China Vows ‘Forceful Measures' After Taiwan's Huawei Export Curb
(Bloomberg) -- Beijing vowed to respond to Taiwan's 'technological blockades' after the self-ruled island blacklisted Chinese companies including Huawei Technologies Co., limiting their ability to develop cutting-edge artificial intelligence.
Bezos Wedding Draws Protests, Soul-Searching Over Tourism in Venice
US Renters Face Storm of Rising Costs
US State Budget Wounds Intensify From Trump, DOGE Policy Shifts
Commuters Are Caught in Johannesburg's Taxi Feuds as Transit Lags
'We will take forceful measures to resolutely safeguard the normal order of cross-strait economic and trade exchange,' Taiwan Affairs Office spokeswoman Zhu Fenglian said Wednesday at a regular briefing in Beijing. She was responding to a question about Taiwan' recent curbs on Chinese companies, and didn't elaborate on how Beijing would respond.
Taiwan last week joined a yearslong US campaign to curtail China's technological ascent by adding the country's AI and chipmaking champions — Huawei and Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp. — to its entity list. That bars the island's firms from doing business with the pair without a license, the first time Taipei has used the blacklist on major Chinese companies.
The new restrictions are likely to, at least partially, cut off Huawei and SMIC's access to Taiwan's plant construction technologies, materials and equipment essential to build AI chips, like those made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. for the likes of Nvidia Corp.
Zhu condemned Taiwan's decision as 'despicable' and claimed it displayed President Lai Ching-te's loyalty to the US government. President Donald Trump's administration has urged Taipei to take more ownership over chip restrictions on China, Bloomberg News previously reported.
'Attempts to decouple will not delay the progress of industrial upgrading on the mainland,' Zhu said, adding that such actions will only damage the competitiveness of Taiwanese enterprises and the island's economy.
Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push
Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags
Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros
Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028?
Can 'MAMUWT' Be to Musk What 'TACO' Is to Trump?
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
34 minutes ago
- Forbes
AI In E-Commerce: Are Brands And Customers Aligned?
Rytis Lauris is the cofounder and CEO of Omnisend, a marketing automation platform built for e-commerce. I don't think there is a single industry AI hasn't touched, and e-commerce is certainly no exception. Chatbots, product recommendations, segment creation and churn prediction have been well underway for some time, but these tools are only the beginning. It seems like every day we read stories of another brand implementing new and improved AI on their site. However, while brands see the value and promise in using AI to revolutionize the customer experience, do consumers want it, and if so, for what purposes? What Online Shoppers Want From AI While times will surely change, currently, many consumers want AI to improve their shopping experiences, not transform them. A consumer survey from my company learned that the AI-powered features shoppers found most useful were improved product recommendations and faster product discovery. Nearly half also said they want to see improvements in customer service. However, product recommendations, whether on-site or in marketing emails, aren't always relevant, much to the dismay of shoppers. This is an opportunity for brands to use AI to give shoppers what they want. The more relevant the recommendations, the easier it is to find a product, leading to a better chance of capturing a sale. For example, take Muse by Wayfair, where users can type a description of what they're looking for (e.g., "modern chic dining room with hints of lime") and find design inspiration. Upon clicking on the 'muse' they like, shoppers can click on the Wayfair products pictured in the image. The challenge for brands with customer service is that many chatbots, though improving, are clunky and often frustrating. This needs to change. For more complex inquiries, there needs to be a seamless escalation procedure that directs to human representatives without losing the chat history or background from the customer. If chatbots or other AI customer service tools can't provide a more intuitive level of support, it creates friction and becomes a detriment to the business. This can't happen. Agentic AI, where autonomous decisions are made, is a rapidly advancing area for e-commerce brands. Maybe the most newsworthy example is Amazon's Buy For Me feature, which allows users to discover products through the Amazon site that are not sold on Amazon and then complete the purchase directly with the off-site retailer on their behalf. Amazon isn't alone in using agentic AI to drive purchases. Visa and Mastercard got into the fray with tools that can make purchases on people's behalf. Admittedly, we are at the early stages of this type of use case for agentic AI, and it's going to be interesting to see where it leads. But right now, most consumers aren't quite ready. In my view, the current behavior for most shoppers is to verify all details, from size and color to shipping information, before clicking 'complete purchase.' Trusting AI to select the right size, color and other variables feels like a large behavioral and trust issue that needs to be overcome. Agentic AI holds a lot of promise for e-commerce brands on the customer-facing and operational sides of the business. It can be used to make product recommendations, sift through product reviews, solve customer service inquiries and track and find lower prices. Operationally, it can be used to track and forecast inventory, analyze data, personalize marketing campaigns and detect fraud. What Brands Can Do Now Consumers' hesitation to use AI for more than basic improvements to their shopping experience isn't irrational. The online purchase process is mostly the same as it was 20 years ago: search, click, browse, add to cart and check out. Expecting consumers to abandon this instinctive behavior overnight is an impossible ask, especially when it comes to making purchases for them. Trust in AI needs to be established and built through use and consistency. But like ecommerce's early days, it's going to be an evolution—one step at a time. If AI applications are consistently useful for shoppers, they'll trust and adopt them. If they're not, they won't. Brands can look to AI to help in various ways, but what they can't lose sight of is that, within this, shopping is often enjoyable for people. Leaving this to programmatic tools removes the thrill of the hunt to find the perfect item. Striking this balance will be a challenge. As such, e-commerce brands should adopt AI thoughtfully and use it to put consumers first. While experimenting with new tools is fine, the goal should be to give shoppers better experiences, whether it's support, product discovery or personalization. If brands can't execute the fundamentals and instead create friction, asking them to change their instinctive shopping behaviors will be a pipe dream. The two 'simplest' ways brands can begin building consumers' trust in AI is through chatbots and product search. Chatbots have come a long way in the past several years, moving from a tool that provides help article links to one that can accurately provide answers and triage customer concerns. By refining customer service chatbots to handle customer queries accurately, consumers can realize their value and trust them further. This trust in one tool gives them a reason to trust the next one. On-site search is another area where brands can use AI to support the customer experience. As search moves from keyword matching to an intuitive prediction model, shoppers' ability to discover additional products and have an expanded, non-linear shopping experience improves. A non-linear shopping experience creates a more enjoyable one, similar to the surprise-and-delight experience of in-store shopping. If AI-powered search results stay relevant and helpful, shoppers are more likely to see AI as a helpful asset vs. an annoyance. The Takeaway Is AI in e-commerce going anywhere? Absolutely not. Will it transform the way online shopping is done? Probably. Are consumers clamoring for radical changes instead of everyday improvements? Not yet. It's OK to dream big, and I'm excited for what's to come, but don't lose sight of what got you here: your customers. Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
Forbes
34 minutes ago
- Forbes
When AI, Energy Demands And Capital Costs Collide
Charles Yeomans is the chairman and founder of Atombeam. In a testimony to Congress in April 2025, Google's former CEO Eric Schmidt addressed not only the future of AI but also the dramatic power consumption associated with it. Although the dramatic increase in energy used by data centers associated with AI workloads is well known—and my last article touched on this crucially important issue—the sheer scale of the challenge is becoming clearer. Uncharted Territory More specifically, Schmidt noted that data center energy consumption could quickly increase from 3% of the power generated today to 99% of that current value, with data centers requiring 67 more gigawatts of power by 2030. He also subsequently put that point in perspective by pointing out that the average nuclear power plant creates about 1 gigawatt of power, even as technology providers plan for 10-gigawatt data centers. Although those figures are subject to some debate—the U.S. Department of Energy, for example, noted that data centers consumed about '4.4% of total electricity in 2023 and is expected to consume from 6.7 to 12% of total U.S. electricity by 2028'—one thing is certain: The proliferation of AI and the more powerful computational capabilities fast-evolving use cases, algorithms and models demand brings with it a power generation challenge of unprecedented proportions. Not surprisingly, to date, nuclear power is seen as the most viable, although still arguably insufficient, answer—a reality made clear by the nuclear ambitions of the largest technology providers. In early May 2025, Elementl Power announced its agreement with Google to build 'three sites for advanced reactors,' as reported by CNBC. Notably, though, Elementl Power, founded in 2022, has yet to build any nuclear sites. We're in uncharted territory. Coming To Terms Clearly, questions abound not just about national security—something Schmidt also stressed—and the feasibility not just of how data centers will be powered but also how quickly they can be built to keep up with AI. This is a point I also made in my last article while pointing to October 2024 research from McKinsey analysts, who found that 'to avoid a deficit, at least twice the data center capacity built since 2000 would have to be built in less than a quarter of the time.' One point, though, has yet to get the attention it fully deserves as we collectively come to terms with the dramatic demands associated with AI. That point is the sheer scale of the capital needed to facilitate the building boom required to create the infrastructure AI demands. But that, too—like the scale of the power consumption Schmidt brought into focus—is beginning to become more clear as April 2024 research, also from McKinsey analysts, reveals. That study predicts that by '2030, data centers are projected to require $6.7 trillion worldwide to keep pace with the demand for compute power.' Consider for a moment the awe-inspiring reality of that number. In 2025, total federal outlays in the U.S. are predicted to reach $7.0 trillion, or 23.3% of the GDP. Viewed differently, that same amount represents nearly 38% of China's GDP of $17.79 trillion, according to the World Bank. And we're talking just about the creation of new data centers. Cost Considerations Of course, data centers are obviously but one piece of the networks needed to use, move and store data associated with AI-powered use cases and workloads. The power consumption and capital costs associated with the infrastructure AI demands also apply to the pipes that connect everything, from the wired infrastructure to the cellular and satellite networks that pull it all together and enable AI outputs to be used in real-world applications. All of those critical components of AI infrastructure require massive capital investments and expenditures. Subsea cable, for example, costs $40,000 per mile, or between $200 million and $250 million for a transatlantic connection. Despite the increased economy, launching satellites remains a costly endeavor, with outlays being highly variable and impacted by numerous factors, from the orbit itself—geostationary Earth orbit costs more than low Earth orbit—to the weight of the satellite, the launch vehicle involved and, of course, the cost of making the satellite itself. Questions also abound about how costs will evolve and how quickly in light of significant advancements in space delivery technologies. Cellular networks are no less complex and also require significant capital investments. For example, in just one deal with U.S. Cellular in 2024, Verizon confirmed earmarking $1 billion for the purchase of additional spectrum alone. The Legacy Problem And then there's the issue of legacy communications and industrial networks that remain in use across many industries. These systems will need to be upgraded to handle large AI workloads if commercial applications of AI are to progress as envisioned. This includes the supervisory control and data acquisition systems (SCADA) that remain prevalent in the utility sector and across industries like manufacturing, with many now two and three decades old. But the issue of legacy systems isn't confined to any one sector. Link 16, the U.S. military's most-used digital datalink, is now in its fourth decade of use. Focusing On The Data Clearly, given these factors, the costs of the modernization and expansion efforts AI demands aren't feasible as viewed currently, particularly in a time when public-sector and private-sector investments are contracting, not growing. Nor is it realistic to believe we collectively have the people and businesses needed to keep pace with AI's rapid expansion and building demands. That's why we must, now more than ever, be pragmatic not only about our response to the investment AI calls for but also the kinds of AI data we use and how we manage, store, share and use that information. It's time to focus on data itself. Does it need to be this big? Can we make it more efficient and reduce the strain on resources? Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
The Verge
34 minutes ago
- The Verge
HDMI 2.2 will support 16K video at 60Hz
After first announcing it at CES 2025, the HDMI Forum is finally releasing the new HDMI 2.2 specification to manufacturers today. Although there is no definitive timeline for how long it will take hardware makers to adopt the new specification, the first Ultra96 HDMI Cables, with bandwidth capabilities boosted to up to 96Gbps, could be available later this year. HDMI 2.1 and the current Ultra High Speed HDMI cables have a maximum bandwidth of 48Gbps which supports resolutions up to 10K and refresh rates up to 120Hz with 4K content. HDMI 2.2 and the new Ultra96 cables will enable even higher resolutions and refresh rates including 4K at 480Hz, 8K at 240Hz, 10K at 120Hz, and even 16K at 60Hz. It will also handle uncompressed video formats with 10-bit and 12-bit color at 8K at 60Hz and 4K at 240Hz. Given how difficult it still is to find native 8K content, don't expect cable providers or console makers to offer 16K anytime soon. HDMI 2.1 has been around since 2017 and hardware makers still don't take full advantage of the spec, so the increased bandwidth and resolutions of 2.2 should help future-proof the HDMI specification for years to come. The HDMI Forum is also hoping that the new specification will make it easier for consumers to know what cable they need to be using. HDMI cables are currently differentiated with names including Standard, High Speed, Premium High Speed, and Ultra High Speed, which doesn't provide any specifics on their capabilities. With HDMI 2.2, the Ultra96 name will make it clear that a cable supports the new specification and bandwidths up to 96Gbps. HDMI 2.2 will also include the new Latency Indication Protocol (LIP), which was also announced last January. The feature is designed to build on audio and video synchronization improvements introduced with HDMI 2.1, particularly for setups where signals are bouncing through a soundbar or an AV receiver before reaching a TV or projector.
