EU, UK strike deal on Gibraltar's post-Brexit status
EU, UK strike deal on Gibraltar's post-Brexit status
Gibraltar is a key military base for Britain because of its strategic location. Photo: AFP
The European Union announced on Wednesday it had sealed a deal with Britain on the status of the territory of Gibraltar, five years after Brexit.
The deal will allow the flow of people and goods over the Gibraltar-Spain border, forming part of London's much-vaunted "reset" in ties with Brussels.
When Britain left the EU in 2020, the relationship between Gibraltar – a key military base for Britain due to its position at the mouth of the Mediterranean Sea – and the bloc remained unresolved.
Talks between London, Madrid, Brussels and Gibraltar on a deal made halting progress negotiations under Britain's previous Conservative government, but the arrival of Labour last year gave new impetus.
"A truly historic milestone: an EU-UK political agreement on the future relationship concerning Gibraltar. This benefits everyone and reinforces a new chapter in the relationship," EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic said on X.
"Today's breakthrough delivers a practical solution after years of uncertainty," British Foreign Minister David Lammy said in a statement.
"Alongside the government of Gibraltar, we have reached an agreement which protects British sovereignty, supports Gibraltar's economy and allows businesses to plan for the long term once again," he added.
Gibraltar's Chief Minister Fabian Picardo said he was "delighted" about the agreement that will bring "legal certainty to the people of Gibraltar, its businesses and to those across the region who rely on stability at the frontier."
The deal, he added, "will protect future generations of British Gibraltarians and does not in any way affect our British sovereignty." (AFP)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
14 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Why Europe must end its strategic drift by working with China
As the United States grows more unpredictable under President Donald Trump, some European nations are considering a pragmatic partnership with China . Could this lead to a new triangular balance, or will it deepen Europe's isolation? Under a second Trump presidency, Europe finds itself caught in a geopolitical no man's land. Washington's increasingly erratic foreign policy , Russia's protracted invasion of Ukraine and the failure to craft a unified European Union strategy towards either Russia or China have left the continent adrift. If trust in Russia and its President Vladimir Putin is irreparably damaged and the US proves too volatile a partner, Europe could soon be forced to reconsider its global alignments. The question is not whether to choose between Washington and Beijing but how to reassert strategic agency in a rapidly shifting world order. Despite the potential appeal of closer EU-China ties – from economic diversification to diplomatic leverage – Europe is hesitating. The default response has been inward retreat rather than outward recalibration. The EU had an opportunity to hedge its risks by deepening ties with Beijing, thereby regaining leverage with the US while securing alternative markets, yet no such move materialised. That hesitation has come at a cost. Europe now finds itself increasingly alone, struggling to articulate a coherent alternative to reliance on the US . With Trump back in the White House, the EU must decide whether continued strategic drift is tenable.
Asia Times
17 hours ago
- Asia Times
Europe perfectly placed to lead a world abandoned by US
I believe we Europeans feel far too safe. Europe's political and economic leadership in the world, which was still unchallenged at the beginning of the century, has long since ceased to exist. Will the dominant cultural influence of Europe be maintained? I think not, unless we defend it and adjust ourselves to new conditions; history has shown that civilisations are all too perishable. It is astonishing how much these words used in 1956 by Konrad Adenauer, one of the founding fathers of the European Union, still sound valid today. They perfectly define the current state of the union. Europeans are still struggling to adjust to new conditions – and the conditions to which they need to adjust also continue to change dramatically. The battle for technological leadership is the current version of this struggle. Success in this domain could transform Europe, yet the continent remains complacent about its decline into backwardness. The European Commission itself calculates that of the 19 digital platforms that have more than 45 million EU users, only one (Zalando) is from the EU. Information is (economic and political) power and losing control means to gradually lose both market share and the ability to protect European democracies. Brussels has produced a mass of regulation on digital services, yet American digital platforms are getting away with what European leaders themselves call the manipulation of democratic elections, with very little repercussions. Elon Musk's X, was banned in Brazil for less – refusing to ban accounts accused of spreading misinformation. This decline, however, has been slow enough to lull European leaders into complacency about the future. Meanwhile, Donald Trump has a point when he laments that the European Union has been slow to engage in the negotiations he imposed on trade. Indeed, even on trade – one of the very few areas in which the European Union has a mandate from the member states to deal directly with third parties – progress is generally stuttering. The commissioner in charge has to constantly find a common denominator with the agendas of 27 member states, each of which has a different industrial agenda. Europe's decision-making processes are sub-optimal. Indeed, they were built for a different age. There is no shared voice on foreign policy – the EU has been able to say far less on Gaza than individual countries like Spain or the UK, for example. This may have the practical consequence of eroding the 'moral leadership' that should still be Europe's soft advantage. Europe's failure to respond to real-world changes is due to sub-optimal institutional settings. However, the current paralysis in the face of a clear need for action may be due to an even more fundamental question of trust in its own capabilities. On one hand, there still seems room for complacency. As Stanley Pignal, the Charlemagne columnist for The Economist, recently put it, Europe can take a moderate amount of satisfaction from its continued status as a place where people are free to pursue 'life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.' Yet, it is evident that the institutions needed to concretely achieve those objectives are crumbling: healthcare systems and welfare; robust and independent media; energy and military autonomy in a world without order. On the other hand, Europe is increasingly resigned. A global poll taken by Gallup International shows that when responding to the question 'do you think that your children will live better than you?' seven of the most pessimistic countries of the world are from the EU. Only 16% of Italians and 24% of French respondents answered 'yes' to this question. According to Ipsos, less than half of young Europeans feel prepared to enter the job market. And they blame the education system for that. The picture may well be even worse now – this survey was taken in 2019, before the pandemic, war in Europe and, more importantly, AI made the picture even more uncertain. Europe has no alternative, as even far-right and far-left parties seem to acknowledge. Note that France's Rassemblement National and Italy's Lega no longer talk about exiting the EU but about changing it from the inside. Individual nation-states simply do not have the minimum scale to even try to take leadership in a world looking for a new order. In a world abandoned by the US, Europe stands a real chance. However, it urgently needs to be creative enough to imagine new mechanisms through which EU institutions take decisions and EU citizens have their say. This, in turn, requires an entire society to somehow recover the reasonable hope that decline is not inevitable (although we also must be aware that it may even nastily accelerate). Finally, young people are absolutely crucial in the process. The rhetoric of 'listening to them' must now be replaced by a call for them to govern. They are today what Karl Marx would have probably defined as a class – with very specific demographic, cultural, economic and linguistic characteristics. These must be turned into a political agenda and a new vision of what Europe of the future could look like. Francesco Grillo is academic fellow, Department of Social and Political Sciences, Bocconi University This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
HKFP
17 hours ago
- HKFP
New head of Hong Kong's Foreign Correspondents' Club Morgan Davis vows to hold the line
The new head of Hong Kong's Foreign Correspondents' Club (FCC) has told HKFP the press club will 'stay the course' under her tenure by supporting journalists and seeking dialogue with governments. Morgan Davis, the Asia Bonds Editor at the UK-headquartered International Financing Review, stood as the sole candidate for president last month, replacing Lee Williamson of the South China Morning Post as chief following elections last month. 'We will continue the same process for issuing press freedom statements and I do not anticipate any changes to our approach this year,' she told HKFP on Thursday over email. 'I believe these are an important tool for us at the club to signal our support for journalists in the region, and we, of course, welcome an open dialogue with governments and regional leaders on these events and topics.' A Hong Kong resident of nine years, Davis was born in Illinois, US and studied journalism in New York. She served as an FCC board member for three years ahead of taking the helm, and also teaches international journalism to master's students at Hong Kong Baptist University. Meanwhile, Williamson posted a farewell messages across social media on Wednesday, saying that he was 'deeply grateful to every single member of both boards over the last two years for their support and counsel, which have been invaluable.' He said that the club had issued 21 press freedom statements over the past two years, with 14 relating to Hong Kong. The FCC Journalism Conference and Charity Committee returned under his leadership, whilst correspondent and journalist membership rose by 6.5 per cent since last year, he added. Gov't lease The club leases a venue from the government at the Old Dairy Farm Depot on Lower Albert Road in Central. After being renewed in 2022 for three years, with new national security clauses added, the agreement is set to expire at the end of this year. Davis told HKFP she was focused on ensuring the lease was renewed: 'I am confident the club has demonstrated its commitment to keeping its home as we invested HK$5.9m to maintain our heritage building. We have proven ourselves to be an integral part of the Hong Kong community through our charity work, our professional programs for journalists, and our club events, which support an open dialogue on relevant issues. ' In 2018, former Hong Kong leader Leung Chun-ying suggested that the lease could be cancelled after the club hosted a talk by a pro-independence activist. Press freedom concerns Hong Kong has plummeted in international press freedom indices since the onset of the 2020 and 2024 security laws. Watchdogs cite the arrest and jailing of journalists, raids on newsrooms and the closure of around 10 media outlets including Apple Daily, Stand News and Citizen News. Over 1,000 journalists have lost their jobs, whilst many have emigrated. Meanwhile, the city's government-funded broadcaster RTHK has adopted new editorial guidelines, purged its archives and axed news and satirical shows. In 2022, Chief Executive John Lee said press freedom was 'in the pocket' of Hongkongers but 'nobody is above the law.' Although he has told the press to ' tell a good Hong Kong story,' government departments have been reluctant to respond to story pitches.
