Hundreds of train fare evasion cases quashed after unlawful prosecutions
Hundreds of people have had their train fare evasions quashed after they were prosecuted unlawfully.
The cases were the last 500 to be declared void after a that railway operators were not allowed to use the controversial single justice procedure (SJP).
Chief Magistrate Paul Goldspring's ruling in August paved the way for thousands of train fare evasion prosecutions to be quashed.
The SJP was introduced in 2015 to allow magistrates to rule on minor offences - such as watching TV without a licence or driving without insurance - without the defendant being present in court.
They were extended to private rail fare evasion prosecutions in 2016 - but many train companies have used them citing the Regulation of Railways Act 1889, which they are not permitted to do.
In a three-minute hearing at Westminster Magistrates Court on Wednesday, Mr Goldspring quashed 350 Northern cases, 180 TransPennine Express cases, and 36 Great Western Railway cases.
He said it should be the final hearing dealing with these kinds of prosecutions - after more than 28,000 were quashed in November.
Read more from Sky News:
Rail firms who have also seen their cases dropped include Avanti West Coast, Greater Anglia, Arriva Rail Northern, Merseyrail, and C2C.
"These cases should not have been brought," Mr Goldspring told the court.
"Any reconciliation in relation to fines is between the Courts and Tribunals Service and the prosecuting railway companies."
Threats of prosecution over £1.85
Engineering graduate Sam Williamson told the in October last year of his SJP ordeal.
He says he was threatened with prosecution by Northern Rail after he mistakenly bought an invalid £3.65 ticket using his 16-25 railcard. The full price ticket was £5.50 - £1.85 more.
Mr Williamson used the ticket to board a train just after 7am, not realising that under the fine print of the railcard terms his ticket was invalid. A minimum fare of £12 applies to any ticket bought with a railcard before 10am. Northern dropped its action against him following media coverage.
Northern, which operates trains across northern England, said it is reviewing its approach to enforcing ticketing and said it has temporarily suspended certain prosecutions while the review is carried out.
A spokesman added: "We remain firmly committed to tackling fare evasion and protecting taxpayers' money. Anyone who travels without a valid ticket can be asked to pay the fare in full, issued with a penalty fare or contacted to provide further evidence to settle the matter out of court. We always take into account any evidence provided or mitigating circumstances.
"Rigorous enforcement against deliberate fare evasion, abuse, and violence will continue."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
03-05-2025
- Yahoo
Prolific fare dodger ‘tried to avoid paying for train' on way to court
One of Britain's biggest fare dodgers, who owes £30,000 in unpaid fines for train fare evasion, was allegedly stopped without a ticket on the morning of his court appearance. Charles Brohiri has been caught without a train ticket at almost every station across the Thameslink, Southern and Greater Northern network. He appeared at Westminster Magistrates' court on Wednesday afternoon to be sentenced for 36 counts of travelling on a railway without paying, having previously been convicted in absentia. Despite promoting himself on social media as the rapper Rvre Dean, the 28-year-old told the court he was homeless, owned no mobile phone and could only access the internet through public libraries. Gareth Ring, prosecutor for Thameslink, told magistrates: 'At 8.16 this morning, Mr Brohiri was stopped on one of our trains without a valid ticket.' Mr Ring handed the magistrates a dossier which he said contained details of 180 previous instances where Brohiri had been caught without a ticket at Thameslink stations or aboard its trains. The prosecutor added that the 28-year-old 'owes the court an awful lot of money'. An arrest warrant against Brohiri for over £30,015 in unpaid court fines was issued in February. This is three times higher than the previous record for a rail fare evasion fine, which was issued for £10,000 last year in southern Essex against an unnamed defendant. Although rail offenders have voluntarily paid back higher sums as an alternative to prosecution, it is unusual for fines of more than a few hundred pounds to be issued for fare evasion. Greater Anglia announced in 2019 that it had secured the imprisonment of Stefan Jaworski, then 37, of Rayleigh in Essex after he was caught evading train fares on some 55 occasions. Although the Regulation of Railways Act 1889 allows offenders to be imprisoned for a 'second or subsequent offence' of fare evasion, the power – which allows sentences of up to three months – is very rarely used. The huge number of charges and convictions Brohiri has racked up sheds fresh light on the controversial private prosecution system for fare evasion. Criminal cases brought against train passengers over fare discrepancies as small as £1.90 triggered a public scandal last year. It ended with 75,000 wrongfully-brought fare evasion cases being nullified by the Chief Magistrate amid public concern that train company bosses were misusing a law dating back to Queen Victoria's reign as an extra revenue stream. All of those fines are now being repaid to wrongly-convicted defendants. Meanwhile, cases such as Brohiri's continue progressing through the courts. Judges heard that he was arrested by police and brought to court on March 30 before he was bailed to reappear for sentencing. The court heard that since then, he had been spoken to 13 times without a valid ticket. Julie Mills, presiding, was told that Brohiri 'clearly disregarded whatever happened in March' and continued to board Thamselink trains. Brohiri, who had repeatedly said to Thameslink over the past year that he lived at an address on Cloverland, Hatfield, told the court that he has been homeless since 2019. An online profile on a music website states: 'Caleb Lewis Brohiri, better known by his stage name, Rvre Dean, hails from Croydon, south London.' According to the L-Hit website, the would-be rapper recorded a single in 2019, but the profile added: 'Before the single's release however, trials and tribulations surfaced which left a big mark on Dean since then.' When asked how he supported himself without a job, Brohiri claimed to have been living 'a bit crazy' of a lifestyle, saying: 'Sometimes people give me money, or I go charities, I go a few places and whatnot and I just go there to get food… like Pret and these places, I just go there.' In court, he was wearing a black long-sleeved shirt, plain black trousers, clean black Puma trainers with white detailing and a black hat. Mr Ring asked him: 'Mr Brohiri, you're clearly well-presented appearance-wise. Did the charity give you help here?' He replied: 'Nah, these are, like, some things I had.' Brohiri's sentencing has been adjourned to August 20, pending probation reports. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
02-05-2025
- Yahoo
Russell Brand Granted Bail in UK Rape Hearing
Comedian, actor and accused rapist Russell Brand was granted bail Friday at a court hearing in London where he faces charges of rape and sexual assault. Brand, now 49, was formally charged April 4 with two counts of sexual assault, one count each of rape, oral rape and indecent assault stemming from alleged encounters with four women between 1999 and 2005. Standing before Chief Magistrate Paul Goldspring for just 14 minutes on Friday, Brand confirmed his name, birth date and address and then listened to the charges against him. At the end of the hearing, Judge Goldspring granted Brand bail on the condition that he keep the court informed of where he is staying at all times, regardless of whether it is in the U.K. or the United States. Brand left the hearing and rode away in a black Mercedes-Benz without speaking to reporters. Judge Goldspring has recommended Brand's case to a higher U.K. court of justice. His first hearing is scheduled for May 30. At Friday's hearing, lead prosecutor Suki Dhadda said that Brand raped one of his four accusers in a hotel room at a 1999 British Labour Party conference. Another woman has accused Brand of orally raping her in a bathroom stall during a 2004 party, while a third woman says Brand attempted to drag her by her arm into a men's bathroom at a London television station in 2001. His fourth accuser in this case claims that Brand grabbed her by the face, pushed her against a wall and forcibly kissed her while grabbing her breasts and buttocks. Brand's accusers remain unnamed, as British law grants victims of alleged sexual violence lifetime media anonymity. It is likely that any trial surrounding the charges against Brand will not be held until a year from now. As is customary in the U.K. court system, no official pleas have been entered yet. Brand has, however, denied all allegations against him. The actor and comedian, who was once married to pop star Katy Perry and is best known in the U.S. for his roles in films 'Forgetting Sarah Marshall' and 'Get Him to the Greek,' posted a video on social media shortly after the charges against him were announced in early April. 'I've always told you guys that when I was young and single before I had my wife and family — who are just out of shot over there, my beautiful children — I was a fool, man. I was a fool before I lived in the light of the Lord,' Brand said in the video. 'I was a drug addict, a sex addict and an imbecile — but what I never was, was a rapist. I've never engaged in non-consensual activity. I pray that you can see that by looking in my eyes.' The charges against Brand have come nearly two years after Britain's Channel 4 and The Sunday Times published a joint investigation in September 2023 detailing serious instances of alleged sexual assault committed by him against four different women between 2006 and 2013. Brand responded to that investigation by categorically denying its claims, much like how he has handled his current assault and rape charges. In recent years, Brand has shifted from starring in Hollywood films and British TV shows to running a YouTube channel, in which he discusses contemporary politics, wellness and conspiracy theories. He is also the host of several podcasts. The post Russell Brand Granted Bail in UK Rape Hearing appeared first on TheWrap.
Business Insider
24-04-2025
- Business Insider
The UK simulated an attack on its own air defenses based on the first night of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. It wasn't pretty.
The UK ran a simulation of a Russian attack to see the strain on its air defenses if the invasion of Ukraine had been aimed at the UK instead, a senior air force official said. The result "was not a pretty picture," Air Commodore Blythe Crawford said at a Royal United Services Institute conference in London on Thursday. Using Gladiator, a £24-million ($32 million) simulation system, the UK's Air Battlespace Training Centre loaded up "Night 1 of Ukraine" — February 24, 2022 — and watched it play out against the UK, according to Crawford, the center's former commandant. He did not detail the exact outcomes of the simulation, which took place in 2022, but it's understood that the UK's air defenses were breached. The simulation was a stark lesson, Crawford said. "We've stood for years at the western edge of Europe feeling as though the rest of the continent has stood between us and the enemy," he told those in attendance. But "Ukraine has made us all sit up and that drove some of the work we were doing in the warfare center to get after how we would solve a problem like that if a similar scenario was pitted against the UK." Russia pummeled Ukraine with missiles during the opening salvo of its full-scale invasion. The UK has improved its air defenses since 2022 and uses an approach that integrates aircraft, ships, and land-based systems — a network critical to defeating any attempt to land invasion forces in the UK. There are also notable differences between how Russia attacked Ukraine and how it might challenge the UK's air defenses, and — given that ground-launched missiles would need to pass through European airspace — if Russia were to attack the UK it might opt to mobilize its Northern fleet and launch an attack from the Atlantic. Crawford also said that "over the last three years, the scenario has become much more complex, in terms of the types of systems that we need to be able to counter, but then also the mass as well." "When you see swarms of hundreds of drones now operating in Ukraine, some of them decoys, some of them with munitions on board, the challenge is how do you tackle them all or do you tackle them all?" he added. "That is a challenge we have right across the West." Crawford described Ukraine as a wake-up call, "where you have two countries with very capable integrated air defence systems going head to head, with neither side really achieving any form of air superiority, which has been a cornerstone of air operations for decades." He added that this had been made more complex by the rise of drones and autonomy, where you can have "swarms of several hundred munitions — not just drones but combined with rockets and ICBMs, at all levels and in all spheres." The concept of air superiority has significantly changed, he said. "We tended to think of it as theater-wide and something you achieved over time. Now we see air superiority being from trench to trench and from zero to 50 feet, rather than necessarily being something that's done right across the theater." While the attack on the UK that Crawford described was just a simulation, he said that Western countries need to learn from what is happening in Ukraine, and can't assume their home bases are safe. "We in the UK over the last few decades have become focused on being garrison safe and making assumptions that we are safe to operate from the home base because most of the wars we've been fighting have been overseas. We need to reverse that thinking and assume that from here on, we're under threat in the home base now as well."
