logo
Rural New Hampshire hospitals brace for potential Medicaid cuts

Rural New Hampshire hospitals brace for potential Medicaid cuts

Yahoo01-05-2025

U.S. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen speaks with Matt Foster, Valley Regional Hospital CEO, in front of an MRI machine at the hospital last week. Rural hospital leaders have been telling Shaheen and the rest of New Hampshire's congressional delegation about the impact cuts to Medicaid would have on their operations. (Photo by William Skipworth/New Hampshire Bulletin)
At 16 beds, Colebrook's Upper Connecticut Valley Hospital is the smallest licensed hospital in New Hampshire.
'We call it 'frontier medicine,'' Tom Mee, CEO of the hospital's parent company, North Country Health, said. 'It's the lifeblood of health care for that community.'
Situated in rural northern Coös County near the U.S.-Canada border, Upper Connecticut Valley Hospital is the only hospital nearby, which makes it vital to the health and well-being of area residents.
'When an urban hospital closes or cuts back programs, you just go to the other hospital that's five miles away,' Mee said. 'In our community, you're driving hours.'
That's why Mee and other rural health providers are so afraid of Republican proposals in Washington, D.C., to gut Medicaid, the country's public health care program for those with low incomes and unique needs. They argue this move would further destabilize an already challenging rural health system.
In early April, Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives voted to approve a resolution outlining the federal budget, an early step in the lengthy federal budgeting process. That outline called for $1.5 trillion in spending cuts to renew President Donald Trump's 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act — which his opponents and many economists decry as a tax break for the richest Americans.
The resolution tasks several legislative committees with cutting different areas of the budget. The House Energy and Commerce Committee has been instructed to cut its portion by about $880 billion over 10 years. While it doesn't explicitly specify these cuts come from Medicaid, the program comprises about $8.2 trillion of the almost $9 trillion the committee can cut from. This means, experts say, it would be impossible to do so without reducing Medicaid or Medicare. Some Republicans have proposed shrinking Medicaid by about a third over 10 years.
If that cut went into effect, an estimated 24 million people receiving Medicaid would lose their health care coverage; 10 million of those would be children. In New Hampshire, that's 60,000 people and 30,000 children. One in 7 New Hampshire residents in total receive Medicaid, and 17.1% of all New Hampshire Medicaid recipients live in Coös County, despite the county comprising roughly 2% of the state's population.
Mee said the country must 'get past this notion that getting people off Medicaid saves money.'
'There is no model where, from a taxpayer perspective, taking somebody off the Medicaid rolls is a net positive for the taxpayer,' Mee said. 'In the short term, yeah, it sounds good that we've got somebody off the Medicaid roll or that they're working, but the flip side of that is that these patients then become uninsured, they don't get preventative health visits in general, and they show up in our ERs months later, sicker than they ever were before.'
Hospitals cannot turn away patients who are unable to pay like most businesses can. They are legally required — through a 1986 law called the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act — to provide emergency treatment to all patients who need it regardless of ability to pay. Without Medicaid, more people will be unable to pay. Hospitals are forced to absorb that cost.
Mee called it 'a long-term drain on the system.'
Coös County is the state's largest county by area (about 1,800 square miles) and its smallest by population (about 32,000 residents). The county has three hospitals — Upper Connecticut Valley Hospital, Androscoggin Valley Hospital, and Weeks Medical Center — all operated by North Country Health. All three are designated as critical access hospitals by the federal government, meaning they're far enough from any other hospital that the government believes they're essential to ensure that an area has access to care.
'On a perfect day, we can drive about 90 minutes between sites,' he said. 'But on a snowy day, you're talking about real life and death at that point if we have to start cutting back on services.'
Mee said that if these Medicaid cuts go into effect, North Country Health would have to consider doing so. About 15% of North Country Health's patients are on Medicaid, he explained.
'I don't lie awake at night worrying about our hospitals closing,' he said. 'But I do worry about whether or not we're going to continue to offer the full scope of services that we do today.'
He said the first services they'd have to consider eliminating are in women's health, including OB-GYNs and baby deliveries, and behavioral health, including psychiatry and substance use disorder. He said the results would be disastrous.
'If we're not able to deliver babies in Coös County, pregnant women and neonates will die,' he said. 'It's a fact.'
Mee said the health system has already eliminated every non-essential cost.
'We've already picked all the low-hanging fruit,' he said. 'So if Medicaid reductions, or however it looks, force us to look at it again, then we're going to have to look at something a bit more draconian than what we've done in the past.'
U.S. Rep. Maggie Goodlander, who represents the North Country — as well as Nashua, Concord, and the western half of New Hampshire — said she's worried about the viability of rural hospitals like those in the North Country and other rural parts of New Hampshire should these cuts be enacted.
'What I'm hearing from so many rural hospitals in our state is just how fragile they are,' Goodlander said. 'I mean, they're operating on the slimmest of margins.'
The congresswoman visited Monadnock Community Hospital in Peterborough, another rural critical access hospital, last week to hear from some of those health care leaders.
'We are really concerned about what's going to happen with Medicaid,' Richard Scheinblum, executive vice president and CFO at Monadnock Community Hospital, said.
In New Hampshire, the fear of federal Medicaid cuts is twofold. Medicaid is funded jointly by the federal government and states. New Hampshire has a trigger law on the books mandating that if federal funding for the expanded Medicaid program falls below 90%, the state government will revoke its portion of the funding for about 60,000 of New Hampshire's recipients who receive coverage through the 2014 expansion.
'If expanded Medicaid blows up, that's between a $1 to $2 million loss to us,' Scheinblum said. This figure is per year, he said, and he calculated it by examining figures from before expansion was enacted, factoring in recent market developments and updated variables.
Goodlander said she's spoken with state lawmakers who don't seem to understand what the impact of this trigger law being activated would be.
Cynthia McGuire, president and CEO at Monadnock Community Hospital, said the hospital isn't sure they'd be able to continue employing the entirety of their current staff with Medicaid cuts. The hospital is one of the largest employers in Peterborough. Additionally, Upper Connecticut Valley Hospital, Androscoggin Valley Hospital, and Weeks Medical Center are the largest employers in their respective towns.
Scheinblum and McGuire said if these cuts went into effect, like North Country Health, they'd also have to look carefully at downsizing their operations.
'What I'd hope we could do is look at some alternative revenue sources or some other areas to scale back,' Scheinblum said, listing philanthropic grants and donations and partnerships with other hospitals as examples. 'Everything would be on the table.'
They noted that due to their community's financial support they're really well positioned compared to other hospitals.
'There are a lot of hospitals in our state that will not survive,' Goodlander noted.
The hospital leaders emphasized the importance of critical access hospitals.
'We're the last stop,' McGuire added. 'We can't shut our door and say we're not going to take care of any more people today. That's what we are here for.'
Matt Foster, president and CEO of Valley Regional Hospital, a critical access hospital in Claremont, said this moment feels like 'December to January 2020 pre-COVID when something's coming but you're really not sure how to plan.'
He said the hospital has 'started to think about' a contingency plan should these cuts be enacted.
'This has come on so quickly we're kind of in the reactive phase,' he said. 'It's like Mike Tyson said, which is, 'Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the face.''
Foster noted the challenges their community faces: Roughly 15% of the population lives below the poverty line, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. About one-third of Claremont's population is on Medicaid.
'Finances are like oxygen,' he said. 'They're not why we're here but they're necessary for life.'
Foster, too, explained that Medicaid would force their hospital to make tough decisions about services, specifically on their payroll.
'We're about as efficient as we can be,' he said. 'There's only so many things you can do that don't rely on (employees).'
Officials at Valley Regional Hospital, which is operated by Dartmouth Health, explained that cutting Medicaid keeps people from obtaining preventative care and forces them to go to the emergency department for things that should be handled by a primary care physician. Jocelyn Caple, interim CEO of Valley Regional Hospital, likened it to 'taking a water balloon, going and squeezing it.'
'It ends up somewhere else, which is not the most efficient or effective place to pay for it,' she said.
U.S. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen spoke with Foster, Caple, and other Valley Regional Hospital officials during a visit to Claremont last week.
'You talk about uncertainty, and one of the challenges that we've had in Washington is also uncertainty,' Shaheen said.
Shaheen said she's also concerned about rural New Hampshire hospitals' ability to remain solvent amid these cuts. Asked what recourse New Hampshire Medicaid proponents have in the event that the trigger law is enacted, Shaheen, who is a former New Hampshire governor, deflected, noting it is a state-level decision, not within her jurisdiction as a federal lawmaker.
Still, she encouraged constituents to 'call your legislator, call the governor, call everybody you can think of, and let them know that that's not acceptable.'
At the same time as federal lawmakers weigh trimming Medicaid, state lawmakers are also proposing changes to the program in New Hampshire. The state Senate passed a bill — Senate Bill 134 — in March requiring people to work in order to receive Medicaid in New Hampshire, and the House approved a plan to charge certain Medicaid recipients premiums and increase the share of prescription costs recipients are responsible for in the budget they passed in April.
Gov. Kelly Ayotte's office, which originally proposed the premium and prescription cost plan, and would have to sign off on work requirements for them to be enacted, did not respond to the Bulletin's requests for comment about state or federal proposals.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wisconsin's budget talks stall. Here's how it could affect the 2026 governor's race
Wisconsin's budget talks stall. Here's how it could affect the 2026 governor's race

Associated Press

time14 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Wisconsin's budget talks stall. Here's how it could affect the 2026 governor's race

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A breakdown in negotiations over a tax cut and other spending measures in Wisconsin threatens to put the 2026 race for governor on hold, with the Democratic incumbent saying he won't announce his decision on seeking a third term in the swing state until after a budget deal is done. Gov. Tony Evers and Republicans who control the Legislature have been meeting in private since April trying to hammer out a deal ahead of the July 1 deadline. But those talks broke down late Wednesday, both sides said. The routine budget-writing process comes as Wisconsin is poised to be in the national political spotlight again next year with the race for governor and a fight over control of the Legislature. Evers has drawn the ire of President Donald Trump's administration and winning back the governor's office is a priority for Republicans. New legislative district maps enacted in February 2024 are more favorable for Democrats, leading them to pick up seats in the November election. They are optimistic that they can swing at least one house of the Legislature in 2026, making it easier for a Democratic governor to enact their agenda. The Wisconsin Supreme Court is also considering a pair of lawsuits that seek to redraw the state's congressional boundaries where Republicans hold six of eight seats. Two of those six seats are targets for national Democrats in 2026 and new maps would only increase their chances of victory as they try to take control of the House away from Republicans. Evers is midway through his second term as governor and has repeatedly said he won't make a decision about whether to run for a third one in 2026 until after the budget is done. That has essentially frozen the field on the Democratic side, while one Republican has already launched his candidacy and others are expected to get in. The governor's spokesman, Sam Roecker, did not immediately return a message Thursday about whether the stalled talks will affect the timing of Evers' decision. There was optimism that the frosty relationship between Evers and Republican legislative leaders was thawing a bit as they met in secret for more than two months to work on the budget. But hopes of a quick deal seemed to evaporate late Wednesday with both sides announcing a stalemate after meeting three days straight. Evers said he supported proposals to cut income taxes for the middle class and eliminate income taxes for some retirees, but Republicans could not get behind Democratic priorities, including lowering child care costs and increasing funding for K-12 schools and the University of Wisconsin. Evers said it was Republicans who decided to stop negotiating, even though he supported tax cuts similar to ones he has vetoed in the past. 'I was ready to make that concession in order to get important things done for Wisconsin's kids,' he said in a statement. Assembly Republican leaders said they remained open to more talks with Evers, but in the meantime the Legislature's budget committee would continue its work 'with the goal of finishing on time.' The committee was scheduled to resume its work on Thursday. It has already gutted many of Evers' priorities, including legalizing marijuana. Senate GOP leaders said they were confident the Legislature would pass a budget that Evers will sign into law. Unlike in many states, the July 1 budget deadline in Wisconsin is soft because if a new plan isn't in place by then current spending levels continue. And once the Legislature passes a budget, Evers can put his mark on it through his broad veto powers that allow him to make dramatic changes in spending.

Exclusive: Newsom faces fallout with key health care allies over Medi-Cal
Exclusive: Newsom faces fallout with key health care allies over Medi-Cal

Axios

time19 minutes ago

  • Axios

Exclusive: Newsom faces fallout with key health care allies over Medi-Cal

Over 120 major organizations throughout California, including health providers, unions and religious groups, are issuing a warning to Gov. Gavin Newsom: Keep Medi-Cal funded, or you'll lose our support. Why it matters: Newsom ran on a universal health care platform. But with a $68 billion budget deficit and presidential ambitions on the horizon, access for the state's most vulnerable populations could now be on the chopping block. Zoom in: Under Newsom's proposal, undocumented immigrants 19 and older would be entitled to emergency medical and pregnancy care but lose coverage for expenses like prescription drugs, dental care and doctor's visits if they don't enroll before January. Starting in 2027, the state would also add a $100 per month premium for adults whose immigration status makes them ineligible for federal Medicaid, including those with legal status. Community-facing clinics would see their reimbursement rates cut as part of the plan. Driving the news: A new open letter, spearheaded by Health Justice Action Fund and St. John's Community Health, blasts Newsom for attempting to "balance the budget on the backs of poor and working Californians" and creating a system that discriminates against immigrants. "People will die. That is not political rhetoric, but a grim reality when chronic conditions go unmanaged, emergencies go untreated, and facilities are forced to shutter," the letter states. "[O]ur goal is to make sure everyone gets the care they need, but these cuts will make that impossible," Bay Area health care worker Ron Cook told Axios via email. Threat level: Newsom's proposal would force California health clinics to face a 20% cut in funding on top of the 10% reduction to Medicaid currently making its way through Congress, the letter notes. It'd jeopardize 2,300 health service sites and lead to loss of access to primary care, mental health services and life-saving medications for 1.6 million Californians, per the letter. Signees include the Bay Area-based North East Medical Services, La Clínica de La Raza, Inc. and Gardner Health Services. What they're saying: The budget proposal "was kind of a five-alarm fire," St. John's president and CEO Jim Mangia told Axios. After California expanded coverage for undocumented immigrants last year, many are finally seeing a doctor, getting their diabetes under control and having their hypertension treated, Mangia said. "The thought of losing it is devastating." The other side: Newsom's office did not immediately return a request for comment, though he has said Medi-Cal expansion cost the state more than expected — about $8.5 billion from the general fund annually. Between the lines: Many community health groups supported Newsom in his run for governor, but his White House ambitions have created a rift, with some advocates accusing him of catering to Republicans by targeting immigrants and trying to avoid raising taxes. "Everything at this point, unfortunately, is about the political calculation of a presidential campaign, not about what's needed by the people of California," Mangia said. What we're watching: Mangia acknowledged the reality of the budget deficit but emphasized that the solution lies with revenue, such as increasing corporate taxes.

Musk Seeks to ‘Kill' Tax Bill, Trump Signs New Travel Ban
Musk Seeks to ‘Kill' Tax Bill, Trump Signs New Travel Ban

Bloomberg

time22 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Musk Seeks to ‘Kill' Tax Bill, Trump Signs New Travel Ban

Elon Musk is on a mission to block President Donald Trump's tax bill after he tried — and failed — to convince Republican lawmakers to preserve valuable tax credits for electric vehicles in the legislation, according to a person familiar with the matter. President Donald Trump signed a proclamation that bans individuals from 12 countries from entering the US, reinstating one of the most controversial measures from his first term after an attack in Colorado that targeted an event supporting Israeli hostages. The Opening Trade has everything you need to know as markets open across Europe. With analysis you won't find anywhere else, we break down the biggest stories of the day and speak to top guests who have skin in the game. Hosted by Anna Edwards and Tom Mackenzie. (Source: Bloomberg)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store