logo

Against another big PC win, NDP keeps hold of London's orange core

CBC28-02-2025

NDP incumbents earn decisive wins in city's 3 downtown ridings
On a night when Doug Ford cruised to a third straight majority in Thursday's Ontario election, the NDP managed to hold off PC challengers and retain their orange core in London's three central ridings.
While the PCs are poised to return to Queen's Park with 80 of the legislature's 124 seats, incumbent NDP candidates pulled off wins in London's three central ridings, delivering second-place finishes for the PC challengers:
Terence Kernaghan won in London North Centre over city councillor Jerry Pribil.
Peggy Sattler won in London West, finishing ahead of educator Beth Allison.
Teresa Armstrong held on to London-Fanshawe, beating landscape business owner Peter Vanderley.
Liberal candidates running in London's three core ridings finished third, another poor showing from a party that once drew strong support from the Forest City.
In the rural ridings outside of London, the PCs dominated. Former agriculture minister Rob Flack won in Elgin-Middlesex-London by 16,000 votes over Liberal Doug Mactavish.
WATCH | Rob Flack tells his supporters he's ready to work for Ontario:
Media Video | Rob Flack tells supporters he's ready to work for Ontario
Caption: The former PC agriculture minister will be back working at Queens Park after receiving decisive support in Elgin-Middlesex-London. He addresses voters on election night at the campaign party in St. Thomas.
Open Full Embed in New Tab Loading external pages may require significantly more data usage.
In Lambton-Kent-Middlesex, Steve Pinsonneault cruised to a win over Liberal challenger and Lucan Mayor Cathy Burghardt-Jesson in a rematch of a byelection held last spring.
Ridings north of London also delivered easy PC wins. Incumbent Lisa Thompson won in Huron-Bruce and first-time candidate Paul Vickers won in Grey-Bruce-Owen Sound.
Election timing a challenge
After thanking supporters gathered in a downtown pub to celebrate his win, Kernaghan chided Ford for setting off what Kernaghan described as an unnecessary election. Ford triggered the rare mid-winter vote more than a year before necessary, saying he wanted a stronger mandate to take on Trump's tariff threats.
"This election was called in the middle of winter, and I think that's something everyone had a struggle with," said Kernaghan. "It was harder to get to people's doors, it was harder to get the message out."
In the final week of the campaign, polls suggested the seat, which Kernaghan has held since 2018, could fall to Pribil.
Instead, Kernaghan was able to win by a wider margin this time: more than 6,800 votes compared to just over 4,000 votes in 2022.
WATCH | Terence Kernaghan's election victory speech:
Sattler said she'll focus on affordability issues when the legislature resumes sitting.
"One of the top priorities is the rising cost of living," she said. "Lots and lots of people are struggling. I heard more about that in this election than I've heard in any of the four elections previously."
As for fending off the PC threat in the closing weeks of the campaign, Sattler said the NDP's ground game in London made the difference despite the challenges of door-knocking in frigid weather.
Armstrong, whose portfolio within Ontario's NDP includes her role as critic for childcare and pensions, said she'll be back to work as soon as tomorrow.
"I am so happy that Peggy and Terence are still going to be representing London. Previously I was dreading working with anybody but them, so I am just so excited they're back in, and they're wonderful representatives for their areas. All of us together are a really strong team for London."
And while the NDP candidates criticized Ford for the timing of the election, Flack echoed Ford's justification that the U.S. tariff threats made it necessary.
"We continue to protect Ontario and defend Ontario to make sure our best interests are met when we sit at the table. I know people questioned it but ultimately, that's what it was about."
Voter turnout rebounds
Heading into Thursday's vote, there were concerns that Ontario might again be heading for a dismal voter turnout, given the unusual timing of the election. Voter turnout hit a historic low of 43 per cent in 2022 and only six per cent of voters cast ballots in early voting.
However, early returns from Thursday's results suggest voter turnout in the core London ridings rebounded this time.
Voter turnout in London West was 50 per cent, while London North Centre's was 47.5 per cent and 41 per cent in London Fanshawe. All three totals are improvements over 2022.
"People were thinking that the snow would be voter suppression, but obviously, this was not a factor in London North Centre," said Kernaghan.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Conservatives vote with Carney government to rush Bill C-5
Conservatives vote with Carney government to rush Bill C-5

National Observer

timean hour ago

  • National Observer

Conservatives vote with Carney government to rush Bill C-5

The federal Conservatives voted with the Liberals on a special order to push a massive piece of legislation on major project approvals through the House of Commons before the week's end. Three hundred and five Conservative and Liberal MPs voted in favour of the government's time allocation motion, while 30 Bloc Québécois, Green and NDP MPs voted against it. The federal government is determined to get Bill C-5 — dubbed the One Canadian Economy Act — through the House of Commons before MPs leave Ottawa for the summer recess. With the Conservatives' support, it looks like the federal government will succeed. Now, the federal Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities will have two meetings this week to study bill C-5 before it is set to report back to the House on Friday. Conservatives and Liberals voted against a Bloc Québécois amendment that would have given the committee two full days to study the legislation. The Bloc Québécois, NDP and Green Party say the Liberals' time allocation motion is undemocratic and doesn't give MPs enough time to study and fully understand the legislation. The section on major project approvals alone would give the federal government authorization to override 13 existing laws and seven regulations for projects deemed 'in the national interest.' Many of these laws and regulations are environmental. The proposed legislation would allow the federal government to conditionally approve projects it deems 'in the national interest' before an environmental or impact assessment or other regulatory processes take place. Review processes will still take place but focus on 'how' a project should be built instead of 'whether' it can be built. Liberal MPs, cabinet ministers and House Leader Steven MacKinnon justified the controversial time allocation motion by saying the government was elected on a mandate to move quickly on projects of national interest and remove federal trade barriers. Liberal MPs, cabinet ministers and House Leader Steven MacKinnon justified the controversial time allocation motio n by saying the government was elected on a mandate to move quickly on projects of national interest and remove federal trade barriers. To assuage concerns, Liberal MPs and cabinet ministers have repeatedly referred to a set of 'criteria' used to determine whether a project is deemed 'in the national interest.' Some factors the government may consider include whether a project advances the interests of Indigenous Peoples and contributes to 'clean growth.' The latter criterion was received with skepticism because Prime Minister Mark Carney touted an oilsands lobby group's proposed carbon capture megaproject as an example of one possible project in the national interest. The problem: the legislation does not require projects to meet all or any of these factors; they are merely a suggestion. Similarly, Carney said his government won't impose a project on a province. However, this is not spelled out in the proposed legislation — Carney's word is the only assurance that provinces won't have a pipeline or other project forced through their jurisdiction. This verbal commitment is not enough to protect provincial sovereignty, Bloc Québécois MPs argue. All day Monday, Bloc Québécois MPs took shots at the Conservatives for voting with the federal government, questioning whether the official opposition is still willing to stand up for democracy. To this, Conservative MP Chris Lewis pointed out that the NDP and Bloc Québécois have both voted with the Liberals previously. If all goes according to the federal government's plan, Bill C-5 will pass third reading on Friday and be sent to the Senate where it goes through a similar process of study and possible amendments. The Senate got a headstart studying the bill on Monday. In the afternoon, senators heard testimony from Transport and Internal Trade Minister Chrystia Freeland on the first portion of the bill which aims to eliminate federal barriers to interprovincial trade. The Senate sits for one week longer than the House of Commons; its last possible sitting day is June 27, compared to June 20 for MPs. Senator Paul Prosper said he plans on putting forward an amendment to slow C-5 down if and when it gets to the Senate in 'hopes that more rational minds prevail in terms of consulting with Indigenous groups.' 'Looking at all options' At a non-partisan news conference on Monday morning, Green Party MP Elizabeth May, Indigenous leaders, Senator Paul Prosper, NDP MP Gord Johns and two environmental lawyers urged the federal government to slow down and not rush the bill. 'This legislation is certainly something all Canadians should be concerned about,' said Abram Benedict, Regional Chief for the Chiefs of Ontario, referencing similar legislation in Ontario that is 'undermining democracy' and First Nations rights holders. Chiefs of Ontario is not opposed to development or projects, Benedict said. 'But First Nation rights holders must be involved from the beginning, not given three weeks' notice that legislation will be coming forward, and given two weeks' notice of what it looks like,' he said. Benedict said the Chiefs of Ontario will 'be looking at all options,' including protest and legal options to slow the federal government down in the courts to ensure rights-holders are heard. This includes a rally planned for Tuesday afternoon outside Parliament. The bill 'is an assault on science and democracy,' Anna Johnston, a staff lawyer at West Coast Environmental Law, said at the press conference. Johnston said the bill will shut the public out of decisions that affect them and allow cabinet to withhold 'virtually all' information about projects from the public, including the project details, scientific reviews and the advice of responsible ministers. Public comment periods would still take place, but after a project has already been listed and received conditional approval, according to the legislation. 'If a highway were designated for fast-tracking just blocks from your home, the minister wouldn't have to give you any information beyond the name and a brief description of it, and you would have no say in whether, where, or how the highway was built,' Johnston said. Ecojustice staff lawyer Joshua Ginsberg is concerned about the federal government giving itself powers to override existing laws to get projects built. Some of the 13 laws the federal government could override under the proposed legislation include: the Fisheries Act, Indian Act, Canada Marine Act, Species at Risk Act and the Impact Assessment Act. 'For example, today, the federal government cannot issue permits, by law, for activities that would jeopardize the survival and recovery of a threatened species, but under this bill, the government could be compelled to approve activities causing that kind of harm, even if science warns of catastrophic consequences,' Ginsberg said. The legislation also empowers ministers to override laws passed by Parliament. This 'extraordinary mechanism' concentrates decision-making authority in the executive and weakens democratic oversight, he said. This bill is worse than Stephen Harper's omnibus bill C-38 which famously 'destroyed 70 environmental laws,' May said. 'It appears to me, and it remains to be seen, that Mr. Carney's new majority coalition is Liberal-Conservative, delivering Pierre Poilievre policies with a more friendly face,' May said. The bill has a five-year sunset clause, meaning that if the bill becomes law, there will be a five year period during which projects can be listed for conditional approval. May pointed out that one Liberal MP, Patrick Weiler, wants a shorter sunset clause because of the sweeping powers it affords to government. 'Allowing cabinet to decide which projects proceed before reviewing them is like jumping off a cliff and then asking for the parachute,' Johnston said. The Bloc Québécois wants no part of projects based on 'energy of the past,' MP Simon-Pierre Savard-Tremblay said during debate on his party's motion on Monday evening. This is just economic and environmental common sense, he said, referencing scientific reports that a vast majority of fossil fuel reserves must remain in the ground if the world has any hope of limiting global warming in line with the Paris Agreement. Canada's oilsands produce 'some of the most heavily polluting oil in the world,' he said.

Saskatchewan premier pitches 'port-to-port corridor' to connect northern Pacific and Arctic coasts
Saskatchewan premier pitches 'port-to-port corridor' to connect northern Pacific and Arctic coasts

Vancouver Sun

time3 hours ago

  • Vancouver Sun

Saskatchewan premier pitches 'port-to-port corridor' to connect northern Pacific and Arctic coasts

CALGARY — Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe is pitching the idea of a 'port-to-port corridor' that would connect energy and other goods to Canada's northern Pacific and Arctic coasts. Moe made his remarks Monday alongside Alberta Premier Danielle Smith at an event focused on both provinces' ambitions to double oil and gas production. 'I know we are not going to be entirely reliant on the U.S for that marketplace,' Moe said. 'We are going to have access to the world.' Moe, who leads the right-of-centre Saskatchewan Party government, said he likes what he's been hearing out of the Liberal federal government about making Canada an 'energy superpower' and the strongest economy in the G7. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. He admits that means going against his political stripe to some degree. 'Far be it for me to be accused of being chair of the Liberal booster club the last decade or so, but there are some comments from this Prime Minister that I think we can truly get behind,' Moe told the event hosted by energy services industry advocacy group Enserva. Prime Minister Mark Carney's government has introduced legislation that would fast track certain infrastructure projects deemed in the 'national interest' as U.S. President Donald Trump upends what until recently has been a reliable cross-border trading relationship. Carney has heard pitches from the premiers about what projects they think should be chosen, but has not said which have made the cut. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith wants a bitumen pipeline to be the 'anchor tenant' of a corridor to the Port of Prince Rupert, B.C., enabling exports to Asia above and beyond what the operating Trans Mountain pipeline can ship from the Vancouver area. She has said that project should be built in tandem with another one she'd like to see considered in the national interest: the Pathways proposal to capture and sequester carbon emissions from Alberta's biggest oilsands producers. Smith and Moe also voiced support for a pipeline to the Port of Churchill, Man., which would enable exports to Europe via Hudson Bay. Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew has been keen on the idea, too. 'One thing the prime minister seems to want is a project and a proponent,' Smith said. 'So we are working to get a proponent or a consortium to put a project on the table, and then we're going to test out this two year timeline that he has.' Smith said Carney has asked conservative premiers to reach out to people they know in the federal Conservatives to help the Liberals' project approval bill pass in the minority Parliament. Despite being encouraged by the new tone in Ottawa, Smith and Moe said they both want the repeal of numerous federal environmental policies that they say have stymied resource investment. 'Policies do matter and we need a significant policy shift and we need it very quickly,' Moe said. The event coincided with the G7 summit in Kananaskis, Alta., where leaders from the United States, France, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom and Italy, as well as the European Union, are meeting. The confab of world leaders puts Alberta on the map at a time when the approach to energy security is being 'recalibrated,' Smith said. 'I know that, especially with the world turmoil, the energy security needs of our international partners has never been more important. And I think this really does drive a focus about how Alberta can be the solution.' Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .

Liberal fast-track of major projects bill ‘new low,' opposition MPs say
Liberal fast-track of major projects bill ‘new low,' opposition MPs say

Global News

time4 hours ago

  • Global News

Liberal fast-track of major projects bill ‘new low,' opposition MPs say

Green Party Leader Elizabeth May said Monday that Prime Minister Mark Carney's decision to ram his government's major projects bill through the House of Commons this week represents a 'new low' in contempt for Parliament. May told a press conference she hasn't seen anything like it since the Conservative government under Stephen Harper pushed a major omnibus bill through more than a decade ago. May said she was 'shocked' by Harper's decision to bring in and fast track C-38 in 2012, a bill that was 400 pages long and 'destroyed 70 environmental laws.' 'This is worse,' she added. 'It appears to me — and it remains to be seen — that Mr. Carney's new majority coalition is Liberal-Conservative, delivering (Conservative Leader) Pierre Poilievre's policies with a more friendly face.' Story continues below advertisement May spoke outside the House of Commons foyer Monday morning alongside First Nations leaders, NDP MP Gord Johns and lawyers from environmental groups — all of whom raised concerns about the legislation and the pace at which it's sprinting through the Commons. Grand Chief Linda Debassigé of the Anishinabek Nation said First Nations have 'not been consulted on this bill appropriately or adequately.' 'This bill presents serious concerns that, in our view, creates a path forward for any government to create legislation that undermines the rights and interests of our First Nations people,' she said. Soon after the press conference, the Liberals passed a closure motion with the support of the Conservatives to speed through study and debate of Bill C-5 by week's end. 4:58 Carney looking to pass legislation 'before summer' to remove trade barriers in Canada Government House leader Steven MacKinnon defended the government's haste Monday, arguing it has public buy-in since the bill delivers on major Liberal campaign promises from the recent election. Story continues below advertisement 'We just had the ultimate democratic test, and you know what we heard?' he said during debate in the House. 'Get this country moving. We need a response to the threats coming from down south.' The bill is now set for an unusually fast two-day study by the House transport committee Tuesday and Wednesday. The government expects to pass the bill through the Commons by end of Friday, which is also the last day the House is supposed to sit before the summer. Sen. Paul Prosper said he will try to slow down the part of the bill dealing with major projects in the Senate with an amendment. If the Senate amends the bill it would have to go back to the House of Commons for another approval. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The legislation would give the federal cabinet the ability to set aside various statutes to push forward approvals for a small number of major industrial products, such as mines, pipelines and ports, if the government deems them to be in the national interest. It aims to speed up the approval process for major projects so that cabinet can render a decision in two years at the most. It also aims to break down internal barriers to trade. Critics warn the proposed law would allow Ottawa to flout its constitutional duty to consult with First Nations under Section 35 of the Constitution. Story continues below advertisement 4:30 Carney, Canadian premiers united on 'nation-building' projects, but do not list them NDP MP Leah Gazan warned Monday that these fast-tracked projects will only wind up in the courts over the government's failure to properly consult with Indigenous peoples. 'The federal government is absolutely bulldozing over democratic principles in favour of corporate interests and it's going to have bad consequences,' she said. 'This is abhorrent. This is unprecedented. We need to ensure governments have proper oversights, not provide ministers in cabinet with unlimited powers to make decisions in violations of constitutional obligations.' Some constitutional experts told The Canadian Press the legislation's most far-reaching provisions — ones that would allow the executive branch to skirt laws to push forward big projects — are likely to survive a court challenge. Paul Daly, chair in administrative law and governance at the University of Ottawa, said while the provisions giving the executive more power are controversial, they're likely constitutional. Story continues below advertisement 'It is unlikely that a court would invalidate this as violating the Constitution,' he said. Sections 21 to 23 of the bill allow the executive branch to bypass existing rules and processes in 13 laws — including the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, the Indian Act and the Impact Assessment Law — through a regulatory process that does not need to be approved by Parliament. These sections are what's known in the legal community as 'Henry VIII clauses' — a reference to a King who preferred to govern by decree rather than through Parliament.' 3:02 Carney calls for energy partnerships to make Canada a global superpower Courts have not found these to be constitutionally invalid, Daly said, adding there are guardrails in the bill and Charter rights will continue to apply to the legislation. 'It's similar in character to the carbon tax legislation from a few years ago, where the Supreme Court said the Henry VIII clause was constitutionally valid. And I suspect that a court, if this statute were challenged, would come to the same conclusion,' Daly said. Story continues below advertisement Anna Johnston, a staff lawyer at West Coast Environmental Law, said sections 22 and 23 are 'very worrisome' because they could allow the federal cabinet to exempt a pipeline or some other project from the Species at Risk Act. She said the bill overall gives the federal government too much leeway on the Crown's duty to consult with Indigenous peoples on decisions that affect them. 'If I were Canada's lawyers, I would have advised them strenuously against this bill,' she told The Canadian Press. 'That consultation has to be meaningful and I worry that, especially under the timelines that this government wants to make these decisions, that this bill is basically circumventing the government's constitutionally required duty to consult.' 2:11 The FSIN says First Nations were left out of the federal-provincial meeting Liberal MP Jaime Battiste insisted the legislation should not be so controversial and blamed the public outcry on bad communication and a lack of understanding of the bill's contents. Story continues below advertisement 'This legislation not only takes the step of saying that the duty to consult on these future projects is there … but there actually has to be meaningful equity and participation,' he told The Canadian Press on Monday. 'That has the opportunity for some lucky First Nations to have billions of dollars' worth of equity as part of these major projects and I'd love to see that and some clean energy in the Atlantic.' Carney said in June that it takes too long to push major new projects through 'arduous' approval processes and that in 'recent decades, it has become too difficult to build new projects in this country.' The federal Conservatives have claimed the bill does not go far enough and want to see the Impact Assessment Act repealed, the bill that currently lays out the federal review process required for major national projects. — With files from Nick Murray

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store