World's top court to deliver landmark climate ruling
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has been tasked with crafting a so-called advisory opinion on countries' obligations to prevent climate change and the consequences for polluters whose emissions have harmed the planet.
Experts say this is the most significant in a string of recent rulings on climate change in international law, with major potential repercussions for states and firms around the world.
Climate-vulnerable countries and campaign groups hope it will have far-reaching legal consequences in the fight against climate change, unifying existing law, shaping national and international legislation, and impacting current court cases.
"It will be the compass the world needs to course correct," said Vishal Prasad, director of the Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change.
"It will give new strength to climate litigation, inspire more ambitious national policies and guide states toward decisions that uphold their legal duties to protect both people and planet," said Prasad.
But some critics argue the ruling will be toothless, as ICJ advisory opinions are not binding and major polluters can choose simply to ignore it.
"ACTS AND OMISSIONS"
The UN, pushed by tiny island state Vanuatu, asked the court to answer two questions.
First, what obligations do states have under international law to protect the Earth's climate from polluting greenhouse gas emissions?
Second, what are the legal consequences for states which "by their acts and omissions have caused significant harm to the climate system and other parts of the environment?"
The second question was explicitly linked to the damage that climate change is causing to small, more vulnerable, countries and their populations.
This applies to countries facing increasingly damaging weather disasters and especially to island nations under threat from rising sea levels like those in the Pacific Ocean.
"DAVID VS GOLIATH"
In what was termed a "David versus Goliath" battle, advanced economies and developing nations clashed at the ICJ during December hearings on the case.
The iconic Peace Palace in the Hague, the seat of the ICJ, played host to more than 100 oral submissions -- the largest number ever, many from tiny states making their first appearance.
"This may well be the most consequential case in the history of humanity," said Vanuatu's representative Ralph Regenvanu, opening the two weeks of hearings.
"The outcome of these proceedings will reverberate across generations, determining the fate of nations like mine and the future of our planet," he told the 15-judge panel.
Major polluters argued the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) was sufficient and new guidelines on countries' obligations were not necessary.
US representative Margaret Taylor said this framework was "the most current expression of states' consent to be bound by international law in respect of climate change".
Taylor urged the court "to ensure its opinion preserves and promotes the centrality of this regime".
Meanwhile, the speaker from India was even more explicit.
"The court should avoid the creation of any new or additional obligations beyond those already existing under the climate change regime," said Luther Rangreji.
The United States under President Donald Trump has since pulled funding for the UNFCCC and withdrawn from its landmark pact, the Paris climate agreement.
"WATERY GRACES"
But smaller states said this framework was inadequate to mitigate climate change's devastating effects.
"As seas rise faster than predicted, these states must stop.
"This court must not permit them to condemn our lands and our people to watery graves," said John Silk from the Marshall Islands.
After bitterly fought UN climate talks in Azerbaijan in November, wealthy countries agreed to provide at least $300 billion a year by 2035 to help developing nations transition to clean energy and prepare for an increase in extreme weather.
The vulnerable nations argued this is simply not enough and urged the ICJ to push for more.
"This is a crisis of survival. It is also a crisis of equity," said Fiji's representative Luke Daunivalu.
"Our people ... are unfairly and unjustly footing the bill for a crisis they did not create.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
3 hours ago
- CNA
Iran, European powers hold first direct nuclear talks since airstrikes as UN deadline nears
ISTANBUL: Iran and European powers held 'serious, frank, and detailed' talks on Friday (Jul 25) over Tehran's nuclear programme, as both sides seek to avoid a lapse of UN sanctions that could be automatically reimposed in October. The meeting in Istanbul marked the first direct contact between Iranian officials and Western diplomats since last month's Israeli and US airstrikes on Iran. It lasted about four hours at Iran's consulate and was attended by representatives from the European Union and the E3 group: France, Britain, and Germany. IRAN AND EUROPE EXCHANGE PROPOSALS Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi said both sides presented specific ideas relating to nuclear inspections and sanctions relief. 'While seriously criticising their stances regarding the recent war of aggression against our people, we explained our principled positions, including on the so-called snapback mechanism,' he said. 'It was agreed that consultations on this matter will continue.' The E3 nations, along with China and Russia, remain parties to the 2015 nuclear deal from which the United States withdrew in 2018. That agreement had lifted international sanctions on Iran in exchange for curbs on its nuclear activities. SANCTIONS DEADLINE LOOMING The talks focused on the expiry of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231, which underpins the 2015 nuclear deal and is due to lapse on Oct 18. If no action is taken by then, all UN sanctions on Iran will be lifted. However, the E3 could trigger the 'snapback' mechanism at least 30 days before that date, reimposing sanctions on sectors including energy, banking, and defence. To allow time for this process, European diplomats have set the end of August as a soft deadline to determine whether diplomacy with Iran can be revived. Officials say Tehran would need to make clear commitments, including eventual talks with Washington, renewed cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, and accounting for roughly 400 kg of near-weapons-grade uranium reportedly unaccounted for since last month's strikes. IRAN RESISTS PRESSURE TO EXTEND UN RESOLUTION Tehran has resisted the idea of extending Resolution 2231. A foreign ministry spokesperson called such suggestions 'meaningless and baseless' prior to the Istanbul meeting. Nevertheless, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Rafael Grossi expressed cautious optimism. Speaking in Singapore, he said inspection visits could resume this year if technical arrangements are made. 'We need to agree on where to go, how to do it. We need to listen to Iran in terms of what they consider should be the precautions to be taken,' Grossi said. US STRIKES AND NUCLEAR FACILITIES The United States carried out five rounds of talks with Iran prior to June's military action, which President Donald Trump said had 'obliterated' Iran's alleged nuclear weapons ambitions. While Tehran maintains its programme is strictly civilian, NBC News has reported that a US intelligence review concluded that only one of the three targeted sites was heavily damaged, while the other two suffered less extensive harm. Iran has consistently denied it seeks to build a nuclear weapon.
CNA
a day ago
- CNA
EU says China's links with Russia now 'determining factor' in ties
BEIJING: EU chief Ursula von der Leyen warned on Thursday (Jul 24) that China's ties with Russia were now the "determining" factor in its relations with the European Union, as she wrapped up a tense summit in Beijing that also saw China agree to speed up exports of rare earth minerals to the bloc. China's leadership has sought to draw the European Union closer as it positions itself as a more reliable partner than the United States and a bedrock of stability in a troubled world. But while nominally intended to celebrate 50 years of diplomatic ties, the EU has made clear there are deep divisions over trade, fears that cheap, subsidised Chinese goods could overwhelm European markets and Beijing's tacit support for Russia's war against Ukraine. Brussels says China's deepening political and economic relations with Moscow since the 2022 invasion have helped Russia's economy weather sweeping Western sanctions. Beijing denies that claim. Wrapping up that summit, von der Leyen told a news conference in Beijing that the bloc had made clear that the issue was now the "determining" factor in its relations with China. She and European Council President Antonio Costa expressed "our expectations that China would follow up on our concerns and the expectation that it would use its influence to bring Russia to accept a ceasefire, to come to the negotiation table, enter peace talks and put an end to the bloodshed", von der Leyen said. She also said the bloc agreed with Beijing to an "upgraded" mechanism for Chinese exports of rare earth minerals - another key sticking point in ties. China dominates the global industry for extracting and refining rare earths. Since April, it has required licences to export some of the strategic materials, triggering anxiety among businesses worldwide. "If there is a delay ... we have now established a mechanism where the companies can immediately ask us to mediate and to find out why there's a delay on the delivery of the critical raw materials," von der Leyen said. And Costa said the officials had raised human rights concerns with Chinese counterparts. "DEEPEN COOPERATION" China, in contrast, framed Thursday's summit as a way for the bloc and Beijing to deepen trust in a turbulent world. Welcoming von der Leyen and Costa at Beijing's ornate Great Hall of the People, President Xi Jinping said "the more severe and complex the international situation is, the more important it is for China and the EU to strengthen communication, increase mutual trust and deepen cooperation". "The challenges facing Europe at present do not come from China," he said, calling on both sides to "make correct strategic choices". Costa also stressed to the Chinese leader that the EU wanted to see "concrete progress on issues related to trade and the economy, and we both want our relationship to be ... mutually beneficial". Chinese Premier Li Qiang told the EU leaders in a separate meeting that "close cooperation" was a "natural choice" for the two major economies. "As long as both China and the EU earnestly uphold free trade, the international economy and trade will stay dynamic," he said. CLIMATE AGREEMENT In rare agreement, China and the EU vowed to "step up" efforts to address climate change. The warming planet is historically an area of convergence between Brussels and Beijing, with both willing to cooperate on combating climate change. Chinese and European leaders agreed on enhancing bilateral cooperation in energy transition and committed to accelerating global renewable energy deployment, a joint statement said. The EU also flagged its yawning trade deficit with China that stood at around US$360 billion last year and which von der Leyen described as "unsustainable". Beijing dismissed those concerns, insisting that Brussels must "rebalance its mentality", not its economic ties with China. If EU concerns were not addressed, "our industry and citizens will demand that we defend our interests", von der Leyen told Premier Li. The EU has imposed hefty tariffs on electric vehicles imported from China, arguing that Beijing's subsidies unfairly undercut European competitors.
CNA
a day ago
- CNA
EU approves counter-tariffs on US goods, says trade deal within reach
BRUSSELS: The European Commission said on Thursday (Jul 24) a negotiated trade solution with the United States is within reach - while EU members voted to approve counter-tariffs on €93 billion (US$109 billion) of US goods in case the talks collapse. The 27-nation bloc's executive has repeatedly said its primary focus is on reaching a deal to avert 30 per cent US tariffs that US President Donald Trump has said he will apply on Aug 1. "Our focus is on finding a negotiated outcome with the US ... We believe such an outcome is within reach," an EU spokesperson said in response to reporters' questions. Alongside negotiations, the Commission has pressed on with plans for potential countermeasures, merging two packages of proposed tariffs of €21 billion and €72 billion into a single list and submitting this to EU members for approval. The rate would be up to 30 per cent, designed to mirror US tariffs, EU sources said. Diplomats said EU countries overwhelmingly approved the measures on Thursday, which the Commission later confirmed. The first package of countermeasures would enter force on Aug 7, with tariffs on soybeans and almonds delayed until Dec 1, an EU official said. The second package would enter force in two stages on Sep 7 and Feb 7. So far the EU has held back from imposing any countermeasures, despite Trump's tariffs already covering 70 per cent of EU exports. EU member states authorised the first package of countermeasures in April, but these were immediately suspended to allow time for negotiations. CLOSING ON DEAL The EU and United States now appear to be heading towards a possible trade deal, according to EU diplomats, which would result in a broad 15 per cent tariff on EU goods imported into the US, mirroring a framework agreement Washington struck with Japan. Trump would still need to take any final decision. The White House said discussions of a deal should be considered "speculation". Trump trade adviser Peter Navarro told Bloomberg News the report from the EU should be taken with "a grain of salt". French Finance Minister Eric Lombard and Italian Industry Minister Adolfo Urso told a joint press conference in Paris they were not aware of a draft agreement, Urso adding he would only pass judgment when one was reached. There was little information available about what the EU would offer the United States to secure a deal. One EU diplomat said the bloc was not looking at a pledge of investment in the United States, as Japan has agreed. Another said the EU might reduce some of its own duties. Its current import duty for cars is 10 per cent. Under the outlines of the potential deal, the 15 per cent rate could apply to sectors including cars and pharmaceuticals and would not be added to long-standing US duties, which average just under 5 per cent. There could also be exemptions for sectors such as aircraft, lumber as well as some medicines and agricultural products, which would not face tariffs, diplomats said.
