Public feedback still required for key projects, says DBKL
PETALING JAYA : New planning regulations for Kuala Lumpur will continue to require stakeholder consultation, Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) said today.
DBKL said although formal objections to the Kuala Lumpur Local Plan 2040 (PTKL 2040) no longer apply following its gazettement on June 11, it remains committed to best planning practices through the implementation of Rule 3 of the Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur Planning Rules 2025, which mandates stakeholder consultations.
It explained that such consultation is required for specific types of proposed developments, such as high-density projects or temporary developments, which require public feedback before approval is granted.
'Additionally, every approved development project in Kuala Lumpur is required to implement a communication strategy covering the pre-construction, construction, and post-construction phases,' it said in a statement.
'This ensures that developers engage with nearby residents to clearly explain the planned development and the benefits it will bring to the local community.'
DBKL said these measures reflect its ongoing commitment to public engagement, transparency, and inclusive decision-making in urban planning.
It was responding to criticism by Seputeh MP Teresa Kok over the 'secret' gazettement of the Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur Planning Rules 2025, which took place on June 13 and became effective three days later.
Kok said the rules, which replace decades-old planning laws, weaken transparency and limit public objections to development projects.
In its statement, DBKL said it remains dedicated to ensuring that the city is developed in an organised, inclusive, and liveable manner, with public input serving as a key foundation of its planning process.
It also stressed that PTKL 2040's preparation was carried out transparently and in full compliance with legal provisions, with all stakeholders given the opportunity to provide input.
It said it implemented a variety of publicity and public engagement methods to ensure broad community participation in line with Sections 14 and 15 of the Federal Territory (Planning) Act 1982.
The public participation period began on Jan 31, 2024, was extended twice, and ended on April 15, 2024, it said.
During this time, DBKL said it hosted permanent and mobile exhibitions across Kuala Lumpur and conducted 13 public briefing sessions, including ones involving Kuala Lumpur MPs.
It also said it went beyond the legal requirements by conducting more engagement sessions than required under the Federal Territory (Planning) Act.
Fifty-one engagement sessions involving more than 1,500 individuals and groups were organised. The participants included academics, MPs, professionals, residents' associations, government bodies, and local authorities.
These engagement efforts spanned several years and formats, and included early pre-consultation sessions in 2019, informal meetings with MPs in 2020, and technical meetings with 32 government bodies.
DBKL also said it gathered feedback through online surveys from 300 residents' associations, hosted focus group discussions with 521 participants, held consultation sessions with MPs in 2023, and organised an open day for the draft amendment in May.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
27 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Selangor's smart parking plan: How it stacks up against global models
PETALING JAYA, Aug 14 — Selangor's upcoming Selangor Intelligent Parking (SIP) system will centralise on-street parking management in four local councils — Petaling Jaya (MBPJ), Subang Jaya (MBSJ), Shah Alam (MBSA) and Selayang (MPS) — under a single integrated model. Under the arrangement, local councils will set parking policies and rates, while Menteri Besar Incorporated (MBI) subsidiary Rantaian Mesra Sdn Bhd will coordinate the system. A private concessionaire will operate the system, including fee collection, while enforcement will remain under council authority with operational support from the concessionaire. State Local Government and Tourism Committee chairman Datuk Ng Suee Lim said the move will 'streamline and centralise' parking services, improve efficiency and boost collection rates from about 30 per cent to 60 per cent. The concessionaire is expected to invest around RM200 million in infrastructure, including about 1,800 CCTV cameras across the participating councils. Parking rates — currently between RM0.40 and RM0.60 per hour — will remain unchanged for now. Revenue will be shared between the concessionaire (50 per cent), the local councils (40 per cent) and MBI (10 per cent). However, some councillors and residents have voiced concerns over the revenue split and the expanded role of a private operator, warning of reduced oversight and possible long-term impacts on council income. While the SIP framework is still being finalised, similar smart parking models have been implemented worldwide. Here's how other countries manage such systems — and who controls the profits and data. Taiwan In Taipei, Tainan and Kaohsiung, parking meters are connected to the city's IoT network, feeding real-time availability and usage data to mobile apps. Drivers are charged by the minute rather than fixed time blocks, encouraging vehicle turnover in busy areas. Data is owned and regulated by local governments, with all revenue going into municipal budgets. Enforcement is carried out by city officers, not private firms, ensuring transparency in fines and collections. Estonia Known for its advanced e-governance, Estonia integrates parking into its X-Road national data exchange platform, enabling seamless communication between municipal authorities, police and transport agencies. While private vendors may supply meters and apps, policy, enforcement and income remain under local authority control. Parking fees are dynamically adjusted based on demand, with real-time price displays. South Korea In Seoul, Incheon and Bucheon, smart parking systems are linked to citywide traffic management platforms. Mobile apps locate and reserve spaces and connect unused private parking — such as in office buildings — to the public network. Technology providers are often private, but oversight, fee setting and revenue collection remain public functions. Some cities use blockchain to track payments and curb fraud. Singapore Singapore's app, developed by the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) and Housing & Development Board (HDB), is a model of user-friendly public sector innovation. Drivers pay by the minute, extend sessions remotely and receive expiry reminders. While tech contractors assist in development, the government controls enforcement and retains all revenue. United Kingdom In cities such as London and Birmingham, councils hire private firms like NSL or APCOA to provide wardens, process payments and maintain equipment. These companies are paid service fees rather than a share of collections. Penalty notices are issued under council authority, and parking income flows back to public budgets. Australia Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane use smart meters and app-based payments, often from international vendors like Parkeon or Duncan Solutions. Councils retain full control of pricing, rules and enforcement, using vendor systems solely as operational tools rather than revenue-sharing arrangements. United States Chicago's 2008 decision to lease parking meters to a private consortium for 75 years is widely regarded as a cautionary tale. The city received an upfront payment but lost control over pricing and billions in future revenue. Rates rose sharply, and the contract has proven difficult to renegotiate — a scenario many cities now avoid. How Selangor's SIP compares Unlike most models where public agencies retain control over both revenue and enforcement, Selangor's SIP proposes a significant private role in fee collection and operational support for enforcement. While centralisation could make parking more convenient for motorists and improve compliance, critics warn it may weaken local council oversight and divert funds from public services. Experiences in Taiwan, Estonia and Singapore show that efficiency and transparency can be achieved without relinquishing control of data, enforcement and revenue to private operators. As Selangor finalises its agreement, the decision will be whether SIP becomes a publicly accountable upgrade — or mirrors global cases where privatisation brought long-term trade-offs.
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Malaysian businesses urged to tap Cambodian market
UALA LUMPUR: The Malaysia-Cambodia Business Association (MCBA) has called on Malaysian businesses to seize emerging opportunities in Cambodia following supply chain disruptions caused by the Cambodian-Thai border conflict. The MCBA said even though a ceasefire is in place, the transportation of certain Thai products has been disrupted, with supply chains in Cambodia slowing significantly or coming to a halt. "This has created new market opportunities for Malaysian businesses. Cambodia is currently experiencing a shortage of certain consumer goods, food products and industrial raw materials, and Malaysia holds clear advantages in terms of quality, pricing and supply stability," it said in a statement yesterday. The association said in situations like this, some Thai investors may choose to withdraw from the Cambodian market, presenting an entry opportunity for Malaysian enterprises. MCBA president Datuk Seri Ricky Yaw said Cambodia's market fundamentals remain strong with promising growth potential. "Malaysian enterprises, with their flexible supply chains, broad industry coverage and quick response capabilities, are well positioned to seize this window of opportunity and gain a competitive edge in the regional market."
Free Malaysia Today
7 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Give cost breakdown of S'wak's ‘White House' project, state govt told
DAP's Violet Yong says Sarawak premier Abang Johari Openg should disclose details such as construction, furnishing, and landscaping costs, and consultancy or design fees for the Kompleks Satria Pertiwi project. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA : Opposition leaders in Sarawak have called on the state government to reveal the total cost of the Kompleks Satria Pertiwi project, as well as a details of how much each item costs, in the name of transparency. They said the details should include the costs of specific items, such as construction, furnishing, landscaping and consultancy or design fees. The Satria Pertiwi, the state government's new administrative complex, also dubbed the 'White House of Sarawak', was declared open by Yang Di Pertua Negeri Wan Junaidi Tuanku Jaafar in conjunction with state permier Abang Johari Openg's birthday on Aug 4. Chong Chieng Jen. DAP's Padungan assemblyman and Stampin MP Chong Chieng Jen told FMT the state government should be transparent in its use of public funds. 'The state owes the public a duty to make known how much the building costs. When the government uses public funds, there should be a breakdown of the costs,' he said. Chong noted that the state government currently lumps funding for projects under 'development expenditure', without a breakdown of costs for specific items. His party colleague Violet Yong, who is Pending assemblyman, pointed out that if the state government has nothing to hide, 'there should be no hesitation in making this information public'. Violet Yong. 'Public funds must be spent prudently and in a way that directly benefits the people, not merely to satisfy political vanity,' she told FMT. The administrative complex, located in Petra Jaya, has a resemblance of the residence and workplace of the US president in Washington DC, earning it the moniker 'White House of Sarawak'. Huge imbalance On another note, Yong said there is now a huge gap between spending on lavish projects compared with funding to meet urgent needs of rural communities. 'Time and again, we have seen the GPS government pour huge sums of money into high-profile 'showpiece' projects while ordinary Sarawakians wait for years, if not decades, for basic infrastructure and essential services,' she said. 'This is the hallmark of a government obsessed with grand image-building at the expense of bread-and-butter issues,' she added. Yong also criticised Abang Johari for his defence of the project in February when he said the previous government office Wisma Bapa Malaysia was open to the public, thus posing a significant security risk. 'If that is the justification, I must ask: how insecure was it that security could not simply be tightened there? 'More importantly, if it was indeed so insecure, what about all the other government departments still operating there? Are they not also exposed to the same so-called security risks?' she asked.
