Brussels gripped by anti-Russian ‘war hysteria' – MEP (VIDEO)
Anti-Russian sentiment in Brussels verges on 'war hysteria,' Fernand Kartheiser, a Luxembourgish MEP recently expelled from his parliamentary group over a visit to Moscow, has said to RT.
The European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR Group) in the European Parliament expelled Kartheiser on Wednesday, accusing him of 'crossing a red line' with his recent visit to Russia. The MEP explained that his trip last month was an attempt to 're-establish some sort of dialogue' with Russia at a time of international tensions.
In an interview with RT on Sunday, Kartheiser admitted he expected the ECR to react badly, given that some in the group maintain 'very pronounced anti-Russian stances.'
The expulsion is symptomatic of 'the general attitude towards Russia in the European Parliament,' he said.
'Sometimes I would think that we could touch upon war hysteria. We are not rational in many of our attitudes,' he stated.
But common citizens in the EU reacted differently to his Russia visit, he stressed. Kartheiser said that 'people in the streets come to me, congratulate me, shake hands, tap me on the shoulder. It's unbelievable.'
'It is clear that there is a divide between the official circles in the European Union, which have a very anti-Russia stance, and the general public,' according to the MEP.
The regular people in the EU are 'much, much more moderate and would really wish to see some dialogue with Russia so that we could sort out our differences in a civilized way,' he added.
Ahead of the trip, Baltic and Nordic delegations in the ECR had warned Kartheiser that they would push to exclude him if he went to Moscow, the Luxembourg Times reported.
The Baltic, Polish, and Scandinavian factions within the parliamentary group are especially outspoken in their anti-Russian stances, Kartheiser told RT.
Brussels adopted a tough stance and imposed sweeping sanctions on Russia after the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in 2022. Despite US President Donald Trump's push to negotiate a peaceful resolution to the conflict, the EU has doubled down on arming Kiev.
Moscow has accused Brussels of striving to derail the US-brokered peace effort and stressed that recent EU moves to boost defense spending make it the 'war party' of Europe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
5 hours ago
- Russia Today
Paris wants to produce drones in Ukraine
Paris is pushing France's largest automaker, Renault, to establish a military drone production operation in Ukraine, the company has confirmed. The announcement comes as Kiev significantly intensifies drone attacks on civilian infrastructure inside Russia. 'We have been contacted by the Defense Ministry about the possibility of producing drones,' Renault said in a statement to several media outlets, including Reuters, on Sunday. Although 'discussions' on the issue have taken place, the company insisted that 'no decision has been taken at this stage,' and that it is awaiting further details from the ministry. French Defense Minister Sebastien Lecornu first revealed the plan on Friday, describing it as an 'unprecedented partnership' in an interview with broadcaster LCI. 'We are going to embark on a completely unprecedented partnership… to equip production lines in Ukraine to… produce drones,' Lecornu said, noting that the project would involve both a major carmaker and a smaller defense contractor. Renault could be tasked with setting up drone assembly lines 'a few dozen or hundreds of kilometers from the front line' in Ukraine, France Info reported on Sunday. According to the newspaper Ouest-France, the project could also involve Delair – a Toulouse-based drone manufacturer that supplies UAVs for border surveillance, reconnaissance, intelligence, and special operations forces. The company has previously delivered kamikaze drones to the French Defense Ministry, which were later sent to Ukraine. Lecornu described the initiative as a 'win-win' for Paris and Kiev, claiming no French personnel would be deployed to Ukraine. The production lines would be operated by Ukrainian workers, and the drones built for Ukraine's military would also be used by the French Armed Forces for 'tactical and operational training that reflects the reality' of modern warfare, he said. Kiev ramped up drone strikes on Russian civilian infrastructure in May, particularly targeting Moscow and other central regions. The peak came during the final week of the month, when 2,300 UAVs were shot down, according to the Russian Defense Ministry. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov condemned the strikes as deliberate attempts to sabotage peace talks. Moscow has repeatedly warned that any weapons production facilities in Ukraine are considered legitimate military targets and subject to 'unequivocal destruction.'
Russia Today
10 hours ago
- Russia Today
Brussels gripped by anti-Russian ‘war hysteria' – MEP (VIDEO)
Anti-Russian sentiment in Brussels verges on 'war hysteria,' Fernand Kartheiser, a Luxembourgish MEP recently expelled from his parliamentary group over a visit to Moscow, has said to RT. The European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR Group) in the European Parliament expelled Kartheiser on Wednesday, accusing him of 'crossing a red line' with his recent visit to Russia. The MEP explained that his trip last month was an attempt to 're-establish some sort of dialogue' with Russia at a time of international tensions. In an interview with RT on Sunday, Kartheiser admitted he expected the ECR to react badly, given that some in the group maintain 'very pronounced anti-Russian stances.' The expulsion is symptomatic of 'the general attitude towards Russia in the European Parliament,' he said. 'Sometimes I would think that we could touch upon war hysteria. We are not rational in many of our attitudes,' he stated. But common citizens in the EU reacted differently to his Russia visit, he stressed. Kartheiser said that 'people in the streets come to me, congratulate me, shake hands, tap me on the shoulder. It's unbelievable.' 'It is clear that there is a divide between the official circles in the European Union, which have a very anti-Russia stance, and the general public,' according to the MEP. The regular people in the EU are 'much, much more moderate and would really wish to see some dialogue with Russia so that we could sort out our differences in a civilized way,' he added. Ahead of the trip, Baltic and Nordic delegations in the ECR had warned Kartheiser that they would push to exclude him if he went to Moscow, the Luxembourg Times reported. The Baltic, Polish, and Scandinavian factions within the parliamentary group are especially outspoken in their anti-Russian stances, Kartheiser told RT. Brussels adopted a tough stance and imposed sweeping sanctions on Russia after the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in 2022. Despite US President Donald Trump's push to negotiate a peaceful resolution to the conflict, the EU has doubled down on arming Kiev. Moscow has accused Brussels of striving to derail the US-brokered peace effort and stressed that recent EU moves to boost defense spending make it the 'war party' of Europe.
Russia Today
a day ago
- Russia Today
Mission: Regrettable – Ukraine's drone strike blows up in its face
For most people, June 1st is a cheerful date – the start of summer, a celebration of children. But from 2025 onward, it may also be remembered as the day Ukraine launched its largest covert operation in Russia since the start of the conflict. While the full impact of the operation is still unclear, estimates suggest anywhere from a handful to several dozen Russian aircraft were damaged or destroyed. The precise details will likely remain shrouded in speculation. What is certain, however, is that the Russian military must rethink how it defends strategic facilities. The traditional approach – based on intercepting missiles and deploying advanced air-defense systems – has proven inadequate against cheap drones that can be assembled from off-the-shelf parts and launched from almost anywhere. That lesson is now painfully clear. But the military will draw its own conclusions. Our focus should be on the political meaning of what happened. Make no mistake – this was not just a military act. Like much of what Ukraine does, this was political theater, staged for a very specific audience: Donald Trump. Kiev's objective was simple. Derail the Istanbul negotiations and paint Russia as the intransigent party. How? By provoking a furious response – one that would make headlines, stir outrage inside Russia, and force Moscow to walk away from the table. The idea was to provoke a reaction that Ukraine could then parade before Washington. The message? 'See? We told you they don't want peace. Arm us more!' It's not the first time they've tried this tactic. From the attack on the Kursk Bridge to the shelling of Donbass civilians, Ukraine has repeatedly used provocation as a diplomatic weapon – seeking to engineer Russia's diplomatic isolation by sabotaging any steps toward negotiation. And yet, once again, it didn't work. Despite outrage from parts of Russian society, Moscow did not take the bait. Our delegation flew to Istanbul as planned. There, negotiators presented Ukraine with a memorandum reiterating the same terms previously offered. Not a step back. At the same time, humanitarian agreements were reached – including a new exchange of prisoners and the return of fallen fighters' remains. So did Russia 'turn the other cheek'? Hardly. Moscow has adopted a strategy one might call an 'Italian strike' – doing the bare minimum to deny our enemies a propaganda victory, while withholding the kind of breakthroughs that would reward bad-faith behavior. Yes, the humanitarian measures agreed upon in Istanbul are important. But let's not kid ourselves – they are not steps toward a peace settlement. Politically, the situation is unchanged. However, there is a deeper issue now at play – one with far more serious implications. On June 1st, Ukrainian forces didn't just target military bases. They targeted components of Russia's nuclear deterrent. Under our official doctrine, an attack on the strategic nuclear infrastructure is grounds for the use of nuclear weapons. Now, no one is suggesting we nuke Kiev over a few aircraft, no matter how advanced or expensive. That would be disproportionate. But here lies the paradox: If Russia does nothing, it risks undermining the credibility of its own deterrence posture, and that sends a dangerous message. In the Western capitals and among Ukrainian hawks, there are already whispers: 'If they didn't respond to this, maybe they'll tolerate even more.' That may sound absurd – but that's how these people think. Their fantasies become policy more often than one would like. So what is the answer? Let's be honest: repeating slogans like 'our response will be success on the battlefield' won't cut it here. Ukraine's leadership isn't acting out of military logic, but emotional desperation. Their calculation is political. So Russia's response must be political, too – emotionally resonant, unmistakably firm, and, above all, creative. This doesn't mean rash escalation, but we can't rely on the old playbook. Hitting the same military targets again and again achieves little. Striking Ukraine's energy infrastructure? Done. Launching another missile as a 'demonstration'? Predictable. Escalating to mass casualties? Unnecessary and, frankly, counterproductive. So what's left? Innovation. Russia must now think asymmetrically. That might mean a covert action so unexpected that it catches Ukraine completely off guard. Or it could involve striking symbolic targets that shift the psychological balance. The key is to remind Kiev – and its patrons – that nothing they do goes unanswered, and that the cost of provocation will always outweigh the benefit. In truth, Russia has spent too long responding conventionally to a conflict that is anything but conventional. Our adversaries deal in optics, symbols, and theater. To counter that effectively, we must speak the same language – without abandoning our principles or resorting to theatrics of our own. The June 1st attack was not a turning point. But it was a warning. Not just about drones or airfields, but about perception and power. The next move, as always, is Russia's to make. And this time, it must be something they don't article was first published by the online newspaper and was translated and edited by the RT team
