NIH Halts Work at High-Level Infectious Disease Laboratory
U.S. health officials have shut down work at a laboratory in Maryland that works on high-risk infectious diseases.
Health officials halted work at the Integrated Research Facility at Fort Detrick, also known as IRF-Frederick, after multiple safety violations, a National Institutes of Health (NIH) official told The Epoch Times in an email on May 5.
The official confirmed that one of the incidents was one researcher poking a hole in another researcher's personal protective equipment.
The other safety violations are not clear.
An email sent to the National Interagency Confederation for Biomedical Research, a consortium of eight agencies that oversees the IRF and other research facilities at Fort Detrick, was not returned. The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, a division of the NIH that manages the work at the IRF, did not respond to a request for comment.
Researchers at the IRF handle high-risk pathogens, including avian influenza, Middle East respiratory syndrome, and Ebola. The facility 'has the capability' to perform research at biosafety level four, which indicates the highest risk, the IRF's website
Related Stories
4/16/2025
5/4/2025
Work at the IRF will resume 'as soon as the safety of our team is assured,' the Department of Health and Human Services, the parent agency of the NIH,
Officials who work for Frederick, a city and county in which Fort Detrick is located, said they were concerned about the work stoppage.
'This facility has been at the forefront of studying deadly infectious diseases, including Ebola, and its work is crucial for public health and safety,' Frederick County Executive Jessica Fitzwater and four members of the Frederick County Council, including its president, Brad Young, told The Epoch Times in an emailed statement.
'The indefinite pause in its operations not only jeopardizes ongoing research but also undermines our preparedness for future outbreaks.
'Frederick County has long been a hub for scientific innovation and research. The IRF's contributions have not only advanced our understanding of infectious diseases but have also brought significant economic benefits to our community. The closure of this lab threatens to disrupt our local economy, potentially leading to job losses and a decline in scientific collaboration. We urge the federal government to reconsider this decision and recognize the vital role that the IRF plays in safeguarding public health and supporting our local economy. The work conducted at this facility is too important to be halted indefinitely.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
10 hours ago
- The Hill
NIH chief heads to Capitol Hill to defend Trump budget
The Big Story NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya heads to Capitol Hill Tuesday to answer questions about the agency's budget as agency staffers protest changes made under his leadership so far. © AP Bhattacharya will have to defend the $18 billion in cuts to the agency that the Trump administration has requested. This would mean a 40 percent reduction in NIH's budget next year. He'll also likely be questioned during the Senate Appropriations subcommittee hearing about NIH's current budget, as the administration has terminated billions of dollars in grants. The hearing comes one day after 90 agency scientists signed a rare letter of protest, modeled after Bhattacharya's 'Great Barrington Declaration' that objected to the Biden administration's COVID-19 policies. Titled 'The Bethesda Declaration' in reference to where NIH's campus is located, the letter lambasted several of the major changes carried out at NIH under the orders of the Trump administration: 'Academic freedom should not be applied selectively based on political ideology. To achieve political aims, NIH has targeted multiple universities with indiscriminate grant terminations, payment freezes for ongoing research, and blanket holds on awards regardless of the quality, progress, or impact of the science,' the letter read. Bhattacharya responded to the letter on social media, arguing the letter had 'some fundamental misconceptions' about NIH's recent actions and further claiming the changes they're protesting are not as severe as they make it seem. Welcome to The Hill's Health Care newsletter, we're Nathaniel Weixel, Joseph Choi and Alejandra O'Connell-Domenech — every week we follow the latest moves on how Washington impacts your health. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads How policy will be impacting the health care sector this week and beyond: RFK Jr. fires CDC's independent vaccine advisors Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said he is removing every member of the independent panel advising the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on vaccines, an unprecedented escalation in his quest to reshape the agency. In a Wall Street Journal op-ed released Monday, Kennedy said the move was necessary to restore faith in vaccines. 'A clean sweep is needed to re-establish public confidence … Kash Patel claims 'breakthrough' in Fauci COVID origins probe FBI Director Kash Patel said in an interview this week that his agency made a 'breakthrough' as it continues to investigate former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Director Dr. Anthony Fauci, a key player in the U.S.'s early response to the COVID-19 pandemic. At the same time, Patel cautioned Fauci's critics from expecting too much. 'We just had a great breakthrough … Gender gap on abortion rights hit record high: Gallup The gender gap between men and women who identify as pro-choice has widened to its largest point on record, according to a new Gallup poll. Sixty-one percent of women view themselves as pro-choice when it comes to abortion while 41 percent of men call themselves pro-choice, the poll released Monday found. The 20-point difference between the genders is the largest gap since Gallup began tracking public opinion on abortion twenty … On Our Radar Upcoming news themes and events we're watching: In Other News Branch out with a different read: What's a Medicaid cut? Senate GOP tiptoes around $800B question When is a Medicaid cut not actually a cut? That's the $800 billion question facing Senate Republicans as they write their own version of the sweeping House-passed tax and spending bill. Administration officials and senators defending against attacks on the bill have coalesced around a message that there will be no cuts to benefits, and the only people who will lose coverage are the ones who never deserved … Around the Nation Local and state headlines on health care: What We're Reading Health news we've flagged from other outlets: What Others are Reading Most read stories on The Hill right now: Pam Bondi's brother crushed in DC Bar Association election Brad Bondi, the brother of Attorney General Pam Bondi, overwhelmingly lost his bid to lead the D.C. Bar Association in a race with record turnout, … Read more Pentagon to deploy about 700 Marines to Los Angeles The U.S. military is set to temporarily move about 700 Marines to Los Angeles, further increasing military presence in the city after the Trump administration … Read more What People Think Opinions related to health submitted to The Hill: You're all caught up. See you tomorrow! Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘We dissent': NIH workers protest Trump policies that ‘harm the health of Americans'
An NIH Pediatric Oncology Branch researcher's lab jacket, embroidered with the NIH logo with blue chevron detail. The POB is dedicated to improving outcomes for children and young adults with cancer and genetic tumor predisposition syndromes. (Photo courtesy of National Institutes of Health) Hundreds of workers at the National Institutes of Health on Monday openly protested the Trump administration's cuts to the agency and consequences for human lives, writing in a sharply worded letter that its actions are causing 'a dramatic reduction in life-saving research.' In a June 9 letter to NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya, NIH workers said they felt 'compelled to speak up when our leadership prioritizes political momentum over human safety and faithful stewardship of public resources.' 'For staff across the National Institutes of Health (NIH), we dissent to Administration policies that undermine the NIH mission, waste public resources, and harm the health of Americans and people across the globe,' they said. The letter is an extraordinary rebuke of the Trump administration's actions against the NIH, which include: terminating hundreds of grants funding scientific and biomedical research; firing more than 1,000 employees this year; and moving to end billions in funds to partner institutions overseas, a move current and former NIH workers say will harm research on rare cancers and infectious diseases, as well as research that aims to minimize tobacco use and related chronic illnesses, among other areas. Some NIH workers signed their names publicly, openly daring to challenge a president who has sought to purge the government of employees he views as disloyal to him. Others signed anonymously. 'It's about the harm that these policies are having on research participants and American public health, and global public health,' said Jenna Norton, who works at the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, one of NIH's 27 institutes. 'There are research participants who generously decide to donate their time and literal pieces of their body, with the understanding that that service is going to help advance research for diseases that they are living with and help the next person who comes along with that disease.' 'These policies are preventing us from delivering on the promise we made to them and honoring the commitment that they made, and putting them at risk,' she said. The workers wrote that they hope Bhattacharya welcomes their criticisms given his vows to prioritize 'academic freedom' and to respect dissenting views as leader of the NIH, which is based in Bethesda, Maryland. Its authors called it the 'Bethesda Declaration' — a play on the controversial 'Great Barrington Declaration' that Bhattacharya co-authored during the COVID-19 pandemic. Bhattacharya's declaration advocated against lockdown measures and proposed that widespread immunity against COVID could be achieved by allowing healthy people to get infected with the virus and instituting protective measures only for medically vulnerable people. It was criticized at the time by Francis Collins, then-director of the NIH, who called Bhattacharya and his co-authors 'fringe epidemiologists,' according to emails the American Institute for Economic Research obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request. In their letter, NIH workers demanded that Bhattacharya restore grants that were 'delayed or terminated for political reasons.' Those grants funded a range of projects, including those addressing Alzheimer's disease, ways to boost vaccination rates, and efforts to combat health disparities or health misinformation. 'Academic freedom should not be applied selectively based on political ideology. To achieve political aims, NIH has targeted multiple universities with indiscriminate grant terminations, payment freezes for ongoing research, and blanket holds on awards regardless of the quality, progress, or impact of the science,' the NIH workers wrote. The funding terminations, they said, 'throw away years of hard work and millions of dollars,' 'risk participant health,' and 'damage hard-earned public trust, counter to your stated goal to improve trust in NIH.' In an emailed comment, Bhattacharya said, 'The Bethesda Declaration has some fundamental misconceptions about the policy directions the NIH has taken in recent months, including the continuing support of the NIH for international collaboration. Nevertheless, respectful dissent in science is productive. We all want the NIH to succeed.' The NIH's nearly $48 billion budget makes it the world's largest public funder of scientific research. Its work has led to countless scientific discoveries that have helped improve health and save lives around the globe. But it hasn't been without controversies, including instances of research misconduct and not effectively monitoring grant awards and the related research. Researchers and some states have sued NIH and HHS over the grant cuts. An April 3 deposition by NIH official Michelle Bulls said Rachel Riley, a senior adviser at HHS who is part of the Department of Government Efficiency created by executive order, provided NIH officials lists of grants to terminate and language for termination notices. Elon Musk, the world's richest person, led DOGE through May. Norton has worked at the NIH as a federal employee or contractor for about a decade. She said the current administration's policies are 'definitely unethical and very likely illegal,' listing a string of developments in recent months. They include terminating studies early and putting participating patients at risk because they have had to abruptly stop taking medications, and holding up research that would predominantly or exclusively recruit participants from minority races and ethnicities, who have historically been underrepresented in medical research. 'They're saying that doing studies exclusively on Black Americans to try to develop interventions that work for that population, or interventions that are culturally tailored to Hispanic-Latino populations — that that kind of research can't go forward is extremely problematic,' Norton said. 'And, as a matter of fact, studies that over-recruit from white people have been allowed to go forward.' The NIH workers also demanded that Bhattacharya reinstate workers who were dismissed under recent mass firings and allow research that is done in partnership with institutions in foreign countries 'to continue without disruption.' The NIH works with organizations around the globe to combat major public health issues, including types of cancer, tobacco-related illnesses, and HIV. In addition to the firing of probationary workers, NIH fired 1,200 civil servants as part of a rapid 'reduction in force' at federal health agencies. During a May 19 town hall meeting with NIH staff, a recording of which was obtained by KFF Health News, Bhattacharya said the decisions about RIFs 'happened before I got here. I actually don't have any transparency into how those decisions were made.' He started at NIH on April 1, the day many workers at NIH and other agencies were told they were fired. Other workers have been fired since Bhattacharya took the helm — nearly all the National Cancer Institute's communications staff were fired in early May, three former employees told KFF Health News. The letter is the latest salvo in a growing movement by scientists and others against the Trump administration's actions. In addition to in-person protests outside HHS headquarters and elsewhere, some former employees are organizing patients to get involved. Peter Garrett, who led the National Cancer Institute's communications work, has created an advocacy nonprofit called Patient Action for Cancer Research. The aim is to engage patients 'in the conversation and federal funding and science policymaking,' he said in an interview. His group aims to get patients and their relatives to speak out about how federal cancer research affects them directly, he said — a 'guerrilla lobbying' effort to put the issue squarely before members of Congress. Garrett said he retired early from the cancer institute because of concerns about political interference. Career officials routinely work under both Republican and Democratic presidents. It is par for the course for their priorities and assignments to evolve when a new president, Cabinet secretaries, and other political appointees take over. Usually, those changes occur without much protest. This time, workers said the upheaval and harm done to the NIH is so extensive that they felt they had no choice but to protest. In 11 years at NIH, Norton said, 'I've never seen anything that comes anywhere near this.' In the June 9 letter, the workers said, 'Many have raised these concerns to NIH leadership, yet we remain pressured to implement harmful measures.' 'It's not about our jobs,' said one NIH worker who signed the letter anonymously. 'It is about humanity. It is about the future.' Senior correspondent Arthur Allen contributed to this report. We'd like to speak with current and former personnel from the Department of Health and Human Services or its component agencies who believe the public should understand the impact of what's happening within the federal health bureaucracy. Please message KFF Health News on Signal at (415) 519-8778 or . KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and article first appeared on KFF Health News and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.
11 hours ago
NIH scientists sign open letter criticizing Trump administration's grant cancellations, firings
More than 300 scientists from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) signed an open letter on Monday morning to director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, criticizing the Trump administration over recent moves. The letter, including 92 signed names and 250 anonymous but verified signatories, shares concerns that research is being politicized, global collaboration is being interrupted and that budget and staff cuts have hindered the ability of NIH to do important research. "[W]e dissent to Administration policies that undermine the NIH mission, waste public resources, and harm the health of Americans and people across the globe," the letter reads. "We are compelled to speak up when our leadership prioritizes political momentum over human safety and faithful stewardship of public resources." Some of the NIH scientists who signed the letter, speaking in their personal capacity and not on behalf of the agency, told ABC News they and their colleagues have tried to raise concerns internally -- and repeatedly -- but to no avail. They said there is now an urgency to speak up, especially as Bhattacharya is set to testify on Tuesday at a hearing before the Senate Appropriations Committee on the proposed NIH budget for the upcoming fiscal year. "There is a lot of risk to speaking up, and I am very scared still, even after it's already done, even after it's already said," Jenna Norton, a program officer at the NIH's National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and one of the lead organizers of the letter, told ABC News. "I think a lot of people are focused on the risk of speaking up, but we also need to think about the risk of not speaking up." The letter, called the Bethesda Declaration -- NIH is headquartered in Bethesda, Maryland -- is modeled after the Great Barrington Declaration, of which Bhattacharya was a co-author. Published in October 2020 and named after the Massachusetts town in which it was drafted, the Great Barrington Declaration called for COVID-19 lockdowns to be avoided and a new plan for handling the pandemic by protecting the most vulnerable individuals but allowing most to resume normal activities, achieving herd immunity naturally. At the time, it was widely criticized by public health professionals, including Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the World Health Organization, who said allowing a virus "we don't fully understand to run free is simply unethical." During testimony before Congress in March 2023, Bhattacharya said the declaration was targeted for "suppression" by federal health officials. "We modeled the Bethesda Declaration after the Great Barrington Declaration … because we wanted him to see himself in our action," Norton said. "He's spoken a lot about his commitment to academic freedom and to dissent. If Jay Bhattacharya is the person he very publicly claims to be, and if he is actually in charge at NIH, our hope is that this will move him to action. And if he's not the person he says to be or he's not in charge at NIH, I think the public and Congress should be aware of that." The letter called on Bhattacharya to reverse grants that have been delayed or terminated for "political reasons" and to allow work with foreign collaborators. The signatories also asked Bhattacharya to reverse a policy capping indirect costs for research at 15% and to reinstate essential staff who were fired at NIH. "The Bethesda Declaration has some fundamental misconceptions about the policy directions the NIH has taken in recent months, including the continuing support of the NIH for international collaboration," Bhattacharya said in a statement to ABC News. "Nevertheless, respectful dissent in science is productive. We all want the NIH to succeed." A spokesperson for the Department of Health & Human Services told ABC News that the agency has not halted "legitimate" collaborations with international partners. Additionally, the spokesperson said other funders, like the Gates Foundation, cap indirect costs at 15% and that each case of termination is being reviewed. Ian Morgan, a postdoctoral researcher at the NIH's National Institute of General Medical Sciences whose work focused on antimicrobial resistance, told ABC News seeing the changes at the agency has been a "traumatic experience." He said when the Trump administration came into office, he was prevented from doing research in his lab because he couldn't purchase essential items and he was not allowed to attend a conference in February to speak with potential collaborators. He also saw many of his coworkers get accidentally terminated and then reinstated. "It's just really traumatic and really disruptive for researchers at the NIH," Morgan, who signed the letter, said. "We get into this not because we're trying to make money, not because of our own benefit. We're getting into this because we want to serve the public. We want to do life-saving research." Sarah Kobrin, a branch chief at the NIH's National Cancer Institute (NCI) who also signed the letter, said prior to the new administration, she worked with researchers interested either in receiving funds from NCI or who had funds already and were requesting assistance from NCI. However, with more than 2,100 research grants totaling around $9.5 billion terminated at NIH -- according to the letter -- she said some of her daily tasks have changed. "I spend my time on the phone now talking with people who've just learned that their projects have been cut and have been given false, pseudo-scientific reasons to say their work is not valuable, not important for public health for America, and it's just not true," Kobrin told ABC News. The NIH researchers told ABC News there is a public letter that people can sign to express their support or they can contact their congressional representatives to express their concerns. Morgan, the antimicrobial researcher, said he doesn't want the letter to just be about detailing all the changes that occurred at NIH since Trump took office. "It is us standing up and showing that that not everything is lost, and certainly there's been irreparable damage, but we still have time to right the ship and take it in the right direction," he said. "I need to leave people with that message of hope because, otherwise, they can feel there's nothing that they can do, and that we're powerless, but we are all powerful."
