The SECURE Act 2.0 Presents Key Differences Over 1.0 Version – Do You Need To Modify a Trust?
The Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) Act, signed into law in 2019, brought significant changes to retirement account distribution rules. The subsequent passage of SECURE Act 2.0 in December 2022 further expanded and refined these regulations, impacting individual retirement accounts (IRAs), employer-sponsored plans, and estate planning strategies.
A crucial aspect of these legislative changes is the impact on trusts named as beneficiaries of retirement accounts. This article compares SECURE Act 2.0 to prior law and explains why trusts that were designed before its enactment must be modified to align with the new legal framework.
Prior to the SECURE Act, trusts were often structured as 'conduit trusts' or 'accumulation trusts' to take advantage of the stretch IRA provisions, allowing RMDs to be distributed gradually over the beneficiary's lifetime. However, under the SECURE Act's 10-year rule, these trusts may no longer function as intended, leading to unintended tax consequences and administrative issues.
The SECURE Act 2.0 continues to reshape retirement and estate planning. Trusts that were structured before these changes may no longer align with the new distribution rules, potentially causing unintended tax burdens and limiting beneficiary protections. Anyone with a trust as the beneficiary of a retirement account should review and modify their estate plan with a qualified professional to ensure compliance with the latest laws and optimize tax efficiency.
By understanding the nuances of SECURE Act 2.0 and adjusting trust provisions accordingly, individuals can better protect their assets, reduce tax exposure and ensure a smoother transition of wealth to future generations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Space Florida eyes merging of US operations at Cape Canaveral
As Florida leaders call for moving the nation's space-agency headquarters to Brevard County, Space Florida is launching a study about how NASA and U.S. Space Force operations could be merged at Cape Canaveral. Space Florida President and CEO Robert Long on Wednesday told board members of the state aerospace agency that a 'unified model' would support the ongoing growth of commercial space operations and ensure government missions can be more efficient and sustainable. 'We think that it's time that we ask ourselves as a nation, what is the optimal model to carry the world's most active and capable spaceport into the future and enable America to continue to lead in space,' Long said. How that looks will be up to a 'new Cape Canaveral Spaceport master plan,' which Long said will include participation from NASA and the Space Force. Under Acting Administrator Janet Petro, NASA is looking to consolidate or relocate operations to streamline the organization. Gov. Ron DeSantis has supported moving NASA's headquarters from Washington, D.C. to Florida, with backers saying it would put leaders closer to the agency's operations. The idea has drawn support from most members of Florida's congressional delegation, including through proposed legislation, the Consolidating Aerospace Programs Efficiently at Canaveral (CAPE Canaveral) Act, which calls for placing the headquarters in Brevard County. Meanwhile, members of the Texas congressional delegation have asked President Donald Trump to move the headquarters to the Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center in Houston. Long said that 'at this stage, there is no predetermined outcome' for the master plan, with a goal to recommend 'a governance model that will maximize spaceport capacity for the nation and minimize inefficiencies.' The military and NASA have operated separate portions of the spaceport since the 1950s. The model enabled America to win the first space race, land people on the Moon, launch 135 space-shuttle missions, construct the International Space Station and begin to explore the solar system, Long said. But Long added the model has changed as the spaceport has 'rapidly evolved into a commercially driven economic engine that supports both government missions and commercial business cases alike.' This year, there have been 31 successful launches from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station and 13 from the John F. Kennedy Space Center. Last year, there were 67 successful launches from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station and 26 at Kennedy Space Center, up from 58 at Cape Canaveral and 13 at Kennedy in 2023. Space Florida, which is working on upgrading wastewater facilities at the cape and expanding wharf space for the industry at Port Canaveral, manages certain operations at the spaceport through property leased from the federal government, including launch and landing facilities through an agreement with NASA. Long said infrastructure at the cape --- such as utility systems, roads and bridges --- is 'becoming strained' as commercial activity at the spaceport has increased. He estimated $2 billion to $3 billion in unfunded infrastructure improvements will need to be addressed over the next decade at the spaceport. A consultant is expected to be named for the master plan study in June, and the first two phases are expected to be completed in eight months to a year, Long said. Click here to download our free news, weather and smart TV apps. And click here to stream Channel 9 Eyewitness News live.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
All aboard the WMAGA? Florida congressman wants to rename DC transit for Trump
"This is the Trump Train, next stop: Ronald Reagan National Airport," could be the conductor's call on Washington, D.C.'s commuter rail system if one Florida GOP congressman has his way. Rep. Greg Steube drafted "The Make Autorail Great Again (MAGA) Act," which would withhold $150 million in federal funding from the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) until it is renamed "WMAGA" – or the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access, in honor of President Donald Trump. It would also require the METRO rail system – six color-coded lines encompassing about 130 miles of track – to be renamed the "Trump Train." Duffy Slams Mta Over Fact-check Of Anti-israel Mobs' Grand Central Takeover Steube called upon a 1966 District of Columbia law granting congressional "consent" for the interstate compact and ensuing establishment of WMATA. "WMATA has received billions in federal assistance over the years and continues to face operational, safety, and fiscal challenges," Steube said in a statement. Read On The Fox News App "In the spirit of DOGE, this bill demands accountability by conditioning federal funding on reforms that signal a cultural shift away from bureaucratic stagnation toward public-facing excellence and patriotism." The day-to-day operations of WMATA and the METRO, including fares and routings, are controlled by its board – not Congress. It also receives funding and recommendations from the three state/district stakeholders. Dot Saves Taxpayers Over $60M By Terminating Texas High-speed-rail Contract WMATA's board consists of two members from Maryland, Virginia and the District of Columbia, plus two appointed by the federal government. Steube called WMATA a "struggling institution" in need of a "fresh identity," particularly ahead of global events scheduled in the region, including the 2027 NFL Draft and FIFA World Cup matches. Fox News Digital reached out to WMATA as well as Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton, D-D.C., for comment. Several METRO stations already sport political names, though they often coincide with nearby sites – including for former President Ronald Reagan, ex-Secretary of State John Dulles, Pierre L'Enfant and Pierre DuPont. A move to rename the entire METRO system in honor of a dignitary, however, has never been tried article source: All aboard the WMAGA? Florida congressman wants to rename DC transit for Trump
New York Post
2 days ago
- New York Post
NYC broker fee law — which protects tenants from costs — challenged by real estate agents in 11th-hour push
These agents are trying to broker a last-minute deal. New York City's real estate industry is making an 11th-hour bid to halt a new law that shifts the burden of costly broker fees away from renters before it takes effect next month. The Real Estate Board of New York, the city's powerful group of over 10,000 real estate professionals, filed a motion earlier this month seeking to put the Fairness in Apartment Rental Expenses Act on pause until the court battle over the law plays out. Here's everything you need to now about the new rules — which will launch on June 11 unless a federal judge agrees to REBNY's motion. 3 New York City's real estate industry is making an 11th-hour bid to halt the new broker fee ban before it takes effect next month. BullRun – What is the Fairness in Apartment Rental Expenses (FARE) Act? The FARE Act — passed in City Council with a veto-proof majority of 42-8 on Nov. 13 — prohibits agents representing property owners from charging prospective renters a 'broker fee.' It also requires that all fees a tenant owes be included in rental agreements and real estate listings. Proponents of the legislation say it will help ease the city's housing crisis by cutting down prohibitive up-front costs for tenants, including broker fees — which are typically about 15% of the annual cost of a rental unit, according to real estate website OpenIgloo. But critics of the law argue landlords may still sneak in broker fees onto tenants through higher monthly rents. Andrew Lieb, managing attorney of boutique real estate litigation law firm Lieb at Law, declares the Big Apple rental market will be 'forever changed' by the FARE Act. 'It will result in tenants losing access to housing from landlords who simply decide it's not worth it to be a landlord anymore,' Lieb told The Post. 'New York City is really making it impossible for a residential landlord to operate given the plethora of red tape that needs to be navigated just to sign a lease — and then enforcing that lease is a whole other disaster.' When do broker fees go away? Unless a federal judge rules otherwise, landlords will be barred from passing on the fee to a tenant after June 11, even if a lease was signed before the effective date, a rep from the Department of Consumer Protection confirmed to The Post. New York City is one of the few cities where landlords can hire a broker and pass the agent's fee onto a tenant. 3 The Real Estate Board of NY (REBNY) has taken the measure to file an 11th hour push in federal court to stop the city's new Fairness in Apartment Rental Expenses (FARE) Act from going into effect. New York landlord-tenant lawyer Altagracia B. Pierre Outerbridge expects the mandate to go into effect, and that a federal judge is 'probably not going to block the law' since the court hasn't yet issued a decision. 'The fact that a month has passed (and the law is going into effect in two weeks) without the Court doing anything suggests that it doesn't feel a huge rush to get involved,' Pierre Outerbridge told The Post. Does this mean that all broker fees are illegal? Landlords and tenants can still hire their own brokers under the FARE Act. But landlords can't shift the cost of a broker that is 'exclusively representing the landlord's interests' onto a tenant. This includes fees for brokers who publish listings with the landlord's permission. 'The FARE Act ensures transparency for tenants to not unfairly be burdened with additional costs by placing the responsibility for a broker's fees on the party that actually hired them,' the City Council said in a statement. What are real estate agents saying? In the lawsuit filed in December, REBNY attorneys claimed the city's 'profoundly misguided' legislation violated federal and state laws, including constitutional free speech and contract rights. 'The FARE Act is constitutionally flawed on multiple accounts. We are confident that the Courts will agree with us,' a REBNY rep told The Post. The New York State Association of Realtors further argues the law would drive up rental costs, strip away 'over half' of online rental listings and open the 'floodgates for baseless lawsuits and penalties against brokers.' 3 Last year, the FARE Act was passed in the City Council, which will prohibit agents representing property owners from charging prospective renters a 'broker fee.' J.C. Rice 'The landlords who still want to use a broker and are allowed to raise the rent to accommodate the shift in responsibility will do so,' Pierre Outerbridge said, adding that some tenants are 'going to be shocked to pay an extra month's rent in broker fees in order to sign their lease.' 'It will exacerbate rental unaffordability,' Violetta Weddepohl, a broker at Serhant, concurred. 'As a result, when leases come up for renewal in a year or two, tenants will face even steeper rent increases. 'I have sympathy for the argument that the broker should be paid by the person who hires them,' she said, 'but the reality is that the landlords can get away with charging higher rent.' But real estate listing website Streeteasy estimated the average cost to sign a lease on rentals that would have currently charged a broker fee will fall by 41.8% once the law takes effect. 'Rental properties that stopped charging tenants a broker fee in the past did not increase rents beyond broader market trends,' reads a December report from the site. 'The lock-in effect of high upfront costs made it easier for landlords to raise rents faster.' What are New York City residents saying? New Yorkers who spoke to The Post were largely in favor of the law taking effect, with nearly every local citing housing affordability as a major concern. 'This is great,' Betsy Laikin, a film producer, told The Post. 'The rents are higher than they've ever been. Why should we pay a broker fee, on top of these rents?' 'I think the broker fee … should not exist,' Luke Atkinson, a 39-year-old painter from Bushwick, Brooklyn, added. '[Brokerage] is a job that doesn't need to exist, and they know it deep down in their souls. 'That's why they're insecure,' he added. 'That's why they're always hustling because it's a job that doesn't need to exist.' Georgi Georgiev, a bartender from Bulgaria who now resides in Fort Greene, is less optimistic. 'One way or another, we are going to pay it if we are getting an apartment, no matter what. We're never gonna not pay,' Georgiev, 45, said. 'There is gonna be so many loopholes.' What happens if an apartment has a broker fee after the law is in effect? The city's Department of Consumer Protection will be enforcing the law after it goes into effect. It's estimated the agency will require about $500,000 in the next fiscal year for outreach and education related to the law, according to City Council records. Those caught in violation of the law will be subject to a $1,000 fine for the first violation and a $2,000 fine for each violation within a two-year period. To file a complaint regarding a FARE Act violation, consumers can visit or call 311 once the law is in effect.
