logo
Renting, a nightmare for trans people in Pune city

Renting, a nightmare for trans people in Pune city

Time of India14 hours ago

Pune: Kadambari Shaikh has a story of triumph like no other. When the trans woman and social activist moved from her family home in Sadashiv Peth to rent a flat in Hadapsar in the late 2000s, she was harassed, abused and driven out.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
"I was medically transitioning at the time. Landlords asked me to dress like a man and avoid wearing a sari if I wanted a house. My neighbours would often harass me and pass crude comments," she said.
Fast-forward to today — "In 2020, I bought a house in the society that had once rejected me, and am now its secretary and committee member," Shaikh said. "I had to fight every step of the way. Now I try to help others, so they don't go through what I did."
Shaikh's full-circle moment of joy is a rare exception. In the city's rapidly expanding skyline of gated societies and highrises, some citizens live an uncomfortable and scared life as they are often denied something as basic as a roof over their heads.
Despite the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019, which prohibits discrimination in housing, education and employment, and Articles 14, 15, 16 and 21 of the Indian Constitution, which provide protection against any
discrimination in society, enforcement remains weak and awareness still patchy.
Activists estimate that Pune has about 6,000 individuals who fall under the broad umbrella of LGBTQIA+, which includes lesbians, gays, bisexuals, trans people and all other individuals who identify as a part of the queer community. For most of them, especially transgender people, the right to rent a home remains a distant dream. Many housing societies enforce unwritten codes that outrightly exclude transgender people.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
As the world celebrated the month of Pride, Nikhilshwari Dhawade (20), a third-year student at a college in the city, was forced to vacate her rented flat in Pashan on June 9, a few days after moving in.
The landlord's daughter told her, "I cannot allow people like you to live here." When the young trans woman refused to leave, explaining her legal right to live there, the landlord's family assaulted her and confined her in a room.
"The landlord's daughter, her husband and her daughter punched me, slapped me and pulled my hair," Dhawade said.
Such violence, deeply ingrained biases and the fear of being unable to be their authentic selves drive many young transpeople to the slums. "Many in the transgender community have no choice but to live in slums, where they often find greater acceptance and solidarity," Shaikh said, while admitting that she was able to buy a house only after she found her footing by training as a professional makeup artist.
This not only empowered her financially but also gave her social capital.
Anil Ukarande, the founder of Yutak Trust — an organisation that works for LGBTQIA+ people — pointed out that despite being a hub for IT and education, and attracting students and professionals from all over, Pune still poses significant challenges for the transgender community.
"Even if they get flats on rent, many are often forced to hide their identity, go back into the closet, and live a dual life.
They are forced to find a place in slums because there, at least, they find some acceptance, even if they must compromise on their living standards," Ukarande said.
The situation is no better for transmen. Thirty-two-year-old Arush Kusalkar moved to a slum area near Shivajinagar after repeated discrimination during his medical and social transition phases.
"As my body was developing masculine features and feminine features were still noticeable at that stage, the owner would subject me to unfair treatment.
Landlords would make me pay an excessively high deposit and inflate the rent," Kusalkar said.
Sportsperson Milan Labade has been living in Pune for six years. She recalled that she once had to move houses three times in a single month — from Kondhwa to Vimannagar to Hadapsar — because the landlords changed their minds soon after she moved in.
Labade, whose PhD focused on the economical conditions of transgender individuals and is currently working at the Centre for Youth Development (CYDA), eventually had to seek solace in a slum.
"I was uncomfortable living in slums. However, due to the difficulty of finding suitable housing, I had no choice but to live there temporarily," the trans woman said.
For most trans people, the targeted harassment begins even before they find a house that they like as they first must deal with brokers. But real estate brokers in the city claim it's a mindset problem, with most owners worried that letting in a transperson would affect their standing in society.
Sachin Soni, a broker from Old Sangvi, said, "At least 70% of societies or flatowners deny houses to a transgender person. I have been working in the field for 25 years and this is a harsh reality. It is all about mindset. Transgender people are also God's creation like us. They are good people."
Mohit Jain, another broker who has been operating in western Pune areas for about seven to eight years, said he has never been successful in finding a rented accommodation for a trans person.
"Unfortunately, most property owners only allow families, which limits my ability to help." Change can only begin if homeowners evolve and get over such regressive attitudes, another broker said.
The archaic worry of "what will people think?" is the thought that rules the mind of many homeowners. "As a human being, I understand that trans people are just like us, and I'm comfortable with them," said Rekha Chitrode, who owns a flat in Pimpri Chinchwad.
"However, as a property owner, it's challenging to rent to them due to societal pressure and stigma. People in the community might view it negatively, impacting the reputation of my building and deterring other potential tenants," she said,
Susi P, a trans woman working in the city, said, "What is the point in humanity advancing technologically and reaching for the space, if people on Earth are still denied basic rights.
Housing is not a favour; it is a fundamental human right."
---------------------------
Even when transgender individuals manage to secure housing, they frequently encounter hostility and exclusion. Many landlords reject us outright to 'protect the image' of the society. It is absurdly unjust to discriminate based on appearances. Gender is visible. That's what makes us a target. It's not enough to say the law protects us if society doesn't — Manasvi Goilkar | Trans woman, social activist & founding member, Shikhandi Trust
Pune: Kadambari Shaikh has a story of triumph like no other.
When the trans woman and social activist moved from her family home in Sadashiv Peth to rent a flat in Hadapsar in the late 2000s, she was harassed, abused and driven out.
"I was medically transitioning at the time. Landlords asked me to dress like a man and avoid wearing a sari if I wanted a house. My neighbours would often harass me and pass crude comments," she said.
Fast-forward to today — "In 2020, I bought a house in the society that had once rejected me, and am now its secretary and committee member," Shaikh said.
"I had to fight every step of the way. Now I try to help others, so they don't go through what I did."
Shaikh's full-circle moment of joy is a rare exception. In the city's rapidly expanding skyline of gated societies and highrises, some citizens live an uncomfortable and scared life as they are often denied something as basic as a roof over their heads.
Despite the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019, which prohibits discrimination in housing, education and employment, and Articles 14, 15, 16 and 21 of the Indian Constitution, which provide protection against any
discrimination in society, enforcement remains weak and awareness still patchy.
Activists estimate that Pune has about 6,000 individuals who fall under the broad umbrella of LGBTQIA+, which includes lesbians, gays, bisexuals, trans people and all other individuals who identify as a part of the queer community. For most of them, especially transgender people, the right to rent a home remains a distant dream. Many housing societies enforce unwritten codes that outrightly exclude transgender people.
As the world celebrated the month of Pride, Nikhilshwari Dhawade (20), a third-year student at a college in the city, was forced to vacate her rented flat in Pashan on June 9, a few days after moving in.
The landlord's daughter told her, "I cannot allow people like you to live here." When the young trans woman refused to leave, explaining her legal right to live there, the landlord's family assaulted her and confined her in a room.
"The landlord's daughter, her husband and her daughter punched me, slapped me and pulled my hair," Dhawade said.
Such violence, deeply ingrained biases and the fear of being unable to be their authentic selves drive many young transpeople to the slums. "Many in the transgender community have no choice but to live in slums, where they often find greater acceptance and solidarity," Shaikh said, while admitting that she was able to buy a house only after she found her footing by training as a professional makeup artist.
This not only empowered her financially but also gave her social capital.
Anil Ukarande, the founder of Yutak Trust — an organisation that works for LGBTQIA+ people — pointed out that despite being a hub for IT and education, and attracting students and professionals from all over, Pune still poses significant challenges for the transgender community.
"Even if they get flats on rent, many are often forced to hide their identity, go back into the closet, and live a dual life.
They are forced to find a place in slums because there, at least, they find some acceptance, even if they must compromise on their living standards," Ukarande said.
The situation is no better for transmen. Thirty-two-year-old Arush Kusalkar moved to a slum area near Shivajinagar after repeated discrimination during his medical and social transition phases.
"As my body was developing masculine features and feminine features were still noticeable at that stage, the owner would subject me to unfair treatment.
Landlords would make me pay an excessively high deposit and inflate the rent," Kusalkar said.
Sportsperson Milan Labade has been living in Pune for six years. She recalled that she once had to move houses three times in a single month — from Kondhwa to Vimannagar to Hadapsar — because the landlords changed their minds soon after she moved in.
Labade, whose PhD focused on the economical conditions of transgender individuals and is currently working at the Centre for Youth Development (CYDA), eventually had to seek solace in a slum.
"I was uncomfortable living in slums. However, due to the difficulty of finding suitable housing, I had no choice but to live there temporarily," the trans woman said.
For most trans people, the targeted harassment begins even before they find a house that they like as they first must deal with brokers. But real estate brokers in the city claim it's a mindset problem, with most owners worried that letting in a transperson would affect their standing in society.
Sachin Soni, a broker from Old Sangvi, said, "At least 70% of societies or flatowners deny houses to a transgender person. I have been working in the field for 25 years and this is a harsh reality. It is all about mindset. Transgender people are also God's creation like us. They are good people."
Mohit Jain, another broker who has been operating in western Pune areas for about seven to eight years, said he has never been successful in finding a rented accommodation for a trans person.
"Unfortunately, most property owners only allow families, which limits my ability to help." Change can only begin if homeowners evolve and get over such regressive attitudes, another broker said.
The archaic worry of "what will people think?" is the thought that rules the mind of many homeowners. "As a human being, I understand that trans people are just like us, and I'm comfortable with them," said Rekha Chitrode, who owns a flat in Pimpri Chinchwad.
"However, as a property owner, it's challenging to rent to them due to societal pressure and stigma. People in the community might view it negatively, impacting the reputation of my building and deterring other potential tenants," she said,
Susi P, a trans woman working in the city, said, "What is the point in humanity advancing technologically and reaching for the space, if people on Earth are still denied basic rights.
Housing is not a favour; it is a fundamental human right."
---------------------------
Even when transgender individuals manage to secure housing, they frequently encounter hostility and exclusion. Many landlords reject us outright to 'protect the image' of the society. It is absurdly unjust to discriminate based on appearances. Gender is visible. That's what makes us a target. It's not enough to say the law protects us if society doesn't — Manasvi Goilkar | Trans woman, social activist & founding member, Shikhandi Trust

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NDC calls on government to reconsider decision to allow felling of rosewood trees in patta lands
NDC calls on government to reconsider decision to allow felling of rosewood trees in patta lands

The Hindu

time26 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

NDC calls on government to reconsider decision to allow felling of rosewood trees in patta lands

The Nilgiri Documentation Center (NDC) has called on the Tamil Nadu government to immediately reconsider the Forest Department's decision to not renew the Tamil Nadu Rosewood Trees (Conservation) Act. The NDC said the 'decision not only goes against all norms of conservation,' but could be a major embarrassment to the government in the coming elections. The withdrawal of the act would allow for the felling of trees from private patta lands, with ecologists voicing their concerns that trees that are located within reserve forests too will be more prone to being targeted by illegal timber smugglers. 'The 1995 legislation enacted by the then Chief Minister Jayalalithaa was a first of its kind in the country to protect the rosewood tree. It was enacted in response to a widespread call led by the Save Nilgiris Campaign to stop the rampant illegal felling of the endangered native species of the State. The prompt action of the Chief Minister was hailed as a forerunner to conserve such trees in the other states coming under the Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve,' said Venugopal Dharmalingam, honorary director of the NDC in a statement. 'At a time when conservation of native trees are given the highest priority by the governments and the courts, a decision of this nature should have been taken at the level of the Chief Minister. The dubious reasons given by the Forest Department to annul the act betrays a sense of insensitivity by the officials. Native trees like the rosewood cannot be grown anywhere or so easily. Withdrawing the act will be a clear licence for the illegal felling of the last of the ancient trees which are listed under the red book of the International Union of Conservation of Nature,' he added. He said rosewood trees, Dalbergia latifolia, listed as a 'vulnerable' species in the IUCN Red list, were found in the Nilgiris region of Tamil Nadu and the Western Ghats, particularly in areas like Anamalais, Mudumalai, and Gudalur. 'These trees are known for their high-quality timber and are a significant part of the Nilgiri Biosphere. A rosewood tree, estimated to be 200 years old, located in the Anamalai Tiger Reserve was declared a Heritage Tree of Tamil Nadu by the State Biodiversity Board in 2017,' he noted, adding that the species holds special significance to the Badaga community.

NYC Pride March: 2 people shot near Stonewall Inn in Manhattan; ‘devastating incident,' says mayor
NYC Pride March: 2 people shot near Stonewall Inn in Manhattan; ‘devastating incident,' says mayor

Time of India

time32 minutes ago

  • Time of India

NYC Pride March: 2 people shot near Stonewall Inn in Manhattan; ‘devastating incident,' says mayor

AP file photo Two people were shot near the landmark Stonewall Inn, located in Greenwich Village, on Sunday after the NYC pride parade, according to the NYT news service. One victim, who was shot in the head, is in a critical condition, while the second victim, who was shot in the leg, is in a more stable condition, according to a spokesperson for the Police Department. Police have not yet identified the perpetrator and are unsure of whether the shooting is related to the Pride march. The shooting occurred just as Pride celebrations were wrapping up, shortly after the New York City Pride March in Manhattan earlier on Sunday, mayor Eric Adams said on social media. 'During a time when our city should be rejoicing and celebrating members of our diverse LGBTQ+ community, incidents like this are devastating.' Adams posted on X. — NYCMayor (@NYCMayor) Adams, along with Zohran Mamdani, the likely Democratic nominee for mayor, had attended the pride parade earlier that day. The Stonewall Inn, considered a national monument, is a bar on Christopher Street and was supposed to host an event for Pride month from noon to 4 am on that day. Representatives for the bar did not immediately comment on the mishap. Douglas Breland, 47, a bouncer at Barrow Street Alehouse near the Stonewall Inn, texted his mother at 9:48 pm about the quiet night, even sharing a photo of the empty bar. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo Moments later, he stepped outside to film the nearly deserted block. Around thirty minutes later, he had heard four loud cracks, which he initially thought were fireworks, but then heard screams of people running down the block and sirens blaring. He then sent his mother another text saying, "2 people were just shot on the corner 1/2 a block from me.' Hours later, Breland sat in a bar booth, still processing the night's events. Outside, the streets were mostly deserted, except for a few late-night revelers. The police were clearing people away from the scene. The Pride March, attended by millions every year, commemorates the Stonewall riots of 1969, which were born out of a police raid on a gay bar in Manhattan.

SC turns down plea for exclusive control of Mahabodhi temple to Buddhists
SC turns down plea for exclusive control of Mahabodhi temple to Buddhists

Hindustan Times

time41 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

SC turns down plea for exclusive control of Mahabodhi temple to Buddhists

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to entertain a plea that sought handing over exclusive control of the Mahabodhi temple in Bihar's Bodh Gaya to Buddhists, and asked the petitioner to approach the high court. The Mahabodhi temple in Bodh Gaya, Bihar. (File Photo) The plea, filed by lawyer and former Maharashtra minister Sulekha Narayan Kumbhare, challenged the constitutional validity of the Bodh Gaya Temple Act, 1949, which entrusted a nine-member committee with the temple's management, of which a majority are Hindus. Refusing to entertain the petition, a bench of justices MM Sundresh and K Vinod Chandran, said, 'How can we issue mandamus? You please approach the high court. This is not maintainable under Article 32.' The petition claimed that the management of the Mahabodhi temple should be with the Buddhists and the Act was unconstitutional for violating the right of Buddhists to profess their religion and manage their religious institutions. 'Inclusion of members in the committee who are non-Buddhists i.e. Hindus is violative of protections guaranteed to the Buddhist citizens of India and the Lord Buddha himself guaranteed under Articles 19 (right to fundamental freedoms), 21 (life and liberty), 25 (freedom of religion), 26 (right to administer institutions), 28 and 29 (minority rights) of the Constitution of India,' the petition stated. Senior advocate Ravindra Laxman Khapre pointed out that due to mismanagement and indifference to the temple, the sacred Bodhi tree at the site is in danger of decay, as found out by a committee of Archaeological Survey of India (ASI). The bench dismissed the petition allowing the petitioner to raise these issues before the high court. 'We are not inclined to entertain the petition. Liberty is granted to approach the high court.' While the definition of Hindus includes Buddhists as well, the religious community was recognised as a minority in 1993 under the National Commission for Minorities Act, 1992. The petition, filed by advocate Jaydip Pati stated that the Mahabodhi temple is the holiest Buddhist shrine in India and is also a World Heritage site since the year 2002, which is not under the exclusive management of Buddhists. It said, 'Though Buddhists are defined as being part of Hindus, their independent right to profess their religion is also recognized. The said recognition therefore confers rights of Buddhists to profess their religion as per their own choice.' The petitioner argued that the surroundings and vicinity of the area, including the area of the temple, which is now under the possession of the Bodh Gaya Temple Committee used to be under control of Lord Buddha. 'In effect, the idol of Lord Buddha is the owner of the land. It is therefore submitted that the ownership of the site is vested in Lord Buddha as a juristic person.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store