
Key Evidence Thrown Out in Jolt to ‘Orgasmic Meditation' Conspiracy Case
Two women accused in Brooklyn of mistreating employees of their 'orgasmic meditation' group argued that key evidence against them had been concocted for a true-crime documentary and had it thrown out of court.
The women, Nicole Daedone and Rachel Cherwitz, won a major pretrial decision in March when prosecutors said in court papers that they no longer considered a key witness credible for their criminal case.
That witness, Ayries Blanck, had been expected to testify this year in Brooklyn federal court and offer her journals about her experience at the company in question, OneTaste.
'The government no longer believes that the disputed portions of the handwritten journals are authentic,' prosecutors wrote to the judge overseeing the case. The diaries, they said, were actually transcribed by hand years later, and they will no longer call Ms. Blanck as a witness nor 'seek to admit any of Blanck's journals at trial.'
Their decision means a woman who had been central to prosecutors' case will not be heard at all.
OneTaste in its heyday was a titillating blend of San Francisco's counterculture and its tech boom — a wellness startup that made headlines by advocating female empowerment through orgasm. It offered classes and sessions that sometimes cost five figures.
But disaffected ex-employees said the company's facade of liberation hid something cultish. Ms. Blanck's account of her time at OneTaste and her journals were memorialized in a 2022 Netflix documentary, 'Orgasm Inc.,' which painted a dark picture of a sexually coercive workplace where workers were manipulated and mistreated by Ms. Daedone and Ms. Cherwitz.
Five months after the documentary was released, Ms. Daedone and Ms. Cherwitz were each indicted on a single count of forced labor conspiracy.
The Justice Department said in court papers that the women, under the guise of wellness, sought to control their employees' lives by withholding wages, driving them into debt and instructing them to perform sex acts. Ms. Daedone and Ms. Cherwitz are set to go on trial in May. The case was investigated out of Brooklyn partly because the company had a business affiliate there.
The situation has been complicated by sprawling civil litigation that overlaps with much of the criminal case. A federal appeals court in Manhattan recently decided that it would hear arguments about whether prosecutors improperly used evidence from a lawsuit. That hearing is set for Monday.
The civil litigation also played a role in the Blanck saga. The defense has argued that at least one person who helped make the 2022 documentary also edited a digital version of the journals that described events from years before, suggesting Ms. Blanck's story was tainted from the start by television storytelling. In the journals, Ms. Blanck describes being coerced into sex, beaten by a boyfriend and manipulated by her bosses.
Court documents also showed that Netflix paid $25,000 to Ms. Blanck's sister, who was featured in the documentary reading from the journals, her voice standing in for her sibling's.
Defense lawyers spent months arguing that there were many reasons that the journals could not have been written in 2015 as Ms. Blanck claimed. The journals cite a book that came out in 2019. The written entries match word-for-word an electronic version of the journals that had been edited over time and by people other than Ms. Blanck. Other known details of Ms. Blanck's life did not square with the content of the journals.
To the defendants, a case based even in part on Ms. Blanck's testimony and writing was inherently fraudulent. 'The government would have presented perjured testimony from its star witness at trial, potentially leading to a wrongful conviction of the defendants,' Ms. Cherwitz's lawyer Celia Cohen wrote to the judge.
After interviews with the F.B.I., Ms. Blanck admitted that her account of creating the handwritten journals was not true, according to the prosecutors' filing. Many parts of the filing are redacted, making it unclear exactly what was false.
The filing said Ms. Blanck had admitted 'that she physically copied the relevant portion of the handwritten journals after typing' her account elsewhere. 'Blanck maintains that she wrote the typewritten journals based at least in part on contemporaneously-written journal entries,' prosecutors wrote.
A lawyer who has represented Ms. Blanck did not respond to messages seeking comment.
For months, prosecutors had told the judge that the journals indicated 'a high degree of trustworthiness' and represented the best evidence of Ms. Blanck's psychological and emotional state at the time.
The prosecutors now say that Ms. Blanck's journals are unnecessary and irrelevant. Without her as a witness, they plan to call several other former OneTaste members and employees to testify.
To the defendants, the hard-fought victory points to a flaw at the heart of the case.
'People watch a movie on Netflix and think it's true, but it's not,' Ms. Cherwitz said. 'If you can slap the word 'cult' or 'sex cult' on it, it seems nefarious and dangerous, which is just woefully untrue.'
A Netflix spokesman declined to comment.
Ms. Daedone, the company founder who once declared 'my religion really is orgasm,' said in an interview that her advocacy of female stimulation as a form of meditation and therapy had angered people, but that nothing about the company was criminal.
She called the accusations 'a narrative shaped by the media and adopted by the government.' She added: 'I have to see it all the way through until the truth is revealed.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
38 minutes ago
- Fox News
'Proof is in the pudding': Trump DOJ tells court it will seek dismissal of Abrego Garcia case
The Trump administration on Tuesday said it plans to seek the dismissal of a civil case ordering them to return Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia to the U.S., arguing in a new court filing that the case is now "moot," given that he is now back in U.S. custody. In the filing, lawyers for the Trump administration told U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis that they plan to submit an official motion to dismiss the case on "mootness grounds" by June 16. Justice Department officials said they have "done exactly what plaintiffs asked for and what this court ordered them to do" – that is, to return Abrego Garcia to the U.S. from El Salvador, where he was deported under the Alien Enemies Act in March in what Trump officials acknowledged was an administrative error. But the filing is likely to do little to quell the mounting legal fight surrounding Abrego Garcia's detention and efforts to secure his return from Salvadorian custody. Upon being returned to the U.S., Abrego Garcia was immediately sent to Tennessee to face federal charges related to transporting undocumented immigrants in the U.S., stemming from an arrest years earlier. Court documents show the Justice Department filed the charges against Abrego Garcia on May 21 – prompting a flurry of fresh questions as to when the investigation and impaneling of a grand jury would have taken place. Lawyers for Abrego Garcia described the timing of his return from Salvadorian custody as "pure farce," and told Xinis in a filing of their own late last week that they plan to file a sanctions motion against the government by Wednesday. They noted that lawyers for the Trump administration were continuing to tell the court, even six days after he was indicted, that they did not have the power to return Abrego Garcia to the U.S. They also noted that, in their view, a contempt charge and sanctions against the government were warranted – reminding Xinis that the Maryland court still has jurisdiction over the civil case. Xinis, for her part, suggested last month that the Trump administration could be held in contempt for their refusal to comply with the court – describing their lack of candor in the discovery proceedings as beating a "frustrated and dead horse." Trump administration lawyers sought to dispel the notion that they intentionally flouted the court on Tuesday, describing plaintiffs' characterization of their actions as "desperate and disappointing." "To be sure, the parties have had pointed disagreements on discovery issues, including because defendants could not share state secrets and other protected materials that would have demonstrated their good-faith compliance with the court's orders," the administration said Tuesday. "But the proof is in the pudding – defendants have returned Abrego Garcia to the United States just as they were ordered to do." Xinis, an Obama appointee, previously criticized the administration for failing to comply with her court's requests for information in the case, and accused officials in a blistering eight-page order of submitting "vague, evasive and incomplete" responses that she said demonstrated "willful and bad faith refusal to comply with discovery obligations."
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US Justice Department 'weaponization' reviews spark calls to drop prosecutions
By Sarah N. Lynch, Ned Parker and Peter Eisler WASHINGTON (Reuters) -As the federal public corruption prosecution of former Tennessee House Speaker Glen Casada neared trial this spring, his lawyers made one last effort to kill the case, by petitioning senior Justice Department officials that it was "weaponization," according to three people familiar with the matter. Under President Donald Trump, the department in February created a "Weaponization Working Group" meant to identify improper politically motivated cases, a response to what the Republican says without evidence was the misuse of prosecutorial resources against him under his Democratic predecessor, Joe Biden. In court filings, prosecutors said that Casada's lawyers met with a senior Justice Department official on March 24, where they alleged the "Deep State" had initiated a "weaponized" prosecution and they sought dismissal of the charges. The plan almost worked, according to three people familiar with the matter. With the Deputy Attorney General's office poised to kill the case, prosecutors in the Justice Department's Public Integrity Section pushed back, reviewing their evidence with the higher-ups, the sources said, adding that the Nashville U.S. Attorney's office and the Criminal Division also supported the case. The request was rejected the next week, according to court filings. Both Casada and the DOJ declined to comment. The case is among at least seven Reuters identified where defense attorneys or Justice Department officials have sought to have prosecutions reviewed for possible dismissal, citing Trump's "weaponization" argument or making other arguments about weaknesses in the cases. In a Tuesday speech, Acting Assistant Attorney General Matthew Galeotti urged defense attorneys to be "conscientious about what, when and how" they appeal prosecutors' decisions. "Seeking premature relief, mischaracterizing prosecutorial conduct, or otherwise failing to be an honest broker actively undermines our system," Galeotti said. The increase in lobbying started not long after the Weaponization Working Group was created, and after the department's February decision to dismiss criminal corruption charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams, six sources familiar with the dynamic told Reuters. To date, the Adams case is the only one to be dismissed over 'weaponization,' three of those sources told Reuters. The lobbying wave comes as the Trump administration has dramatically scaled back the Justice Department's Public Integrity Section, reduced the size of its foreign bribery unit and advised department attorneys that tax enforcement is "not a priority," two of the people familiar with the matter said. A department spokesman said the DOJ will "continue to enforce our nation's tax laws." Trump has said the changes are necessary to root out Justice Department lawyers he derides as 'hacks and radicals' for prosecuting him and some supporters while he was out of power. NEW GROUP HAS BROAD REMIT The working group is empowered to review any 'civil or criminal enforcement authority of the United States' exercised under Biden. A lawyer for Robert Burke, a former Navy admiral who was convicted in May on bribery charges, wrote to the department ahead of trial raising concerns about witness credibility, which failed to convince prosecutors to drop the case. Now the lawyer, Tim Parlatore -- a former Trump defense lawyer -- plans to seek a pardon. "I would be crazy not to at least inquire about a pardon," Parlatore said. Another example is a case involving billionaire Britannia Financial Group founder Julio Martín Herrera-Velutini, who is facing an August trial alongside Puerto Rico's former governor on bribery charges. Herrera-Velutini is represented by former Trump defense attorney Chris Kise, who has sought to convince the Justice Department to dismiss or reduce the charges, though the outcome of such efforts is unclear, three people familiar with the case told Reuters. Kise did not return requests for comment, and Reuters could not determine what arguments he has made to the department about the case. WEAPONIZATION REVIEW While many of the reviews of cases are spurred by aggressive lobbying, some requests are coming from within the DOJ. In early February, prosecutors in the department's Tax Division were ordered by senior Justice Department officials to write a memo explaining why the prosecution of Paul Walczak was not an example of "weaponization," two of the people familiar with the matter told Reuters. Walczak, of Florida, pleaded guilty in November to not paying employment taxes and not filing his individual income tax returns, and the trial team was preparing for his sentencing. Prosecutors were baffled, the people said, and only discovered after a few Google searches that Walczak's mother Elizabeth Fago was a Trump donor who, according to a New York Times report, hosted a political fundraiser where portions of a diary written by Biden's daughter Ashley were circulated. The department let the case proceed, and Walczak was sentenced to 18 months in prison. Trump in April spared him any prison with a pardon, which according to the New York Times, was handed down shortly after Fago attended a $1 million fundraising dinner for Trump. The White House did not respond to a request for comment on the pardon. An attorney for Walczak said he was unaware of any interactions by the defense team with the Weaponization Working Group. In a statement, the Fago and Walczak families said media reports have painted an "incomplete and inaccurate" picture of the pardon application, and that Trump had "ample grounds to grant the pardon on the merits." Although no criminal prosecutions have been dismissed, prosecutors are bracing for impact since Trump in May named Ed Martin, a supporter of Trump's false claims that his 2020 election defeat was the result of fraud, to lead the working group and serve as pardon attorney. Martin has already successfully encouraged Trump to approve pardons for some of the president's supporters, according to his social media posts. Casada, who was convicted at trial in May on multiple counts of fraud, money laundering and bribery, is now expected to seek a pardon, a person familiar with the matter said. "We've also been getting more folks coming forward within the government as well as outside, saying, 'Can you look at this? Can you look at that?'" Martin recently told reporters. "It's a problem that seems to be growing faster than we can capture it."
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
States sue to block Trump administration plan to distribute machine-gun conversion devices
Caso's Gun-A-Rama in Jersey City, New Jersey, has been open since 1967. (Photo by Aristide Economopoulos/NJ Monitor) Attorneys general in 16 jurisdictions sued Monday to block a Trump administration plan to redistribute thousands of devices that convert guns to machine guns, including distribution in states where such devices are banned by state law. The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Maryland, said the plan would not only expose residents of those states to greater amounts of deadly violence, but it would be contrary to federal law that calls for the seizure of machine-gun conversion devices. And it would cause federal officials to 'aid and abet violations of state law' by distributing the devices in states where they are outlawed, the suit said. The decision to return almost 12,000 forced reset triggers — which allow shooters to fire hundreds of rounds a minute with one pull of the trigger — was announced in a settlement last month between the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and gun manufacturers and gun-rights groups. 'These devices enable firearms to fire up to 900 bullets per minute. The increased rate of fire allows carnage and chaos to reign on the streets,' said Maryland Attorney General Anthony Brown in a virtual press briefing Monday with fellow Democrats, New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin and Delaware Attorney General Kathy Jennings. 'Everyone nearby becomes vulnerable to serious injury or death. These are battlefield weapons that have no place in our communities,' Brown said. Under the Biden administration, ATF classified forced reset triggers as 'prohibited machine guns under federal law … and conducted extensive retrieval operations, seizing nearly 12,000 FRTs from the field,' according to the lawsuit. But the new administration reversed course after a Feb. 7 executive order from President Donald Trump on 'Protecting Second Amendment Rights.' On May 16, the Justice Department announced a settlement with Rare Breed Triggers, a manufacturer of the devices based in Wichita City, Texas. Under the deal, the company agreed not to develop or design such triggers for handguns, to promote safe and responsible use of its products, and to enforce its patents to 'prevent infringement that could threaten public safety.' In exchange, the government agreed not to enforce any policy where an FRT is 'contended to be' a machine gun, and to return by Sept. 30 any reset triggers seized or 'taken as a result of a voluntary surrender.' 'We won,' Lawrence DeMonico, president of Rare Breed Triggers, said in a video posted online the day settlement was announced. 'With the Trump administration's renewed focused on justice and their commitment to correcting the weaponization of the DOJ under the Biden administration, we were finally able to secure a deal that brought this fight to a close.' Representatives with Rare Breed Triggers and the Justice Department did not respond to email requests for comment Monday. The National Association of Gun Rights, which was also a party to the settlement, said it a statement that the deal will survive any challenge from the 'anti-gun attorneys general.' 'A federal court already ruled the government unlawfully seized thousands of legal triggers from law-abiding Americans — a decision that the ATF now acknowledges and accepts,' said Hannah Hill, vice president for the association. 'These states lack standing to file this lawsuit, and they know it. This suit is just reckless political lawfare.' But the states' lawsuit highlights the impact of gun violence in their jurisdictions, where it said there were nearly 47,000 gun-related deaths in 2023. Illinois had the most such deaths that year, at 1,691. Of the states represented at Mondays briefing, Maryland recorded 737 gun-related deaths in 2023, New Jersey had 430 and Delaware had 124, according to the suit. The suit also spells out the financial burden that comes with gun violence, for medical bills, police, court and prison costs. It said one fatal shooting in Baltimore can cost $2.4 million and a nonfatal shooting costs $1.5 million. In Newark, New Jersey, the cost is nearly $2.2 million for a fatal shooting and $1 million for a nonfatal shooting. 'This is not a partisan issue. It is a public safety issue,' Delaware's Jennings said. 'The Trump administration's deal to redistribute these deadly devices violates the law, full stop. It undermines public safety and ties the hand of law enforcement.' Platkin recalled the shooting death in March 2022, just two months after he took office, of SeQuoya Bacon-Jones, who was a bystander to a shooting when she was struck and killed. Platkin said SeQuoya would have celebrated her 13th birthday last Saturday. 'She had dreamed of becoming a law enforcement officer, but instead she was killed by a single stray bullet while she was playing hide-and-seek in the courtyard of her apartment complex,' Platkin said. 'I wish the Trump administration … would put little kids like Sequoya's interests ahead of the gun lobby's. But since they don't seem to care, we're going to make them care.' Besides Maryland, Delaware and New Jersey, other jurisdictions on the suit are the District of Columbia and the states of Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington. All but Maine and Vermont currently have state laws prohibiting forced reset triggers or guns modified with them. This story was originally published by Maryland Matters. Like Maine Morning Star, Maryland Matters is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Maryland Matters maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Steve Crane for questions: editor@ SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE