logo
From contamination to justice: The US towns that took on ‘forever chemical' giants — and won

From contamination to justice: The US towns that took on ‘forever chemical' giants — and won

Malay Mail18-05-2025

WASHINGTON, May 19 — No corner of Earth is untouched. From Tibet to Antarctica, so-called 'forever chemicals' have seeped into the blood of nearly every living creature.
Tainting food, water and wildlife, these toxic substances have been linked to ailments ranging from birth defects to rare cancers.
Yet if it weren't for the efforts of residents in two heavily impacted American towns, the world might still be in the dark.
In the new book They Poisoned the World: Life and Death in the Age of Chemicals,' investigative journalist Mariah Blake recounts how people in Parkersburg, West Virginia, and Hoosick Falls, New York, blew the whistle on the industrial giants that poisoned them — and, in the process, forced the world to reckon with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS.
'We're talking about a class of chemicals that doesn't break down in the environment,' Blake tells AFP, calling it the 'worst contamination crisis in human history.'
First developed in the 1930s, PFAS are prized for their strength, heat resistance, and water- and grease-repelling powers. Built on the carbon-fluoride bond — the strongest in chemistry — they persist like radioactive waste and accumulate in our bodies, hence the 'forever' nickname.
Blake's research traces their history, from accidental discovery by a DuPont chemist to modern usage in cookware, clothing, and cosmetics.
They might have remained a curiosity if Manhattan Project scientists hadn't needed a coating that could withstand atomic-bomb chemistry, helping companies produce them at scale.
Mariah Blake, author of the new book 'They Poisoned the World: Life and Death in the Age of Forever Chemicals' signs copies in Vroman's Bookstore in Pasadena, California May 14, 2025. — AFP pic
Corporate malfeasance
Industry knew the risks early. Internal tests showed plant workers suffered chemical burns and respiratory distress. Crops withered and livestock died near manufacturing sites.
So how did they get away with it? Blake tracks the roots to the 1920s, when reports emerged that leaded gasoline caused psychosis and death among factory workers. In response, an industry-backed scientist advanced a now-infamous doctrine: chemicals should be presumed safe until proven harmful.
This 'Kehoe principle' incentivised corporations to manufacture doubt around health risks — a big reason it took until last year for the US to finalise a ban on asbestos.
DuPont's own studies warned that Teflon had no place on cookware. But after a French engineer coated his wife's muffin tins with it, a Parisian craze took off — and an American entrepreneur sold the idea back to DuPont.
Soon nonstick pans were flying off shelves, thanks in part to a regulatory gap: PFAS, along with thousands of other chemicals, were 'grandfathered' into the 1976 Toxic Substances Control Act and required no further testing.
Mariah Blake, author of the new book 'They Poisoned the World: Life and Death in the Age of Forever Chemicals' speaks at an author's talk and signs her book, in Vroman's Bookstore in Pasadena, California May 14, 2025. — AFP pic
Massive litigation
The cover-up began to unravel in the 1990s in Parkersburg, where DuPont had for decades been dumping Teflon waste into pits and the Ohio River.
The town reaped economic benefits, but female plant workers were having babies with birth defects, a cattle farmer downstream was losing his herd, and residents developed rare cancers.
Blake tells the story through 'accidental activists.' One is Michael Hickey, a preppy insurance underwriter with no interest in politics or the environment. After cancer took his father and friends, he started testing Hoosick Falls's water.
Another is Emily Marpe, 'a teen mom with a high school education' who saved to buy her family's dream house in upstate New York, only to learn the water flowing from the taps was fouled with PFAS that now coursed through their blood in massive levels.
'She knew the science inside out,' says Blake, 'and became an incredibly articulate advocate.'
Years of litigation yielded hundreds of millions in settlements and forced DuPont and 3M to phase out two notorious PFAS. But the companies pivoted to substitutes like GenX — later shown to be just as toxic.
Still, Blake argues the tide is turning. France has banned PFAS in many consumer goods, the EU is considering a ban, and in the US, states are moving to restrict PFAS in sludge fertiliser and food packaging.
Liabilities linked to the chemicals are driving major retailers from McDonald's to REI to pledge PFAS-free products.
Her optimism is tempered by the political climate. Just this week, the Trump administration announced the rollback of federal drinking water standards for four next-generation PFAS chemicals.
But she believes the momentum is real.
'Ordinary citizens who set out to protect their families and communities have really created this dramatic change,' she says. 'It's like climate change — it feels intractable, but here's a case where people have made major headway.' — AFP

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Inside the intricate science, engineering, and policy hurdles shaping Nasa, SpaceX's bid to send humans to Mars
Inside the intricate science, engineering, and policy hurdles shaping Nasa, SpaceX's bid to send humans to Mars

Malay Mail

time18 hours ago

  • Malay Mail

Inside the intricate science, engineering, and policy hurdles shaping Nasa, SpaceX's bid to send humans to Mars

WASHINGTON, June 6 — A crewed mission to Mars would rank among the most complex and costly undertakings in human history—and US President Donald Trump has vowed to make it a national priority. That political momentum, coupled with SpaceX chief Elon Musk's zeal, has breathed new life into a cause long championed by Red Planet advocates—even as major obstacles remain, including Trump and Musk's latest feud. Why go? As Nasa writes in its Moon to Mars blueprint, 'exploration of the cosmos remains a great calling for humanity.' A mission to Mars would pursue scientific objectives like determining whether Mars ever hosted life and charting the evolution of its surface, as well as answering broader space physics questions—such as the history of the Sun through studying Martian soil. Geopolitics also looms large, as Trump has pledged to 'plant the American flag on the planet Mars and even far beyond,' invoking the 'unlimited promise of the American dream.' Critics, however, say cuts to Nasa's science budget and the cancellation of key projects—including the return of rock samples collected by the Perseverance rover—are undermining the research mission. 'The purpose of exploration is not just to go somewhere,' Nobel-winning astrophysicist John Mather told AFP. 'This is not a tourist thing. This is a fundamental knowledge thing.' Getting there Musk is betting SpaceX's future on Starship, the largest rocket ever built, despite fiery failures in its nine test flights. He's aiming for an uncrewed launch by late 2026, timed with the next favorable Earth-Mars alignment. But the timeline is widely seen as optimistic: Starship has yet to land its upper stage or demonstrate in-orbit refueling—both essential for deep space travel. Some experts believe the system is fundamentally sound, while others say it's too soon to judge. 'A lot of the pertinent and relevant technical information... is not known to us,' Kurt Polzin, chief engineer for Nasa's space nuclear propulsion project, told AFP. He backs Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP), which uses fission to heat hydrogen and generate thrust. NTP delivers 'a lot of power in a very small package,' Polzin said, eliminating the need for orbital refueling or fuel production on Mars. Astronauts would spend seven to nine months in a cramped spacecraft, exposed to intense space radiation beyond Earth's magnetosphere. Ideas to improve radiation shielding range from passive methods, like using dense materials, to active concepts such as plasma fields that deflect radiation, while drugs are being developed to reduce cell damage. Without a system to simulate gravity—such as rotational spin—crews would also need grueling exercise routines to counteract muscle and bone loss. Mental health is another concern. Growing plants aboard—more for morale than sustenance—has proved beneficial on the ISS. Communication delays further complicate matters. On the station, real-time data has helped prevent an average of 1.7 potentially fatal incidents per year, said Erik Antonsen, chair of NASA's human systems risk board—but such communication will not be possible en route to Mars. Life on Mars Once on the surface, the uncertainties grow. Probes and rovers have found hints—organic molecules, seasonal methane—but no definitive signs of life. If it ever existed, it likely died out long ago. Still, Earth's own 'extremophiles' offer intriguing clues—from fungi that harness Chernobyl's radiation for energy, to microbes that survived 500,000 years in frozen stasis. 'If they can survive here in extreme environments, we have every reason to suspect they can be on Mars,' said NASA astrobiologist Jennifer Eigenbrode at the recent Humans to the Moon and Mars Summit. And while NASA has decided nuclear fission will power surface operations, other choices—from crop selection to habitat design—remain open. 'Mars has a 24-hour, 39-minute day—that small difference creates strain, increases stress, and reduces sleep quality,' said Phnam Bagley, a space architect who designs for comfort and crew well-being—critical factors in preventing conflict. The first trip would be around 500 days on the surface, but long-term colonization raises deeper questions. For instance, scientists don't yet know whether mammalian embryos can develop in low gravity—or what childbirth on Mars would entail. 'I think it's really important to take that seriously,' said NASA's Antonsen. 'Even if you don't plan on it happening, people are still going to have sex, and somebody might get pregnant. Then it becomes a medical issue.' — AFP

Elon Musk's controversial Starbase city rises in Texas, but critics raise alarm on pollution, zoning and ‘colonisation' of sacred land
Elon Musk's controversial Starbase city rises in Texas, but critics raise alarm on pollution, zoning and ‘colonisation' of sacred land

Malay Mail

timea day ago

  • Malay Mail

Elon Musk's controversial Starbase city rises in Texas, but critics raise alarm on pollution, zoning and ‘colonisation' of sacred land

STARBASE (Texas), June 6 — Elon Musk has a long way to go before colonising Mars, but the controversial billionaire already has his own city on a flat patch of Texas, where giant, experimental Starship rockets roar over the incongruous sight of dolphins — and some sceptical human neighbours. Starbase on the south Texas coast is HQ for the Starship project and something of a shrine to its South African-born founder, the world's richest man and until recently one of President Donald Trump's closest advisors. Musk's short Washington tenure spearheading the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, ended last week, with a vow to get back to his day job of running his business empire, including SpaceX, Tesla and Starlink. The departure came as investors grew increasingly nervous about the spillover from Musk's reputational damage after publicly allying himself to Trump and tearing through the US government in search of spending cuts. Now he hopes to hunker down in Starbase near the Mexican border and get back to the matter of reaching Mars. The scene is a curious mix of futuristic high-tech and down-to-earth attractions for a city that was officially incorporated in May but remains very much a work-in-progress. Cars speed down the narrow Boca Chica Boulevard leading to Starbase, where an AFP film crew was not allowed to enter. A huge bust of Musk on the outskirts of the settlement was vandalised in April and now stands with the right cheek peeled off, covered by a giant plaster. A cluster of buildings rises near the launch site, including an imposing corporate tower that bears Musk's X logo and prefabricated houses painted black, white, and gray. For now, the city has only about 500 residents, some still living in trailers and some in the prefab homes, which have patios and outdoor grills. Looming over the landscape are two models of super heavy launchers and one Starship rocket. 'I think it's pretty cool, making a whole entire city based around a launch site,' said 21-year-old computer engineer Dominick Cardenas who was visiting the area for the unsuccessful test launch last week. 'Maybe I'll move down here one day. Who knows? I'd love to go to Mars, who wouldn't?' This photo taken on May 28, 2025 shows a damaged bust of Elon Musk with a plaque reading "Elon aka MemeLord by ElonRWA on BASE" outside Brownsville, Texas. — AFP pic Environmental impact But the space city is surrounded by nature and wildlife, especially birds. Activist Christopher Basaldu, who is a member of the Carrizo/Comecrudo Native American tribe and holds a PhD in sociocultural anthropology, called Musk a 'coloniser.' 'The land here is sacred to the original inhabitants of the area. And SpaceX is polluting and desecrating this land,' he told AFP. There are two federal wildlife refuges in the area where SpaceX operates: the Lower Rio Grande Valley and the Laguna Atascosa. There is also the Boca Chica Beach, where residents have been spending their summers for decades and which is now closed during test flights. 'There isn't supposed to be exploding rockets next to pristine wetlands and habitat,' Hinojosa said. In 2024, the Environmental Protection Agency fined SpaceX for unauthorised discharges of water from its deluge system into wetlands near its Starbase launch pad connected to the Rio Grande. Despite protests by Hinjosa and other groups, SpaceX received approval from the Federal Aviation Administration to increase the number of launches per year from five to 25. Hinojosa calls it 'very much a David versus Goliath situation.' 'We are one of the poorest communities in the country... and we're dealing with the biggest bully on the planet, Elon Musk,' she said. 'Elon Musk has so much power that he's found a way around most of our lawsuits,' she added. View of the SpaceX's building outside Brownsville, Texas on May 28, 2025. — AFP pic Mall, restaurants, power plant According to a document obtained by CNBC, Starbase City officials have notified the residents that they might 'lose the right to continue using' their property as they currently do. A hearing is scheduled for the end of June to discuss the new zoning plan. SpaceX is also building the Rio West giant shopping mall and restaurant complex near Starbase, valued at $15 million, according to official filings. And environmental activists worry that the Rio Grande liquified natural gas plant being built in the neighbouring city of Brownsville, which has the capacity to process methane, a gas that powers Starship, could become Musk's fuelling station. SpaceX representatives, Starbase City Mayor Bobby Peden as well as Cameron County officials did not respond to AFP requests for comment for this story. — AFP

Bail hearing set for Chinese researcher accused of smuggling farm fungus into US
Bail hearing set for Chinese researcher accused of smuggling farm fungus into US

Malay Mail

time2 days ago

  • Malay Mail

Bail hearing set for Chinese researcher accused of smuggling farm fungus into US

WASHINGTON, June 5 — A Michigan court has scheduled a bail hearing on Thursday for a Chinese researcher accused of smuggling biological samples into the United States. Yunqing Jian, 33, and her boyfriend Zunyong Liu, 34, who conducted biological studies in the same field, were accused of smuggling a fungus into the United States for research. Jian, who according to a federal criminal complaint has worked on research projects in the United States since 2022, made her first court appearance on Tuesday. Liu was denied entry into the United States last July, when the pathogen, a fungus identified by the US Department of Justice as Fusarium graminearum, was found in his luggage. Liu said he wanted to conduct research on the fungus at a University of Michigan laboratory where Jian worked, according to the complaint. Prosecutors described the fungus as a dangerous biological pathogen that had the potential to be used as an agricultural terrorism weapon. The fungus is already widespread on US farms, tested for and tightly controlled in grains, and is not considered dangerous unless consumed in large quantities. Clair Keene, an agronomist at North Dakota State University, said she was puzzled by US authorities' description of the fungus. 'It's a common pathogen. We have it here. The claim that Fusarium graminearum can be used as a biological weapon doesn't strike me as accurate,' she said. The fungus can cause Fusarium head blight, typically known as scab. It is common among wheat, barley and other grains especially during rainy years. The telltale salmon-pink streaks on the grain heads contain a toxic byproduct called vomitoxin, which in high quantities can cause nausea and vomiting when eaten. Keene said farmers often spray fungicide to protect their crop and researchers have developed strains of wheat that are resistant to the fungus. Reuters was unable to contact Jian or her lawyer for comment. The case involving the researchers comes as the University of Michigan and other universities have faced pressure from the Trump administration over allegations they have done too little to combat antisemitism on campus and what the administration depicts as radical ideology in the classroom. Universities' ties to China also have come under scrutiny. The University of Michigan said in a statement it condemned 'any actions that seek to cause harm, threaten national security or undermine the university's critical public mission.' 'It is important to note that the university has received no funding from the Chinese government in relation to research conducted by the accused individuals,' the university said, adding it will 'continue to cooperate' with federal law enforcement in its ongoing investigation and prosecution. FBI director Kash Patel said in a post on X that the case was a reminder that China's ruling Communist Party 'is working around the clock to deploy operatives and researchers to infiltrate American institutions and target our food supply, which would have grave consequences... putting American lives and our economy at serious risk.' The Chinese Embassy in Washington in response to a Reuters request for comment sent a statement from its spokesperson Liu Pengyu. 'I don't know the specific situation, but I would like to emphasise that the Chinese government has always required overseas Chinese citizens to abide by local laws and regulations and will also resolutely safeguard their legitimate rights and interests,' Liu said. — Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store