'People are dying', say ex-miners waiting for pension cash
Speaking to BBC East Midlands Today, the chief secretary to the Treasury, Darren Jones, indicated there would be an announcement in the next Budget, saying "we'll be able to say more towards the end of the year".
'We don't have time'
But former miner Dave Drury, who worked at Welbeck Colliery in Nottinghamshire, said he was angry at the minister's comments."It's just somebody sat down with a pen who just needs to sign that off," he said."Probably 2,000 miners a year are dying of old age and respiratory mining-related diseases. "They ain't got time to wait. It's six-a-day I think it works out at. So whoever's got the pen, get it signed."After 14 years at the coalface, Mr Drury became a training officer for a year and his pension was transferred from the MPS to the BCSSS."We were all fighting together, but I do think it's as simple as someone's looked down at a piece of paper and seen 'mineworkers' pensions' and they've added the word 'scheme' on the end," he said."And adding that word 'scheme' has excluded the BCSSS."
Of the roughly 40,000 BCSSS members, about 40% are women.Kim Smith, who worked at the Coal Board, based in Mansfield, said: "It's not government money, it's not taxpayers' money, it's the scheme members' money and we'll like that money back to improve our standard of living."We're losing five or six members a day so every day that this gets dragged out more people are not going to benefit and I don't think that's fair."Mansfield's Labour MP Steve Yemm – whose constituency contains the highest number of BCSSS members in the country – also questioned why it was taking so long."This requires a signature by a civil servant to sign over the reserve, and I can't really understand why it would take any length of time to do that," he said.Yemm was one of 41 Labour MPs from coalfield constituencies who wrote a letter to Darren Jones in January, warning "the matter of securing pension justice for mining communities remains incomplete"."We urge you to prioritise this issue and address it without delay," they added.Darren Jones argued there were various issues still to be resolved.He said: "You've got to do the work around how much money is in the scheme, how much is guaranteed for pensioners, what's the risk profile."All of those conversations for the Mineworkers' Pensions Scheme had happened before the election…which is why we could move quickly."Jones confirmed that the government was in "active conversations" with the BCSSS trustees and asked if that meant there would be an announcement in the next Budget, he said: "That would be a time to pay attention, yes."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
4 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Donald Trump can still stop Starmer's shameful Chagos surrender
In a recent meeting with a cross-party group of British MPs in Washington, I was struck by the outright defeatism on display over the Chagos Islands surrender. I was told that Sir Keir Starmer's shameful agreement in May to hand over the British Indian Ocean Territory to Chinese ally Mauritius was a done deal, and it was pointless to even discuss it. Several of the MPs agreed that the Labour Government's decision was absolutely awful, but the overriding feeling was that nothing could be done to stop it. Thankfully, there is hope that the deal can still be torpedoed at the twelfth hour. As the Chagos agreement is a treaty that cedes sovereign British territory, legal experts note that it must be ratified first by Westminster. And it would surely be extremely difficult for the Prime Minister to defend the agreement in Parliament if Britain's closest friend and partner stepped in to oppose it. The US President's upcoming state visit to London on September 17-19 has added a new sense of urgency, with growing concerns in the United States over the implications of the deal for the future of the vital Anglo-American military base at Diego Garcia, which is capable of hosting America's long-range B-2 bombers. Diego Garcia sits at the heart of the Indian Ocean, and will play an increasingly important role for the United States in combatting Communist China in the Indo-Pacific region, a huge strategic priority for the Trump administration. A growing number of US policymakers fear that the Chagos deal will hand Beijing an unprecedented win at the expense of the United States and the United Kingdom, undermining the long-term future of Diego Garcia and significantly weakening the strategic position of the West in the region. Indeed, the Chagos issue is far from over in Washington, and major red flags are being raised in the US, despite a large-scale PR offensive waged by the Foreign Office earlier this year. The stakes are incredibly high. There is a very real possibility that Mauritius could, a few years from now, break the agreement with the UK over Diego Garcia under pressure from Beijing, find a reason to end the lease with London, and cut an even more lucrative deal with Communist China. What if the Chinese offered Mauritius double or triple what the British Government is offering to pay? This would be a nightmare scenario for the US, resulting in the loss of an incredibly vital American base. Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana has been a prominent opponent of the UK giving the Chagos Islands away, and other Members of Congress are now weighing in. In a highly significant development this month on Capitol Hill, the powerful Republican-led House of Representatives Committee on Appropriations directly raised the issue of the Chagos Islands deal between the UK and Mauritius, urging the US Secretary of State to engage further with the British Government on assurances that vital US strategic interests are protected. In the 'National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs Appropriations Bill, 2026', the Committee recognised 'that with the growing challenge from the PRC the military facilities on the island of Diego Garcia are central to Anglo-American power projection and relative control of the Indian Ocean. Recognising the invaluable strategic importance and geographic relevance of Diego Garcia to the United States, the Committee encourages the Secretary of State to engage with His Majesty's Government of the United Kingdom to ensure our long-term access to the facilities and that they remain integral to allied security.' Meanwhile in the UK, the full cost of the Chagos deal to the British taxpayer is only now seeing the light of day. As The Telegraph recently revealed, the total cost to the British taxpayer to lease the Diego Garcia military base from Mauritius will be almost £35bn if fulfilled, 10 times more than the Labour government originally claimed. This is one of the biggest deceptions by a British government in modern times, and also one of the most dangerous, with massive implications for US and British national security interests on the world stage. In the weeks ahead, we can expect significantly increased scrutiny of the Starmer Government's Chagos Islands deal on Capitol Hill as well as from the administration, especially in advance of the upcoming presidential state visit to the UK next month. Significantly, the US State Department backed the Chagos deal in a statement in May, but there has never been an official declaration issued by the White House. A last-minute intervention against the deal is not out of the question. President Trump still has an opportunity to weigh in directly on the issue, and can and should send the Chagos deal to the depths of the Indian Ocean where it clearly belongs. By doing so, he would be defending vital American strategic interests, denying China a major long-term victory, and protecting a crucial military base at the heart of the US/UK Special Relationship Nile Gardiner is Director of The Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom at The Heritage Foundation in Washington, DC
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
SNP must not act as bystanders in run-up to next year's election
James Murphy's piece on Saturday was scathingly critical: 'The reality is that Swinney's plan isn't designed to win independence. It's designed to preserve control of the issue inside the SNP. It's self-interest wearing a saltire.' READ MORE: Every plan to achieve indy must be subject to the test of practicality On the same day, I believe Selma Rahman spoke for many thousands of SNP voters when she said: 'I'm beginning to consider myself voting fodder for the SNP, the way Labour took so many of us for granted in the past.' She'd still vote SNP in 2026, 'but the grassroots/Yes movement and civic society need to come together, speaking out with the (very broad) independence movement.' John Swinney, widely admired for personal qualities, has become rather like a coach addressing his sweating team as they collapse on the benches at half-time of a home game down 0-6: 'There's still time. We've missed chances and conceded gift goals but our tactics are sound. Don't despair! There's still time, plenty of time...' READ MORE: Supreme Court's sex ruling 'rolls back progress for all women', SNP members say And there is still time; nine months until the Holyrood election, and nine months, as we all know, is a long time if you're expecting a delivery (though it's nearly always wonderfully worth the wait). But all John is promising to deliver, as we earnestly hope for a rebirth of our nation, is a prolonged extension of expectancy. So the SNP need to stand up and sharpen up, remember their genetic responsibility and join up with other parties and agencies together to declare in their manifestos a common resolve, given the authority of a majority of the sovereign people, to leave the 1707 Travesty of Union and at last take our rightful place at the table of the world's free and independent democracies. Let's see Holyrood 2026 as more than exciting; its potential is epic. John Melrose Peebles IT is certainly correct to say that a vote for independence in a plebiscite election will not sway Starmer. It is probably true to say that dangling him by the ankles from the Forth bridge will not make him accede to a second referendum (not that I'm suggesting we try that – it would probably pollute the water if he fell). Nothing in our lifetime will make Westminster pay anything other than lip service to the democratic right of the Scots to secede from this pseudo union, so it is time to stop wasting our efforts in trying. READ MORE: Holyrood 2026 is the first step in regaining our political mojo A plebiscite election, whilst it will definitely not persuade Starmer or any other 'elected' dictator to accept our rights, will convince the rest of the world that we are being held prisoner in this farcical facsimile of a democracy. We should have withdrawn our MPs from the palace of hypocrisy when we swept the board. No, it wasn't a democratic majority but under Westminster rules it was a victory. Remember a majority of votes in this 'democracy' never happens but the chancers soldier on regardless. We should have told the world that we were open for business then, and not waited for the electorate to be disheartened by failure. I once knew a retired civil engineer who said: 'I have built bridges, roads and dams in every former British colony and they all had one thing in common with Scotland. The Raj only left either when the fighting became too hot or there was eff all left to steal!' You will never get the thief to leave your house by asking nicely. This one is going to stay until there is eff all left to steal and, given their shortage of water and greed for electricity, that could take a very long time. They won't go until we throw them out, especially given the number of 'patriots' who would rather be serfs for a price than freemen for a fortune, so, whatever we do, begging for a referendum without making it obvious that denial is going to hurt, is not going to work! Les Hunter Lanark THERE are many in Scotland who, despite the prevailing fragmentation of the efforts of popular and party political movements to emancipate us from the current multi-faceted dystopia, retain the grace to be willing, if not able yet, to fully forgive Nicola Sturgeon entirely for wasted years and squandered momentum towards a more hopeful legacy for our children. There is no doubt that her attempts at a qualified apology for errors of strategic judgement, particularly in the distracting domain of gender recognition and the debilitating 'pacts' it necessitated, have made a good start in rehabilitating her posterity. READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon is still as strong a voice as ever for those in need I suspect and hope it represents the understandable human tendency to 'own up' in instalments to more extensive and wide-ranging incompetence. In the case of Nicola et al, the acquiescing to long-term devolution and substandard governance latterly are more difficult to hold hands up to, in addition to matters of judicial/political boundaries being compromised. It is counterproductive in the long run to rehash the derelictions of fallible human beings. The epithet of 'humanum est errare' and to forgive divine is apposite and also an urgent matter in Scottish politics if the current parlous state of the NHS, public health, education and mental health and the devastating inequalities that stalk the land are to be meaningfully transformed in the coming decade in an independent Scotland. While I am suspicious of political auto justifications as per Robin McAlpine's article of August 16, I nonetheless provisionally salute Nicola's gesture and wish the remnant SNP party a full return to health and vigour after their period of malaise and lack of clear vision. Andrew Docherty Selkirk
Glasgow Times
3 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Business group and MSP hit out at Glasgow congestion charge
The council is to press on with planning for a charge on drivers from outside, with city residents exempt. It has met with opposition from Labour and now others have raised their concerns. READ NEXT:Update on plan for congestion charge on motorists in Glasgow The plan for a future congestion charge were raised in a council paper stating the council has considered a proposal on a workplace parking tax but has recommended to pursue it at the moment. One of the groups opposed to a workplace parling levy was Glasgow Chamber of Commerce which has now stated its opposition to a congestion charge. Stuart Patrick, Chief Executive of Glasgow Chamber of Commerce, said: "We cannot support a city-wide congestion charge until public transport improvements have been made in line with the conclusions of the Connectivity Commission. "We are very concerned about the possible displacement of business out of Glasgow. We believe the City Council needs support from the Scottish Government to deliver priority transport projects such as the Clyde Metro and the Glasgow City Region Bus Partnership improvement plan." The council said any charge could take years to be implemented. READ NEXT:Opposition to plans for a Glasgow congestion charge on drivers revealed Meanwhile, Monica Lennon, Labour MSP for Central Scotland has written to the council leader, Susan Aitken with concerns over people from outside Glasgow being charged and asking for it to be stopped. She said: 'I want to be clear that I fully recognise the importance of shifting from car dependency to more sustainable travel and transport. 'However, while our communities are underserved by public transport it is wrong to penalise them for the lack of choice available to them. The MSP said: 'If these plans go ahead, residents in South Lanarkshire and my constituents in the wider Central Scotland region could be forced to pay to visit Glasgow for work, family, or social reasons, including healthcare and education. 'Not only will this exacerbate inequalities, but it will also undermine public confidence in measures to protect our environment.' She added: 'Many of my constituents find it impossible to access the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital by public transport.' A council spokesperson said: 'We remain firmly committed to promoting sustainable transport throughout the city, and whilst we do not control the running or delivery of public transport, we will continue to work with partners on initiatives aimed at improving the city's public transport infrastructure. 'Having fully explored Workplace Parking Licensing and illustrated what a potential scheme in Glasgow could look like, we have no plans to take this forward at this time. 'While it is clear that the exploration of any congestion charging scheme would likely take several years and would require detailed feasibility work to be progressed, the council will engage closely with the required national regulatory review as part of our ongoing work in this area.'
