logo
Terry Aslesen sees important work ahead as he seeks second Mitchell school board term

Terry Aslesen sees important work ahead as he seeks second Mitchell school board term

Yahoo24-05-2025

May 23—EDITOR'S NOTE — This is the first of three profiles of candidates running for the Mitchell Board of Education on June 3. The profiles are presented in alphabetical order, beginning with Terry Aslesen. Profiles for candidates Kimberly Lofgren and Deb Olson will be published in future editions of the Mitchell Republic, respectively.
MITCHELL — Terry Aslesen has given decades of his life to education in the Mitchell School District.
An alum of the local public school system, he served as a teacher and administrator for 43 years, helping launch successful programs such as Second Chance High School and the dual credits program. Implementing block scheduling was another highlight of his time as a district employee.
Since retired, he ran for the Mitchell Board of Education in 2022, emerging as one of two candidates to top a field of six to take his first three-year term on the board. Currently seeking his second term, he said his motivation to serve the students and district remains the same since he first entered the field.
"I don't think anything's more important than education," Aslesen told the Mitchell Republic in a recent interview. "And you can't stay excellent if you stay the same. The world is evolving and changing so quickly, so you have to constantly be looking at — how do we get better?"
Aslesen, 68, wrestled with that question in his first term. He said he's seen progress in the right direction during his time on the board.
As part of the board, he has established himself as a member with broad institutional knowledge, with extensive experience as a student, teacher and principal. He reaches back into his own history with the district for perspective on today's educational environment, often spurring discussion on spending, policy reform and student opportunity.
His approach puts the student educational experience at the forefront, he said, and one of the most important factors in that formula is having good teachers at the head of the classroom. Aslesen said changing and streamlining policies for bereavement leave, improved salaries, professional and sick leave and the extra-curricular pay helped make the district a more appealing environment for high-grade instructors.
"If you don't have great teachers, you'll never have a great school, no matter what you do. It doesn't matter how good the buildings you have are or what curriculum you have, it starts with teachers," Aslesen said. "We had some horrible policies. We had two sets of policies on several things."
Aslesen was pleased with other aspects of the last three years. The addition of an attendance liaison and literacy coaches to the staff have helped take steps toward addressing attendance issues and improving student reading skills. He stood firm when he felt the board hastily approved a new fingerprinting policy for visitors to the school, and lobbied to have it modified to be more welcoming to parents who want to take part in classroom activities, or to volunteers with organizations like Junior Achievement, who share real-world life and job experiences with students.
The addition of all-day begindergarten and the approval of new cell phone policies for the high school and middle school were also positive developments in his time on the board, he said. And he has enthusiastically embraced board planning session meetings, which are now held on occasion to give the board time to discuss short and long term goals without the pressure of the need for immediate vote on a subject.
And, of course, the new high school building that is nearing completion and will welcome district staff and students at the start of the 2025-26 school year, is a major improvement to the district. Aslesen was a prime proponent of building the school and its accompanying athletic facilities at the same time instead of over a period of years after the COVID-19 pandemic spiked construction prices.
He strongly believes that was the correct move, and credits the public with making that a reality after a bond vote to complete the work passed with an overwhelming majority.
Aslesen said his experience and input from the public and his fellow board members guide him in his decision-making process. He listens, he asks questions and tries to take in the perspective of all district patrons. Working together is important to ensuring the best educational experience for the students, he said.
"I have a lot of community input that I'm receiving and you got to listen. You don't always have to agree, but you got to listen," he said. "Sometimes, out of the blue, you get some of the best ideas given to you that you've ever heard, or somebody improves on something. All of us are smarter than any one of us, so I try to get feedback whenever I get the opportunity."
As he eyes a second term, Aslesen said there is more work on the horizon.
With the new high school nearing completion, the board can now look at other upgrades that may be needed. Air conditioning is needed at the gymnasiums at the middle school and L.B. Williams Elementary School, he said. The middle school gym also could use LED lighting.
He also hopes to have more discussion on the fate of the old MHS. Some parts of it, such as locker rooms and parking for football games or track meets, could still be utilized to benefit the district, he said. Another option could be offering it to the city or county as potential office space, or repurposing it for daycare or apartments.
When it comes to the students themselves, Aslesen would like to see even more kids taking part in activities, a proven method for keeping attendance figures high. To enhance that further, it might be worth exploring a four-day school week, he said. Under that setup, away activities could be scheduled primarily on Fridays and Saturdays, while home activities could still be held during the week.
That's less time on the road during class time and more time in the classroom for students, Aslesen said.
"It's something worth looking into. We always need to be evolving and we keep adding and adding activities, and kids keep missing more and more and more school time. And the research says that it's not good for the kids to miss what's in the classroom. Just like attendance, if the kids aren't there, they're not learning everything they're supposed to be learning as much as they could be," said Aslesen. "So I'd like to see if there are opportunities for us to restructure so that activity kids wouldn't miss as much."
He is also interested in exploring the benefits of opportunities like the Careers class, a semester-long class that sees students hear from parents or other community leaders about professions around Mitchell. The class is still offered but not required, something Aslesen feels could be beneficial.
There is work to do and discussions to be held, but he's looking forward to the challenges and whatever the future may hold.
"I think that I would be a vote for making their schools for the children in this community the best they can possibly be. I'm constantly looking for how we can make it better. Because if you're not moving forward, you're going backwards," Aslesen said.
The election for the Mitchell Board of Education will be held Tuesday, June 3. Absentee voting has begun and can be done at the Davison County Auditor's Office until 5 p.m. June 2, and voters will be able to vote in person June 3 from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. at the Davison County Fairgrounds.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Terry Aslesen sees important work ahead as he seeks second Mitchell school board term
Terry Aslesen sees important work ahead as he seeks second Mitchell school board term

Yahoo

time24-05-2025

  • Yahoo

Terry Aslesen sees important work ahead as he seeks second Mitchell school board term

May 23—EDITOR'S NOTE — This is the first of three profiles of candidates running for the Mitchell Board of Education on June 3. The profiles are presented in alphabetical order, beginning with Terry Aslesen. Profiles for candidates Kimberly Lofgren and Deb Olson will be published in future editions of the Mitchell Republic, respectively. MITCHELL — Terry Aslesen has given decades of his life to education in the Mitchell School District. An alum of the local public school system, he served as a teacher and administrator for 43 years, helping launch successful programs such as Second Chance High School and the dual credits program. Implementing block scheduling was another highlight of his time as a district employee. Since retired, he ran for the Mitchell Board of Education in 2022, emerging as one of two candidates to top a field of six to take his first three-year term on the board. Currently seeking his second term, he said his motivation to serve the students and district remains the same since he first entered the field. "I don't think anything's more important than education," Aslesen told the Mitchell Republic in a recent interview. "And you can't stay excellent if you stay the same. The world is evolving and changing so quickly, so you have to constantly be looking at — how do we get better?" Aslesen, 68, wrestled with that question in his first term. He said he's seen progress in the right direction during his time on the board. As part of the board, he has established himself as a member with broad institutional knowledge, with extensive experience as a student, teacher and principal. He reaches back into his own history with the district for perspective on today's educational environment, often spurring discussion on spending, policy reform and student opportunity. His approach puts the student educational experience at the forefront, he said, and one of the most important factors in that formula is having good teachers at the head of the classroom. Aslesen said changing and streamlining policies for bereavement leave, improved salaries, professional and sick leave and the extra-curricular pay helped make the district a more appealing environment for high-grade instructors. "If you don't have great teachers, you'll never have a great school, no matter what you do. It doesn't matter how good the buildings you have are or what curriculum you have, it starts with teachers," Aslesen said. "We had some horrible policies. We had two sets of policies on several things." Aslesen was pleased with other aspects of the last three years. The addition of an attendance liaison and literacy coaches to the staff have helped take steps toward addressing attendance issues and improving student reading skills. He stood firm when he felt the board hastily approved a new fingerprinting policy for visitors to the school, and lobbied to have it modified to be more welcoming to parents who want to take part in classroom activities, or to volunteers with organizations like Junior Achievement, who share real-world life and job experiences with students. The addition of all-day begindergarten and the approval of new cell phone policies for the high school and middle school were also positive developments in his time on the board, he said. And he has enthusiastically embraced board planning session meetings, which are now held on occasion to give the board time to discuss short and long term goals without the pressure of the need for immediate vote on a subject. And, of course, the new high school building that is nearing completion and will welcome district staff and students at the start of the 2025-26 school year, is a major improvement to the district. Aslesen was a prime proponent of building the school and its accompanying athletic facilities at the same time instead of over a period of years after the COVID-19 pandemic spiked construction prices. He strongly believes that was the correct move, and credits the public with making that a reality after a bond vote to complete the work passed with an overwhelming majority. Aslesen said his experience and input from the public and his fellow board members guide him in his decision-making process. He listens, he asks questions and tries to take in the perspective of all district patrons. Working together is important to ensuring the best educational experience for the students, he said. "I have a lot of community input that I'm receiving and you got to listen. You don't always have to agree, but you got to listen," he said. "Sometimes, out of the blue, you get some of the best ideas given to you that you've ever heard, or somebody improves on something. All of us are smarter than any one of us, so I try to get feedback whenever I get the opportunity." As he eyes a second term, Aslesen said there is more work on the horizon. With the new high school nearing completion, the board can now look at other upgrades that may be needed. Air conditioning is needed at the gymnasiums at the middle school and L.B. Williams Elementary School, he said. The middle school gym also could use LED lighting. He also hopes to have more discussion on the fate of the old MHS. Some parts of it, such as locker rooms and parking for football games or track meets, could still be utilized to benefit the district, he said. Another option could be offering it to the city or county as potential office space, or repurposing it for daycare or apartments. When it comes to the students themselves, Aslesen would like to see even more kids taking part in activities, a proven method for keeping attendance figures high. To enhance that further, it might be worth exploring a four-day school week, he said. Under that setup, away activities could be scheduled primarily on Fridays and Saturdays, while home activities could still be held during the week. That's less time on the road during class time and more time in the classroom for students, Aslesen said. "It's something worth looking into. We always need to be evolving and we keep adding and adding activities, and kids keep missing more and more and more school time. And the research says that it's not good for the kids to miss what's in the classroom. Just like attendance, if the kids aren't there, they're not learning everything they're supposed to be learning as much as they could be," said Aslesen. "So I'd like to see if there are opportunities for us to restructure so that activity kids wouldn't miss as much." He is also interested in exploring the benefits of opportunities like the Careers class, a semester-long class that sees students hear from parents or other community leaders about professions around Mitchell. The class is still offered but not required, something Aslesen feels could be beneficial. There is work to do and discussions to be held, but he's looking forward to the challenges and whatever the future may hold. "I think that I would be a vote for making their schools for the children in this community the best they can possibly be. I'm constantly looking for how we can make it better. Because if you're not moving forward, you're going backwards," Aslesen said. The election for the Mitchell Board of Education will be held Tuesday, June 3. Absentee voting has begun and can be done at the Davison County Auditor's Office until 5 p.m. June 2, and voters will be able to vote in person June 3 from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. at the Davison County Fairgrounds.

Winner City Council member calls for resignation of town's mayor
Winner City Council member calls for resignation of town's mayor

Yahoo

time09-04-2025

  • Yahoo

Winner City Council member calls for resignation of town's mayor

Apr. 8—WINNER, S.D. — A member of the Winner City Council on Monday night called for the resignation of the city mayor, citing inappropriate sexual and racial comments allegedly made by the city official. The comments came during the public commentary portion of the April 7 meeting of the Winner City Council. "I'm standing here tonight to ask you, Mr. Mayor, to resign effective immediately," Jeremy Clay, a member of the city council who has been serving since 2018, said at the meeting. "During your time in the official capacity of the mayor of Winner, you've made several sexual and racist statements while conducting official city business." Clay spoke for several minutes near the beginning of the meeting outlining the alleged offenses of Brad Schramm, who serves as mayor of the community. Those accusations included sexual comments made toward city employees and officials, as well as racial comments made to others. Clay said Schramm had made sexually inappropriate comments to Felicia Hughes, another member of the Winner City Council, as well as to Harly Koenig, who serves as the finance officer for the city. He told the Mitchell Republic on Tuesday afternoon that both comments were made while conducting city business and that he personally witnessed both incidents. He also made reference to a pair of racial comments, including use of the N-word, that he had been told about by another city official and through other "city channels." He said he was not present for either of the two racial incidents he cited at the Monday night meeting but believed them to be true. Clay stated his wish for Schramm to resign his position several times during his presentation, and closed by iterating that point again. "Mr. Schramm, you are an embarrassment to the city of Winner and a legal liability. I request you, sir, to resign effective immediately," Clay said. Public commentary at public meetings is generally used to allow the public to speak on matters of city interest that may not otherwise be included on the official agenda. Clay told the Republic that his comments came as a member of the public as opposed to speaking as a member of the Winner City Council. After Clay had finished his commentary at the meeting, Schramm offered a brief response. "Thank you for that, Mr. Clay. And if you want to take things out of context, that's your responsibility," Schramm said. "If you're going to disparage me, Mr. Clay, you better have your facts right." Clay said that he attended a committee meeting Tuesday morning at which Schramm was present and said that the interaction between the two at that time was "civil," but the mayor gave no indication of any intention to resign. The Mitchell Republic reached out to Schramm by phone for comment but had not heard back by the time this article was published. Clay told the Republic Tuesday that he stands by the comments he made Monday night. "They're true. I would not have taken to the podium and spread false information. It was time the public heard these things," Clay said. "The entire council is aware of it. And these are just the ones I've heard, there have been many more that I've been told about." Clay said the city council has no legal recourse to remove Schramm from office, and claimed that if it had such an option, it would have been used by now. He said that the mayor can be recalled by public petition, but said that he would not initiate that process himself. The main goal was to get the information out in the open at a public meeting, which he did Monday night. "I'm not going to (initiate a recall petition). I feel like I had a responsibility to the people of the city of Winner to bring it forward and make them aware," Clay said. "I would say it would be up to the public. I feel I did my part, I made the public aware of what's being said."

Rep. Dusty Johnson looks ahead to more Farm Bill work
Rep. Dusty Johnson looks ahead to more Farm Bill work

Yahoo

time05-02-2025

  • Yahoo

Rep. Dusty Johnson looks ahead to more Farm Bill work

Feb. 4—MITCHELL — Rep. Dusty Johnson and other members of Congress worked hard to get a new Farm Bill done before the start of 2025. But it didn't happen. As lawmakers scrambled for compromises to come up with a spending deal and avoid a government shutdown, for the second straight year, a one-year extension to the 2018 Farm Bill was agreed upon. That ensured programs like crop insurance, conservation programs and SNAP benefits would continue as they are intended to. Johnson said he was disappointed in the delay, but was optimistic a solution would be found later this year. "We don't have a farm bill yet. It's not complete," Johnson told the Mitchell Republic in a recent interview. "We did get a disaster package out that allows people who have been suffering from some pretty difficult situations to get some assistance. But we still do need to get a Farm Bill done this year, and I think we will." Johnson said it was disappointing that Congress was unable to get an updated Farm Bill done. An extension of the previous Farm Bill keeps critical programs running, but every extension without a fully-updated bill means operating under policy that is more and more outdated every year. Johnson cited leadership in the Senate as one sticking point in the process. That leadership has now undergone change with the ascent of John Boozman, a Republican from Arkansas, to the position of chair on the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Commission. He replaces former chair Debbie Stabenow, a Democrat from Michigan. He felt the change would be beneficial to the process of moving the Farm Bill forward, as cooperation between the two houses of Congress is crucial to progress. "We absolutely need to have the Senate pick up the pace, and I think they will. There's a new chairman, and he seems far more driven to get this done than what we saw from his predecessor, who retired," Johnson said. The failure to get a bill passed stems partly from a stalemate between Democrats and Republicans over how to pay for it and whether to place limits on nutrition and climate programs, among other nuances. A bill this important is going to come with some compromises on both sides, and delaying it only hurts the American farmer and the economies that revolve around it and the farm. "This is something that's only going to get done with both parties working together and both the House and Senate working together. Does it get a little frustrating? It does get frustrating, in part because I don't really understand the value of the delay," Johnson said. "Normally, in D.C., I understand why somebody is slow-walking something. They have something to gain by the delay. For the life of me, I just don't understand who in the world benefits from having a Farm Bill languish as it has been." The 2018 Farm Bill extension runs through Sept. 30, 2025. That means the clock is again ticking, putting pressure on lawmakers to put differences aside and come up with a solution that they can agree on enough to make it law for the next five years. From here, the national lawmaking apparatus will have to adjust to the new Trump administration, which will likely have some input into the Farm Bill. But Johnson said the bulk of the work will have to be done in the House and Senate and across party lines if is to be successful. "We're just waiting on the Senate now to get rolling again with the administrative transition. The administration will be a little bit involved in the Farm Bill, but really this is something that the House and Senate have to do their work," Johnson said. "In the House, we've got a really good Farm Bill. We'll dust it off for this year, we'll clean it up a little bit, and I imagine we will be able to vote it out of committee again on a strongly bipartisan basis. If the Senate can do the same, then I think we'll be in a good position to succeed." Key points expected in the 2025 Farm Bill include increased funding for climate-smart conservation practices, potential adjustments to SNAP benefits, enhanced support for specialty crops, improved crop insurance programs, focus on rural development initiatives and likely provisions for expanding access to healthy food in underserved communities. Not all legislation and policy that affects the agriculture industry is included in the Farm Bill. Johnson said there are areas of policy to consider that could positively impact the American farmer. Reducing input costs can help create a beneficial balance that could help offset some weaker commodity prices. "We're in a pretty lousy price environment for commodities. Cattle are good, but corn and beans are really soft. With input costs as high as they are, that really squeezes our producers. I do think when we get federal government spending under control that it's going to trickle throughout the supply chain to help hold the line on some of these input costs," Johnson said. "As we get more American energy to the market, that's going to reduce energy costs for producers. If we can help on the input side, that's going to make it a little bit easier for producers to get a margin." Johnson also feels the Trump administration's approach to Waters of the United States rules, which defines waters that are subject to federal jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act, is superior to that of his predecessor. Subjects covered under the rules include navigable waters, impoundments, tributaries, wetlands, intrastate lakes and ponds and streams. The rules can impact farmers by determining which bodies of water on their land fall under federal regulation, potentially affecting their ability to perform basic farming activities like drainage or land modification without needing permits. That can lead to increased costs, delays and uncertainty regarding land management practices on their property. The Trump administration should be more friendly to farmers when it comes to control over their fields, Johnson said. "With the previous administration on Waters of the United States, you had them, in essence, asserting jurisdiction over a wet spot in somebody's field. The Donald Trump approach to waters of the United States is, listen, it's got to be a large navigable body before that's the federal government's business," Johnson said. "That's not to say that there aren't important state and local regulations that can have an impact, but if something's going to be the business of the United States government, it should have a national impact."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store