Another Oklahoman hit by SNAP benefits crime ring
This latest victim was in the hospital unaware of what happened until it was too late.
Federal funding to replace SNAP benefits stolen ran out in December. Now, those who continue to get hit by this crime ring, are left with nothing, needing to survive until the next month's benefits arrive.
Reimbursement funds expire for stolen snap benefits
'I was hospitalized for a week, and when I was released from the hospital a week ago, I went to go check my benefits to get some food, and my benefits had all been stolen,' she said.
Another Oklahoman was hit by scammers, wiping their benefits right off their card.
We are concealing this woman's identity due to a domestic violence case.
She is already dealing with plenty, so this was the last thing she needed to see once she was released from the hospital.
'I called the Oklahoma line and she just started apologizing and saying they've had a lot of calls of a lot of benefits that had been stolen, and that the reimbursement fund or program had been stopped,' she said. 'So, the chances of me ever seeing my food stamp money ever again was going to be very, very slim.'
She says after hearing this, she wasn't sure what she was going to do, putting her in a bind.
'I have a rare form of lupus and my appetite does get affected by that,' she said. 'The things that I need right now, I don't have.'
Special agent explains how thieves profit from stolen snap benefits
We reached out to the Department of Human Services to see if there was anything they could do on the state level to stop this.
Unfortunately, they said as of now, there isn't much they can do.
In our ongoing efforts to protect Oklahoma families, Oklahoma Human Services continues to work diligently with our federal partners to reduce the theft of SNAP benefits.
Oklahoma Department of Human Services
Many Oklahomans continue to ask for more to be done to protect their benefits.
'It doesn't feel like the federal government's doing enough to protect the card,' she said. 'Maybe the state does need to have a reimbursement fund for emergencies like this, because right now we can't do anything.'
DHS also said they are a few months away from rolling out new features for SNAP recipients that will provide more security for every Oklahoman.
In the meantime, DHS recommends you lock your card after each use.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Homeland Security seeks dismissal of UI students' immigration case
(Main photo courtesy of the University of Iowa; form courtesy of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security) The U.S. Department of Homeland Security is seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by University of Iowa students who fear they've been targeted for deportation. The federal agency argues that it has complied with court orders in the case by reversing a decision in April to alter the students' status within the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System — a move that could have paved the way for deportation. By reversing course, the agency's lawyers argue, Homeland Security has rendered the lawsuit moot. The plaintiffs, they argue in their motion to dismiss the case, 'have obtained the relief they originally sought. There is nothing more for the court to do.' In their motion, lawyers for Homeland Security acknowledge the judge in the case, when responding to a different motion, had previously ruled that 'actions compelled by court order are not actions that moot a case.' Attorneys for the students have yet to respond to the motion to dismiss. The students' attorney, Katherine Melloy Goettel, declined to comment on the matter. A hearing in the case is scheduled for Aug. 27. In April 2025, the three UI international students and one international-student graduate sued DHS for wrongful termination of their student status, which they alleged caused irreparable stress and anxiety due to fear of imminent seizure and deportation. On May 15, 2025, a federal judge issued a preliminary injunction requiring DHS to maintain the plaintiffs' status as students in its Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS) records. The judge also ordered DHS to add to the records a notation of active student status that would be backdated to the date the agency had terminated that status — ensuring that other entities wouldn't act on the termination and attempt to deport the students on that basis. On June 12, 2025, DHS filed a motion seeking to revise the injunction. The department argued that due to technological limitations with SEVIS records, the system did not allow the creation of written notations that would be visible to other users of the system, such as schools and employers, outside of DHS. DHS asked that the court issue a ruling indicating it had fulfilled the requirements of the injunction, while also arguing the injunction was overbroad and amounted to a prohibition against any sort of prosecution for crimes the students might commit. Noting that DHS had made no assertions as to what, if any, efforts had been made to remedy the claimed technological limitations within SEVIS, U.S. District Court Judge Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger denied DHS' motion to revise her order. With regard to DHS' claim that the injunction bars future criminal prosecutions, Ebinger noted that her order does not apply to state, county, or local law enforcement acting separately from DHS and not at DHS' instruction. Also, she ruled, the injunction 'prevents neither arrests nor the commencement of prosecutions. Rather, as to the plaintiffs — four individual people whom the court previously found to be likely to succeed on their claims of unfounded and harmful status record interference — the court's order requires advance notice to the court as part of defendants' due process efforts. The order does not prohibit law enforcement actions.' As part of their recent request for a dismissal of the lawsuit, attorneys for Homeland Security provided the court with a sworn statement from Akil Baldwin, the acting assistant director of the National Security Division of Homeland Security Investigations within the department. In his statement, Baldwin said he oversees the Student Exchange Visitor Program 'in support of ICE efforts to identify, disrupt and dismantle transnational criminal enterprises and terrorist organizations.' He said the four UI students' criminal histories — which, according to the students' attorney, are limited to misdemeanor-level offenses such as drunken driving — led to the revocation of their student visas. The process, he said in his statement, began when Homeland Security Investigations, or HSI, launched what he called the Student Criminal Alien Initiative. As part of that initiative, he said, HSI obtained access to the federal criminal database maintained by the National Crime Information Center to determine 'whether any nonimmigrant students had criminal records.' HSI then sent its findings to the U.S. Department of State 'to take action as it deemed appropriate,' Baldwin said. The Department of State then revoked 'some nonimmigrant student visas with an NCIC record,' Baldwin stated. Then, at the Department of State's request, HSI terminated the SERVIS records of those students who now had no valid student visa. In April, amid a flurry of litigation related to its actions, Homeland Security reversed course and began restoring the students' SEVIS records to 'active' status. During a District of Columbia court hearing in April, Homeland Security's assistant director for national security, Andre Watson, discussed the agency's Student Criminal Alien Initiative. Watson testified as to how 10 to 20 ICE employees spent several weeks combing through the records of 1.3 million holders of student visas to determine whether any of them might have had some form of interaction with law enforcement, such as a traffic violation that was later dismissed. An exasperated D.C. District Court Judge Ana C. Reyes asked Watson, 'Are you telling me that with all of the cost cutting that we have going on right now — because apparently we're spending too much money in the federal government doing things like, oh, I don't know, funding cancer research, can't afford to do that — that we had, not 'we,' but 'someone,' had 10 to 20 federal employees spend their time going name by name in a database to see what hits they got for 1.3 million people? Is that what happened? Yes or no.' 'Yes,' Watson replied. He explained that of the 1.3 million student names, less than half of 1%, or roughly 6,400 student names, were passed on to the State Department. The State Department then revoked visas to travel into the United States for 3,000 of those students, and then told Homeland Security to terminate those students' status in the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System. After hearing from Watson, Judge Reyes cited what she called the federal government's 'utter lack of concern for human individuals who we have invited into our country and who have (made) communities richer by being students who have contributed to our colleges and who have paid our colleges.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
AG Ellison sues Trump administration — again — over conditions for funding for crime victims
Attorney General Keith Ellison at a press conference on Feb. 9, 2024. Photo by Madison McVan/Minnesota Reformer. Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison sued the Trump administration for the 35th time this year, this time alleging that the federal government is illegally placing conditions on funds for services and resources for crime victims. Ellison joined 20 other attorneys general in filing the suit. The Victims of Crime Act, signed by President Ronald Regan in 1984, created grant programs to pay for victim and witness advocacy services; emergency shelter; medical, funeral, and burial expenses; crime scene cleanup; sexual assault forensic exams; and more. This year, the U.S. Department of Justice, which administers the program, imposed new conditions on the grants, mandating that they may not be used for 'any program or activity that, directly or indirectly, violates (or promotes or facilitates the violation of) federal immigration law…including by failing to…give access to DHS agents, or honor DHS requests and provide requested notice to DHS agents.' In other words, states — and the organizations that provide crime victim services, like domestic violence shelters, rape crisis centers, child advocacy centers — can't access the funds without agreeing to cooperate with President Donald Trump's immigration priorities. 'Crime victims deserve so much better than to be used as political leverage, so I am filing a lawsuit to put an end to that and make sure victims get the support and compensation they deserve,' Ellison said in a press release. Over the past four years, Minnesota has received an average of nearly $2 million per year in Victims of Crime Act grants. Last year, grant recipients served more than 115,000 individuals in Minnesota, according to DOJ data. The lawsuit alleges that the DOJ violated the Administrative Procedure Act, which requires federal agencies to work within the language of the law approved by Congress — the Victims of Crime Act makes no mention of immigration. The lawsuit also accuses the federal government of violating the separation of powers outlined in the Constitution by refusing to spend money allocated by Congress.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
California trucker faces deportation after fatal crash on Florida turnpike
A California man, Harjinder Singh, is facing deportation proceedings after being charged in a fatal crash in Florida earlier this month. After the fatal crash, Singh flew back to California from Florida, according to investigators. The Department of Homeland Security then moved to initiate deportation proceedings, citing the severity of the incident. Singh's legal status allows him to live and work in the U.S., but federal officials seek to revoke that status. Here's what to know about the Harjinder Singh case. Illegal U-turn leads to fatal crash on Florida Turnpike, authorities allege On Aug. 12, Harjinder Singh, a 28-year-old truck driver from Stockton, was operating a 2024 International semi-tractor trailer on Florida's Turnpike near mile marker 171 in St. Lucie County. According to the Florida Highway Patrol (FHP), Singh attempted an illegal U-turn in an 'official use only' area, crossing all northbound lanes of traffic. A black 2015 Chrysler Town & Country minivan traveling in the inside lane was unable to avoid the trailer and collided with it, becoming wedged under the left side of the truck Three people in the minivan died as a result of the crash: A 30-year-old man from Florida City A 37-year-old woman from Pompano Beach A 54-year-old man from Miami Two victims were pronounced dead at the scene, while the third died later at Lawnwood Hospital in Fort Pierce, Florida. Singh appears in California court on a fugitive warrant Harjinder Singh appeared before the San Joaquin County Superior Court in Stockton. During the hearing, Singh agreed to waive extradition and return to Florida to face three counts of vehicular homicide stemming from the Aug. 12 crash that killed three people. What has the Trump administration said about the Singh case? The Trump administration has strongly criticized California's role in the case of Harjinder Singh, the truck driver accused of causing a fatal crash in Florida. Officials from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of Transportation (DOT) stated that Singh entered the United States illegally in 2018 and failed basic English and road sign tests during a post-crash investigation. DHS noted that Singh's initial application for work authorization was denied under the Trump administration in September 2020, but was later approved under the Biden administration in June 2021 Federal officials argue that California's policies enabled Singh to obtain a commercial driver's license despite his immigration status and lack of language proficiency. The DOT is investigating whether the issuance of Singh's license complied with federal regulations, and Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier cited the incident as evidence of the need for stricter licensing and immigration enforcement. California defends licensing process for truck driver in fatal crash Gov. Gavin Newsom's office pushed back against criticism from the Trump administration following the arrest of Harjinder Singh, a truck driver accused of killing three people in a Florida crash. In a post on X, Newsom's press office said the federal government had already confirmed Singh's eligibility to work in the U.S. and issued him a work permit. The California Department of Motor Vehicles said it followed all federal and state laws when issuing and renewing Singh's commercial driver's license. DMV spokesperson Jonathan Groveman said Singh's documents were verified through the federal Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements system and the federal employment authorization process. Singh's license is a federal REAL ID, which he was entitled to receive based on confirmation of his legal status. Newsom accused the Department of Homeland Security of political motives and federal overreach. His administration has fought Trump-era immigration policies, including efforts to deport longtime residents and cut immigrants off from public services. California has filed dozens of lawsuits over immigration, education funding, and data access. Newsom says the policies unfairly target the state's diverse population and weaken its sovereignty. Victoria Franco of the Stockton Record and the USA TODAY Network contributed to this story. This article originally appeared on Palm Springs Desert Sun: California trucker faces deportation after fatal Florida crash
