Judge's ‘grave concerns' in NSW strip search class action case
Raya Meredith was made to undress in front of a police officer, lift her breasts, and remove her tampon during a 'humiliating' and terrifying strip search at the Splendour in the Grass music festival in 2018 that police later admitted was illegal.
The then-27-year-old is the lead plaintiff in a class-action lawsuit brought by Slater and Gordon and the Redfern Legal Centre against the state of NSW on behalf of more than 3000 people likely subjected to illegal strip searches from 2016-2022.
Ms Meredith's lawyer, Kylie Nomchong SC argued in her closing statements Tuesday and Wednesday that there was a failure on the part of 'senior echelons' of NSW Police to ensure proper training and supervision given to police doing searches.
Julian Sexton SC, who is representing the state of NSW, pushed back on claims by Ms Nomchong about police training and the findings of a report by the Lessons Learned Unit (LLU) following a complaint after a 2013 Mardi Gras afterparty.
Mr Sexton said the report, contrary to submissions by Ms Nomchong, did not represent an 'admission of widespread unlawful use of strip searches' or routine unlawful strip searches and instead only made 'recommendations about best practice'.
He went on to tell the court that out of 172,000 searches in 2016, 3850 were strip searches. Resulting from those searches were only 79 complaints, four of which were sustained, with a further two sustained complaints the following year.
'This demonstrates that there was a decreasing number of complaints sustained. There were only five complaints sustained in the period up until November 2018. That doesn't indicate a widespread use of unlawful searches,' Mr Saxton said.
He made similar claims about the 'very small number' of civil cases.
Justice Dina Yehia said the defence case and state of NSW's admission that Ms Meredith's strip search was illegal were of 'grave concern' during Thursday's hearing.
Justice Yehia told Mr Saxton before the lunch adjournment that 'the conduct of the proceedings in relation to the three iterations of defence that were initially relied upon, that is a matter, I'll be quite honest with you, of grave concern to me.
'All I have is three officers' statements that say either that they don't remember the search at all or both that they don't remember the search nor remember the plaintiff, the lead plaintiff in those circumstances,' she said, referring to Ms Meredith.
'I'm just not sure how this could ever have proceeded in the way that it did with the initial pleadings.'
Mr Saxton said the admission about the legality of the search was 'more accurate to say it was an admission based on the absence of proof' and police may have based their recollections on 'practice' rather than specific memory.
In response, Justice Yehia said: 'An assertion that the officer's assessment of the plaintiff's demeanour, physical appearance, body language and answers to questions while they spoke outside the tent is very specific.'
Under NSW law, strip searches – which are recognised as being 'highly invasive and humiliating' – are supposed to be undertaken within specific statutory guidelines, including preconditions of 'seriousness and urgency' that they be done.
Ms Nomchong told the court on Tuesday that not a single COPS event log contained why a strip search was necessary, and the general duties officers were 'defective in their understanding of the basis on which strip searches could be carried out'.
'They were not supervised. They were not trained. And, as a direct result, that is why my plaintiff was unlawfully strip searched … along with others who attended the music festival in 2018,' Ms Nomchong said in her more than six-hour statement.
Resuming on Wednesday, Ms Nomchong urged the court to award exemplary damages 'not only to express the court's disapprobation but because of the manifest breaches of the (Law Enforcement Powers and Responsibilities Act) by searching officers'.
Ms Nomchong went on to add 'but also because of the … manifest failures on the part of the senior echelons of the NSW Police Force responsible for both general and focus training for conducting strip searches' in the state at the time.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
17 minutes ago
- ABC News
Fence-cutting trespassers endanger cattle and nearby highway drivers
Farmers in southern Western Australia say trespassers who cut fences to enter private land for hunting and camping are turning livestock into safety hazards, allowing them to escape onto nearby roads. Cattle producer Geoff Pearson said one of his properties, located along a major regional highway, had been targeted for the past three years. "They cut [the fences], we patch them, they cut them, we patch them. If they don't cut the fences we've got situations where they just drive straight over the gates," he said. "We've had instances where cattle have been hit by cars. We've had to compensate the [driver] in write-off situations. "Fortunately no-one has been injured … but we have to fit the bill on that." Mr Pearson, who is also the WAFarmers' livestock section president, said an estimated 200 trespass incidents had cost him hundreds of thousands of dollars. Bridgetown farmer Lawson Harper said cattle escaped onto the South West Highway after pig hunters cut gate locks at his neighbour's property two months ago. Mr Harper said pig hunters also took their hunting dogs and broke onto his property, which "distresses" his cows. "It's just blatant disregard. I'm not sure why it's developed but it seems to be the norm now," he said. Mr Lawson said it was "a matter of time" before someone got hurt as a result of livestock getting out and wandering onto roads. City of Albany ranger Carl Fjastad said there was growing community concern about straying livestock with 88 reports of farm animals on roads in the Great Southern in the past year. He said livestock on roads was a "real hazard to road users", particularly during hours of darkness. Mr Fjastad said a driver was lucky to escape injury after crashing into a stray cow on the road near Redmond, four hours south of Perth, in May this year. The problem is not a new one for local farmers. A decade ago Brunswick dairy and beef farmer Paul Ieraci was out checking his boundaries when he noticed fencing had been cut and vehicles had driven though. "You hit panic mode," he said. Mr Ieraci said a neighbour then called him and said they had "come across some dead cattle" they believed to be his. Mr Ieraci's cattle had escaped through the damaged fence and wandered into bushland filled with heart-leaf poison bush. "I came across the dead cattle, which was quite heartbreaking," he said. Mr Ieraci said he was able to save some, but more than 20 Friesian steers and mated heifers died. "It's not our intent to put our cattle in danger, to have them roaming the roads and highways," he said. Mr Pearson said when people trespassed onto his property he contacted local police and tried to provide as much information as possible. He has since invested in hundreds of cameras around his property to try and deter trespassers or help identify them. Despite there being no easy fix he remained hopeful he will one day get livestock back in his paddock. A WA Police spokesperson said trespassing or causing damage to a person's property was a criminal offence that "can impact on a farmer's livelihood". They said it was difficult to ascertain how widespread the problem was in remote agricultural areas. Anyone with information about suspicious activity around rural properties is urged to contact Crime Stoppers.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
WA government to introduce 'post and boast' laws amid concerns about protests, freedom of speech
Footage posted on social media of two stolen cars hooning around a regional town in Western Australia is the sort of thing that has prompted new legislation set to be debated in state parliament this week. The videos showed children with their faces covered, ramming police cars and bragging about their crimes. Governments around the country initially called on the Commonwealth to pressure social media platforms to crack down on the content, but they are also taking their own action. Last month, the WA government introduced a "post and boast" bill to parliament targeting so-called "crimefluencers" who boast about their offences on social media. Some groups are concerned the proposed law goes too far, is too broad and will have a "chilling effect" on free speech. So what will happen if the bill is passed as it stands? It is an amendment to the Criminal Code, named the "Post and Boast Offence". It would make it an offence to "disseminate material" that depicts a crime with the purpose of boasting or glorifying the criminal behaviour or encouraging others to engage in the same conduct. In essence, the government said it was targeting people who posted crimes on social media "that may humiliate, intimidate or victimise a person, increase the reputation or notoriety of the offender, glorify the conduct, or encourage copycat behaviour". That includes a range of criminal offences — assaults, stealing and robbery, property damage, dangerous or reckless driving, racial harassment and inciting racial hatred, and Nazi symbols and salutes. The legislation makes clear that a person can be prosecuted regardless of whether they have been prosecuted, or convicted of, the offence depicted in their post. The maximum penalty is three years in jail, one year more than the penalty for the same offence in Victoria. Courts will also be able to order the person to "remove, retract, recover, delete, destroy or forfeit to the state" the post in question, punishable by 12 months in jail and a $12,000 fine if they do not comply. The government says the changes aim to prevent further harm and re-traumatisation of victims, meaning there will be exceptions where people are not motivated by malicious intent and are posting for another reason. The list of activities that will not be penalised includes material posted "for a genuine scientific, educational, academic, artistic, literary, satirical or entertainment purpose". A journalist or news publisher reporting news or current affairs will not be prosecuted either. And there will be no penalty if the conduct depicted in the video is fictional or artificially created, if it was posted to denounce or warn against criminal behaviour. There are also specific exceptions for members of a law enforcement agency or intelligence agency. Critics say while the government claims the intent of the laws is to stop criminal behaviour, the legislation's impact will be much broader. They have pointed to legal comment by University of Western Australia Associate Professor of Law Murray Wesson, who concluded the proposed bill had "the potential to infringe the constitutionally protected implied freedom of political communication". "This is due to the extraordinary breadth of the offence, in particular the wide definitions of dissemination [which includes dissemination of material to one other person] and relevant offence [which includes unlawful assemblies and breaches of the peace]," he wrote. Conservation Council WA executive director Matt Roberts was concerned the law could stop peaceful protest, and would be "stifling the voice of the public" on what they wanted from the government. Critics like Mr Roberts argue people who took part in the successful protest movement in 2016 and 2017 to stop the Roe 8 highway extension and prevent the destruction of the Beeliar wetlands, backed by Labor at the time, could have been charged under this new legislation, but the government denies they would have been charged. At the time when Labor was in opposition, people chained themselves to construction machinery and pushed over gates, with police charging some protesters with trespassing, obstruction and refusing to give details to police. "Just for sharing that, people would be criminalised under these laws," Mr Roberts said. WA Greens leader Brad Pettitt labelled said the laws would have "a chilling effect ... on freedom of expression and the right to protest". He said the suffragettes who campaigned for women's right to vote could be imprisoned today under this law, and the Franklin River dam protests in Tasmania during the 1980s would have also been targeted Greens MLC Sophie McNeil said she would be charged over videos she had shared of activists raising attention about the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. "Right now you've got members of parliament who could be eligible for three years in jail simply for supporting peaceful, non-violent protest. And that's absolutely outrageous," she said. The legislation does not specifically mention protests as a legitimate defence from prosecution, but WA Premier Roger Cook was adamant protests were not the focus. He said the causes people were protesting against, and the activity of protest, were "absolutely not the focus of these laws". "Highlighting the behaviour or observing that the behaviour has taken place and commenting in relation to the cause will not of itself attract the attention of the post and boast laws," he said. The premier said the law's primary focus was crime, adding: "It's about people who glorify criminal and unlawful behaviour." He said he wanted to ensure people in WA could still protest and express their freedom of speech. The laws will be debated in parliament this week. Labor has the numbers to pass the laws, and the opposition has said it will be supporting the legislation. But opposition legal affairs spokesperson Nick Goiran questioned why only some criminal behaviour was included instead of all crime. He noted the Greens planned to refer the bill to parliament's Legislative Committee and added the opposition would support a three-month inquiry. Dr Pettitt said the Greens would push for a raft of amendments, namely excluding non-violent protest and ensuring it doesn't "criminalise a whole new generation of young people".
ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Pilot to give evidence in trial of crocodile wrangler
The pilot who survived a fatal helicopter accident in February 2022 which claimed the life of Chris "Willow" Wilson, is expected to give evidence today in the Supreme Court trial of celebrity crocodile wrangler, Matt Wright. Mr Wright has pleaded not guilty to three counts of attempting to pervert the course of justice for his alleged interference with an investigation into the crash. The pilot - Sebastian Robinson - survived the accident but sustained lifelong injuries.
