logo
Inside the Senate GOP's heated meeting with Stephen Miller

Inside the Senate GOP's heated meeting with Stephen Miller

Axios21 hours ago

GOP frustration bubbled over in a closed-door meeting with senators and White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller on Thursday morning, Axios has learned.
Why it matters: The border has long been a unifying issue for Republicans. Now it's a point of drama as Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) seeks to make cuts some border funding in the Trump budget bill.
Paul was not physically in the room with Miller, but his presence was overwhelming.
Two sources described the meeting as heated and shared frustrations that Paul was using his power of Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs chair to make a unifying issue divisive.
Zoom in: Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kansas) grew particularly frustrated at Miller for not having more specific statistics on hand, per two sources.
Miller indicated Paul already had detailed statistics — about how they arrived at the billions of dollars needed to continue building a border wall, for example — but was not sharing them with other senators.
Zoom out: Paul's version of the border security text for the bill would have significantly less funding. He has long balked at the price tag. He's expected to vote "no" on any final package due to its debt ceiling measures.
In a different closed-door meeting on Wednesday, Paul pitched GOP senators on needing to have more information about why the border price tag was so high — $150 billion.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump warns of ‘massive conflict' soon if Iran nuclear talks break down
Trump warns of ‘massive conflict' soon if Iran nuclear talks break down

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump warns of ‘massive conflict' soon if Iran nuclear talks break down

Donald Trump has warned that a 'massive conflict' could break out in the Middle East soon if talks over an Iranian nuclear deal break down, amid concerns over a possible Israeli strike against Tehran. Trump said on Thursday he was worried that an Israeli strike could 'blow' the negotiations, and he confirmed he had ordered some US personnel to evacuate from the Middle East in case of an Iranian counterattack that could include 'missiles flying in their buildings'. His warning came after the International Atomic Energy Agency issued its strongest condemnation of Iran in 20 years as it said the country had continued to enrich uranium to near weapons-grade levels and had failed to comply with its nuclear nonproliferation obligations. Iran responded defiantly, calling the censure a 'political resolution' and announcing it had built and would activate a third site to enrich uranium that could produce fissile material used to make a nuclear weapon. US and European officials have been told that Israel is fully ready to launch a pre-emptive strike targeting Iran's nuclear programme, even if Washington does not provide direct support, US media have reported. There is no clear timeline for when Israel would launch a strike, although it could come as soon as Sunday, the Wall Street Journal reported. The Trump administration has privately told Israel that it would not participate in a strike, according to Axios. Trump conceded an Israeli attack against Iran's nuclear programme 'could very well happen'. 'There's a chance of massive conflict,' he said. 'We have a lot of American people in this area. And I said we have to tell them to get out soon. And I don't want to be the one that didn't give any warning and missiles are flying into their buildings.' On Thursday the commander of Iran's Revolutionary Guards, Hossein Salami, said the retaliation to any Israeli aggression would be 'more forceful and destructive' than in past offensives, after Tehran said it had been alerted to a potential attack. Related: US orders non-essential embassy staff out of Iraq amid growing Middle East tensions The US decision to pull personnel from embassies and bases in the Middle East sparked concerns over an impending military strike but also speculation that the Trump administration may be increasing pressure on Iran to concede to a deal in order to avert a regional war. Trump's Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff, will travel to Oman for a sixth round of talks with Iranian officials on Sunday, a source familiar with his travel plans said on Thursday. Trump said: 'I want to have an agreement with Iran. We're fairly close to a pretty good agreement … as long as I think there is agreement, I don't want [Israel] going in, because I think it could blow it.' He later added in a social media post that Iran would never obtain a nuclear weapon. 'We remain committed to a Diplomatic Resolution to the Iran Nuclear Issue!' he wrote. 'My entire Administration has been directed to negotiate with Iran. They could be a Great Country, but they first must completely give up hopes of obtaining a Nuclear Weapon.' The motion by the UN nuclear watchdog on Thursday focused on Iran's refusal since 2019 to explain activity at three secret nuclear sites, but also on Iran's buildup of its stockpile of uranium enriched to 60%, close to weapons grade. The European powers said the IAEA had not been able to guarantee that Iran's nuclear programme was exclusively peaceful. The watchdog's vote is a necessary precursor to European powers using their right to reimpose UN-wide sanctions on Iran in the autumn. The motion was passed with 19 votes in favour, three against and 11 abstentions. In a joint statement, the three European powers and the US said: 'It is not the board that is forcing this step on Iran, but Iran who is forcing this step on the board.' Iran's nuclear chief, Mohammad Eslami, disclosed that a new, previously secret third enrichment site had been built and was ready to operate when equipped with machinery. He said advanced sixth-generation enrichment machines would replace first-generation machines at its Fordow fuel enrichment site. The sense of imminent drama intensified late on Wednesday when the US state department said it had ordered the departure of all non-essential personnel and their dependents from its embassy in Baghdad. Simultaneously, a US official said the defence secretary, Pete Hegseth, had authorised the voluntary departure of military dependents from countries across the region, including Bahrain and Kuwait. American soldiers in the region were not affected by this order. The key sticking point in the nuclear talks is Iran's right to enrich uranium domestically. Iran's president, Masoud Pezeshkian, said Iran would not back down on its right to enrich and said his country would go its own way. In return for the lifting of sanctions, it has offered to enrich uranium inside its country subject to greater IAEA inspection and previously agreed limits on enrichment of 3.67%. In what could be a preparation for an Israeli attack, but may yet be Trump loading the psychological bargaining chips before Sunday's talks, Israel's strategic affairs minister, Ron Dermer, and the Mossad intelligence agency head, David Barnea, will meet Witkoff in advance of the Oman-brokered nuclear talks. Iran regards the Trump demand not to enrich as unreasonable since other nuclear non-proliferation treaty states are allowed to do so, and Iran's right had been accepted by the Obama and Biden administrations. Iran says its nuclear ambitions are confined to a civil nuclear programme, but Israel claims past Iranian deceit means military action is the only certain way to remove the threat of Iran acquiring a nuclear bomb. Israel believes that after its two military exchanges with Tehran last year, Iranian air defences are uniquely vulnerable, and Iran's preparations for a bomb are so advanced that delay would be a historic error. David Albright, the president of the Institute for Science and International Security, said: 'If you are at 60% enriched, you are 99% of the way to weapon-grade uranium, which is the ideal material for nuclear weapons. So this programme does not look like a civil programme. It looks like they are going up the ladder to get toward weapon-grade uranium while not actually making the weapon-grade uranium.' He said Iran could get to weapons-grade uranium within a week, while a crude nuclear explosive device could be attached within months. Albright said Israel had very good intelligence on the layout of Iran's nuclear sites, especially the Fordow fuel enrichment plant. He said: 'They know exactly how the tunnels go, where they start, how they zig and zag, where the ventilation system is, the power supplies. And without it, you don't have to bring down the roof of the enrichment hall to put that facility out of operation for a long time and make it very hard to get into.' It is contested whether Israel, lacking the US's 30,000lb bunker-busting Moab ( 'mother of all bombs'), has the capability to destroy the Fordow facility due to its depth underground.

Trump Tries to Humiliate GOP Senator by Claiming He ‘Snuck' Into White House Picnic
Trump Tries to Humiliate GOP Senator by Claiming He ‘Snuck' Into White House Picnic

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Tries to Humiliate GOP Senator by Claiming He ‘Snuck' Into White House Picnic

Donald Trump appeared to make a dig at Sen. Rand Paul by suggesting he 'snuck' into Thursday night's congressional picnic—despite having been invited after a war of words with the White House. Addressing the bipartisan crowd on the White House lawn, Trump seemed to allude to a recent dust-up between himself and Paul, who has vocally opposed the GOP's budget and the $45 million military parade for the Army's 250th anniversary on Saturday, which is also Trump's 79th birthday. 'We have so many of our congressmen, and we have some senators in here, I have to tell you,' Trump said from the balcony. 'They snuck in, but that's OK. They wanted to be here.' On Wednesday, Paul said Trump had revoked his family's invitation, and accused the president of being 'incredibly petty.' 'The level of immaturity is beyond words,' Paul said at the time, adding that the move had caused him to 'lose a lot of respect I once had for Donald Trump.' Yet the following morning, Trump took to Truth Social to say that 'of course' Paul and his family could come. 'He's the toughest vote in the history of the U.S. Senate, but why wouldn't he be?' Trump wrote. 'Besides, it gives me more time to get his Vote on the Great, Big, Beautiful Bill, one of the greatest and most important pieces of legislation ever put before our Senators & Congressmen/women. It will help to, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! I look forward to seeing Rand. The Party will be Great!' Trump's aside Thursday may also have had to do with Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie, who has long been a thorn in Trump's side from the right, most recently with his vote against the GOP's budget which passed the House by a single vote. On Thursday morning, Massie claimed the White House had withheld his invitation. 'Incredibly petty & shortsighted of Trump's staff to exclude Republicans from the annual White House picnic while inviting Pelosi and every Democrat,' Massie posted on X, a few hours before Trump cleared the air regarding Paul. 'I always give my few tickets to my staff and their kids, but apparently this year my tickets have been withheld as well. Low class.' It wasn't immediately clear whether Massie ultimately attended the picnic. The White House did not respond to a request for comment from the Daily Beast, nor did Massie's office.

Trump's DHS ‘report all foreign invaders' poster stokes hatred, not safety
Trump's DHS ‘report all foreign invaders' poster stokes hatred, not safety

Miami Herald

timean hour ago

  • Miami Herald

Trump's DHS ‘report all foreign invaders' poster stokes hatred, not safety

The Trump administration escalated its anti-immigrant campaign by promoting a poster calling on Americans to report 'all foreign invaders' to authorities, only days after sending the National Guard and Marines to quell largely peaceful protests against immigration raids in Los Angeles. It may be no coincidence that President Donald Trump's latest anti-immigration offensive comes at a time when the World Bank and major U.S. financial institutions are predicting an economic downturn, fueled by his tariff wars. The new immigration moves seem designed to distract from the country's economic slowdown. The Washington D.C-based World Bank issued a report on June 10 forecasting that the U.S. economy will grow by only 1.4% this year, or half of last year's rate of 2.8%. It cited Trump's trade wars as one of the main culprits. Just days earlier, Elon Musk — the world's richest man and until last week a top Trump adviser — warned that the president's tariffs 'will cause a recession in the second half this year.' Musk later apologized for some of his posts and deleted several of them, including that one, after being warned of potential administration retaliations against his companies. The Morgan Stanley investment bank projects that the U.S. economy will grow at a meager 1.5% this year, and 1% in 2026. Trump may also be seeking to distract from his 'One Big Beautiful Bill' tax legislation, now pending in the Senate. The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office warns it would strip millions of Americans of Medicaid health coverage and could increase the deficit by $2.4 trillion over the next decade. Granted, Trump and his hard-line immigration adviser, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, have a long history of lashing out against immigrants. Trump famously said in 2023, and has repeated several times since, that immigrants 'are poisoning the blood of our country.' In recent days, Miller has labeled the Los Angeles demonstrators are an 'insurrectionist mob' and a 'threat to civilization.' This, despite the fact that — as of this writing — not a single death has occurred during the Los Angeles protests. By comparison, Trump hailed the violent Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol rioters as 'patriots,' even though their rampage left at least seven dead and more than 150 police officers injured. The poster urging Americans to rat on 'all foreign invaders' appeared June 11 on the Department of Homeland Security's official X (formerly Twitter) account, and was quickly shared by Miller on his own social media. The poster, reminiscent of World War II propaganda, depicts Uncle Sam wielding a hammer as he hangs a sign reading: 'Help your all foreign invaders.' Below, it lists an ICE hotline for reporting the so-called 'invaders.' In smaller print, the DHS post urges Americans to 'help your country locate and arrest illegal aliens' and invites them to report 'criminal activity' to the ICE hotline. Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, an immigration attorney and senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, noted that the poster was originally created by a white supremacist known for spreading anti-Jewish and anti-black propaganda, who took credit for it. Regardless of its origin, the DHS-endorsed call to report 'foreign invaders' echoes tactics used by authoritarian regimes — as happened in Nazi Germany, or still happens in Communist China or Cuba. The government telling you to inform on your neighbors is profoundly un-American. It contradicts America's respect for the rule of law, equal rights for all and a professional civil service, Reichlin-Melnik said. 'The bigger issue is the use of the word 'invaders,' because undocumented immigrants are not invaders,' he told me. 'No invasion in history has involved people crossing the border to work as dishwashers, or to pick crops, and who entered the country legally.' Even the hundreds of thousands of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) and humanitarian parole holders from Venezuela, Cuba, Haiti and other countries — whom Trump now seeks to deport — cannot be described as 'illegals,' as the administration insists. By definition, someone approved by the U.S. government to enter and work legally is not an 'illegal alien,' critics say. 'The biggest danger is that this kind of rhetoric is dangerous, because people believe it, and it can lead to violence,' Reichlin-Melnik told me. 'The El Paso shooter in 2018 drove hundreds of miles to massacre people at a Walmart because he sincerely believed that Latinos were invading the United States.' Indeed, we're treading a perilous path. First, Trump administration officials claimed their anti-immigration crusade would target mainly 'illegal criminals' — a stance many Americans support. Then, the net widened to include 'illegal aliens' in general. Now, the goalpost keeps shifting, and the rhetoric targets 'all foreign invaders.' The DHS-publicized poster is not funny. This leap is a leap too far, too fast, and in the wrong direction.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store