Your government slashed consumer protections. Now what?
In the same way people don't think about their plumbing until a deathly stench rises from their shower drain, most of us have gotten used to the safeguards afforded by the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau — we've got backup if there's a problem.
Among its service to American consumers: returning more than $21 billion to 205 million people; saving more than $5 billion by capping bank fees; fielding more than 6.8 million complaints about medical debt, student loan repayment and credit reporting; returning $183 million to veterans and service members for violations of the Military Lending Act; and removing $49 billion in medical collections from credit reports (anything under $500 cannot be included). Higher credit scores mean better rates and easier approvals on loans, credit cards and rentals.
The Trump administration has frozen the work of the CFPB (though there have been conflicting messages from the president himself), but only Congress can officially shut it down. It is funded by the nonpartisan Federal Reserve board to insulate it from politically driven fluctuations, and its fate hinges on a lawsuit brought by the National Employees Treasury Union that covers CFPB staff. A coalition of 23 state attorneys general submitted an amicus brief, arguing that shutting the bureau would cause catastrophic harm to consumers if oversight is left to the states.
'The Trump Administration's takeover of the CFPB is an effort to destroy the agency responsible for overseeing the mortgage markets, stopping predatory debt collectors, and preventing American families from being exploited by big banks and payday lenders,' said California Attorney General Rob Bonta in a statement. 'From sharing complaints and trend data, to providing training, and partnering on joint investigations and litigations, the loss of CFPB's partnership has devastating and deep implications for California and households across the nation."
The Bureau was created in the wake of the 2008 financial meltdown after fiscal institutions extended too much risky credit to folks who were unable to repay and went wild with mortgage rates and fees, which sank real estate markets and sent people into stratospheric amounts of debt. Signed into law in 2010 and enacted in 2011 as part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the CFPB has since established national bulwarks for consumers against high fees for credit cards, payday loans and banking transactions and overdrafts.
But actually, the CFPB was a great investment that put money back in people's pockets. Since its inception, taxpayers spent $7.6 billion on the CFPB, but the Bureau returned $21 billion to consumers — about $2.76 for each dollar spent, said Mallory SoRelle, an assistant professor at Duke University's Sanford School of Public Policy and the author of Democracy Declined: The Failed Politics of Consumer Financial Protection.
'But those numbers don't account for the money that consumers save from the agency rulemaking, complaint handling, educational activities, or other supervisory activities, so it would be a conservative estimate," she said. "For example, the agency's own estimates suggest that the 2024 overdraft rule alone could save consumers $5 billion each year — significantly increasing the return on investment from just one single rule. Even if the actual savings ended up being lower, that is a huge potential return.'
'The agency has returned over $20 billion to consumers since its founding — protecting Americans from junk fees, medical debt, and predatory lending. President Trump campaigned on capping credit card interest rates at 10% and lowering costs for Americans. [Trump] needs a strong CFPB and a strong CFPB Director to do that. But if President Trump and Republicans decide to cower to Wall Street billionaires and destroy the agency, they will have a fight on their hands,' Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) said in a statement. Warren was one of the CFPB's original champions.
SoRelle said that while there are agencies that have consumer divisions, their primary mission is to prioritize the profitability and soundness of financial institutions — such as the FDIC and the Federal Reserve — not the people they serve. The 'low bar' of protections, in fact, helped usher in the financial crisis of 2008.
'There were these existing agencies, but they were adopting pretty weak consumer financial protections,' SoRelle said, 'They weren't really as engaged with some of the enforcement actions that were needed to keep on top of those protections.'
Consumers can also wield power by choosing financial products, especially through credit unions, that are more consumer friendly. And read the fine print, carefully. 'I don't think it's fair to say that all of these financial institutions are out to defraud people, but it's also true that there are a lot of financial institutions that have historically engaged in practices that break the law, that engaged in discriminatory practices or unfair practices, or are simply focused on profits and are charging fees that are disproportionately hard for certain types of people to pay for,' SoRelle said.
It's expensive to be poor. For many, the problem isn't so much lack of financial knowledge as having poor credit and fewer options, falling into murderous interest rates and deeper debt via payday loans and overdraft fees.
Financial payment services are ramping up — especially peer-to-peer payments across social media and 'buy now, pay later' services — without much regulation. 'Nobody's really quite clear who has oversight over them,' SoRelle said. 'We're not really sure if some of these products count as credit or if maybe there's something else.' Without the CFPB, new platforms and services may escape a regulatory eye.
Some states, however, may step in, depending on how seriously they take consumer protection, creating a patchwork of regulations across the country. 'If you live in a state where the government is deciding to regulate these more stringently, you are going to have more protection,' SoRelle said.
'For now, the complaint database of the CFPB is still available and people should file complaints there. The CFPB historically has done a really good job of trying to help consumers navigate those complaints,' SoRelle said. She advised folks to also leverage their state's attorney general's office and any other consumer protection apparatus available.
SoRelle urged people to reach out to their elected officials to support the full restoration of the CFPB.
'If you value the work that the CFPB does, and you want your pocketbook protected, then you've got to show up for it the way that it would show up for you. And that means contacting your elected officials to tell them to stop what's happening,' she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
25 minutes ago
- The Hill
US should stay out of war in Middle East: Retired colonel
Following Israeli strikes on Iran, one retired military officer told NewsNation, The Hill's sister network, that the U.S. should stay out of the fight. Iran has already vowed retaliation and the U.S. has shifted military assets into the region in case they are needed. Retired Lt. Col. Daniel Davis told NewsNation that the path forward depends on whether Iran chooses to prioritize revenge or regime survival, with revenge being the more dangerous option. 'Iran can bring substantial damage to Israel if they choose to go down the path of revenge, because then they're not going to be concerned about what happens next,' he said. 'They're going to be concerned about how much damage they can cause in the meantime.' Iran could consider the U.S. involved in the attack because it had forewarning and because the country supplies military aid to Israel. Secretary of State Marco Rubio denied any U.S. involvement in the initial attack and President Trump has urged Iran to reach a deal on dismantling its nuclear program. 'I will just categorically say that no matter what happens in terms of Israel and Iran, we should not get involved,' Davis said. 'It is not our war to fight.' 'It shouldn't have started at all, and we should not sacrifice American troops, which we surely would do if we get into a fight there,' he said.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Parade to Display Power at Home That's Being Tested Abroad
(Bloomberg) -- President Donald Trump's pledge to exert US power around the world is being tested in Europe and the Middle East, but this weekend offers him a chance to display that power on American soil. Shuttered NY College Has Alumni Fighting Over Its Future Trump's Military Parade Has Washington Bracing for Tanks and Weaponry NYC Renters Brace for Price Hikes After Broker-Fee Ban Do World's Fairs Still Matter? As Part of a $45 Billion Push, ICE Prepares for a Vast Expansion of Detention Space Trump, who's celebrating his 79th birthday on Saturday, is the driving force behind the parade down Washington's Constitution Avenue — which runs behind the White House — that includes a muscular exhibition of 6,600 soldiers, Abrams tanks, Bradley Fighting Vehicles and a Black Hawk helicopter. Also planned are historic reenactments, state-of-the-art military technology and a flyover with the Air Force Thunderbirds. The Army is marking its 250th anniversary with a companion all-day event on the National Mall. The parade is expected to cost $45 million, an estimate that includes potential damage to major District of Columbia streets from heavy tank treads. The US last celebrated its military strength in 1991 after the first Gulf War. The only other such events celebrated the end of the Civil War and World Wars I and II. While Democratic President John F. Kennedy included military displays in his 1961 inaugural parade, such exhibitions are more common in authoritarian countries such as Russia, China and North Korea. Longtime US ally France also marks its annual Bastille Day with a military parade. Previous parades in the US came in moments of national unity and patriotism about victories overseas. By contrast, Trump's parade coincides with his seizing control of California's National Guard and deploying US Marines to quell protests over immigration raids in the state. An appeals court is allowing him to continue their use over the weekend as a lawsuit from Governor Gavin Newsom is considered. Across the globe, Trump's exertion of US influence and power has been repeatedly stymied. Few US trade deals have been notched since his April 2 'Liberation Day' announcement. Israel and Iran traded missile strikes on Friday, jeopardizing US talks with the Tehran government over its nuclear program. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Israel acted 'unilaterally.' Hours later, Trump linked the strikes to the talks, demanding that Iran return to the discussions. Despite a promise to end the war in Ukraine on 'Day 1,' Trump has failed to push Russian President Vladimir Putin to the negotiating table and both sides are waging increasingly audacious attacks. European leaders are moving away from relying on the US and seeking other means of aiding Ukraine. Back home, the Washington parade will be flanked by at least 200 'No King' protests nationwide to defy what organizers call Trump's brand of authoritarianism. Millions are expected to participate from New York and Chicago to Milwaukee and Los Angeles. Trump on Monday referred back to the 2020 protests over the murder of George Floyd by Minneapolis police, and suggested he would handle such incidents differently in his second term. 'There's so many different places where we let it burn, we wanted to be politically correct, we wanted to be nice,' he said. 'Those people that want to protest, they're going to be met with very big force,' Trump said this week. 'And I haven't even heard about a protest, but, you know, this is people that hate our country, but they will be met with very heavy force.' Trump has been eager to host a military parade ever since attending a Bastille Day parade in Paris during his first term. City officials in Washington warned that heavy military vehicles could damage city streets, and the price tag became a political liability. American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination The Spying Scandal Rocking the World of HR Software New Grads Join Worst Entry-Level Job Market in Years As Companies Abandon Climate Pledges, Is There a Silver Lining? US Tariffs Threaten to Derail Vietnam's Historic Industrial Boom ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US Steel Sale to Nippon Steel Poised to Close After Trump Deal
(Bloomberg) -- Nippon Steel Corp. won conditional US approval for its $14.1 billion purchase of United States Steel Corp., capping a lengthy saga in a tie-up that will create one of the world's largest steel companies. Shuttered NY College Has Alumni Fighting Over Its Future Trump's Military Parade Has Washington Bracing for Tanks and Weaponry NYC Renters Brace for Price Hikes After Broker-Fee Ban Do World's Fairs Still Matter? As Part of a $45 Billion Push, ICE Prepares for a Vast Expansion of Detention Space In a release Friday, the companies said they've committed to a national security agreement proposed by the Trump administration, which earlier cleared the deal subject to those terms. As part of the $55-per-share deal, the Japanese company will invest an additional $11 billion by 2028, including an initial commitment in a greenfield project that would be completed after 2028. Nippon had previously raised its pledged additional investment in an effort to win President Donald Trump's approval. Nippon Steel will also spend an extra $3 billion after 2028 for a new steel mill, according to people familiar with the matter. That would push the total additional investment — on top of the purchase price — to $14 billion. Earlier Friday, Trump formally opened the door to approving the sale of US Steel by submitting the agreement to the companies and amending former President Joe Biden's move to block the agreement in an executive order. The president's action cleared the sale so long as the companies comply with the government's terms. 'President Trump promised to protect American Steel and American Jobs — and he has delivered on that promise,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said in a written statement. 'Today's executive order ensures US Steel will remain in the great Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and be safeguarded as a critical element of America's national and economic security.' Nippon Steel and US Steel in the release said they had received regulatory approvals and that 'the partnership is expected to be finalized promptly.' The deal is expected to close by June 18, the merger agreement deadline, Japan's Nikkei reported on Saturday, without saying where it got the information. Trump earlier this week said the US would receive a so-called golden share in the post-transaction company, though it's not clear what that would entail. The companies confirmed that the US would get a golden share but didn't elaborate. The terms of the security agreement include significant and unprecedented US control measures, as well as certain control over some board seats and requirements that some leadership roles go to American citizens, according to a person familiar with the pact, speaking on condition of anonymity. The golden share does not include an equity stake in the company, the person said. Earlier: Nippon Steel Plans $6 Billion Investment in Its Japanese Mills 'The Japanese government believes that this investment will strengthen the ability of the Japanese and US steel industries to generate new innovation and lead to the strengthening of the close partnership between Japan and the US,' Japan's Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, Yoji Muto, said in a written statement. 'We welcome the decision of the US government.' Trump and Biden as well as former Vice President Kamala Harris campaigned against the deal, before the former president blocked it in January. Trump has since reversed his position, insisting that the agreement would preserve steel jobs in the US. The text of the security agreement hasn't been released. Trump and others have previously announced other elements of the deal, including bonuses to steelworkers, a requirement to keep existing blast furnaces running for a decade, and government veto power to retain control over the board of the US Steel subsidiary. Trump has also hailed the accord as vindication of his trade policies, which have seen the administration levy tariffs in a bid to pressure companies to shift more manufacturing to the US. Japan has been engaging in negotiations with the US over trade in a bid to avoid higher levies Trump has threatened. Trump's decision to champion Nippon Steel's bid offers to provide fresh momentum for those talks. Trump held a rally in Pennsylvania two weeks ago, at US Steel's iconic Mon Valley facility, celebrating the deal with a crowd of steelworkers, even though it had not yet been finalized. Earlier: US, Mexico Near Deal to Cut Steel Duties and Cap Imports Trump also used that event to announce he was doubling his tariffs on steel and aluminum, raising them to 50% from 25%. Since that rally, government officials, company executives and deal advisers worked to hammer out the finer details and get the final signatures. The deal creates a combined company that will be the world's second-largest steelmaker. It will become a formidable domestic competitor to Nucor Corp., which for a generation has dominated the American steel industry. The acquisition also clears the way for enhanced steelmaking in areas the US has lagged in recent years, including the type of steel critical to bolster ailing electric grids across the country. The Japanese steelmaker's takeover became a political lightning rod after the leadership of the United Steelworkers – based, like US Steel itself, in Pittsburgh – staunchly opposed the tie-up. Biden sided with them, as did Trump. The deal has taken a winding path with extensions, a Biden block, a legal fight, and then Trump's decision to reexamine it before ultimately clearing it. Nippon Steel and US Steel have steadily tried to address worries, with Vice Chairman Takahiro Mori making repeated visits to the US to clinch the deal. Divisions within the union were laid bare through the process, with local union leaders expressing support for the deal and breaking with their national leadership. Trump's reversal was a few months in the making. In February, he surprised the parties by blessing some kind of a minority stake — an announcement they hadn't been privy to and didn't understand. The deal, then and now, was built on Nippon Steel buying US Steel entirely. The question was mitigation measures. The president said he supported a 'planned partnership' between the companies on May 23, without providing details of an announcement that appeared to bless the original deal with additional mitigation measures. --With assistance from Jennifer A. Dlouhy, Meghashyam Mali and Yoshiaki Nohara. (Updates with potential closing timeframe in eighth paragraph.) American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination The Spying Scandal Rocking the World of HR Software New Grads Join Worst Entry-Level Job Market in Years As Companies Abandon Climate Pledges, Is There a Silver Lining? US Tariffs Threaten to Derail Vietnam's Historic Industrial Boom ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.