MAGA country voters sound alarm over ‘ridiculous' national debt amid debate over Trump-backed bill
Voters in red areas of the country are ringing alarm bells over the country's national debt just as President Donald Trump wants Congress to pass a bill experts say will add trillions to it over the next few years.
Fox News Digital spoke to voters in Trump voting districts throughout the United States to gauge how they feel about the U.S. national debt. Most of them said that it was a significant cause for concern, and some even called out the president they support for adding to it.
"We need to address the national debt, and I thought that Trump was doing that when he brought in [Elon] Musk. Don't get me wrong, I'm a Trump supporter. But I think his spending's gotten a little bit out of control," Art, in Lapeer, Michigan, told Fox.
The national debt currently sits at $36.2 trillion and counting, according to Fox Business' National Debt Tracker. A new spending bill – dubbed the "big, beautiful bill" by Trump – has reinvigorated concern over how much higher the debt, with its implications for economic growth and future spending, can get.
The sweeping tax cuts and spending package, passed by the GOP-controlled House in May, addresses many of the president's legislative priorities on cutting taxes, boosting border security, American energy, defense, and rolling back some of former President Joe Biden's environmental regulations and tax credits.
However, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has projected the legislation would add $2.4 trillion to the national debt, prompting criticism from even Trump allies like Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., and Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla.
Former Department of Government Efficiency head Elon Musk even publicly feuded with the president over the bill last week, in a spat that played out on social media.
Ahead of the upcoming Senate vote on passing the bill, Fox News Digital asked voters in Republican voting precincts about the national debt, and many responded they had serious reservations.
A woman in Staten Island, New York, who asked to remain anonymous, told Fox, "It's too big. And we're leaving it for the future, for our children, and we're leaving all that debt on them to pay for. I don't think that's right."
"We can't keep spending ourselves into the ground and leaving that burden for our children and grandchildren," Franceen in Boca Raton, Florida, declared.
Chris from Cypress, Texas said, "I mean, I'm inheriting it, my kids are inheriting it, and we've got to cut it off, or we're going to default."
Front Royal, Virginia, resident Frank told Fox that the debt has been a "longstanding problem."
"It's probably going to be there even after I'm gone, but yeah, of course, any country has a problem with their debt. Of course, it's a problem," he said.
Joe in Lapeer said, "Yes, I think it is an issue. So, at this time, I think it's going to level out over time. It can't keep going the way it was going, put it that way. You know, that's my opinion."
A man from Staten Island, who asked to remain anonymous, acknowledged the problem but expressed hope that Trump will try to right the ship.
"I think it's always a problem," he said. "I think the other party was just – made everything upside down and now Trump's trying to fix it. So, it's going to take a few years, but I think we're on the right track."
"It is a huge problem," Chad in Cypress, Texas, declared. "You know, we've got to the point right now – I think we're $34, $36 trillion in debt. And it's like running up a credit card, you know, sooner or later the bill has to be paid and there's no reason for America to be in debt."
However, another gentleman from Staten Island, who also asked to remain anonymous, told Fox he wasn't too concerned.
"I have no idea what the debt is. I could care less what the national debt is, as long as Trump makes this country a little better. National debt has been in existence for hundreds of years, right?" he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Upturn
25 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
I regret some of my posts about President Trump: Elon Musk expresses regret
By Aditya Bhagchandani Published on June 11, 2025, 12:44 IST In what appears to be a shift in tone, Elon Musk on Tuesday posted that he regrets some of his recent remarks about President Donald Trump, saying, 'They went too far.' I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 11, 2025 This comes just days after Trump addressed their ongoing feud, stating he wished Musk 'very well' and suggesting the tech mogul might be seeking a conversation. In a gesture that caught attention, Musk had responded with a heart emoji on X (formerly Twitter), sparking speculation about a possible reconciliation. Tensions between the two escalated last week after Musk called Trump's proposed 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' a 'pork-filled abomination' and accused the President of suppressing Jeffrey Epstein-related files. The latter post, which Musk later deleted, reportedly infuriated Trump, who retaliated with harsh criticism and even threatened to sever government contracts with Musk-led firms. The feud intensified when Musk countered by threatening to halt NASA-linked SpaceX missions and claimed Trump would have lost the 2024 election without his support. He also floated the possibility of impeachment. However, Musk's latest message—posted at 12:34 PM on June 11—marks a notable departure from his confrontational stance, possibly signaling the beginning of a de-escalation. While no official conversation has been confirmed, both camps appear to be softening their positions, leaving the door open for future dialogue. Aditya Bhagchandani serves as the Senior Editor and Writer at Business Upturn, where he leads coverage across the Business, Finance, Corporate, and Stock Market segments. With a keen eye for detail and a commitment to journalistic integrity, he not only contributes insightful articles but also oversees editorial direction for the reporting team.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jewish deli offers traditional recipes and a taste of 'home' with new Westchester location
At a time when kosher delicatessens are closing more than opening, Epsteins, which has been in Hartsdale since 1969, has a second location. Their Somers spot, which opened June 9, has the same nostalgic vibe and Old School menu as Hartsdale (think pastrami on rye, knishes, matzoh ball soup and latkes), but is smaller, with about 40 seats as opposed to 125. Dale Stasi, who's owned the Hartsdale Epsteins since 2008, said she's long familiar with the area as her parents, who previously ran the business with her and her husband, Chris, used to live nearby in Heritage Hills. "This was an ideal location for us," said Stasi. "The community has been near and dear to our family so when we saw the opportunity to open here, we grabbed it." (The space had been a Mexican restaurant.) Dig in: Westchester restaurant scene heats up with 19 new spots this summer. See the list The history of Epsteins goes back to the Bronx when Seymour Epstein opened his first deli on Jerome Avenue in 1952. At one point he and his family owned five restaurants, including on Long Island and in Westchester. Along the way he sold them, including — in 2008 — to the Stasis who ran them with Dale's parents Robert DeGroat and Marion Rainone. (The Yonkers location, which closed last May, had, since 2008, not been affiliated with the Hartsdale location.) "In New York alone there used to be 500 kosher restaurants," said DeGroat. "Now there are less than 500 in the country." Still, Stasi believes it's a viable business. "The amount of people that have told us how happy they are we opened and how the food feels like their childhood has been overwhelming." "There's a strong sense of heritage in this cuisine and it's important that we keep it alive." That means traditional recipes that date back to the Bronx like stuffed cabbage, noodle kugel, potato latkes, kishke (also known as stuffed derma), kreplach, Hungarian goulash and brisket. More: Summer eats: Our food reporter's picks include Lower Hudson Valley's best lobster and more And, of course, pastrami, corned beef and brisket, the three of which are top sellers. Instructions on the menu advise diners to tell their server if they want their meat carved traditional (naturally fatty, juicy and full of flavor), trimmed (meaning some fat is removed) or first cut, which is super lean. For a taste of all three, they also offer a knish made with a mixture of each. Stasi is also particularly proud of their hot dogs which are another top seller. In a nod to the family that created it all, you'll also find Grandma's Trio (derma, cabbage and a meatball) which references Seymour's mother. Stasi said since Seymour (since deceased) started the company with his wife Gloria (also deceased) and brothers, there have only been three owners: Seymour, his nephew and the Stasis. And now new generations have found — and enjoyed — their food, with a lot of customers coming from Hartsdale or remembering them from when their bar or bat mitzvah was catered by Epsteins. "There's a comfort in going back to your roots," said Stasi. "These are traditional recipes that have been passed down for generations and I think people appreciate that. "It's like a little taste of home." Address: 325 Route 100 (in Somers Centre), Somers, 914-556-6393, Hours: 11 a.m. to 7 p.m. daily (subject to change). Good to Know: Outdoor dining to come. Have you been to Hartsdale? Epsteins' original location is at 387 Central Ave., (Dalewood Shopping Center), 914-428-5320. Want more info on dining in the lower Hudson Valley? My weekly newsletter is free — and often includes behind-the-scenes deets I don't always share in my stories. Sign up at Also, if you have news on restaurant openings or closings — or just want to say hi —email JRMuchnick@ Jeanne Muchnick covers food and dining. Click here for her most recent articles and follow her latest dining adventures on Instagram @jeannemuchnick or via the lohudfood newsletter. This article originally appeared on Rockland/Westchester Journal News: Epsteins in Somers NY: Jewish deli opens second Westchester location
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘The market is as clueless as the Fed': Why this trader says stocks could continue to do well for months
As traders brace for a fresh round of U.S. inflation data this week, a new twist is developing in the way some are thinking about the likely impact of tariffs and the path that major asset classes could take from here. For Gang Hu, a trader at New York hedge fund WinShore Capital Partners, the conclusion is that stocks can still power higher no matter what this Wednesday's consumer-price index for May shows and despite continuing uncertainty about inflation. That's in contrast to the views held by many market participants through April 8 — when the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA, S&P 500 SPX and Nasdaq Composite COMP all fell to 52-week lows just three days after President Donald Trump's 10% baseline tariff on U.S. imports from most countries took effect following months of trade uncertainty. 'It might be another Apple or Microsoft': My wife invested $100K in one stock and it exploded 1,500%. Do we sell? 'The situation is extreme': I'm 65 and leaving my estate to only one grandchild. Can the others contest my will? 'I prepaid our mom's rent for a year': My sister is a millionaire and never helps our mother. How do I cut her out of her will? I bought my mother-in-law a condo — and she took out a $30,000 car loan. Now she refuses to get a roommate. 'He failed in his fiduciary duty': My brother liquidated our mother's 401(k) for her nursing home. He claimed the rest. One big reason for the current shift in thinking is that the full impact of tariffs is taking longer than expected to show up in the final price of goods, and it may take up to three more months for this to play out. Anecdotal information in the Federal Reserve's Beige Book report released last week revealed that, as of May, businesses planned to pass on tariff-related costs by August. This delayed impact from tariffs has since been factored into traders' expectations for the core CPI inflation rate that excludes food and energy, which is seen as likely to peak on a monthly basis in August. Traders of derivatives-like instruments known as fixings are now preparing for the monthly core CPI rate to rise to just over 0.4% in August, up from 0.2% for April, according to Hu's calculations. They expect this rate to then slide back down to below 0.2% for November and December, before inching up toward 0.3% again by next March. However, there's more to this than meets the eye, Hu said, and these numbers don't mean much of anything. 'In reality, the market is as clueless as the Fed,' Hu said via phone on Monday. 'The market is not currently pricing in any second inflationary impact in the form of a wage-inflation spiral, which could happen fast, and the market is not pricing in any recession impact.' What's more, previous fears of a U.S. recession have yet to come to fruition after years of speculation, even though recent data such as last week's jump in unemployment-benefit filings and a contraction in the services sector point to signs of a slowdown. The result is that the stock market has generally stabilized. On Monday, U.S. stocks closed mostly higher as traders awaited details of U.S.-China trade talks being held in London. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite finished the session at their highest levels since February, at 6,005.88 and 19,591.24 respectively, despite lingering questions about the inflationary impacts of tariffs. Also on Monday, analysts at Barclays said signs of stagflation, or the unwelcome mix of slowing economic growth and increasing inflation, have 'crept back' into the data, and this week's inflation report has the potential to show 'the first real evidence of tariff-linked price pressures.' Even so, one-year BX:TMUBMUSD01Y through 30-year BX:TMUBMUSD30Y Treasury yields finished lower after a monthly survey from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York indicated nationwide consumer expectations for inflation had dropped in May. Hu has demonstrated a propensity for being on target with his thinking on inflation. In July 2022, he told MarketWatch that 'inflation is going to be stickier than most people imagine,' which turned out to be the case. Less than a year later, in February 2023, Hu said inflation could easily take more than a year to decline enough for the Fed to cut interest rates. The Fed raised borrowing costs to as high as 5.25%-5.5% in July of that year, then left them unchanged for more than a year before delivering its first rate cut in September 2024. According to Hu, tariffs are a bit of a double-edged sword. They have the potential to either drive the U.S. into a recession or lead to further inflation that keeps the Federal Reserve on hold at a benchmark rate of between 4.25% and 4.5%, creating a fairly wide range of possible outcomes for the economy in the months ahead. An example of just how wide the band of trading can be is illustrated by what has already happened this year: The S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite reached their year-to-date closing highs of 6,144.15 and 20,056.25, respectively, in February. Less than two months later, on April 8, they fell to their lowest closing levels of the year, at 4,982.77 and 15,267.91. As of Monday, they rose back to their highest closing levels since February. For now, 'the market could be reasonably stable even in the presence of uncertainty,' Hu said. 'Rate-cut expectations could be either too low or too high, and 2025 cuts could easily be zero or 100 basis points in reality. Daily price changes could be very large, and we could go to the top and bottom of ranges very quickly, with few people fading anything in most asset prices. But all in all, prices stay in a range.' He added: 'The million-dollar question is, will there be a secondary impact of the initial inflation shock in the form of a wage-inflation spiral? By September, we should have a decent idea of whether there will be a secondary impact.' Economists polled by the Wall Street Journal expect the May consumer-price index released on Wednesday to produce a 2.5% annual headline rate and 0.3% monthly core rate that are both benign relative to April's data. The producer-price index for the same month, which follows on Thursday, is expected to show a 0.2% increase versus a month-over-month drop of 0.5% in April. My son, 39, will be released from prison in 2030. Do I leave him my $100K life insurance? 20 stocks bucking bad trends on Wall Street — what might be next for them? I have $1,000 in credit-card debt. Will I be able to hide my inheritance from the bank? How do I make sure my son-in-law doesn't get his hands on my daughter's inheritance? 20 stocks of companies that have improved profit margins and are expected to grow quickly Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
