logo
Woke ‘banter police' to ‘spy on workers & report inappropriate conversations', under Rayner plans

Woke ‘banter police' to ‘spy on workers & report inappropriate conversations', under Rayner plans

The Suna day ago
DEPUTY Prime Minister Angela Rayner has been accused of trying to censor workplace banter by deploying diversity officers in businesses across the UK.
New laws drawn up by Rayner would see firms pressured into employing "diversity officers" to crack down on workplace banter deemed offensive.
2
2
These new employees would be tasked with, among other things, protecting staff from the possibly offensive content of overheard conversations.
The Tories branded the officers " banter police" and warned that the they would create a "chilling effect" on businesses.
Under the new Employment Rights Bill employers must try and protect staff from harassment by third parties.
Concerns have been raised that the contents of the bill would see a crackdown on free speech.
It comes after the bill was criticised for potentially preventing football fans from asking the ref "are you blind?"
Lord Young said the bill could see a partially-sighted steward take a club to court if offended by chants.
The bill also means workers could take employers to tribunal if jokes or banter overheard in the office are deemed offensive.
It is expected to cause firms to hire more diversity officers in a bid to prove they have done all they can to protect their workers from offensive banter and shield themselves from potential tribunal cases.
The deputy PMs bill fails to stipulate any ring fence allowing for the expression of opinion on political, moral, religious or social matters.
According to the Mail Online the number of employment tribunal claims relating to banter in the workplace rose by nearly 50 per cent in 2021.
The legislation also requires bosses to allow trade union representatives time off for issues "relating to equality in the workplace."
Critics have said the bill paves the way to greater unionisation in the workplace.
Rayner's critics added that the she had received large donations from unions who will directly benefit from the legislation.
The new law will slash the last government's attempts to stop Whitehall spending taxpayers' cash on diversity, equality and inclusion.
It is also set to end zero-hours contracts, strengthen redundancy and flexible working rights and allow firms to be taken to tribunals even if employees do not want to sue.
However, the legislation will repeal Tory trade union laws which will reduce the threshold for strike action and make union funding of the Labour party automatic.
Unions will also have an easier time infiltrating workplaces under the new legislation, able to operate with just 2 per cent of a businesses staff joining up.
The Bill says: "Introducing explicit protections from third-party harassment will ensure that victims can be confident that they have recourse to legal redress if their employer has not taken all reasonable steps to protect them."
A government spokesman said: "The Employment Rights Bill will not affect anyone's right to lawful free speech, which this Government stands firmly behind.
"Upsetting remarks do not fall within the definition of harassment.
"We are strengthening workplace protections to tackle harassment and protect employees from intimidating and hostile abuse as well as sexual harassment."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dudley rail research firm goes into administration
Dudley rail research firm goes into administration

BBC News

time26 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Dudley rail research firm goes into administration

A not-for-profit organisation which has been involved in a Very Light Rail (VLR) system for Coventry has gone into Black Country Innovative Manufacturing Organisation (BCIMO) runs what it describes as a "unique world-class centre for rail innovation."The £32m VLR centre was built with money from a range of sources, including regional enterprise partnerships and Coventry City Council and Dudley Borough Council.A lack of anticipated funding and rising costs had led to cash flow challenges for BCIMO, administrators RSM UK said. The VLR centre remained open and continued to trade during the administration period, they added, but there had been a "small number" of to sell the business and assets were being "rapidly explored," with a view to keeping the centre going and rescuing the BCIMO brand, said RSM UK."BCIMO has been responsible for the important work undertaken at the VLR centre over the last few years," stated joint administrator Deviesh parties were encouraged to come forward in the "coming days." BCIMO came into being in 2019, ahead of the centre being completed by Dudley Council in is like a tram, but involves single, battery-powered cars that can each transport about 50 people, and do not need deep tracks to run Coventry the city council is working on a new system using special weight bearing concrete slabs and vehicles specially designed for tight has been developed in partnership with BCIMO and WMG at the University of Warwick. 'Business as usual' Coventry City Council said it was disappointed to hear that BCIMO was in administration, but it would not have any impact on Coventry Very Light Rail."It is absolutely business as usual for us," said cabinet member Jim O'Boyle."Following the really successful on road trial in the city centre, the vehicle is now in Alcester for the next stage of development," said the the vehicle is worked on, an 800-metre section of track is set to be laid from the railway station to the University Technology Park, to show how it can run in live traffic. Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.

Inquiry launched into government handling of Harry Dunn's death, Lammy announces
Inquiry launched into government handling of Harry Dunn's death, Lammy announces

The Independent

time26 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Inquiry launched into government handling of Harry Dunn's death, Lammy announces

David Lammy has launched an independent inquiry into the way the Foreign Office officials handled the death of Harry Dunn in an accident involving a member of the US intelligence community. The 19-year-old was killed when a car driven by Anne Sacoolas hit his motorcycle near the exit to RAF Croughton in Northamptonshire in 2019. Ms Sacoolas, who was the wife of a CIA operative working near the airbase, was allowed to leave the country with claims that she was covered by diplomatic immunity. Requests for extradition were initially rejected by the first Donald Trump administration, although the president met Dunn's parents. Sacoolas would later provide videolink evidence but did not return to the UK for trial because it was unlikely to result in a prison sentence. There was criticism over the way the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCDO) handled the case, and whether more could have been done to ensure Sacoolas returned to the UK. The review will be led by Dame Anne Owers DBE, who will examine actions taken by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office in support of the family of Harry Dunn in the period between 27 August and the end of December 2019. Having promised to undertake a review while sitting as an opposition MP, Mr Lammy has met twice with family members since becoming foreign secretary and committed the government to learning lessons from the tragedy. He said: 'I have the deepest respect for the resolve Harry's family have shown since his tragic death and in launching this independent review, we are honouring the commitments we have made to them. 'I am confident the review into how the case was handled by the previous government has the remit required to properly address the family's concerns and to ensure lessons are learned. 'Having worked previously with Dame Anne Owers on the Lammy Review in 2017, I don't believe anyone is better qualified to undertake this important piece of work.' The mother of Harry Dunn, Charlotte Charles, said: 'We welcome today's formal announcement by the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office that a full review into the handling of Harry's case will now take place. 'We now look forward to working with Dame Anne Owers and doing all we can to support her in this important task. It is our sincere hope that her work will help ensure that no other family is ever treated in the way that ours was. This review is yet another step in our long journey towards ensuring that Harry's loss was not in vain and that the World is a better and safer place.'

Labour opens door to wealth tax
Labour opens door to wealth tax

Telegraph

time27 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Labour opens door to wealth tax

Downing Street has opened the door to introducing a new wealth tax following pressure from Labour's union paymasters. No 10 repeatedly refused to rule out a new levy on wealthy taxpayers after Lord Kinnock, the former Labour leader, said the party was 'willing to explore' it. In a briefing with journalists on Monday, the Prime Minister's spokesman initially appeared to suggest a wealth tax was off the table, pointing back to past comments from the Chancellor ruling it out. However, he failed to explicitly repeat that commitment, instead saying repeatedly that Sir Keir Starmer stood by his position that 'those with the broadest shoulders carry the greatest burden'. It will raise suspicions that Rachel Reeves is considering a new raid on the rich to plug the hole in Britain's finances left by the Government's dramatic reversal on welfare cuts. The Prime Minister is facing mounting pressure to consider the move. On Sunday, some of Labour's biggest union paymasters, including Angela Rayner's former employer Unison, backed calls for a wealth tax. One union source told The Telegraph they would raise the idea with the Prime Minister and lobby Labour MPs. Asked on Monday if Sir Keir would back a wealth tax, his spokesman said: 'We have repeatedly said that those with the broadest shoulders carry the greatest burden, and the choices we've made reflect that… But as you know, I'm not going to write the next Budget for you right now.' He went on to point out that 'the Chancellor has said in the past that we're not going to be bringing in a wealth tax', but repeatedly failed to repeat that commitment. Asked if those words reflected the Government's current position, the spokesman said: 'The existing position is what I've just said a couple of times, which is that we have repeatedly said, as the Prime Minister has said, that those with the broadest shoulders carry the greatest burden, and the choices we've made reflect that.' He added: 'The Government is committed to making sure the wealthiest in society pay their fair share of tax. And that's why the Chancellor announced a series of reforms in the last Budget to help fix the public finances in as fair a way as possible.' In an interview with The Telegraph earlier this year, Ms Reeves said there would be no increases to wealth taxes in her Autumn Budget. 'We're not interested in a wealth tax,' she said. 'Our priority is to grow the economy and that's the way that you make working people better off and secure better public finances. 'But there was lots of speculation ahead of the Spring Statement, including in your paper, about all the taxes I was going to raise. What taxes did I raise in the Spring Statement? None.' Asked on Monday if the position had now changed, the spokesman said: 'The position is as it's always been, and as I say, the Government is committed to making sure the wealthiest in our society pay their fair share of tax, but I'm just not going to write future Budgets here, as is our long-standing position.' Economists have warned that a new wealth tax would trigger a fresh exodus of the rich from Britain. However, the Prime Minister's spokesman insisted that finance leaders still see the UK as the 'best place in the world to invest in'. It comes after Cabinet ministers were warned taxes would have to rise following Sir Keir's capitulation on benefits. The gutting of the welfare cuts package last week has required the Treasury to find an extra £4.6 billion a year but has emboldened hard-Left Labour backbenchers to push for more policy changes. Speaking on Sky News on Sunday, Lord Kinnock, who led the Labour Party between 1983 and 1992, said of Sir Keir's Government: 'The appearance has been given that they are bogged down by their own imposed limitations. 'There are ways around that, ways out of it, pathways that I think people are willing to explore and actually would commend themselves to the great majority of the general public. 'They include, for instance, asset taxes in a period in which for the last 20-odd years in the United Kingdom, like quite a lot of other Western economies, earned incomes have stagnated in real terms while asset values have zoomed. They've just gone through the roof and they've been barely touched. 'Now, you wouldn't have to touch assets of under £6 million or £7 million, so people's houses would be secure. But even by going for an imposition of 2 per cent on asset values above £10 million, say, which is a very big fortune, the Government would be in a position to collect £10 billion or £11 billion a year.' Five trade unions have told The Telegraph that they will pressure the Prime Minister to pursue wealth taxes, while Labour rebels threw their weight behind the demands.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store