Why South African commissions fail to deliver justice and perpetuate violence
LONDIWE GUMEDE
FORMER Economic Freedom Front (EFF) politician Dr Mbuyiseni Ndlozi argues that a president cannot find anyone guilty.
He is, instead, advocating for a "proper" judicial commission of inquiry, led by a judge, with strict timelines. He deems this "proper" for a democracy.
However, the subsequent analysis of South African commissions reveals how they often fall short of this ideal, instead perpetuating systemic violence and delaying justice.
The Commissions Act, 1947 (Act No. 8 of 1947), used for enquiries like the Zondo Commission on State of Capture, originated under British colonial rule. This embedded a legalistic facade for systemic violence.
It enabled apartheid-era enquiries, such as the Hefer Commission (2003) and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), which probed allegations of apartheid espionage against the then-National Director of Public Prosecutions Vusi Pikoli and the then-Justice Minister Penuel Maduna, and apartheid-era crime, respectively, to probe without any accountability.
There was also the Donen Commission, which probed the UN's 'oil for food' program, which exonerates individuals linked to the scandal, like Tokyo Sexwale and former Director General Sandile Nogxina. Like colonial inquests pathologising indigenous resistance, modern commissions prioritise bureaucratic order over human dignity.
Actress Tebogo Thobejane's condemnation, 'No mention of the lack of protection… left to fight alone,' echoes this centuries-old erasure.
After a brush with death, she now attends a trial process that offers legal theatrics, not safety.
Thobejane, a survivor of a hit allegedly engineered by her ex-boyfriend Vusimuzi 'Cat' Matlala and his wife, feels betrayed by the lack of protection against the suspected mastermind of the underworld. Commissions ritually harvest victim trauma while withholding redress.
Matlala will likely be the subject of a commission of inquiry headed by acting deputy Chief Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga after his name was mentioned by KwaZulu-Natal provincial police commissioner Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi two weeks ago.
The Marikana Commission, which was established after the August 2012 massacre of Lonmin mine workers, gathered 641 days of testimony from widows of massacred miners and colleagues of the departed miners yet delivered no prosecutions or timely reparations.
Similarly, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) heard 21,000 victim testimonies but granted amnesty to 1,500 perpetrators, providing only negligible justice.
This dynamic inherits colonial evidence-gathering: Black pain becomes archival fodder, catalogued and then discarded.
As Thobejane noted, President Cyril Ramaphosa's speeches often overlook victims, reducing their experiences to procedural footnotes.
Commission structures inherently protect power networks.
The Mokgoro Commission (2018) and Ginwala Inquiry (2007) scrutinised prosecutors threatening political elites under the NPA Act. Enquiries into police violence, such as those in Khayelitsha (2012), operated with weaker mandates.
This bifurcation mirrors colonial "divide and rule" tactics, ensuring that accountability evaporates. The Zondo Commission's R1 billion inquiry, for instance, yielded minimal prosecutions despite documenting over R1.5 trillion in state capture.
Victims like Thobejane receive a whiff of justice, marked by endless postponements while perpetrators retain influence. Ramaphosa's latest commission of inquiry's mandate is investigation, not prosecution.
Judicial appointments cloak commissions in false objectivity. Retired judges like Farlam (Marikana) and Seriti (Arms Deal) lent legitimacy to enquiries that ultimately shielded the interests of the state and corporations.
The president's latest 'independent commission' further demonstrates how these bodies often obscure underlying political complexities and power struggles.
This legal theatre pathologises victims: Marikana miners were framed as 'illegal strikers,' while Thobejane's assault became a tabloid spectacle.
When commissions centre perpetrators' due process over victims' safety, they enact "terror through bureaucracy." The TRC's unresolved legacy continues to haunt recent and past commissions.
Thirty years later, only 137 of its recommended prosecutions have been investigated, while apartheid-era cases like the Cradock Four murders remain in legal limbo.
Nomonde Calata's tears at a 2025 inquest echo her 1996 TRC testimony, testifying to the commission's broken promises. Thobejane's demand for 'accountability and support' confronts this cycle; her ex-boyfriend faces new charges while his police and political connections remain intact.
Reparations remain theoretical: TRC victims received a single payment of R30 000 each, while Marikana families await R1 billion in compensation.
This reflects colonialism's core calculus: human suffering indexed against fiscal "pragmatism."Breaking this machinery requires centring victims as architects, not evidence.
Unlike President Ramaphosa's commissions, a transformative approach would enforce existing recommendations: implementing the Khayelitsha Commission's 2012 police reforms, funding TRC-mandated educational reparations, and prosecuting the network of Thobejane's ex-boyfriend beyond his hitmen.
Thobejane's courage, demanding protection while testifying, sets a model for this agency. Yet, without dismantling the Commissions Act and colonial-era legalisms, enquiries remain stone fortresses where violence is ritualised, not remedied.
South Africa remains fractured by inequality, a landscape where commissions consecrate state power while the vulnerable fight alone in the ruins.
(Gumede is a freelance journalist with interests in politics, economics, sports, travel, and community news. Her views don't necessarily reflect those of the Sunday Tribune or IOL)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

TimesLIVE
an hour ago
- TimesLIVE
Trump says he may skip G20 summit in SA, cites policy disapproval
US President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he might skip the Group of 20 (G20) leaders' summit in South Africa in November and send someone else to represent the US, citing his disapproval of South African policies. 'I think maybe I'll send somebody else because I've had a lot of problems with South Africa. They have some very bad policies,' Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One. Trump has taken issue with South African domestic and foreign policies, ranging from its land policy to its case accusing Israel of genocide in the US ally's war in Gaza. He signed an executive order in February to cut US financial assistance to South Africa. In May, Trump confronted President Cyril Ramaphosa with false claims about a white genocide and land seizures during a White House meeting. Earlier this year, secretary of state Marco Rubio boycotted a G20 foreign ministers' meeting in South Africa, which has the G20 presidency from December 2024 to November 2025. Washington, under Trump and former president Joe Biden, has complained about the case brought by South Africa at the International Court of Justice, where it accused Israel of genocide over its military assault in Gaza. Israel's assault has killed tens of thousands, caused a hunger crisis, internally displaced Gaza's entire population and also led to accusations of war crimes at the International Criminal Court. Israel denied the accusations and cast its Gaza offensive as self-defence after a deadly October 2023 Hamas attack that killed 1,200 people and in which more than 250 were taken hostage. Diplomatic relations between the US and South Africa have also been strained under Trump due to the government's BEE policies to address the legacy of centuries of racial inequality. Ramaphosa, who has urged Trump to attend the G20 summit, rejected Washington's claims that South Africa will use its land policy to arbitrarily confiscate white-owned land.


Eyewitness News
an hour ago
- Eyewitness News
Mantashe takes swipe at countries threatening to impose higher import tariffs on trade partners
JOHANNESBURG - Mineral and Petroleum Resources Minister Gwede Mantashe has taken a thinly veiled swipe at countries threatening to impose higher import tariffs on trade partners, labelling the threats as bullying. Mantashe's concerns about the impact of higher tariffs on miners come ahead of an expected 30% duty on South African products shipped to the US set to take effect at the end of the week. READ: Mantashe punts critical minerals as a key driver for SA's economic development, job creation Speaking at an engagement on the G20 critical minerals framework in Sandton on Tuesday, he called on captains of industry to find alternative markets for the country's critical minerals. The US relies on South African metals and minerals that are essential for its economy and national security, making them the biggest South African exports to the US. But for US President Donald Trump, doing business with the superpower means taking a hard stance - you're either with the US or you're against it. During this year's instalment of the BRICS meeting in Brazil in June, Trump threatened BRICS allies with higher tariffs on goods into the US, above the universal baseline on all trading partners. Mantashe said: "We must not be apologetic for initiatives that take us forward, we must never. If being a member of BRICS attracts tariffs from the US, it tells us that we must diversify our markets more and more aggressively and not focus on where tariffs are imposed on us." Platinum group metals and chrome were on a list of exemptions before the US paused its previous tariff threats, but a levy on diamonds and other minerals raised concerns about lower export earnings for South Africa. It's unclear at this stage what parameters will apply to the 1 August tariffs.


The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
Madlanga inquiry: Probe into Mkhwanazi's allegations to cost R147.9m
KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) Police Commissioner Lieutenant General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi will be the first to be consulted. Acting Deputy Chief Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga's inquiry into KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) police chief Lieutenant General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi's allegations of criminal infiltration into the South African justice system is expected to cost taxpayers an estimated R147.9 million. This was revealed to The Citizen by the department of Justice and Constitutional Development spokesperson Terence Manase on Tuesday. 'Regarding your specific inquiry, we can confirm that the department of Justice and Constitutional Development is responsible for the procurement process for services for the Commission in consultation with the Commission Chairperson and Secretary,' Manase told The Citizen. Millions Manase said that due to the timeframes, the department has applied for a 'deviation from standard procurement processes' with the National Treasury for the Madlanga Commission and 'is awaiting feedback.' 'The estimated budget for the Commission over a six-month period is R147.9 million.' On Monday, Madlanga said his team was treating the bombshell revelations by Mkhwanazi regarding police interference with the urgency they deserve. He outlined the process of the Judicial Commission of Inquiry into criminality, political interference and corruption in the criminal justice system at a media briefing in Sandton, which included scheduling Mkhwanazi as the first to be consulted. ALSO READ: 'Ramaphosa will go down in history as one of the most useless presidents' – analyst Judicial commission President Cyril Ramaphosa announced his decision to establish a commission of inquiry to investigate the serious allegations of political interference in police operations made by Mkhwanazi earlier in July. During the briefing, Madlanga also revealed they would meet with Mkhwanazi in the coming days. 'The imminent consultation that I referred to is going to be with Lieutenant General Mkhwanazi. One has no idea what the consultation will lead to.' Allegations Madlanga added that the timeline for the commission of inquiry into criminality, political interference and corruption in the criminal justice system is 'quite tight'. 'Regarding the timeline, we will conduct our work with the timeline in mind. Should the need arise for an extension, that is something we will address at the right time. 'Just looking at the allegations that were made on the 6th of July, they seem to cover quite a wide spectrum and, in consultations and investigations, are likely to yield a lot more than what was referred to in the allegations 6 July. So the timelines, I must say, do appear to be quite tight,' Madlanga said. The commission is expected to deliver a preliminary report in three months and a final report within six months of its formation. ALSO READ: Has government been blue-ticking State Capture report recommendations? Ramaphosa answers