride. 'The key to achieving this type of growth is leaving the money untouched. As Warren Buffett espouses, 'Never interrupt compounding.'' Several business leaders praised the accounts and said they'd make contributions to their employee's kids' accounts. 'We see … the establishment of these Trump Accounts as a simple yet powerful way to transform lives,' Dell Technologies CEO Michael Dell said. 'Decades of research has shown that giving children a financial head start profoundly impacts their long-term success.' Get started: Match with an advisor who can help you achieve your financial goals Trump Accounts have some similarities with 529 savings plans, but there are some notable differences. Funding: Trump accounts would be initially funded by the federal government, while 529 plans are typically funded by parents, grandparents or other relatives. Withdrawals: Withdrawals from 529 plans are tax-free as long as they're used for qualified educational expenses. Withdrawals from Trump accounts would have fewer restrictions on their uses, but are taxed at long-term capital gains rates. Contribution limits: Annual contributions for Trump accounts would be limited to $5,000, while 529 plans allow for much higher limits, from about $235,000 to more than $600,000, depending on the state that sponsors the plan (these are lifetime limits; there's no annual limit for 529s). Many people assume that the maximum 529 plan contribution is $19,000 per child in 2025 — or $38,000 if you file jointly — but that's the maximum amount you can contribute without exceeding the annual gift tax limit. (If you give someone more than that limit in any given year, then you're required to file a gift tax return, though you likely still won't owe taxes on the gift.) Here's what else you should know about using a 529 plan to save for your kids' education. Compare advisors: Bankrate's list of the best financial advisors Custodial Roth IRAs also allow kids to set aside money and have it be invested so it grows over time. Here's how they compare to the proposed Trump accounts. Earned income requirement: Trump accounts would be funded at birth and allow for additional contributions each year, while custodial Roth IRAs require a child to have earned income during the year in order to contribute. Contribution limits: Custodial Roth IRA contributions are limited to $7,000 in 2025, or the total amount of earned income a child has during the year, whichever is less. Trump accounts would allow for annual contributions of $5,000. Taxes on withdrawals: Withdrawals from Roth IRAs during retirement are tax-free, while withdrawals from the proposed Trump accounts would be taxed at the long-term capital gains rate. Here's more on custodial Roth IRAs. The proposed Trump Accounts would create new investment accounts for every American baby born in the next few years, funded with $1,000 from the federal government. The accounts would be invested in index funds that track the U.S. stock market and could receive additional contributions each year of $5,000 from private entities. The plan is subject to change as the bill makes its way through the legislative process. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Video: Trump gives major update on Iran nuclear deal negotiations
Video: Trump gives major update on Iran nuclear deal negotiations

American Military News

time24 minutes ago

  • American Military News

Video: Trump gives major update on Iran nuclear deal negotiations

President Donald Trump warned in a recent interview that he is 'less confident' that the United States will reach a nuclear deal with Iran amid ongoing negotiations between his administration and the Iranian government. During an interview on Miranda Devine's 'Pod Force One' podcast, the 47th president was asked if he believed he could get Iran to make a nuclear deal, according to The New York Post. 'I don't know,' Trump said. 'I don't know. I did think so, and I'm getting more and more — less confident about it.' 'They seem to be delaying, and I think that's a shame, but I'm less confident now than I would have been a couple of months ago,' Trump added. 'Something happened to them, but I am much less confident of a deal being made. I would have said a deal would be made.' While Trump acknowledged that he is 'less confident' about a potential nuclear deal with Iran, the president told Devine during the interview that there is 'nothing final' with regard to Iran accepting a deal with the United States. READ MORE: Iran orders ballistic missile materials from China for hundreds of missiles: Report Asked what would happen if Iran did not accept a nuclear deal, the president said. 'Well, if they don't make a deal, they're not going to have a nuclear weapon. If they do make a deal, they're not going to have a nuclear weapon, too, you know? But they're not going to have a new nuclear weapon, so it's not going to matter from that standpoint.' 'But it would be nicer to do it without warfare, without people dying, it would be so much nicer to do it,' Trump added. 'But I don't think I see the same level of enthusiasm for them to make a deal. I think they would make a mistake, but we'll see. I guess time will tell.' President Trump tells @mirandadevine he doesn't think Iran wants to make a deal 'it would be nicer to do it without warfare, without people dying…But I don't think I see the same level of enthusiasm for them to make a deal. I think they would make a mistake" — Jim Hanson (@JimHansonDC) June 11, 2025 Last week, Iranian Supreme Leader Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei rejected a nuclear deal with the United States that was proposed by the Trump administration. According to The Times of Israel, Iranian Defense Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh suggested during a press conference on Wednesday that Iran will target U.S. military bases in the Middle East if the nuclear negotiations are unsuccessful and the United States engages in military conflict with Iran. Nasirzadeh warned, 'Some officials on the other side threaten conflict if negotiations don't come to fruition. If a conflict is imposed on us… all US bases are within our reach and we will boldly target them in host countries.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store