Wong says help offered after 'awful' shooting of Aussie reporter in US
Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here BREAKING Socceroos lock in World Cup spot with win Foreign Minister Penny Wong says the federal government had reached out to 9News correspondent Lauren Tomasi to offer assistance, after the reporter was shot by police with a rubber bullet during her coverage of the ongoing protests in Los Angeles. The moment was captured on camera, showing a masked officer lifting their gun and firing at close range, striking Tomasi with a supposed "non-lethal" round. Tomasi later said she was "sore, but okay" and that she and her cameraman were both unharmed, as the footage sparked an international reaction. Foreign Minister Penny Wong. (Today) Wong told Today that the footage captured a "really awful" moment. "We've made the appropriate representations, and I'm very conscious also that we should handle this in the way Lauren is comfortable with," she said. "We obviously have reached out through the consulate general in Los Angeles and stand ready to provide any assistance she needs." Lauren Tomasi was shot by a police officer while covering the Los Angeles protests. (Nine) Wong said "Australia believes in a free media and journalists should be able to do their job safely". The foreign minister would not be drawn on whether Prime Minister Anthony Albanese would raise the matter with US President Donald Trump at the G7 summit in Canada this week. "He doesn't telegraph these sorts things ahead of the discussion," Wong said. "But please be assured that we have acted through the all the appropriate diplomatic channels." Albanese condemned the attack yesterday , saying Tomasi was targeted by the police officer despite clearly being identifiable as a member of the media. "We don't find it acceptable that it occurred, and we think that the role of the media is particularly important," he said. The Los Angeles Police Department confirmed it had launched a formal investigation into the attack. media
Politics
federal politics
Protests
Los Angeles
USA
World
Australia
national CONTACT US
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
28 minutes ago
- The Age
The most important meeting of Albanese's career just got trickier
The federal government's decision to sanction two far-right Israeli minsters, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, has been a long time coming. It underscores the deep frustration with the Netanyahu government felt by some of Israel's oldest and most reliable allies at the intransigence of that country's prime minister and a growing disgust at the human toll of the war in Gaza. It's also an exquisite piece of timing, coming on the eve of Anthony Albanese's expected first meeting with Donald Trump on the sidelines of the G7 Summit in Canada. But the PM has hardly signed up to a radical position. Joined by the Norwegians, the conservative prime minister of New Zealand, Christopher Luxon and a pair of centre-left leaders – UK's Keir Starmer and Canada's Mark Carney – the sanctions carry weight, as evidenced by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio's almost immediate pushback, and the move is sure to be discussed if, or when, the president and the PM finally meet in person. Given that the only world leader Netanyahu appears to pay any significant heed to is Trump, leaders like Albanese have a part to play in both publicly and privately lobbying the president over ending the war in Gaza, and a possible, eventual two-state solution. At the time of writing, on the eve of a trip that will take him to Nadi, in Fiji, Seattle, Washington and Kananaskis, Canada for the G7 summit, a sit-down between the prime minister and the US president had not been confirmed. But it seems highly likely that the men will meet, if Trump turns up at the summit. Albanese will have bilateral meetings ('bilats') with world leaders including Carney and Starmer, Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and South Korea's new president, Lee Jae-myung. The Australian decision to sanction the Israeli ministers comes less than two weeks after US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth called publicly for Australia to increase its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, an increase of about $40 billion a year and a near-doubling from the current level of about 2 per cent. Hegseth's call received a lukewarm reception, at best, in Canberra with Albanese noting at the National Press Club this week that 'if the health minister or the comms minister or the infrastructure minister came to us and said, 'we want you to spend X percentage of GDP but we won't tell you what it's for' ... they wouldn't get far in an ERC [Expenditure Review Committee] process'. The prime minister's view is that his government will find the necessary equipment and capabilities for the Australia defence forces, rather than increasing its spending before it knows what it wants to spend it on. Taken together, the decision to sanction the two Israeli ministers and to push back against the American defence spending demands signal something more significant.
Sydney Morning Herald
32 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
The most important meeting of Albanese's career just got trickier
The federal government's decision to sanction two far-right Israeli minsters, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, has been a long time coming. It underscores the deep frustration with the Netanyahu government felt by some of Israel's oldest and most reliable allies at the intransigence of that country's prime minister and a growing disgust at the human toll of the war in Gaza. It's also an exquisite piece of timing, coming on the eve of Anthony Albanese's expected first meeting with Donald Trump on the sidelines of the G7 Summit in Canada. But the PM has hardly signed up to a radical position. Joined by the Norwegians, the conservative prime minister of New Zealand, Christopher Luxon and a pair of centre-left leaders – UK's Keir Starmer and Canada's Mark Carney – the sanctions carry weight, as evidenced by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio's almost immediate pushback, and the move is sure to be discussed if, or when, the president and the PM finally meet in person. Given that the only world leader Netanyahu appears to pay any significant heed to is Trump, leaders like Albanese have a part to play in both publicly and privately lobbying the president over ending the war in Gaza, and a possible, eventual two-state solution. At the time of writing, on the eve of a trip that will take him to Nadi, in Fiji, Seattle, Washington and Kananaskis, Canada for the G7 summit, a sit-down between the prime minister and the US president had not been confirmed. But it seems highly likely that the men will meet, if Trump turns up at the summit. Albanese will have bilateral meetings ('bilats') with world leaders including Carney and Starmer, Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and South Korea's new president, Lee Jae-myung. The Australian decision to sanction the Israeli ministers comes less than two weeks after US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth called publicly for Australia to increase its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, an increase of about $40 billion a year and a near-doubling from the current level of about 2 per cent. Hegseth's call received a lukewarm reception, at best, in Canberra with Albanese noting at the National Press Club this week that 'if the health minister or the comms minister or the infrastructure minister came to us and said, 'we want you to spend X percentage of GDP but we won't tell you what it's for' ... they wouldn't get far in an ERC [Expenditure Review Committee] process'. The prime minister's view is that his government will find the necessary equipment and capabilities for the Australia defence forces, rather than increasing its spending before it knows what it wants to spend it on. Taken together, the decision to sanction the two Israeli ministers and to push back against the American defence spending demands signal something more significant.
Sydney Morning Herald
3 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
The home politics of Trump's America Alone should not torpedo AUKUS
The decision by the United States to review the AUKUS submarine deal with two of its most faithful allies has rung alarm bells in Canberra, despite the claims from our leaders that we have nothing to fear. In some ways, the review was inevitable. Last October, a US Congressional Research Service report showed America's boat-building program was behind schedule and nowhere near able to supply the first of Australia's AUKUS nuclear submarines on time. The US review is being carried out under President Donald Trump's 'America First' mantra and his nation's ongoing political instability suggests Australia would be wise to conduct its own oversight. Under the first pillar of the pact, Australia will buy three to five nuclear-powered submarines from the US, starting in the 2030s, and build more through a joint initiative with the US and UK. Under the second pillar, the three nations will collaborate on advanced defence technologies. Australia is also contributing at least $4.6 billion to the US defence industrial base to shore up submarine production; $800 million has already been paid. The deal was announced in 2021 under then prime minister Scott Morrison and then US president Joe Biden. Trump's 'America First' has distorted many accepted beliefs about alliances. The US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth's intimidatory call for Australia to boost defence spending by tens of billions of dollars to 3.5 per cent of GDP in the near term was a clear trampling of sovereignty brushed aside by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. Now with Trump banging the drum loudly on China and Taiwan, the US review accentuates Australia's sovereignty vulnerability in signing up to the trilateral security partnership that permits a US president to refuse to release the boats to Australia if it is required for American defence priorities. The AUKUS partnership was built on a mutual strength, obligations and respect for sovereignty. The 'America Alone' mindset, while playing big to some of the folks back home, has echoes of the 1930s that, if allowed to fully flower, will further weaken America as world admiration for its values fades. The University of Sydney's United States Studies Centre found support for AUKUS's second pillar funding and future translation of basic research into capability was nascent and unco-ordinated. Given such problems, it is entirely possible that the timing of the review announcement and Trump's obsession with being seen to obtain the best deal in all circumstances are attempts to unbalance Albanese on the eve of their expected meeting at next week's G7 summit, and gain Australian concessions. Defence Minister Richard Marles indicated there were no contingency plans should the AUKUS partnership sink. 'Chopping and changing guarantees, you will never have the capability ... There is a plan here, we are sticking to it, and we're going to deliver it,' he told ABC radio on Thursday.
